• 한국정보관리학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국정보관리학회 2002년도 추계학술발표논집
• /
• pp.23-65
• /
• 2002

This study is to consider varying factors of internal/external informational and operational environments in libraries, and develop a new evaluation indicators for university libraries in digital environments. In order to do this research, the previous works have been investigated, and the Delphi study and our own analysis have been performed. The main research results are as follows. First, the results through the Delphi method that was to adopted to verify evaluation items and indicators determined by the literature review show that the repressed values for each evaluation category is greater than 3.00. overall average is 4.02. and standard deviation is ranged from 0.40 to 0.62 for each category. This means that the evaluation indicators are valid. Second, the factor analysis was performed to verify the construct validity of evaluation indicators. As a result. the cumulative variance of evaluation indicators consisting of 11 dimensions per factor is 72.733%. In turn, this result shows that the validity of these indicators is very reliable. Third, t-test and one way ANOVA are performed within significance probability 0.05 in order to verify differences in each librarians point of views for the degree of importance in evaluation indicators. The results show that these evaluation indicators are verified to be appropriate since there is no significant difference. Based on the Delphi study and our own analysis. we developed a new evaluation indicators that consists of 7 evaluation categories, 35 evaluation items, and 92 evaluation indicators.

• 품질경영학회지
• /
• 제50권4호
• /
• pp.665-677
• /
• 2022

Purpose: The purpose of this study is to analyze the current status and investigate relevant indicators so that R&D performance evaluation suitable for government-funded research institutes can proceed. A suitable performance evaluation model was presented based on the surveyed indicators. Based on the presented performance evaluation model, the importance was analyzed to calculate the weight for each indicator of the performance evaluation model. Methods: The method applied in this study presented a performance evaluation model based on the organizational performance evaluation cases of advanced overseas countries. By using the AHP(Analytic Hierarchy Process) technique, the weight of each indicator of the performance evaluation model was studied. Results: As a result of examining the indicators necessary for the evaluation model, focusing on overseas cases, 13 evaluation items were derived. A weight was calculated for the importance of the study results. And the scientific/technical research results showed the highest excellence. Conclusion: Key indicators of performance evaluation suitable for government-funded research institutes were derived and presented through detailed modeling in three stages. A realistic model that can objectively evaluate the performance of government-funded research institutes was proposed using the AHP technique.

• 정보관리연구
• /
• 제39권4호
• /
• pp.97-120
• /
• 2008

경쟁력 향상과 생산성 제고의 도구로서 디지털 환경에 적합한 새로운 전문도서관 평가지표 개발의 필요성이 대두되고 있다. 특히, 전문도서관의 경우 다른 도서관과 달리 다양한 주제적 배경을 가지고 있고, 1인 운영 소규모 도서관도 많다는 특성을 충분히 고려하여 평가지표가 개발되어야 한다. 이에 본 연구에서는 2007년에 작성된 전문도서관 평가지표를 기초로 하여 이해하기 쉽고 적용 가능성이 높은 새로운 평가지표를 개발하였다. 개발된 전문도서관 평가지표는 선행연구와 타관종의 평가지표를 충분히 검토하였으며, 다양한 주제 분야 전문도서관 소속 전문가들의 의견이 반영될 수 있도록 수차례의 회의를 거쳐 완성되었다. 새 평가지표의 개발 후 타당성과 실효성을 검증하기 위해 평가지표 타당성 설문조사를 실시하였으며, 아울러 일부 전문도서관을 대상으로 모의평가도 실시하였다. 개발된 평가지표로 전문도서관 운영평가를 정착시킨다면, 새 평가지표는 전문도서관의 현재 수준을 파악하고 개선하여 미래 지향적 전문도서관 육성에 기여할 수 있을 것이다.

• 한국문헌정보학회지
• /
• 제45권2호
• /
• pp.309-324
• /
• 2011

이 연구의 목적은 우리나라 대학도서관 평가에 적용할 수 있는 평가 지표를 개발하는 것이다. 이 연구에서는 (1) 평가 방법, 절차 및 기준의 확정, (2) 평가에 사용될 정량적 및 정성적 평가 지표의 개발, (3) 시범 평가를 통한 지표의 적용 가능성 평가라는 세 가지 요소로 구성된 대학도서관 평가 모형을 구축하는 동시에 일반 현황 지표, 전국 대학 공동활용 지표, 특성화 지표 및 이용자 만족도 지표를 개발하였다. 이 지표들을 사용하여 2010년 대학도서관 평가 시범사업을 시행함으로써 이들의 적용 가능성 및 타당성을 검증하고자 시도하였다.

• Journal of Information Processing Systems
• /
• 제14권4호
• /
• pp.916-925
• /
• 2018

The academic research performance is often quantitatively measured by means of using citation frequency. The citation frequency-based indicators, such as h-index and impact factor, are commonly used reflecting the citation quality to some extent. However, these frequency-based indicators are usually carried out based on the assumption that all citations are equal. This may lead to biased evaluations in that, the attributes of the citing objects and cited objects are significant. A high-accuracy evaluation method is needed. In this paper, we review various citation quality-based evaluation indicators, and categorize them considering the algorithms being applied. We discuss the pros and cons of these indicators, and compare them from four dimensions. The outcomes will be useful for our further research on distinguishing citation quality.

