• 제목/요약/키워드: Rule-based approach

검색결과 545건 처리시간 0.021초

일제강점기 '전위미술론'의 전통관 연구 - '문장(文章)' 그룹을 중심으로 (A Study on Avant-Garde Fine Art during the period of Japanese Colonial Rule of Korea, centering on 'Munjang' (a literary magazine))

  • 박계리
    • 미술이론과 현장
    • /
    • 제4호
    • /
    • pp.57-76
    • /
    • 2006
  • From the late 1920s to the 1930s, Korea's fine art community focused on traditional viewpoints as their main topic. The traditional viewpoints were discussed mainly by Korean students studying in Japan, especially oil painters. Such discussions on tradition can be divided into two separate halves, namely the pre- and post-Sino-Japanese War (1937) periods. Before the war, the modernists among Korea's fine art community tried to gain a fuller understanding of contemporary Western modern art, namely, expressionism, futurism, surrealism, and so forth, on the basis of Orientalism, and borrow from these schools' in order to create their own works. Furthermore, proponents of Joseon's avant-garde fine arts and artists of the pro-fine art school triggered debate on the traditional viewpoints. After the Sino-Japanese War, these artists continued to embrace Western modern art on the basis of Orientalism. However, since Western modern fine art was regressing into Oriental fine art during this period, Korean artists did not need to research Western modern fine art, but sought to study Joseon's classics and create Joseon's own avant- garde fine art in a movement led by the Munjang group. This research reviews the traditional view espoused by the Munjang group, which represented the avant-garde fine art movement of the post-war period. Advocating Joseon's own current of avant-garde fine art through the Munjang literary magazine, Gil Jin - seop, Kim Yong-jun and others accepted the Japanese fine art community's methodology for the restoration of classicism, but refused Orientalism as an ideology, and attempted to renew their perception of Joseon tradition. The advocation of the restoration of classicism by Gil Jin-seop and Kim Yong-jun appears to be similar to that of the Yasuda Yojuro-style restoration of classicism. However, Gil Jin-seop and Kim Yong-jun did not seek their sources of classicism from the Three-Kingdoms and Unified Silla periods, which Japan had promoted as a symbol of unity among the Joseon people; instead they sought classicism from the Joseon fine art which the Japanese had criticized as a hotbed of decadence. It was the Joseon period that the Munjang group chose as classicism when Japan was upholding Fascism as a contemporary extremism, and when Hangeul (Korean writing system) was banned from schools. The group highly evaluated literature written in the style of women, especially women's writings on the royal court, as represented by Hanjungnok (A Story of Sorrowful Days). In the area of fine art, the group renewed the evaluation of not only literary paintings, but also of the authentic landscape paintings refused by, and the values of the Chusa school criticized as decadent by, the colonial bureaucratic artists, there by making great progress in promoting the traditional viewpoint. Kim Yong-jun embraced a painting philosophy based on the painting techniques of Sasaeng (sketching), because he paid keen attention to the tradition of literary paintings, authentic landscape paintings and genre paintings. The literary painting theory of the 20th century, which was highly developed, could naturally shed both the colonial historical viewpoint which regarded Joseon fine art as heteronomical, and the traditional viewpoint which regarded Joseon fine art as decadent. As such, the Munjang group was able to embrace the Joseon period as the source of classicism amid the prevalent colonial historical viewpoint, presumably as it had accumulated first-hand experience in appreciating curios of paintings and calligraphic works, instead of taking a logical approach. Kim Yong-jun, in his fine art theory, defined artistic forms as the expression of mind, and noted that such an artistic mind could be attained by the appreciation of nature and life. This is because, for the Munjang group, the experience of appreciating nature and life begins with the appreciation of curios of paintings and calligraphic works. Furthermore, for the members of the Munjang group, who were purists who valued artistic style, the concept of individuality presumably was an engine that protected them from falling into the then totalitarian world view represented by the Nishita philosophy. Such a 20th century literary painting theory espoused by the Munjang group concurred with the contemporary traditional viewpoint spearheaded by Oh Se-chang in the 1910s. This theory had a great influence on South and North Korea's fine art theories and circles through the Fine Art College of Seoul National University and Pyongyang Fine Art School in the wake of Korea's liberation. In this sense, the significance of the theory should be re-evaluated.

