• Clinics in Shoulder and Elbow
• /
• 제16권2호
• /
• pp.107-114
• /
• 2013

목적: 상완골 간부 골절에서 골수강 내 금속정 고정을 시행한 후 잔존한 전위에 대해 임상적, 방사선학적 결과를 분석하였다. 대상 및 방법: 2004년 7월부터 2011년 8월까지 상완골 간부 골절에 대해서 골수강 내 금속정 고정 후 잔존한 전위가 10 mm 이상, 20 mm 미만인 8예를 대상으로 하였다. 평균 연령은 54.1세(43~70세), 남자 3예, 여자 5예였다. 수술 직후 단순 방사선 사진으로 전위와 각형성의 정도를 측정하였으며, 추시 방사선 사진으로 이의 호전 정도와 골유합, 합병증 여부를 확인하였다. 술 후 견관절 및 주관절의 운동 범위와 통증에 대해서 조사하였다. 결과: 모든 예에서 골유합을 얻을 수 있었고, 평균 골유합 기간은 16.1주였다. 최종 추시 견관절 및 주관절의 운동범위는 대부분 정상 범위로 돌아왔다. 1예에서 견관절 강직으로 인하여 관절경적 관절낭 이완술 및 도수 조작술 후 운동범위를 회복하였으며, 일시적인 견관절 통증 1예, 주관절 통증 1예가 있었다. 2예에서 근위 나사못의 빠짐이 있었으나 모두 골유합을 얻었다. 결론: 상완골 간부 골절에서 골수강 내 금속정 고정 후 잔존한 전위에도 불구하고 골유합을 얻을 수 있었으며 우수한 임상적 결과를 보였기 때문에, 관혈적 정복 또는 추가 고정은 필요하지 않았다.

• 구강회복응용과학지
• /
• 제27권2호
• /
• pp.185-195
• /
• 2011

본 연구는 외부연결방식(external type)의 임프란트에서 기존의 타이타늄 지대주와 지르코니아 지대주를 각각의 임플란트와 연결하여 하중을 가한 후 임플란트 외부육각기둥(external hexgon)부분 및 platform 표면변화를 FESEM 상으로 관찰하고, 임프란트와 타이타늄 지대주 및 지르코니아 지대주의 Viker's 경도를 측정하였다. 1. 임프란트, 타이타늄 지대주 및 지르코니아 지대주의 Viker's 경도는 각각 평균 $309.80{\pm}11.78$ HV, $318.40{\pm}11.82$ HV, $1495.30{\pm}16.21$ HV였다. 임프란트와 타이타늄 지대주 사이에는 통계학적으로 유의성이 존재하지 않았지만(P>0.05, Anova), 임프란트와 지르코니아 사이에는 통계학적으로 유의성이 관찰되었다(P<0.05, Anova). 2. 10,000번 하중을 가한 후 임플란트 표면변화 관찰에서 타이타늄 지대주 그룹과 지르코니아 지대주 그룹 모두에서 마모가 관찰 되었으며, 지르코니아 지대주에서 보다 현저한 마모양상을 나타내었다. 본 연구에서 표면경도의 차이로 인하여 타이타늄 지대주를 사용할 때보다 지르코니아 지대주를 사용한 경우 임플란트의 external hexagon부분 및 플랫폼의 마모도가 현저하였다.

• Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
• /
• 제42권
• /
• pp.6.1-6.6
• /
• 2020

