• Title/Summary/Keyword: Research Evaluation

Search Result 25,156, Processing Time 0.077 seconds

CORRELATION BETWEEN SPF INDEX AND SAFETY MARKER IN SUNCREENS

  • Kim, Jong-Won;Suh, Soo-Kyung;Park, Ju-Young;Park, Chang-Won;Seo, Kyung-Won;Kim, Kyu-Bong;Kim, Kwang-Jin;Kim, Jae-Hee;Lee, Sun-Hee
    • Proceedings of the Korean Society of Toxicology Conference
    • /
    • 2002.11b
    • /
    • pp.195-195
    • /
    • 2002
  • In recent years, the safety of sunscreens has been challenged based on the reports of its adverse effect on users; dermatitis, allergic contact dermatitis, photoallergic contact dermatitis. To investigate a correlation between sun protection factor (SPF) and the safety of sunscreens, we measured in vitro SPF index using homosalate as a standard and examined the toxicity tests on cosmetics; primary skin irritation tests, ocular irritation test, and skin sensitization test.(omitted)

  • PDF

ASSESSMENT OF STABILITY AND ALLERGENICITY OF FOOD ALLERGENIC PROTEINS

  • Lee, J-H;Yoon, W-K;Han, S-B;Yun, S-O;Park, S-H;Lee, H-J;Yoon, P-S;Moon, J-S;Kim, H-C
    • Proceedings of the Korean Society of Toxicology Conference
    • /
    • 2002.11b
    • /
    • pp.180-180
    • /
    • 2002
  • The potential allergenicity of the transgene products in genetically modified organisms (GMOs), has been an important issue. As a part of the risk assessment of GMOs, we investigated the physicochemical stability and the immunogenicity of food allergens to determine their allergenicity.(omitted)

  • PDF

Activation of toll-like receptor signaling by polysaccharide isolated from cell culture of Acantopanax senticosus

  • Ahn, H-J;Han, S-B;Yoon, Y-D;Lee, H-S;Moon, J-S;Lee, C-W;Lee, K-H;Park, S-K;Kim, H-C
    • Proceedings of the Korean Society of Toxicology Conference
    • /
    • 2002.11b
    • /
    • pp.182-182
    • /
    • 2002
  • We investigated the mechanism of immunomodulatory action of polysaccharide isolated from cell culture of Acanthopanax senticosus (ASP). ASP was found to increase directly proliferation and differentiation of B cells, and cytokine production of macrophages, but not proliferation and cytokine production of T cells.(omitted)

  • PDF

Relevance Analysis of Performance Evaluation Systems of Government S&T Research Groups (출연연구기관의 연구회 단위 기관평가제도의 적합성 분석)

  • Nam, Yeong-Ho;Kim, Byeong-Tae
    • Journal of Technology Innovation
    • /
    • v.14 no.3
    • /
    • pp.117-154
    • /
    • 2006
  • This research examines performance evaluatees' opinions regarding the current institutional performance evaluation systems of Government S&T Research Institutes (GRIs). Under the current evaluation systems, twenty GRIs are grouped into three Research Groups and each Group has its own evaluation systems. One problem of the current institutional evaluation systems is that the systems cannot reflect individual GRIs' characteristics. The following methods are used. First, based on four perspectives of Kaplan & Norton(1992)'s Balanced Scorecard(BSC) model, six perspectives appropriate to GRUs' characteristics are derived. Second, experts classify current performance evaluation measures into the six perspectives. This enables different evaluation systems of three GRI Research Groups to be compared under the same evaluation measures. Third, GRIs' evaluatees are asked to allocate appropriate weights on the performance measures. Evaluatees' weights of a GRI are compared with average weights of the related Group. Finally in every BSC's perspective, GRIs that have extraordinarily over-scored or under-scored weights are analyzed in terms of GRIs' missions, customers, capability of human resources, etc. In the Basic Research Group, the Korea Basic Science Institute is deviated in the financial perspective and the strategic direction perspectives. In the Public Research Group, Korea Institute of Construction Technology is significantly different from other GRIs in three perspectives. Five out of eight GRIs in the Industrial Research Group, GRIs are significantly different each other in several perspectives. It could be concluded that the current institutional evaluation systems are least appropriate in measuring performance of the GRIs of the Industrial Research Group.

  • PDF

Neurotoxicity of Synthetic Cannabinoids JWH-081 and JWH-210

  • Cha, Hye Jin;Seong, Yeon-Hee;Song, Min-Ji;Jeong, Ho-Sang;Shin, Jisoon;Yun, Jaesuk;Han, Kyoungmoon;Kim, Young-Hoon;Kang, Hoil;Kim, Hyoung Soo
    • Biomolecules & Therapeutics
    • /
    • v.23 no.6
    • /
    • pp.597-603
    • /
    • 2015
  • Synthetic cannabinoids JWH-018 and JWH-250 in 'herbal incense' also called 'spice' were first introduced in many countries. Numerous synthetic cannabinoids with similar chemical structures emerged simultaneously and suddenly. Currently there are not sufficient data on their adverse effects including neurotoxicity. There are only anecdotal reports that suggest their toxicity. In the present study, we evaluated the neurotoxicity of two synthetic cannabinoids (JWH-081 and JWH-210) through observation of various behavioral changes and analysis of histopathological changes using experimental mice with various doses (0.1, 1, 5 mg/kg). In functional observation battery (FOB) test, animals treated with 5 mg/kg of JWH-081 or JWH-210 showed traction and tremor. Their locomotor activities and rotarod retention time were significantly (p<0.05) decreased. However, no significant change was observed in learning or memory function. In histopathological analysis, neural cells of the animals treated with the high dose (5 mg/kg) of JWH-081 or JWH-210 showed distorted nuclei and nucleus membranes in the core shell of nucleus accumbens, suggesting neurotoxicity. Our results suggest that JWH-081 and JWH-210 may be neurotoxic substances through changing neuronal cell damages, especially in the core shell part of nucleus accumbens. To confirm our findings, further studies are needed in the future.