  • PDF

수집형 기록관의 전거제어시스템 분석 - 민주화운동기념사업회 사료관리시스템의 사례를 중심으로 - (Analysis of Authority Control System in Collecting Repository -from the case of Archival Management System in Korea Democracy Foundation-)

  • 이현정
    • 기록학연구
    • /
    • 제13호
    • /
    • pp.91-134
    • /
    • 2006
  • 일반적으로 사적(私的)영역에서 수집되는 기록물, 즉 매뉴스크립트는 물리적 상태가 불량하고 기록물의 전후 맥락과 생산이력에 대한 정보가 파편적으로 수집되는 경우가 대부분이다. 때문에 수집형 기록관에서는 다양한 경로로 수집되는 기록물에 대한 생산기관(생산자)명을 효과적으로 통제하고 기록물 생산배경을 이해할 때 핵심요소인 출처정보를 축적할 필요가 있다. 수집형 기록관에서 이러한 전거제어와 출처정보 관리는 수집부터 체계화되어야 하며, 이는 수집시 관리과정까지 고려하여 필요한 정보를 구축하는 것을 의미한다. 이 논문은 민주화운동기념사업회 사료관이 개발한 사료관리시스템 가운데 전거제어 방식을 소개함으로써 수집형 기록관의 전거제어 및 출처정보 축적의 필요성을 확인하고 기록물 전거시스템을 구축할 때 고려할 사항들을 제안하기 위한 것이다. 이를 위해 본 연구에서는 사료관리에서 전거제어의 필요성을 알아보고, 사료전거제어 기준과 실무절차, 구축과정에 대해 살펴보았다. 사료관 사료전거시스템의 특징은 수집, 등록, 기술 등 각 업무 흐름에 따라 전거를 제어하고 출처정보를 관리하여 이를 사료의 지적 관리와 검색도구로 이용한다는 것에 있다. 끝으로 이러한 전거관리 사례를 통해 국제표준인 ISAAR(CPF)를 준용하여 기관마다 적합한 형태로 기술요소를 재구성하고 전거파일 유형을 설정하여 표준적으로 관리해야 할 것을 제안함으로써 향후 수집형 기록관에서 기록물 전거시스템을 구축하는데 있어 참고할 수 있도록 하였다.

『전경(典經)』 「권지(權智)」편 연구 (A Study on the Gwon Ji (權智) of Jeon-gyeong)

  • 고남식
    • 대순사상논총
    • /
    • 제37집
    • /
    • pp.53-105
    • /
    • 2021
  • 이글은 『전경(典經)』의 「권지」편(編) 구절들을 통해 권지의 의미를 살펴보고, 다른 편에 나타난 권지적 면모와 『전경(典經)』 각 편의 장(章)의 양상을 찾아보며, 나아가 「권지」편 각 구절들의 변모를 『대순전경』 6판과 비교 대조하여 그 문헌학적 의미를 탐색할 목적으로 진행되었다. 상제가 1871년 9월 19일(陰) 전라도 고부군 우덕면 객망리(客望里)에 강세(降世)하여, 광구천하(匡救天下)하기 위해 천지인 삼계에 대한 대(大) 권능(權能)으로 9년간 천지공사(天地公事, 1901~1909)를 행하여, 인류에게 전북 모악산(母岳山) 대원사(大院寺)에서 연 상제의 천지대도(天地大道)가 전해지고 연차적으로 도수(度數)를 맞춰 지상에 오(五)만년 무량극락(無量極樂) 용화선경(龍華仙境)인 지상천국(地上天國)이 이룩되어 가는 것은 상제가 보여준 권능(權能)을 근간으로 천지공사가 삼계(三界)에서 완수(完遂)되기 때문이다. 또 「공사」편만이 아니라 「교운」, 「교법」, 「제생」, 「예시」편 등도 상제의 권능을 토대로 이루어져 최종적으로 지상천국이라는 유토피아가 구현되는 내용을 보여주고 있다. 따라서 각 편 구절들에 대한 상제의 권지를 토대로 한 고찰은 『전경』에 대한 통괄적 접근이라는 면에서도 의미가 있다고 할 수 있다. 또한 이글은 앞서 진행된 「행록」, 「교법」, 「공사」, 「교운」편 연구와 마찬가지로 『전경』 「권지」편 1장과 2장 구절들에 대해 『전경』(1974)보다 앞서 1965년에 출판된 증산교단(甑山敎團)에서 보편화된 경전인 『대순전경』 6판 구절들과 비교 분석하여, 「권지」편 구절들의 변이의 양상을 찾아보았다는 면에서도 연구의 의미가 있다. 이글에서 「권지」편 1장과 2장 구절들의 특성을 바탕으로 『전경』 각 편에 나타난 상제 권지의 양상을 찾아본 후 구절의 변이 양상을 『대순전경』 6판과 비교 연구한 결과를 요약해보면 다음과 같다. 첫째, 상제의 권지는 천지인 삼계에서 이루어져 천지공사(天地公事)를 통해 후천선경을 이루는 핵심적 요소가 됨을 정리 요약된 구절들에서 볼 수 있다. 둘째, 『전경』이 일곱 개의 편으로 나누어져 있지만, 「공사」편에 삼계 대권에 대한 구절이 나타나듯이 일곱 개의 편에 천지인으로 용사된 상제의 권능 관련 구절들이 분포되어 각 편의 제목이 나타내는 목적을 이루는 것으로 되어 있다. 이는 대표적으로 이글에서 본 「공사」편 1장 구절을 보아도 드러난다. 셋째, 여러 개의 장으로 되어 있는 『전경』의 5개 편에서의 장의 분류에 대한 기준은 교법을 제외하고 공통점은 연도별로 이루어졌다는 것이다. 「권지」편을 포함해서 다수의 장으로 이루어진 편에서 내용상으로 보더라도 장 분류에 대한 규칙성은 특별히 찾을 수 없었다. 넷째, 『전경』 「권지」편 1, 2장 구절들에 대해 이상호가 마지막으로 편저한 『대순전경』의 최종판인 6판(1965)을 대비시켜 살펴 본 결과 다음과 같이 크게 정리된다. 1. 두 문헌에서 구절의 내용이 거의 같은 구절도 있다. 2. 각 문헌의 서술이 단어(單語)나 몇 개 문장(文章)에서 차이가 나는 구절들도 등장한다. 3. 각 문헌의 구절의 연도가 차이가 나는 구절들이 보인다. 4. 기록의 내용상 두 문헌의 각각에서 더 추가된 기록들도 발견된다.

