• 한국IT서비스학회지
• /
• 제13권1호
• /
• pp.181-196
• /
• 2014

Many studies have been studied in the Information Technology (IT) area such as Information Systems, Business, Industrial Engineering, Computer Science, Data Analytics and so on. Although various fields for IT exist, searching experts and reviewers in IT journals are subjective. The related journals have made efforts to assign experts for the qualified review. This study conducted developing the framework for understanding and evaluating the experts among co-authors and reviewers through social network analysis. To explore the findings, we collected data of the co-authored network and the reviewer network of the Korea Society of IT Services Journal. Totally, 545 authors for submissions and 314 co-authors were used for analyzing the co-authored network. To analyze the network, we divided two networks as a network for 545 papers and a network of 316 papers excluded 229 single authored-papers. In the findings, we found out various researchers published their papers with collaborations. Also, authors who have high scores of centrality can be said as experts for specific fields. In addition, we analyzed 358 data of reviewers from 2005 to 2011. About 50 reviewers have reviewed the submitted papers based on their expertise since 2005. Peculiarly, the expertise and the qualified review in Korea Society of IT Services Journal were identified in that almost reviewers do not review various papers at a time based on low degree measures and network density.

• 한국융합학회논문지
• /
• 제6권4호
• /
• pp.205-212
• /
• 2015

본 논문에서는 중국 최대의 온라인 쇼핑몰로 자리매김한 타오바오를 대상으로 구매후기가 구매자의 구매의사결정에 어떠한 영향을 주는지를 밝히고자 연구하였다. 본 논문에서는 구매후기 내용특성, 구매후기 제공자특성, 구매자 특성이라는 세 가지 차원을 중심으로 구매자의 구매후기 수용에 영향을 미치는 주요 선행요인들을 도출하였다. 타오바오에서 제품을 구매한 경험을 가진 구매자들을 대상으로 데이터를 수집하여 분석한 결과는 다음과 같다. 첫째, 본 연구에서 구매후기 충분성과 구매후기 선명성은 모두 고객후기 수용에 통계적으로 비유의적으로 나타났다. 둘째, 구매후기 제공자 신뢰성과 구매후기 제공자 유사성은 모두 고객후기 수용을 증가시키는 것으로 나타났다. 셋째, 구매자 특성 차원에 속하는 사전지식과 관여도는 모두 고객후기 수용을 증가시키는 것으로 밝혀졌다. 마지막으로, 고객후기 수용은 구매자의 구매의도를 상당히 증가시키는 것으로 나타났다. 본 논문은 중국시장에 진출하고자 하는 쇼핑몰 이해당사자에게 구매후기 관리의 중요성을 알리고 관리방안을 제시하고 있다.

• 정보처리학회논문지:소프트웨어 및 데이터공학
• /
• 제4권8호
• /
• pp.321-330
• /
• 2015

현재 저널 논문 투고 및 심사 시스템에서 저자는 언제든지 논문 투고가 가능하며 그에 따라 저널 편집위원들이 투고된 논문들에 가장 적절한 심사위원들을 찾아 배정하는 데에 어려움을 겪고 있다. 본 논문에서는 편집위원들의 이러한 심사위원 선정의 어려움을 해결하기 위하여, 투고된 논문들에 적절한 심사위원들을 추천하는 탐욕 알고리즘과 유전 알고리즘을 제시한다. 제안하는 두 알고리즘에서는 투고 논문들의 키워드(Keyword)와 심사위원들의 전문지식 태그(Expertise Tag) 정보를 활용하여 심사위원들의 전문성을 평가하고, 추천되는 심사위원들 간의 공정성 및 심사 참여빈도를 고려하여 심사위원들에게 심사기회가 균등하게 이루어지도록 한다. 제안하는 알고리즘을 검증하기 위하여 본 논문에서는 한국정보처리학회에서 운영하고 있는 JIPS 논문 투고 및 심사 시스템에 추천 알고리즘을 적용해보고 이의 결과를 제시한다. 마지막으로, 제안하는 두 알고리즘의 성능 분석을 수행하여 유전 알고리즘이 탐욕 알고리즘에 비해 추천 심사위원들의 적합도 측면에서 더 좋은 성능을 나타냄을 제시한다.

