• 제목/요약/키워드: Risk sharing

검색결과 290건 처리시간 0.029초

공급사슬에서의 위험공유 (Risk Sharing in a Supply Chain)

  • Ahn, Seongje
    • 한국경영과학회지
    • /
    • 제28권4호
    • /
    • pp.115-129
    • /
    • 2003
  • This paper suggests that the profit sharing contract can be Pareto optimal for both supplier and the purchaser. It is shown that Pareto optimal risk sharing contract can be obtained even though the decisions are made in a decentralized manner. The effect of risk attitude of the members of the supply chain is discussed. We examined various aspects of the risk sharing contract such as risk altitude, bargaining power, and cost of information system. The different risk attitude changes the optimal parameters and decision variables. Especially, we proved that, when both the supplier and the purchaser are risk averse, the purchaser orders less quantity than when the one is risk neutral and the other is risk averse. If the fixed cost for the information system is big enough to satisfy a certain condition, it is Pareto optimal not to share the profit and the purchaser takes all the risk even though he is risk averse.

EU 지역간 소비위험분산에 대한 실증연구 (An Empirical Study on the Consumption Risk Sharing across the EU Regions)

  • 박유진;송정석
    • 국제지역연구
    • /
    • 제13권2호
    • /
    • pp.89-115
    • /
    • 2009
  • 본 연구는 EU 회원국들의 소비위험분산 행위를 살펴보기 위해 기존의 소비위험분산 측정방법에 소위 이례적 관측치 (outlier)를 고려하여 기법을 도입하고 있다. 본 연구는 단순히 소비위험분산을 측정하는 기존의 방법에서 더 나아가 어느 국가 혹은 지역들이 소비위험분산에 특히 더 기여하는지를 밝히고자 한다. 이를 위해 기존 계량경제학의 회귀분석에서 간과되었던 특정 관측치의 회귀분석결과에 대한 영향력 분석을 DFFITS와 DFBETAS 접근법을 사용하였다. 이같은 소비위험분산 측정 결과 EU 지역의 소비위험분산 정도는 서유럽국가와 비교적 최근에 EU에 가입한 동유럽국가로 크게 이분되어 있음을 발견하였다.

위험 지각에 따른 지식공유: 이타적인 행동인가, 속셈이 있는 행동인가? (Knowledge sharing under perceived risk: Altruistic or goal-oriented motives?)

  • 김하연;강대석;원소정
    • 지식경영연구
    • /
    • 제15권4호
    • /
    • pp.35-56
    • /
    • 2014
  • This study examined the effect of perceived risk, an under-explored area in the knowledge sharing literature. We proposed that employee perceptions of risk relate positively with their knowledge sharing behaviors (donating and collecting), and examined the mediating role of impression management strategies in the hypothesized relationships. We also explored the moderating effect of leader-member exchange (LMX) in the relationship between perceived risk and impression management strategies. Valid and reliable self-report and supervisory evaluation measures were collected from a sample of 251 railroad employees in safety-sensitive positions. The results indicate that perceived risk was not significantly associated with knowledge sharing, but rather the risk perception impacts were indirect through impression management strategies such as exemplification and supplication. The study also found that LMX has no moderating effect on the perceived risk and impression management strategies. In discussing these results, we present significant insights in terms of subjective risk judgment as a potential mechanism which can encourage organizational politics.

A Review of International Risk Sharing for Policy Analysis

  • Poncela, Pilar;Nardo, Michela;Pericoli, Filippo M.
    • East Asian Economic Review
    • /
    • 제23권3호
    • /
    • pp.227-260
    • /
    • 2019
  • This paper offers a comprehensive view of international risk sharing and of related policy issues from the perspective of the European Union. The traditional analyses contemplate three risk-sharing channels: the capital markets channel (through cross border portfolio investments), international transfers and the credit markets channel (via savings). Comparative analyses reveal that, on average, about 80% of the shock remains unsmoothed in Europe while only about 18% of the shock is transmitted to consumers within the US. From aggregated figures, there is space for improving, particularly, the cross-border investments channel in Europe. In this sense, the completion of the Banking and Capital Markets Union are expected to boost risk sharing across European member states. We also review new additional issues usually not contemplated by the traditional literature as depreciation, migration and the role of sovereigns and two new additional channels recently considered in the literature: government consumption and the real exchange rate. Finally, we also examine recent analysis related to the geographic distribution of risk sharing.