가맹본부의 리더십 행동유형과 가맹사업자의 관계결속에 관한 실증적 연구 - 가맹사업자의 자기효능감의 조절효과를 중심으로 - (An Empirical Study in Relationship between Franchisor's Leadership Behavior Style and Commitment by Focusing Moderating Effect of Franchisee's Self-efficacy)

  • 양회창;이영철
    • 한국유통학회지:유통연구
    • /
    • 제15권1호
    • /
    • pp.49-71
    • /
    • 2010
  • 본 연구는 가맹사업자의 자기효능감에 주목하여 정부가 예비가맹사업자들을 보호하기 위해 가맹본부에 다양한 규제와 정책을 사용하는 것이 최선의 방법이 아니라는 것에 관심을 두고 있다. 본 연구에서는 경로-목표이론(path-goal theory)에서 제시한 가맹본부의 리더십 행동 유형과 가맹사업자의 관계결속의 영향관계에 있어서 가맹사업자의 특성으로 자기효능감의 조절효과를 규명하고, 실증 분석한 결과 다음과 같은 연구의 시사점을 발견할 수 있었다. 첫째, 가맹본부의 리더십 행동유형이 관계결속에 긍정적 효과를 가져 온다는 사실이 확인됨으로써 가맹본부는 가맹사업자에게 맞는 리더십 행동유형을 적용할 수 있도록 하여야 한다. 둘째, 가맹사업자의 자기효능감이 관계결속에 긍정적 효과가 있을 뿐만 아니라, 리더십 행동유형과 관계결속 사이에 상당한 조절효과가 있기 때문에 가맹본부는 가맹사업자들의 개인차(individual difference) 관리가 필요하다. 셋째, 정부는 가맹본부를 규제할 것만이 아니라 가맹본부가 가맹사업자들의 특성을 확실하게 파악하고 기업의 목표달성을 위한 정당한 통제가 가능하도록 제도적 지원을 해야 할 것이다.

