• Title/Summary/Keyword: Replaceable Item

Search Result 2, Processing Time 0.015 seconds

A Study on the Construction of Reliability Centered Maintenance System for Korean Tilting Train (한국형 틸팅열차의 신뢰성기반 유지보수 체계 구축에 관한 연구)

  • Seo, Sung-Il;Mun, Hyung-Suk;Eum, Ki-Young
    • Journal of the Korean Society for Railway
    • /
    • v.10 no.5
    • /
    • pp.520-526
    • /
    • 2007
  • 본 논문에서는 한국형 틸팅열차의 유지보수 활동을 위해 신뢰성기반유지보수체계를 제안하였다. 열차시스템을 3단계의 교체 부품 단위로 분류하고, 각 단위에 대해 기능블록도를 작성한 후 고장모드 영향 분석을 실시하였다. 각 단위의 심각도를 결정한 후 유지보수 정책을 제안하였으며, 틸팅열차를 위한 유지보수 기준을 정하고, 실제 사례를 제시하였다. 제안된 신뢰성기반유지보수체계는 기존 유지보수 체계와도 호환성을 갖고 있으며, 안전성 향상과 유지보수 활동 효율화에 기여할 수 있다.In this paper, a reliability centered maintenance (RCM) system is proposed to perform maintenance action for Korean Tilting Train. The train system was divided into line replaceable units up to three steps. Functional block diagrams were drawn and failure mode effect analysis for the units was carried out. The criticality of each unit was determined and a maintenance policy was proposed. Maintenance and repair criteria for the tilting train were determined and an example was presented. The proposed RCM system is compatible with the previous maintenance system and contributes to improvement of safety and efficiency of maintenance action.

A Study on the Maintainability Prediction in the Initial Design Phase between Weapon System Development (무기체계 개발간 초기 설계단계에서의 정비도 예측방안 연구)

  • Kim, Yeoungseok;Hur, Jangwok
    • Journal of the Korea Institute of Military Science and Technology
    • /
    • v.22 no.6
    • /
    • pp.824-831
    • /
    • 2019
  • For effective development in consideration of the maintainability of the weapon system, it is necessary to understand whether the maintainability design requirements are satisfied at the early phase of development. This requires the application of an early design phase maintainability prediction process to provide opportunities for improvement. By defining the ambiguity group definition, fault isolation level, fault isolation probability, and countermeasures for faults, it was possible to predict early phase development. The MTTR of the initial design phase applying Procedure V to the artillery system was 3.46H, which is about 16 % higher than 2.98H, the MTTR using Procedure II. This is a result of system design ambiguity that has not been specified in the early phase of development.