• 제목/요약/키워드: Research review

검색결과 17,579건 처리시간 0.041초

온라인 리뷰 수용에 영향을 미치는 요인 : 온라인 리뷰 품질과 동의성을 중심으로 (Determinants of Online Review Adoption : Focusing on Online Review Quality and Consensus)

  • 허성혜;류성렬;전수현
    • Journal of Information Technology Applications and Management
    • /
    • 제16권4호
    • /
    • pp.41-58
    • /
    • 2009
  • This research investigated how people are influenced to adopt online review. We applied the Elaboration Likelihood Model (ELM) and the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) to this study. Our research model highlights the assessment of online review usefulness as a mediator from online review quality to online review adoption. This research predicted online review consensus has a role to bulid up online reviw usefulness. This study also includes vividness and perceived similarity as determinants of online review quality. Survey data reflect user's perceptions of actual online review they read. Results support most of research hypotheses except hypothesis related to moderating effect of user involvement. This research offers a model for understanding online review user's acceptance. Additional theoretical and practical implications are also discussed in the paper.

  • PDF

국제경영 분야에 관한 연구동향 분석 (Review on Literatures of International Management)

  • 권기환;권재현
    • 무역학회지
    • /
    • 제45권6호
    • /
    • pp.227-258
    • /
    • 2020
  • The field of international management has consistently been recognized as one of the key research pillars in the grand scope of trade studies. In this paper, we conducted critical review on literatures of international management, which were published in Korea Trade Review from 1975 to 2019. Especially, this paper analyzed 'when did research results in the field of international management appear in Korea Trade Review for the first time?', 'how many papers in the field of international management have been published in Korea Trade Review so far?', 'what topics have the papers in the field of international management published in Korea Trade Review mainly described?', and 'what research methods have the papers in the field of international management published in Korea Trade Review adopted?' In particular, this paper compared the similarities and differences between the research issues in leading global journals and those of international management research papers published in Korea Trade Review. In addition, some implications for future research would be suggested regarding what characteristics of international management studies will be meaningful to be published in the Korea Trade Review.

COVID-19 International Collaborative Research by the Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service Using Its Nationwide Real-world Data: Database, Outcomes, and Implications

  • Rho, Yeunsook;Cho, Do Yeon;Son, Yejin;Lee, Yu Jin;Kim, Ji Woo;Lee, Hye Jin;You, Seng Chan;Park, Rae Woong;Lee, Jin Yong
    • Journal of Preventive Medicine and Public Health
    • /
    • 제54권1호
    • /
    • pp.8-16
    • /
    • 2021
  • This article aims to introduce the inception and operation of the COVID-19 International Collaborative Research Project, the world's first coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) open data project for research, along with its dataset and research method, and to discuss relevant considerations for collaborative research using nationwide real-world data (RWD). COVID-19 has spread across the world since early 2020, becoming a serious global health threat to life, safety, and social and economic activities. However, insufficient RWD from patients was available to help clinicians efficiently diagnose and treat patients with COVID-19, or to provide necessary information to the government for policy-making. Countries that saw a rapid surge of infections had to focus on leveraging medical professionals to treat patients, and the circumstances made it even more difficult to promptly use COVID-19 RWD. Against this backdrop, the Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service (HIRA) of Korea decided to open its COVID-19 RWD collected through Korea's universal health insurance program, under the title of the COVID-19 International Collaborative Research Project. The dataset, consisting of 476 508 claim statements from 234 427 patients (7590 confirmed cases) and 18 691 318 claim statements of the same patients for the previous 3 years, was established and hosted on HIRA's in-house server. Researchers who applied to participate in the project uploaded analysis code on the platform prepared by HIRA, and HIRA conducted the analysis and provided outcome values. As of November 2020, analyses have been completed for 129 research projects, which have been published or are in the process of being published in prestigious journals.