Background: Various types of miniplates have been developed and used for the reduction of facial bone fractures. We introduced Yang's Keyhole (YK) plate, and reported on its short-term stability. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the long-term stability of the YK plate, as a follow-up study, by examining the patients who had used the YK plate among the patients with the reduction of mandible fractures and who visited for plate removal. Methods: We reviewed the medical records of 16 patients who underwent mandibular fracture fixation using a YK plate (group I) and 17 patients who underwent mandibular fracture fixation using a conventional plate (group II). Assessment was then made on malunion, occlusal stability, discomfort during the application, and clinical symptoms. Results: From January 2015 to December 2017, a total of 36 patients underwent mandibular fracture surgery using a YK plate. A total of 16 patients received plate removal. Among them, 15 were male and 1 female. The average age was 26 years. The applied surgical sites were the 12 on mandibular angle, 4 on mandibular symphysis, and 2 on subcondyle. The application period of YK plate was an average of 335 days. During the same period, 45 people underwent surgery on the conventional plate. A total of 17 patients received plate removal. Among them, 15 were male and 2 females. The average age was 36 years. The applied surgical sites were the 8 on mandibular angle, 4 on mandibular symphysis, and 2 on subcondyle. The application period of the conventional plate was an average of 349 days. No malocclusion occurred at the time of removal, and occlusion was stable. No patient complained of joint disease or discomfort. Conclusion: The YK plate system, in which the screw was first inserted and the plate was applied, for clinical convenience did not cause any particular problem and no significant difference from the conventional plate.

• Journal of the Korean Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons
• /
• 제34권3호
• /
• pp.341-349
• /
• 2008

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the $Osstem^{(R)}$ implants (US II/SS II implants) through the retrospective study for the clinical success rate during the installation of the $Osstem^{(R)}$ implants (US II/SS II implants) by using of the procedures of maxillary sinus floor elevation. Materials and methods: The current study was researched in the 6 medical institutions: Chonnam National University, Chosun University, Pusan DaeDong Hospital, Bundang Seoul National University Hospital, Ap-Seon Clinic, and All Clinic. Based on the total number of 116 patients whose treatment was the installation of the US II/SS II implants with the procedures of the maxillary sinus floor elevation, they were conferred on the dental records of the patients under the joint consultation of the 6 medical institutions. On the dental recording charts, there were included in as the following; the name of the institutions, gender, age, with or without smoking or drinking, with or without the generalized diseases, the height of the alveolar bone on the operational sites, elapsed edentulous state period, the state of the opposed or adjacent teeth, the methods of the maxillary sinus floor elevation, secondary time period for surgery, the lengths, types, and diameters of implants, with or without bone transplantation or the types of bone, postoperative current bone height, current adjacent soft tissue state of the implants, with or without the success of the installations of the implants. We have done our survey with the clinical and radiolographical examinations and dental questionaries. The success and survival rate of the implants was evaluated. Results 1. Total number of the patients with the installation of the US II implants were 62. The 252 numbers of US II implants were installed on the 89 maxillary sinuses. The patient's mean age was 54.1 years old and there were 36 men and 27 women. 2. Total number of patients with the installation of SS II implant were 57. The 165 numbers of SS II implants were planted on the 80 maxillary sinuses. Their mean age was 48.7 years old and there were 37 men and 20 women. 3. The follow-up period was 30.7 months(21-49 mon) on average. The vertical bone loss of installed implants after the procedures of the maxillary sinus elevation was 1.1 mm on average in SS II and 1.3 mm on average in US II. There existed no statistical significance on each group. The mean enlarged bone height after the maxillary sinus floor elevation was 8.2 mm. 4. For the procedures of the maxillary sinus elevation, the Lateral approach technique occupied 87.1%, which was the most used one. In addition, the most frequently used transplanted bone was autogenous bone only which was 72.7% during the maxillary sinus floor elevation. 5. The complication of maxillary sinus floor elevation were perforation of sinus membrane, disesthesia on doner site, exposure of cover screw and exposure of maxillar bone. 6. The survival rate of US II and SS II after maxillary sinus floor elevation was 99.2% and 95.8%, respectively. And the success rate of US II and SS II after maxillary sinus floor elevation was 97.6% and 89.7%, respectively. Conclusion : On the evaluation of the analysis of our study, both US II and SS II implants showed the excellent clinical results by use of the procedures of maxillary sinus floor elevation.