A Study on Improvements of Research Performance Evaluation for Enhancing the Soundness of Academic Activities (학술 활동 건전성 제고를 위한 연구업적평가 개선에 관한 연구)

  • Younghee, Noh;Ji Hei, Kang;Yong Hwan, Kim;Jeong-Mo, Yang;Jongwook, Lee
    • Journal of the Korean BIBLIA Society for library and Information Science
    • /
    • v.33 no.4
    • /
    • pp.93-114
    • /
    • 2022
  • This study aims to propose the ways to improve the research performance evaluation to support the establishment of a sound research culture. For the study, we analyzed the cases of domestic and foreign research performance evaluation, and a survey and an interview were conducted for faculty and research performance evaluation officials, respectively. In the study, the direction of establishing the principle of research performance evaluation, the method of categorizing the type of research performance, the method and procedure of research performance evaluation, and necessary documents were proposed. First, eight principles were suggested to be considered in evaluating research achievements to ensure the validity, reliability, and transparency of the evaluation while supplementing the limitations of quantitative evaluation. Second, the main types of research achievements were categorized into journal articles, books, and presentations at academic conferences. Third, as a research achievement evaluation method, a hybrid evaluation using quantitative and qualitative and multiple measurement indicators was proposed. Fourth, a total of 11 steps (required 7 steps) were presented as a procedure for research achievement evaluation. Fifth, publications, evaluation documents, and committee chair's reports were proposed as major documents for research achievement evaluation. The research achievement evaluation improvement plan presented in this study should be flexibly applied in consideration of the characteristics of the academic and research fields and universities.

An Empirical Study on Development of IS Evaluation Indices : In Case of Public Sectors (정보시스템 평가지표 개발에 관한 실증적 연구 : 공공부문을 중심으로)

  • 정해용;김상훈
    • Journal of the Korean Operations Research and Management Science Society
    • /
    • v.28 no.4
    • /
    • pp.155-189
    • /
    • 2003
  • In this research, the comprehensive evaluation model of IS(information systems) for public sectors is theoretically constructed through reviewing and integrating previous IS evaluation-related research. This model is hypothesized to consist of five sectors(System Sector, User Sector, Organization and Management Sector, Resource Management Sector and Strategic Contribution Sector), ten evaluation items belonging to these five evaluation sectors, and sixty two evaluation indices for these ten evaluation items. The results of empirical analyses to test the validity of the research model show that the evaluation sectors turn out to be the same ones as proposed in the hypothetical model. The evaluation items(System Quality, Information Quality, Service Quality) in System Sector proves to be consistent with the hypothetical model. However, in case of User Sector, two evaluation items(Perceived Usefulness and User Satisfaction) which are included in the hypothetical model are found to be merged into one item(User Satisfaction). And, it is shown that four evaluation items such as the Efficiency of Internal Process, Customer Satisfaction, Organizational Innovation, and the Degree of Informatization competence improvement are included in Organization and Management Sector, differently from the research model in which the items, Organizational innovation and the Degree of Informatization competence improvement, are not divided. As a final result, sixty two evaluation indices that comprise all the evaluation items belonging to five sectors are found to be reduced to fifty seven ones through factor analyses, criterion-related validity tests and reliability analyses.

Evaluation research in Korean medical education: a systematic review

  • Hye Jin Park;Yu Ra Kim
    • Journal of Yeungnam Medical Science
    • /
    • v.40 no.3
    • /
    • pp.233-240
    • /
    • 2023
  • The purpose of this study aims to analyze research trends related to 'evaluation' in Korean medical education through a systematic review. This study used a systematic review method, which is a research methodology for research trends and 'literature analysis.' Researchers searched the Korean journal literature published until the end of December 2020 in the Korean research database with keywords related to medicine and evaluation. Thus, 5,205 cases were identified. Based on these data, 143 papers were selected through a logical screening process, requiring 1 month to complete the data search and analysis process. In terms of publications, medical journals overwhelmingly outnumbered nonmedical journals until 2015; however, after 2016, the number of papers published in nonmedical journals increased, and the number of published papers was similar to that of medical journals. In terms of evaluation-related research, research on student and program evaluations has been very active compared to that on accreditation. As the number of evaluation studies has gradually decreased over the past 10 years, preparing a plan to revitalize them in Korean medical education is necessary. Considering that the role of evaluation in education has been emphasized in recent years, research on reestablishing the concept of evaluation; developing evaluation indicators; analyzing the status of student evaluation, program evaluation, and accreditation; and deriving measures to improve medical education through evaluation is required.