미국과 한국의 Single Institutional Review Board와 Human Research Protection Program의 비교와 함의 (Comparison and Implications of Single Institutional Review Board and Human Research Protection Program in the United States and Korea)

  • 김옥주
    • 대한기관윤리심의기구협의회지
    • /
    • 제5권1호
    • /
    • pp.1-13
    • /
    • 2023
  • In the United States (US), due to the Common Rule, completely revised in 2017, single Institutional Review Board (IRB) review has become mandatory for government-sponsored multi-institutional research since 2020 regardless of the number of participating institutions. The goal of these changes is to reduce redundant reviews by the IRB at each institution and better protect research participants. In this paper, single IRB and Human Research Protection Program (HRPP) in the US and Korea were compared and considered, and their implications were discussed. A comparison of the HRPP evaluation and certification systems of the US and Korea includes that of SMART IRB in the US and Korea Central IRB, aiming at single IRB review for efficient review with support from the country and building a more efficient national human subject research network in the future. Its comparison and analysis will be helpful in deriving future tasks and development directions of single IRB and HRPP in Korea.

  • PDF

자체방제계획서 검토기준 마련 연구 (A Study on the Self-Prevention Plan System)

  • 김성범;노혜란;이진선;김정민;안승영;석광설
    • 한국재난정보학회 논문집
    • /
    • 제9권1호
    • /
    • pp.50-55
    • /
    • 2013
  • 자체방제계획서 검토기준과 검토서는 공정안전보고서, 안전성향상계획서 등 안전관리제도의 심사내용과 기준, 심사양식에 관한 고시 및 지침을 분석하였다. 심사 담당인력과의 인터뷰를 통해 심사과정에서 예상되는 문제점을 사전 파악하여 연구에 반영될 수 있도록 하였다. 또한 자체방제계획서 작성항목에 따라 서류검토 및 현장이행실태 등의 검토방법으로 나누어 제안하였다. 자체방제계획서 검토는 유해화학물질관리법에 규정되어 있으나, 실질적인 승인절차가 없어 성과가 미흡했던 "자체방제계획서 검토제도"를 활성화 시키고, 검토반 구성을 통한 업무의 전문성과 효율성을 제고하고자 본 연구를 수행하였다.

학술지 "환경교육" 논문 분석을 통한 학교 환경교육 연구 동향 고찰 (A Review of Research Trends in School Environmental Education Focused on Journal of Korean Association for Environmental Education)

  • 황세영;서은정;이리나;홍인영
    • 한국환경교육학회지:환경교육
    • /
    • 제25권2호
    • /
    • pp.224-241
    • /
    • 2012
  • The purpose of this study was to review the research trends in school environmental education. We analyzed 383 research papers that specifically focused on the school context which were 66% of the total number (N=577) published in this journal between 1990~2011. We defined the characteristics of review and developed a review method by examining previous review studies in this area. The review framework for school environmental education research was devised in terms of seven research areas: 1) Theories and objectives of school environmental education, 2) Environmental awareness, attitude and behavior, 3) Current issues in environmental education in the school context, 4) Instructions and programs, 5) National Curriculum, 6) Environmental education contents, and 7) Teacher professionalism. In this paper, we present dominant features within each category with focus on the overall trends of research methods and themes. Finally, we discuss research issues emerging out of the empirical analysis for considering the value of research for enhancing the quality of environmental education in schools.

  • PDF

Institutional Review Board 심의에 대한 연구자 만족도 및 임상연구보호프로그램 개선 요구도에 대한 설문조사 연구 (A Survey Study on Researchers' Satisfaction with Institutional Review Board Reviews and Demands for Enhancing Human Research Protection Programs)