위험분담제도에 대한 고찰: 항암제 사례를 중심으로 (Overview of Risk-Sharing Schemes: Focusing on Anticancer Drugs)

  • 손현순;신현택
    • 한국임상약학회지
    • /
    • 제23권2호
    • /
    • pp.89-96
    • /
    • 2013
  • This article aimed to introduce 'risk sharing' schemes for pharmaceuticals between drug manufacturers and healthcare payer. Published literature review was undertaken to summarize risk sharing concepts and collect information on existing scheme examples in other countries focusing on new anticancer drugs. Risk sharing schemes could be categorized into health outcomes-based and non-outcomes (financial) based ones. Outcome-based schemes could be broken down into performance-linked reimbursement and conditional coverage. Performance-linked reimbursement can be further broken into outcomes guarantee and pattern or process of care and conditional coverage included coverage with evidence development and conditional treatment continuation schemes. Non-outcome based schemes included market share and price volume at population level, and utilization caps and manufacturer funded treatment initiation at patient level. We reviewed the fifteen examples for anticancer drugs that risk sharing agreements in response to the inherent uncertainties and increased costs of eleven anticancer drugs. Of them, eight cases were coverage with evidence development schemes. The anticancer drugs except bevacizumab and cetuximab were all listed on the national health insurance formulary in Korea, with reimbursement criteria defined on the basis of approved indications and administrations. Risk sharing approach may be a useful tool to ensure values for drug expenditure, but there are a number of concerns such as high administration costs, lack of transparency and conflicts of interest, especially for performance-based health outcomes reimbursement schemes.

The Impact of Information Sharing Under Opportunism in Supplier-Buyer Relationships: An Empirical Analysis

  • Chang, Young Bong;Cho, Wooje
    • 정보화연구
    • /
    • 제9권4호
    • /
    • pp.365-376
    • /
    • 2012
  • We examine the value of information sharing in the context of supplier-buyer relationships after controlling for trading partners' opportunism. Given that trading partners' opportunism is not randomly chosen, we explicitly incorporate their self-selection process into our estimation procedure by employing Heckman's self-selection model. According to our analysis, firms that have built safeguards via mutual trust, commitments and information sharing experience less opportunistic risk in supplier-buyer relationships. Our findings also suggest that information sharing has a positive impact on firm performance after controlling for opportunism. Further, firms that are less exposed to trading partners' opportunistic risk have achieved a higher performance than others that are more exposed. Importantly, higher performance for those firms with less opportunistic risk is driven by safeguards in supplier-buyer relationships as well as information sharing. Our findings can be applied for systems analysts to design information systems of supplier-buyer transactions.

코로나19 (COVID-19) 관련 위험정보 탐색과 처리가 코로나19 예방 행동 및 정보 공유에 미치는 영향 (The Effects of COVID-19 Risk Information Seeking and Processing on its Preventive Behaviors and Information Sharing)

  • 박민정;채상미
    • 한국IT서비스학회지
    • /
    • 제19권5호
    • /
    • pp.65-81
    • /
    • 2020
  • This study aims to examine the effects of users' perceptions of COVID-19 risk on their seeking and processing of relevant information as COVID-19 emerges and spreads worldwide in 2019. We apply the risk information seeking and processing model (RISP Model) to verify whether users' COVID-19 related information seeking and processing behaviors have a positive effect on their preventive and information sharing behaviors. To achieve this research goal, an online survey was conducted with about 400 of social media users. The users' perceptions of risk for COVID-19 increased their perceived insufficiency of COVID-19 information. In addition, the perceived insufficiency of users' information formed a positive relationship with seeking and searching of information behaviors. The processing of COVID-19 related information has increased related preventive behaviors and sharing of information through social media. While searching for information related to COVID-19 prompted personal information sharing behaviors, it did not significantly affect preventive behaviors. Accordingly, in order to promote COVID-19 preventive behaviors as well as overall user health-related behaviors it can be inferred that additional measures are needed in addition to pursuing relevant information.

손익공유형 민간투자사업의 투자위험분담 가치 산정 (Real Option Analysis to Value Government Risk Share Liability in BTO-a Projects)

