• Title/Summary/Keyword: SMARTER 해법

Search Result 2, Processing Time 0.015 seconds

Study on the Improvement of the Convective Differencing Scheme for the High-Accuracy and Stable Resolution of the Numerical Solution (수치해의 정확성과 안정성이 보장되는 대류항 미분법 개선에 관한 연구)

  • 신종근;최영돈
    • Transactions of the Korean Society of Mechanical Engineers
    • /
    • v.16 no.6
    • /
    • pp.1179-1194
    • /
    • 1992
  • QUICKER scheme has several attractive properties. However, under highly convective conditions, it produces overshoots and possibly some oscillations on each side of steps in the dependent variable when the flow is convected at an angle oblique to the grid line. Fortunately, it is possible to modify the QUICKER scheme using non-linear and linear functional relationship. Details of the development of polynomial upwinding scheme are given in this paper, where it is seen that this non-linear scheme has also third order accuracy. This polynomial upwinding scheme is used as the basis for the SHARPER and SMARTER schemes. Another revised scheme was developed by partial modification of QUICKER scheme using CDS and UPWIND schemes(QUICKUP). These revised schemes are tested at the well known bench mark flows, Two-Dimensional Pure Convection Flows in Oblique-Step, Lid Driven Cavity Flows and Buoyancy Driven Cavity Flows. For pure convection oblique step flow test problem, QUICKUP, SMARTER and SHARPER schemes remain absolutely monotonic without overshoot and oscillation. QUICKUP scheme is more accurate than any other scheme in their relative accuracy. In high Reynolds number Lid Driven Cavity Flow, SMARTER and SHARPER schemes retain lower computational cost than QUICKER and QUICKUP schemes, but computed velocity values in the revised schemes produced less predicted values than QUICKER scheme which is strongly effected by overshoot and undershoot values. Also, in Buoyancy Driven Cavity Flow, SMARTER, SHARPER and QUICKUP schemes give acceptable results.

An Evaluation of Recent Higher-order Bounded Convection Schemes (최근의 고차 유계 대류항 처리법의 평가)

  • Choi Seok Ki;Lee Yong Bum
    • Journal of computational fluids engineering
    • /
    • v.2 no.1
    • /
    • pp.73-83
    • /
    • 1997
  • 이 논문은 최근에 개발된 네가지 종류의 고차 유계 대류항 처리법인 SOUCUP, HLPA, SMARTER 그리고 COPLA 해법들을 비교 분석한다. 모든 해법들을 실제적인 공학적인 문제에의 적용을 위하여 비균일, 비직교 좌표에 공식화 하였다. 해법들의 상대적인 검증을 위하여 여러 가지 종류의 시험 문제들에 적용하여 검증하였다. 수치실험의 결과는 시험한 4종류의 해법들이 유계성을 만족하고 고차 해법의 정확도를 유지하는 것으로 나타났다. HLPA, SMARTER와 COPLA 해법들은 거의 같은 정도의 해의 정확성을 보였으며, SCOCUP 해법은 조금 부정확한 것으로 나타났다.

  • PDF