• 대한한방내과학회지
• /
• 제22권2호
• /
• pp.223-237
• /
• 2001

Objective : There have not been studies on the oriental medicine research trends and qualitative analysis of Korean oriental medicine articles in Korea, particularly in the oriental medicine area. This study's purpose is to appreciate Korean oriental medicine's research trends and assess the quality of the Korean oriental medical journals' level. This study will help upgrade Korean oriental medical journals. Method : We found 93 stroke-related articles in the Journal of Korean Oriental Medicine, published between 1980(Volume 1) and 2001(Volume 45). We surveyed the institutes involved in each study, and the number of people in each study. We seperated by epidemiological study design, the studies into categories. Campbell and Stanley's study design into 6 categories, statistical methods into 13 categories. Next, we assessed the 41 articles by a checklist, which had 10 categories. The quality score was analyzed by survey variables over the period, which were divided by the date of publication: the 1980s, the first half of the 1990s, second half of the 1990s and 2000s. Results : 46.3% od the studies didn't use statistical methods. 56.1%, were case series studies by classification of epidemiological study design, and 53.6% were one-shot case studies designed by Campbell and Stanley's study design. The quality score was 58.33 point 60 is average. In quality level by Browman GP etc.'s, 83.0% of the studies were included in V levels. But, the quality scores were significant by presence of reviewer system, statistical method's usage, and over the period. Conclusion : The Journal of Korean Oriental Medicine needs to improve the quality its articles. To improve the quality of oriental medicine related articles, the following are necessary: working together, joint work of inter-educational system, strengthening of reviewer system, use of statistical methods, and consulting to the expert of research at the stage of study design.

• 한국콘텐츠학회논문지
• /
• 제21권2호
• /
• pp.538-547
• /
• 2021

본 연구는 인터넷 게임 방송의 분석을 통해 게임 방송에 친화적인 게임 디자인 요소를 도출하고자 한다. 이를 위해 인터넷 게임 방송 시청 동기 등에 관한 선행 연구들을 분석하여 방송의 지향점을 '통달'과 '오락'으로 단순화하고, 이들의 조합을 통해 스트리머의 방송 유형을 'Reviewer', 'Master', 'Entertainer', 'Acrobat'으로 구분하였다. 이를 토대로 다양한 장르의 게임 방송을 분석한 결과 유형별 방송 영상물 수와 조회수 모두 'Acrobat'유형의 방송이 가장 높은 것으로 확인되었다. 또한 장르는 유사하지만, 방송 유형에서 'Master'유형이 주도적인 와 'Acrobat'유형이 주도적인 의 콘텐츠 기획 요소를 비교분석하고 'Acrobat'유형의 방송에 유리한 만의 게임 디자인적 요소를 'Fortune', 'Setup Time', 'Control View'로 정리하여 방송 친화적인 게임 설계를 위한 가이드라인을 제시하였다.

• Archives of Plastic Surgery
• /
• 제49권4호
• /
• pp.538-542
• /
• 2022

Performing the first peer review of a plastic surgical research article can be an overwhelming task. However, it is an essential scholarly skill and peer review is used in a multitude of settings: evaluation of journal articles, conference abstracts, and research proposals. Furthermore, peer reviewing provides more than just the opportunity to read and help improve other's work: peer reviewing can improve your own scientific writing. A structured approach is possible and recommended. In these ten tips, we provide guidance on how to successfully conduct the first peer reviews. The ten tips on peer reviewing concern: 1) Appropriateness: are you qualified and prepared to perform the peer review? 2) Familiarization with the journal and its reviewing guidelines; 3) Gathering first impressions of the paper followed by specific tips for reviewing; 4) the abstract and introduction; 5) Materials, methods, and results (including statistical considerations); and 6) discussion, conclusion, and references. Tip 7 concerns writing and structuring the review; Tips 7 and 8 describe how to provide constructive criticism and understanding the limits of your expertise. Finally, Tip 10 details why-and how-you become a peer reviewer. Peer review can be done by any plastic surgeon, not just those interested in an academic career. These ten tips provide useful insights for both the aspiring and the experienced peer reviewer. In conclusion, a systematic approach to peer reviewing is possible and recommended, and can help you getting started to provide quality peer reviews that contribute to moving the field of plastic surgery forward.