  • 구석모;이성훈;이승재
    • 대한교통학회지
    • /
    • 제35권4호
    • /
    • pp.360-373
    • /
    • 2017
  • 국내 민간투자사업의 추진 방식 중 수익형 민간투자사업은 수요 위험이 존재하는 방식이다. 수요 위험이 현실화 될 경우 민간사업자는 예상보다 낮은 수입으로 인해 재무적인 어려움을 겪으며, 정부도 안정적인 사회기반시설 운영에 차질을 빚을 수 있다. 따라서 정부는 수요 위험에 따른 위험 분담 정책을 다양하게 적용해 오고 있다. 하지만 정부의 위험 분담은 수요의 불확실성으로 인한 정부의 우발채무이며, 실시협약의 문구로 표현되어 기존의 전통적인 사업평가 방식인 NPV 방식으로는 위험을 계량화 할 수 없다. 본 연구는 수요 위험 분담 정책의 하나로 2015년에 도입된 손익공유형 방식(BTO-a)을 대상으로 수요 위험을 고려한 정부의 투자위험 분담 가치를 산정하는데 목적을 두고 있다. 투자위험 분담은 금융에서의 옵션(option) 형태를 갖게 된다. 민간사업자는 수입이 감소했을 때 정부로 부터 보조금을 청구할 권리를 가지고 있으며, 반대로 정부는 일정 조건하에서 보조금을 지급할 의무를 가지고 있다. 본 연구에서는 Black-Scholes 옵션가격결정 모형을 활용하여 투자위험 분담의 가치추정 방법론을 정립하고 사례 사업을 통해 결과의 적정성을 살펴보았다. 사례 사업은 제안된 고속도로 민간투자사업을 대상으로 하였으며, 분석결과 투자위험 분담 가치는 약 120억원으로 추정되어 민간이 투자한 투자비의 약 4%를 차지하는 것으로 나타났다. 즉, 정부가 투자위험을 분담함으로써 120억원의 재정지원을 추가로 투입하는 효과로 볼 수 있다. 교통량 위험을 확률변수로 가정할 경우 사례사업에서 도출된 옵션가치는 평균이 122억원이고 표준편차는 36.7억원으로 도출되었다. 누적분포를 도출한 결과 90% 확률 구간의 옵션가치가 69억원에서 188억원의 범위에서 결정될 것으로 나타났다. 본 연구에서 제시한 방법은 미래수요의 불확실성하에서 정부와 민간사업자가 더 나은 위험 분석과 투자위험 분담에 대한 경제적인 가치를 이해하는데 도움을 줄 것으로 기대한다.

Financing Risk in Indonesian Islamic Rural Banks: Do Financing Products Matter?

  • WIDARJONO, Agus;ANTO, M.B. Hendrie;FAKHRUNNAS, Faaza
    • The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business
    • /
    • 제7권9호
    • /
    • pp.305-314
    • /
    • 2020
  • This paper investigates the impact of profit and loss sharing (PLS) contracts on non-performing financing of Islamic rural banks as Islamic small banks focus on small and medium enterprises at province level across country. Our study employs panel data, consisting of 142 Islamic rural banks and using quarterly data from 2013Q1 to 2018Q4, and splits them based on the bank's size and geographical area. Both static and dynamic panel regressions are then applied. The results obviously indicate that a high proportion of profit and loss sharing contracts leads to high financing risk. The large Islamic banks encounter a higher non-performing financing stemming from profit and loss contracts compared to small Islamic banks. Profit and loss contracts also produce higher financing risk for Islamic banks outside Java, as those areas are less developed areas than Java itself. A more efficient Islamic bank is less financing risk. Income diversification lessens the impaired financing and, more particularly, large Islamic banks and Islamic banks located in Java much benefit by diversifying income and financing to lower financing risk. Our study suggests that Islamic rural banks may consider the optimal level of profit and loss sharing contracts to minimize financing risk.

미국 TV드라마 산업에서 메이저 스튜디오의 리스크 분산 메커니즘 (Major Studios' Risk Sharing Mechanism in the US TV Drama Industry)

  • 임정수
    • 한국콘텐츠학회논문지
    • /
    • 제11권11호
    • /
    • pp.137-144
    • /
    • 2011
  • 이 연구는 미국 드라마 산업에서 제작 영역과 방송 네트워크 간의 리스크 분산 메커니즘을 설명하고자 한다. 할리우드의 드라마 생산과 유통의 구조는 산업의 각 영역들이 불확실성을 줄이고 투자 리스크를 분산시키기 위해 노력한 결과물이라고 할 수 있다. 1990년대 이래, 미국 드라마 생산과 유통의 리스크 분산전략의 중심에는 스튜디오와 네트워크의 수직결합이 있었다. 수직결합을 통한 리스크 분산에서 네트워크의 가장 중요한 역할은 스튜디오가 제작한 드라마를 편성하는 것이었고, 그들이 편성한 텔레비전 드라마에 네트워크 브랜드 가치를 제공하는 것이었다. 한편, 스튜디오의 가장 중요한 역할은 제작 인프라, 인력 및 재정적 관리 능력, 유통 및 배급 능력, 상품 관리 능력 등을 들 수 있다. 스튜디오와의 수직결합을 통해서 네트워크는 드라마의 2차 시장 및 부가 시장에 대한 권리도 확보하게 되면서 프로그램 제작비 투입 규모를 늘릴 수 있었다. 그러나, 네트워크의 제작비 증가는 네트워크에 재정적 부담으로 작용할 수 있다. 이 논의는 제작사와 방송사의 리스크 분산 문제로 갈등을 빚고 있는 우리나라 드라마 산업에 리스크 분산의 메커니즘과 합리적 리스크 분산의 중요성을 시사한다.