  • 박신영;안초롱;노양희;김세주;라선영
    • 대한기관윤리심의기구협의회지
    • /
    • 제5권2호
    • /
    • pp.43-50
    • /
    • 2023
  • Purpose: Due to the stringency of regulations related to clinical research, researchers face various requirements in the Institutional Review Board (IRB) review process. Specifically, they encounter time constraints and administrative burdens. In order to cultivate a more favorable review culture and establish a robust research environment, it is necessary to analyze researchers' perceptions of the IRB review. Therefore, this study aims to assess researchers' overall experiences with the IRB and identify researchers' educational needs and demands for research-related policies. Methods: A semistructured questionnaire with 34 items was developed and refined in consultation with advisors from IRB and Human Research Protection Program (HRPP). The questionnaire was distributed via an online survey to researchers with experience in IRB review. The survey covered general characteristics, satisfaction with the IRB review process (rated on a 10-point scale), experiences with IRB review, HRPP policy demands. Results: The study's descriptive statistics revealed a moderate satisfaction level (average rating, 6.75 out of 10) with the IRB review. Researchers from clinical medicine and other disciplines showed similar satisfaction scores of 6.65 and 6.87, respectively. However, respondents with over 5 years of research experience expressed higher satisfaction (mean score, 7.03) compared to those with less experience (mean score, 6.57). Institutional support was emphasized for improving the IRB review process. Certain training topics generated higher demands for addressing frequently raised IRB issues among minor discipline researchers compared to clinical medicine (p=0.017). Conclusion: We conducted an analysis of researchers' perceptions regarding the IRB as well as their demands concerning educational and HRPP policies. It is imperative to address the pinpointed areas for enhancement and integrate a range of perspectives in order to effectively cultivate a robust research ethics culture and ensure comprehensive participant protection.

  • PDF

외국의 후향적 DUR 제도 현황과 정책적 함의 (Review of the Retrospective Drug Utilization Review Program from Foreign Countries' Experience)

  • 김동숙;김수경;장선미
    • 약학회지
    • /
    • 제55권3호
    • /
    • pp.173-184
    • /
    • 2011
  • The purpose of this study was to review foreign retrospective Drug Utilization Review(DUR), and so to suggest a development plan suitable for use with domestic situation. Literature review of foreign retrospective DUR program and domestic project such as DUR and prescribing analysis project were reviewed. To improve prescribing quality, developed countries such as US, Canada, UK, France, and Australia have implemented various forms of policy. Based on the review of foreign retrospective DUR program, we suggested to apply practical implementation of retrospective DUR program.

Research on Mathematics Education in China: A Review of Doctoral Theses

  • Li, Zhuo;Yu, Bo
    • 한국수학교육학회지시리즈D:수학교육연구
    • /
    • 제18권2호
    • /
    • pp.89-101
    • /
    • 2014
  • This paper presents a survey study aiming to systematically review research on mathematics education in China and identify important variables that should be considered in future research. The literature surveyed is selected from doctoral theses. The study reveals that important progress has been made over the last two decades. Following the review and discussion, the study proposes five needed directions for advancing research on mathematics education in China.

사전심사제도 도입에 다른 의사의 진료행태 변화 (A study on changes in physician behavior after enforcing pre-review system)

  • 김세라;김진희
    • 보건행정학회지
    • /
    • 제14권4호
    • /
    • pp.88-113
    • /
    • 2004
  • Starting from April, 2003, new pre-review system has been introduced and implemented to reduce unnecessary conflict with medical care organizations caused by current retrospective claim review system and to enhance efficiency of review system. The main purpose of pre-review system is to educate doctors to contrive adequacy of medical services. This research mainly focuses on effectiveness of pre-review system's influence on physicians' behavior changes. The analysis-participants were drawn from 1,449 clinics which implemented pre-review system, since April of 2003. The research results are as followings. First, the amount per claim has reduced by $\\3,154$, days of visit per claim by 0.1 day, and amount per visit by $\\412$, which were statistically significant. Second, anesthesiologists have decreased in three indicators the most, and the internists had least of changes. Third, the amount per claim and days of visit per claims has dropped significantly on physicians with less periods of practice and physicians with more ages. Fourth, the clinics without the expensive medical equipments, the city clinics showed significant decrease on days of visit per claim. Fifth, in intervention methods, the one-to-one education showed more significant decrease on amount per visit rather than information feedback by paper. In conclusion, the pre-review system have an impact on self-imposed physician behavioral change. The outcome of this research may be utilized for future extension implementation of pre-review system. Furthermore, it is showed that ability of transitions in medical services review system according to the future transition of payment system and context of health service policy.