• 한국건설관리학회논문집
• /
• 제7권3호
• /
• pp.45-55
• /
• 2006

본 연구는 건설경영자의 경영Mind정립과 합리적 의사결정에 필요한 사고체계 구축에 필요한 논리와 기업경영에서 돌출될 수 있는 외부적 간섭인자를 효과적으로 분석할 수 있는 방향을 제시하는 것이 목적이다. 따라서 경영Mind 정립에 적용되는 간섭인자들이 경영 의사결정에 많은 영향을 주기 때문에 Mind정립과 경영환경에 대한 합리적 접근방법을 제시하고, 시간의 동태성에 따른 환경 요인들을 경영학, 심리학, 철학적 개념에서 논리적 단계로 분석했다. 끝으로 의사결정 요소에 대한 원칙적 한계 및 접근단계와 평가기준을 정립해보았다. 본 연구를 수행한 결과를 다음과 같이 요약해 본다. (1) 경영자의 의사결정 접근방법 (3) 시간의 동태성과 경영Mind (3) 의사결정의 외부 환경적 요인 (4) 경영Mind의 Synergy화 방법 (5) Mind 정립의 기대효과.

• 한국과학교육학회지
• /
• 제29권2호
• /
• pp.253-266
• /
• 2009

This study was focused on analyzing students' informal reasoning patterns and their considerations in decision-making on socioscientific issues. This study involved 20 undergraduate students (10 biology majors and 10 non-biology majors) and showed how the two groups responded on socioscientific issues. Semi-structured interviews were conducted twice respectively based on six scenarios of gene therapy and human cloning. The result showed 93% of the total number of participants' decisions were made by rationalistic reasoning, whereas emotional reasoning was 49%, and intuitive reasoning was 27%. Students usually used two or three informal reasoning patterns together. Most of the students took more consideration on social factors. Some perceived ethical and moral implications of the issues, but they did not consider them seriously. They made their decisions depending on their own values, etc. 65% of the participants got their information on socioscientific issues from the mass media. Biology majors hardly used intuitive reasoning compared to non-biology majors. The Biology major group took into deep considerations on socioscientific issues while the non-biology major group seemed to interpret the given scenarios simply. This implied that the content knowledge was a significant factor of their decision-making. Therefore, it is necessary to develop proper science courses for non-major students to improve their decision-making on socioscientific issues. So, when we develop educational materials or programs, we should consider students' reasoning patterns, their considerations in decision-making, and their content knowledge. And because the mass media has the potential to play a key role for an effective education, we need to make a plan to make a practical application.

• 한국국방경영분석학회지
• /
• 제6권1호
• /
• pp.93-101
• /
• 1980

An effectively designed budget system in the poor resources environment necessarily has three design criteria : (i) to be both planning-oriented and control-oriented, (ii) to be both rationalistic and realistic, (iii) to be sensitive to the variations of resources environment. PPB system is an extreme (planning-oriented and rationalistic) and conventional OEB/OUB system is the other extreme (control-oriented and incrementalistic). Generally, the merits of rationalism are limited because of the infeasibility of applications. Hence, mixtures of the two extremes such as MBO, ZBB, and RZBB have been examined and applied during the last decade. The classical mathematical models of capital budgeting are the starting points of the development of the Budget-Mix Model introduced in this paper. They are modified by the followings: (i) technological-resource constraints, (ii) bounded-variable constraint, (iii) the exchange rules. Special emphasis is laid on the above (iii), because we need more efficient interresource exchanges in the budget-mix process. The Budget-Mix Model is not based on optimization, but a heuristic approach which assures a satisficing solution. And the application fields of this model range between the incremental Nonzero-Base Budgeting and the rational Zero-Base Budgeting. In this thesis, the author suggests 'the budget- mix concept' and a budget-mix model. Budget-mix is a decision process of making program-mix and resource-mix together. For keeping this concept in the existing organization realistic, we need the development of quantitative models describing budget-mix situations.