• Title/Summary/Keyword: Respiratory Tract Infection (RTI)

Search Result 4, Processing Time 0.016 seconds

In vivo Efficacy of LB20304a against Experimental Respiratory Tract Infection in Mice (생쥐의 호흡기 감염에 대한 퀴놀론계 항생제 LB20304a의 치료 효과)

  • An, Mi-Jeong;Kim, Mu-Yong;Baek, Gyeong-Suk;Kim, In-Cheol;Gwak, Jin-Hwan
    • YAKHAK HOEJI
    • /
    • v.40 no.4
    • /
    • pp.438-441
    • /
    • 1996
  • The therapeutic activity of LB20304a was examined on experimental respiratory tract infection (RTI) caused by Klebsiella pneumoniae DT-S in mice. A single oral dose of LB 20304a (1.2mg/mouse) showed a rapid bacteriocidal activity in lung tissue at 4,7 and 24h after administration of drug. The in vivo activity of LB20304a was comparable to that of ciprofloxacin against K. pneumoniae infection, although in vitro MIC of LB20304a was four-fold higher than that of ciprofloxacin.

  • PDF

Retrospective Drug Utilization Review of Antibiotics for Respiratory Tract Infection(RTI) in Ambulatory Outpatient Care (외래 호흡기계 질환에서 항생제 사용에 대한 후향적 평가방안)

  • Kim, Dong-Sook;Bae, Green;Kim, Su-Kyeong;Lee, Hak-Seon;Kim, Yoon Jin;Lee, SukHyang
    • Korean Journal of Clinical Pharmacy
    • /
    • v.22 no.4
    • /
    • pp.291-303
    • /
    • 2012
  • As respiratory tract infections (RTI) account for about 60% of all antibiotic prescriptions in outpatient care setting, there are significant concerns about emerging resistance that are largely due to the excessive or inappropriate use of antibacterial agents for viral respiratory infections. This study was aimed to develop retrospective drug utilization review (DUR) program of antibiotics for RTIs using Delphi methods. Retrospective DUR criteria of antibiotics for RTIs were identified based on clinical practice guidelines and opinion of experts. Expert panel members were clinical doctors and pharmacists and Delphi method was applied by survey on 16 members of panels. The claim data from Korean Health Insurance Review & Assessment (HIRA) were used to examine trends in outpatient antibiotic prescription between Janunary to December of 2008. As results, Quality index for RTI was assessed for the claim type, antibiotics use of quantity, duration, number and cost. Antibiotic prescription rate for RTIs, Defined Daily Dose (DDD), and duration of antibiotics use were more recognized as significant quality index by experts' opinion. Use of first line agents suggested by guidelines was low and duration of antibiotics use was shorter compared to the recommendations. Antibiotics were over prescribed for RITs. However, dose and duration of antibiotics were under-used.

In Vitro and in Vivo Antibacterial Activities of a New Parenteral Cephalosporin, LB10522 (주사제용 세파로스포린계 항생제 LB10522의 in vitro 및 in vivo 항균력)

  • Paek, Kyung-Sook;Oh, Jeong-In;Kim, Mu-Yong;Kim, In-Chull;Kwak, Jin-Hwan
    • YAKHAK HOEJI
    • /
    • v.40 no.1
    • /
    • pp.95-101
    • /
    • 1996
  • The in vitro antibacterial activities of LB10522, a new catechol-substituted cephalosporin, were compared with those of cefpirome, ceftazidime, ceftriaxone, and cefoperaz one against clinical isolates and laboratory standard anaerobes. LB10522 had broad spectrum antibacterial activities against both gram-positive and gram-negative microorganisms. It was most active against gram-positve bacteria among the reference cephalosporins tested. Against gram-negative strains such as the family Enterobacteriaceae, LB10522 showed an activity comparable to that of cefpirome. But LB10522 was more potent than ceftazidime, ceftriaxone and cefoperazone. In particular, Pseudomonas aeruginosa was highly susceptible to LB10522, which was 32-fold and 64-fold more active than ceftazidime and cefpirome, respectively. Against anaerobic strains, the activity of LB10522 was similar to those of reference compounds. LB10522 exhibited potent therapeutic activities against experimental local infections in mice. The therapeutic effect of LB10522 against urinary tract infection (UTI) caused by P. aeruginosa 1912E in mice was superior to that of cefpirome. Against experimental respiratory tract infection (RTI) caused by K. pneumoniae DT-S in mice, LB10522 was as effective as cefpirome. The in vivo efficacy of LB10522 was correlated well with its in vitro activity.

  • PDF

Vitamin D and Risk of Respiratory Tract Infections in Children: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials (비타민 D와 소아 호흡기 감염의 위험성: 무작위 대조 연구에 대한 체계적 문헌고찰 및 메타분석)

  • Ahn, Jong Gyun;Lee, Dokyung;Kim, Kyung-Hyo
    • Pediatric Infection and Vaccine
    • /
    • v.23 no.2
    • /
    • pp.109-116
    • /
    • 2016
  • Purpose: Recent observational studies have found that vitamin D deficiency is associated with respiratory tract infections. However, randomized controlled trials (RCTs) regarding the efficacy of vitamin D in childhood respiratory tract infection (RTI) have yield inconsistent results. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the association between vitamin D supplementation and the risk of RTI. Methods: A comprehensive search was conducted using MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trial. Randomized controlled trials of vitamin D supplementation for prevention of RTI in children were included for the analysis. Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing the risk of bias was used to assess the quality of the studies. Pooled risk ratios with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were meta-analyzed using Review Manager 5.3. Results: A total of seven RCTs were included in the meta-analysis. According to a random-effects model, the risk ratio for vitamin D supplementation was 0.82 (95% CI: 0.69-0.98) and $I^2=62%$ for heterogeneity. On subgroup analysis, heterogeneity decreased in the subgroup with follow-up less than 1 year, participants ${\geq}5years$ of age, patients subgroup, and subgroup with dosing daily. Funnel plot showed that there might be publication bias in the field. Conclusions: The present meta-analysis supports a beneficial effect of vitamin D supplementation for the prevention of RTI in children. However, the result should be interpreted with caution due to limitations including a small number of available RCTs, heterogeneity among the studies, and potential publication bias.