• 한국융합학회논문지
• /
• 제9권4호
• /
• pp.99-110
• /
• 2018

저자들은 2008년부터 2016년까지 고대의료원 구로병원 예방치과 구취클리닉에 내원한 구취 환자 중, 생리적 구취증 환자 171명에 대한 진료기록을 통하여 구취에 영향을 줄 수 있다고 인정되는 11개 독립변수들의 자료를 수집하였다. 이들 11개 독립변수들과 3개 종속변수들 중, 생리적 구취 발생에 융복합적 영향을 미치는 공통요인을 추출하여, 향후 구취 예방을 위한 구강보건교육자료 제작 등에 활용할 목적으로 본 연구를 시작하였다. 생리적 구취 발생과 밀접한 연관성이 있다고 알려진 안정 시 타액량, 타액 완충능, 타액 침전율의 3개 종속변수에 11개 독립변수들이 미치는 영향력을 다중회귀분석과 경로분석을 이용하여 분석하였고, 각 변수들의 기술통계적인 결과 분석과 함께, 3개 종속변수에 통계적으로 유의하게 직접, 간접적으로 영향을 미치는 공통적인 융복합적 독립변수 요인들을 추출한 결과, 성별, 식음규칙성, 성격, 조식섭식습관의 네가지 요인이 추출되었다.

• Journal of Oral Medicine and Pain
• /
• 제19권2호
• /
• pp.25-45
• /
• 1994

The purposes of this study were to investigate the effect of pilocarpine-containing chewing gum for the treatment of xerostomia and to compare the effect of pilocarpine-containing chewing gum with that of pilocarpine oral administration. The 20 subjective and objective xerostomic patients were included in this study and divided into 3 groups. Five subjects were included in gum base chewing group, 10 in pilocarpine-containing gum chewing, and 5 in pilocarpine oral administration. The author measured unstimulated whole salivary flow rate, stimulated parotid salivary flow rate, pH of resting whole saliva, viscosity of stimulated whole saliva, and subjective symptoms and discomforts using VAS(visual analogue scale) at the beginning of the experiment. And the author investigated the changes of these factors at 1, 2, 3, and 4 week after. The obtained results were as follows : 1. There were significant increases in the unstimulated whole salivary flow rate in pilocarpine-containing gum chewing and pilocarpine oral administration groups. But there was no significant difference between pilocarpine-containing gum chewing and pilocarpine oral administration groups. 2. There was a significant increase in the stimulated parotid salivary flow rate in pilocarpine- containing gum chewing group. But there was no significant difference between pilocarpine- containing gum chewing and pilocarpine oral administration groups. 3. The change of salivary pH showed the increasing pattern in all groups. But there was no significant difference among groups. 4. There were no significant changes in the values of salivary viscosity in all groups through the experimental period. 5. There were significant decreases of VAS(visual analogue scale) in the degree of subjective symptoms and discomforts in pilocarpine-containing gum chewing and pilocarpine oral administration groups. But there was no significant difference between pilocarpine- containing gum chewing and pilocarpine oral administration groups.

• 한국산학기술학회논문지
• /
• 제17권6호
• /
• pp.537-545
• /
• 2016

본 연구는 구강환경요인을 살펴보고, 구강환경이 구강세균 검출에 미치는 위험요인 알아보고자 시행하였다. 연구기간은 2015년 2월 15일~ 2월 28일까지 성인 근로자 60명을 대상으로 조사하였다. 연구변수로는 안정시, 자극시 타액분비율, 타액완충능, 타액 pH, 설배와 설하 구강건조도, 구취 설태량을 측정하였다. 구강세균의 검출 유무를 확인하기 위하여 안정시 타액분비율의 gDNA를 추출하여 균을 검출하였다. 그 결과, S.mutans균은 흡연자 15배, 자극시, 안정시 타액분비율 1.3~1.6배 위험도가 더 높았으며, P.intermedia는 흡연자 13배, 설하 구강건조도 4.3배, 설태량 4배 TM7은 설하 구강건조도 5.5배 더 높은 위험도를 나타냈다. 구강 내 세균을 줄이기 위해서는 타액분비율을 촉진시키는 습관을 형성하고, 금연교육을 시행함이 중요하다고 본다. 또한 구강위생이 깨끗하고 관리가 잘되는 성인에서는 구강세균이 많이 줄어들고, 구강질환을 좀 더 예방할 수 있을 것이라 기대된다.

• Journal of Oral Medicine and Pain
• /
• 제25권1호
• /
• pp.41-51
• /
• 2000

This study was performed to investigate the effect of three modalities commonly used for reduction of oral malodor and to review the contributing factors for halitosis. For this study, 45 subjects of good general health in their third decades were selected, and they were divided into three groups by each modality, that is, tongue scraping, $ZnCl_2$ mouth rinse, and periodontal treatment. Subjective sense of halitosis, diets, Oral hygiene index based on tooth brushing and tongue brushing habit, resting salivary flow rate, gingival index, degree of tongue coating were recored in the Halito-Chart designed by the author. Oral malodor converted from volatile sulfur compound was measured by the Halimeter$^{(R)}$(Interscan Co., USA), and the correlation between the oral factors and pre-treatment halimeter score were analysed. Data obtained were analysed by the SPSS windows program and the results of this study were as follows : 1. There were no significant correlation between oral factors such as oral hygiene index, salivary flow rate, gingival index, degree of tongue coating and pre-treatment halimeter score. 2. Difference between pre- and post-treatment halimeter score by the three modalities were significant, but correlation between pre- and post-treatment score within group was most significant in the periodontal treatment group followed by the tongue scraping group and lowest in the $ZnCl_2$ mouth rinse group. 3. Reduction of halimeter score was significant only in subjects with relatively more tongue coating in the tongue scraping group, but in the $ZnCl_2$ mouth rinse group and in the periodontal treatment group, the modality applied to each group had same significant effects without regard to the degree of oral hygiene index or gingival index. 4. Men had more tongue coating than women, and reduction of halimeter score was significant in men, but not in women.