• The Journal of Korean Society for Radiation Therapy
• /
• v.7 no.1
• /
• pp.133-145
• /
• 1995

1. Purpose : 30 patients with uterine cervical cancer who had been treated at Department of radiation Oncology of Korea university Hospital from June, 1, 1994. to December. 31, 1994. were analyzed to the radiation field accuracy using verification films. 2. Methods and Materials : 30 patients were divided by 6 groups, 5 patients respectively : Group (1) : Standard physique, supine not-fixed Group (2) : Standard physique, supine fixed Group (3) : Obesity physique, supine, not-fixed Group (4) : Obesity physique, supine, not-fixed Group (5) : Obesity physique, prone, not-fixed Group (6) : Obesity physique, prone, fixed All groups were taken verification fimls during the whole treatment period, and it compared with simulation films and portal fimls, 3. Results : This results suggest that all patients should be immovilized and especially obesity physique patients should be treated by prone position in order to reduce radiation field discrepancy. In addition, this results should help to prescribe appropriate safty margins for patients simulation.

• Radiation Oncology Journal
• /
• v.22 no.2
• /
• pp.91-97
• /
• 2004

Propose: To Analyze the survival outcomes and prognostic factors In glioblastoma patients treated with surgery and radiation therapy. Materials and Methods : One hundred twenty glloblastoma patients treated with postoperative radiation therapy from 1994 to 2003 at Samsung Medical Center were retrospectively reviewed. Surgical extents were gross total resection in 22 patients (18$\%$), subtotal resection in 69 (58$\%$), and biopsy only in 29 (24$\%$). The median radiation dose was 50 Gy, ranging from 45 Gy to 72 Gy The median follow-up period was 12 months ranging from 2 to 52 months. Results The overall 1- and 2-year survival rates were 52$\%$ and 14$\%$, respectively, and the median survival duration was 13 months. Favorable prognostic factors by Uunivarlate analyses of prognostic factors on 1-year survival rate were revealed that age under 50 (p<0.01), ECOG performance status 0 or 1 (p=0.03), single lesion (p=0.02), and gross total resection (p=0.04), were the favorable prognostic (actors. and by Mmultlvarlate analyses were revealed that female (p<0.01), age under 50 (p<0.01), ECOG performance status 0 or 1 (p=0.05) and gross total resection (p=0.05) were the favorable prognostic factors. Conclusions : The results of our study were comparable with those previously reported. To Improve treatment outcome, various modifications, Including radiation dose escalation through newer radiation therapy techniques and use of effective chemotherapy regimen, should be further Investigated. Investigated. Also Furthermore, the application of Individualized treatment strategy based on 4he patient's prognostic factors might be needed.