• Korean Journal of Radiology
• /
• 제22권5호
• /
• pp.714-724
• /
• 2021

Objective: To evaluate the value of ¹⁸F-fluorodeoxyglucose PET/MRI added to contrast-enhanced CT (CECT) in initial staging, assessment of resectability, and postoperative follow-up of biliary tract cancer. Materials and Methods: This retrospective study included 100 patients (initial workup [n = 65] and postoperative follow-up [n = 35]) who had undergone PET/MRI and CECT for bile duct or gallbladder lesions between January 2013 and March 2020. Two radiologists independently reviewed the CECT imaging set and CECT plus PET/MRI set to determine the likelihood of malignancy, local and overall resectability, and distant metastasis in the initial workup group, and local recurrence and distant metastasis in the follow-up group. Diagnostic performances of the two imaging sets were compared using clinical-surgical-pathologic findings as standards of reference. Results: The diagnostic performance of CECT significantly improved after the addition of PET/MRI for liver metastasis (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [A_z]: 0.77 vs. 0.91 [p = 0.027] for reviewer 1; 0.76 vs. 0.92 [p = 0.021] for reviewer 2), lymph node metastasis (0.73 vs. 0.92 [p = 0.004]; 0.81 vs. 0.92 [p = 0.023]), and overall resectability (0.79 vs. 0.92 [p = 0.007]; 0.82 vs. 0.94 [p = 0.021]) in the initial workup group. In the follow-up group, the diagnostic performance of CECT plus PET/MRI was significantly higher than that of CECT imaging for local recurrence (0.81 vs. 1.00 [p = 0.029]; 0.82 vs. 0.94 [p = 0.045]). Conclusion: PET/MRI may add value to CECT in patients with biliary tract cancer both in the initial workup for staging and determination of overall resectability and in follow-up for local recurrence.

• 한국가구학회지
• /
• 제28권4호
• /
• pp.380-391
• /
• 2017

This study makes sense for suggesting efficient spatial design education. The reviewer has been responsible for the 'spatial design' curriculum for six years and has established it as a case of four stages of education. The curriculum falls into a 3-year professional university. In conclusion, in order to effectively educate the spatial design, it is a place where the space is actually present, and the learners will be able to make a destination where the learner can often experience it. It is recommended that teams be organized and organized. In addition, if you can apply a variety of design methodologies, The learners will be able to experience a rich space design process.

• Clinical and Experimental Pediatrics
• /
• 제52권7호
• /
• pp.756-765
• /
• 2009

This paper aims to provide an introduction to junior authors on how to write a medical paper in a clearer and more scientific manner. One important thing to be always remembered is that the reviewer and the reader will be reading your paper for the first time, and thus, you should make it as lucid as possible. You should pay attention to consistency in every regard in your paper. Use of the active voice usually makes the sentences shorter and clearer in meaning. Organize your content carefully and present it logically, avoiding unnecessary repetition in different sections. Give a diligent thought to every aspect; research is a work of the mind, not of the hands. Write technically, using powerful language. Most importantly, fulfill the exact submission requirements of the journal.

• Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology & Nutrition
• /
• 제13권2호
• /
• pp.117-127
• /
• 2010

This paper aims to give beginners an introductory course on how to write a medical paper more effectively. Bear in mind the reviewer and the reader will be reading your paper for the first time, so you should write it easily. Everything in your paper must be coherent. Use of the active voice is usually shorter and clearer. Organize your story carefully and logically, and then you can avoid unnecessary repetition in different sections. Think hard, because research is made by the mind, not by the hands. Write technically and powerfully. Above all, you have to meet the submission regulation of the target journal exactly.