• 한국경영과학회지
• /
• 제37권4호
• /
• pp.161-180
• /
• 2012

We develop some evaluation tool and indicators for the scores for medical equipment replacement in hospital. There has been no research for Korean hospitals although there are many for foreign medical institutions. In this paper, among many variables that were obtained from the previous studies, eleven variables are selected as indicators and tied as three groups. And then we obtain scores of medical equipments based on the weighted values of those indicators. We can make decisions whether we replace medical equipments or not by ranking the medical equipments based on the scores. This paper shows that we can make decisions to replace medical equipments very objectively and effectively using the evaluation tool and indicators we develop.

• 정보관리학회지
• /
• 제19권4호
• /
• pp.258-296
• /
• 2002

본 연구는 도서관 내·외적인 정보환경과 운영환경의 변화요인을 수용하여 디지털 환경에서 대학도서관 평가지표를 개발하는데 있다. 이러한 연구를 수행하기 위하여 문헌연구와 델파이 조사, 본 조사를 실시하였으며, 본 연구를 통하여 규명된 연구의 주요 결과는 다음과 같다. 첫째, 문헌 연구를 통하여 설정한 평가 항목 및 지표의 내용타당도를 검증하기 위한 델파이 조사 결과, 각 평가영역별 평정 값이 3.00이상이고 전체 평균이 4.02이며, 표준편차는 .40～.62 사이에 분포되어 있으므로 델파이 조사결과 평가지표는 타당한 것으로 조사되었다. 둘째, 본 평가지표의 구인타당도를 검증하기 위하여 요인분석을 실시하였다. 그 결과 11개 요인으로 구성된 평가항목의 요인별 누적 변량은 72.733%로서 타당성이 높은 것으로 검증되었다. 셋째, 사서의 특성별로 인지하는 정도의 차이를 검증하기 위하여 유의확률 0.05 수준에서 t-검증과 일원 변량분석을 실시하였다. 이상과 같이 델파이 조사와 본 조사의 결과를 토대로 하여 전체 7개 평가부분 35개 평가항목 92개의 평가지표로 구성된 새로운 평가지표를 개발하였다.

• 한국환경복원기술학회지
• /
• 제17권6호
• /
• pp.1-15
• /
• 2014

A dredging on erosion control dam has been enforced without evaluation the factors that affect the dredging. In addition, there is the negative effect much more than positive effect by dredging on erosion control dam. Therefore, this study was carried out to develop evaluation indicators and to suggest fieldbook in order to determine whether sand deposits at erosion control dam should be dredged up or not. The most important six evaluation indicators that can decide to dredge up at erosion control dam were obtained from three round delphi technique and were selected in the following order: the current sand deposit ratio(0.339), existence of cultivated land and house downstream(0.276), the slope of streambed(0.162), the amount of movable soil and gravel(0.118), the history of any disasters(0.063), the basin area(0.043). The weighted score for each evaluation indicator were acquired from AHP analysis with respect to the degree of importance and then the modified weighted score for actual measurements were classified as three categories: large(2.53), medium(1.60) and small(1.01). Based on delphi technique, erosion control dam dredging evaluation fieldbook introduced the four evaluation indicators out of the total six evaluation indicators and two low effected evaluation indicators were excluded. This results showed that the values for reliability analysis and consistency ratio were acceptable.

• 한국조경학회지
• /
• 제24권4호
• /
• pp.23-38
• /
• 1997

In this Study, indicators for the evaluation of environmental amenity were determined through the investigation of the resident's consciousness in all thirty one cities and counties of Kyonggi. Also, environmental amenity that the resident feel in terms of recognition level was evaluated and based on the determined environmental indicators, environmental amenity for the physical environmental situation was evaluated. By analyzing the results, basic data for the planning of the future environmental management were prepared. The results of this study can be summarized as follows First, the developed indicators for the evaluation of environmental amenity consist of four intermediate evaluation items and fifteen individual evaluation items, and fifty four evaluation standards in total . Two to five evaluation standards were determined for the respective individual evaluation items. Second, using the developed indicators, the evaluation of environmental amenity were implemented based on both resident's consciousness and statistical data. Third, by analyzing the difference between two evaluation results, future research plan was proposed.

• 청소년시설환경
• /
• 제9권4호
• /
• pp.49-55
• /
• 2011

The purpose of this study is to investigate and analysis importance for evaluation indicators in youth centers. The sample of it is 138 youth centers. Method of this analysis of importance for its indicators is AHP(Analytic Hierarchy Process). Evaluation domains in youth center are process evaluation, product evaluation, input evaluation and specialized program in order of importance. Also, it is important to evaluate in needs assessment, recruitment of youth instructor, participation of youth in decision making, connective project with schools, sanitation level of youth center, satisfaction research, efforts of improvement of youth center staff in evaluation indicators. The result of this study is that importance for evaluation indicators suggests developmental directivity in youth center management.