  • PDF

새로운 간호윤리학 방법론;통합된 사례방법론 (An integrated Method of New Casuistry and Specified Principlism as Nursing Ethics Methodology)

  • 엄영란
    • 간호행정학회지
    • /
    • 제3권1호
    • /
    • pp.51-64
    • /
    • 1997
  • The purpose of the study was to introduce an integrated approach of new Casuistry and specified principlism in resolving ethical problems and studying nursing ethics. In studying clinical ethics and nursing ethics, there is no systematic research method. While nurses often experience ethical dilemmas in practice, much of previous research on nursing ethics has focused merely on describing the existing problems. In addition, ethists presented theoretical analysis and critics rather than providing the specific problems solving strategies. There is a need in clinical situations for an integrated method which can provide the objective description for existing problem situations as well as specific problem solving methods. We inherit two distinct ways of discussing ethical issues. One of these frames these issues in terms of principles, rules, and other general ideas; the other focuses on the specific features of particular kinds of moral cases. In the first way general ethical rules relate to specific moral cases in a theoretical manner, with universal rules serving as "axioms" from which particular moral judgments are deduced as theorems. In the seconds, this relation is frankly practical. with general moral rules serving as "maxims", which can be fully understood only in terms of the paradigmatic cases that define their meaning and force. Theoretical arguments are structured in ways that free them from any dependence on the circumstances of their presentation and ensure them a validity of a kind that is not affected by the practical context of use. In formal arguments particular conclusions are deduced from("entailed by") the initial axioms or universal principles that are the apex of the argument. So the truth or certainty that attaches to those axioms flows downward to the specific instances to be "proved". In the language of formal logic, the axioms are major premises, the facts that specify the present instance are minor premises, and the conclusion to be "proved" is deduced (follows necessarily) from the initial presises. Practical arguments, by contrast, involve a wider range of factors than formal deductions and are read with an eye to their occasion of use. Instead of aiming at strict entailments, they draw on the outcomes of previous experience, carrying over the procedures used to resolve earlier problems and reapply them in new problmatic situations. Practical arguments depend for their power on how closely the present circumstances resemble those of the earlier precedent cases for which this particular type of argument was originally devised. So. in practical arguments, the truths and certitudes established in the precedent cases pass sideways, so as to provide "resolutions" of later problems. In the language of rational analysis, the facts of the present case define the gounds on which any resolution must be based; the general considerations that carried wight in similar situations provide warrants that help settle future cases. So the resolution of any problem holds good presumptively; its strengh depends on the similarities between the present case and the prededents; and its soundness can be challenged (or rebutted) in situations that are recognized ans exceptional. Jonsen & Toulmin (1988), and Jonsen (1991) introduce New Casuistry as a practical method. The oxford English Dictionary defines casuistry quite accurately as "that part of ethics which resolves cases of conscience, applying the general rules of religion and morality to particular instances in which circumstances alter cases or in which there appears to be a conflict of duties." They modified the casuistry of the medieval ages to use in clinical situations which is characterized by "the typology of cases and the analogy as an inference method". A case is the unit of analysis. The structure of case was made with interaction of situation and moral rules. The situation is what surrounds or stands around. The moral rule is the essence of case. The analogy can be objective because "the grounds, the warrants, the theoretical backing, the modal qualifiers" are identified in the cases. The specified principlism was the method that Degrazia (1992) integrated the principlism and the specification introduced by Richardson (1990). In this method, the principle is specified by adding information about limitations of the scope and restricting the range of the principle. This should be substantive qualifications. The integrated method is an combination of the New Casuistry and the specified principlism. For example, the study was "Ethical problems experienced by nurses in the care of terminally ill patients"(Um, 1994). A semi-structured in-depth interview was conducted for fifteen nurses who mainly took care of terminally ill patients. The first stage, twenty one cases were identified as relevant to the topic, and then were classified to four types of problems. For instance, one of these types was the patient's refusal of care. The second stage, the ethical problems in the case were defined, and then the case was analyzed. This was to analyze the reasons, the ethical values, and the related ethical principles in the cases. Then the interpretation was synthetically done by integration of the result of analysis and the situation. The third stage was the ordering phase of the cases, which was done according to the result of the interpretation and the common principles in the cases. The first two stages describe the methodology of new casuistry, and the final stage was for the methodology of the specified principlism. The common principles were the principle of autonomy and the principle of caring. The principle of autonomy was specified; when competent patients refused care, nurse should discontinue the care to respect for the patients' decision. The principle of caring was also specified; when the competent patients refused care, nurses should continue to provide the care in spite of the patients' refusal to preserve their life. These specification may lead the opposite behavior, which emphasizes the importance of nurse's will and intentions to make their decision in the clinical situations.

  • PDF