• 한국습지학회지
• /
• 제23권4호
• /
• pp.307-316
• /
• 2021

도시개발의 지나친 진행에 따라 불투수면의 증가로 인해 유출이 증가되어 도시 홍수에 대한 우려가 증가되고 있으며, 도시 유역의 물순환을 개발 이전과 같은 상태로 되돌리고자 하는 노력이 지속되고 있다. 이를 위한 노력으로 저영향 개발(Low Impact Development, LID) 기술이 저류, 침투, 증발산과 같은 기작을 통해 도시개발 전후의 수문 현상을 모사하기 위해 주목받기 시작했으며, LID를 실제 유역에 도입할 수 있는 기법에 대한 연구가 국·내외에서 활발하게 이루어지고 있다. 본 연구에서는 도시 소유역에 강우-유출 수문모형인 SWMM의 모의를 통해 LID를 적용하여 목표로 유출량 저감 효과를 시나리오 별로 분석 및 평가하였다. SWMM-LID 모형을 가산1빗물펌프장 유역을 대상으로 구축하였으며 옥상녹화와 투수성 블록 포장 기법을 기법별 정성평가를 통해 유역에 적용할 LID 기법으로 선정하였다. SWMM내에서 저류 및 침투를 통한 총 유출량 감소 효과를 위해 설정되어야 하는 각 인자들을 설계 하였으며, 6가지 시나리오를 선정하여 모의한 결과, 투수성 포장에 의한 저감 효과가 옥상녹화에 의한 저감 효과보다 더 크게 나타났다. 향후 유역의 특성에 맞는 LID 시설의 설계가 필요하며, 특히 서로 영향을 미치는 하천이나 지하수위 등 도시 수자원 요소들은 전체 시스템에서 고려할 수 있도록 고려되어야 한다.

• 교육시설 논문지
• /
• 제25권5호
• /
• pp.3-12
• /
• 2018

The purpose of this study is to examine the degree of appropriateness of using design quality indicators for the educational building, and complements for design quality indicators. For doing this, each items of the Korean educational building design indicator was validated by teachers, school staff and an education officer. First, School Personnel and Teachers considered indicators for the classroom designed for general subjects as being valid. However, in terms of indicators for the outside space, they thought of them as not being valid. In particular, it seemed that school staff would have a passive attitude toward the open of the school facility for the local society. It is judged that there happens an adverse effect caused by the open of the school facility for the local society in the educational environment of the school. Second, Education Office Supervisors thought that eco-friendly indicators, LED lighting, an outer wall, and widows and doors had a high validity. On the contrary, he viewed the validity of a rainwater retention basin as being low, which was likely because he rarely had expertise on the construction. When it comes to the indicator of technology capability, ultrahigh-speed information network was seen as being valid, and the indicator of economic feasibility had high validity on maintenance and durability. Third, compared to groups of Teachers and School Personnel, the group of education officers presented high validity of indicators. Validity of indicators might be differently showed because different items on indicators were measured. However, it is speculated that Education Office Supervisors mostly acknowledged the validity of indicators. Fourth, a majority of Teachers, School staff, and Education Office Supervisors were favor of the system of the evaluation accreditation for school facilities since it played a guide role in improving the quality of school. In order to settle the system of the evaluation accreditation for school facilities, it is most important that institutions in the local society which are publicly reliable should participate in the phase of designing the system of the evaluation accreditation for school facilities. In sum, overall respondents agreed with the system of the evaluation accreditation for school facilities but were aware that reliable organizations in public would need to take part in planning the system of the evaluation accreditation for school facilities from the beginning.