• 한국축산식품학회지
• /
• 제36권2호
• /
• pp.194-197
• /
• 2016

The alkaline phosphatase (ALP) assay is a rapid and convenient method for verifying milk pasteurization. Since colorimetric ALP assays rely on subjective visual assessments, their results are especially unreliable near the detection limits. In this study, we attempted to establish quantitative criteria for residual ALP in milk by using a more objective method based on spectrophotometric measurements. Raw milk was heat-treated for 0, 10, 20, 30, and 40 min and then subjected to ALP assays. The quantitative criteria for residual ALP in the milk was determined as 2 μg phenol/mL of milk, which is just above the ALP value of milk samples heat-treated for 30 min. These newly proposed methodology and criteria could facilitate the microbiological quality control of milk.

• 한국정보통신학회논문지
• /
• 제23권5호
• /
• pp.508-515
• /
• 2019

소프트웨어 관련 R&D 사업의 결과의 성공여부를 판단하는 기준으로 다양한 정량지표를 많이 사용하고 있으나, 어떠한 정량지표를 선정하는 것이 적절한지에 대한 판단은 다소 어려운 부분이 있다. 본 논문에서는 소프트웨어 개발의 정량적 평가지표 선정에 기준을 제공하기 위해 소프트웨어 품질 수준의 표준으로 활용되고 있는 ISO/IEC25023를 활용하여 소프트웨어 제품 개발의 정량적 평가지표 생성프로세스를 제안한다. 제안 프로세스는 2단계로 구성되어 있다. 첫 번째 단계에서는 ISO/IEC25023 표준규격의 품질특성과 부특성을 도출하고, 두 번째 단계에서는 1단계 결과인 품질특성과 부특성에 부합하는 평가지표 가이드를 도출한다. 제안하는 정량적 평가지표 생성 프로세스는 소프트웨어 개발 프로젝트의 특성에 맞는 정량적 평가지표 선정에 도움이 될 것으로 기대한다.

• 한국터널지하공간학회 논문집
• /
• 제12권4호
• /
• pp.307-319
• /
• 2010

대구지하철 화재사고에서와 같이 철도터널 내 화재는 제연과 배연의 어려움으로 자칫 대형 사고로 이어질 가능성이 크다. 철도터널에서는 화재 시 안전성 확보를 위하여 정량적 위험도 평가를 통하여 방재 시설을 설치하도록 되어 있다. 이 연구에서는 터널내 화재시 정량적 위험도평가를 위해서 필요한 화재발생 표준시나리오, 화재 및 대피해석모델, 사망자 추정모델, 사회적 위험도 평가기준 등을 정립하여 철도터널에 대한 정량적 안전성 평가 기법을 제시하고자 하였다. 또한 본 연구에는 각각의 철도터널 화재사고에 대한 정량적 위험도를 평가할 수 있는 프로그램의 개발과 각종 모델을 정립하여 호남고속철도 방재시설 설계에 반영하였다.

• 대한인간공학회지
• /
• 제14권2호
• /
• pp.63-73
• /
• 1995

An approach to quantitative evaluation of product usability during the design and implementation phases of the product life cycle is presented. The evaluation starts by defining a set of usability characteristics, viz. physical, cognitive and affective characteristic. Each of these characteristics is assessed by a set of usability criteria, such as functionality, visual clarity, learmability, etc. The usability criterion is then evaluated by a checklist consisting of a detailed questionnaire. The fuzzy weighted-checklist method with linguistic variables is used for quantitative analysis. Also, the method for quantifying usability improve- ments in iterative design processes is considered. This analysis procides a quantit- ative measure, which reflects the degree of excellence of product usability during the design and development phases.

• 한국환경과학회지
• /
• 제14권3호
• /
• pp.289-296
• /
• 2005

In this study aims is water supply criteria relations for evaluating the possible performance of water resources systems. These measures describe how likely a systems is to fail(reliability), how quickly it recovers from failure(resiliency), and how severe the consequences of failure may be(vulnerability). The performance of a criteria evaluating with a variety of operating policies illustrates their use. As a result study frequency reliability and quantitative reliability is linear relations and quantitative reliability is high reliability for equality water supply policy. As reliability and vulnerability are in inverse proportion to each other. Therefore these criteria relation analysis can be for Imha dam to variety water supply policy.

• 한국경영과학회지
• /
• 제27권1호
• /
• pp.53-73
• /
• 2002

The launch of a new business is crucial to the future growth and profitability of a company. A new business project typically requires a large amount of resources while it has a high possibility of failure. The evaluation of new business opportunities is therefore quite a critical decision-making to companies. This evaluation includes screening of a large number of criteria at a time which often makes desision-making very complicated. Management should evaluate the business alternatives in a sound and consistent manner that is hard to achieve because the new business evaluation is a typical semi/unstructured decision-making problem. The difficulty in such an evaluation will increase if it is required for management to consider both quantitative and qualitative criteria simultaneously. Under these circumstances, this study has proposed a decision-making framework that utilizes analytical hierarchy process(AHP). This study has identified a set of criteria essential to the new business evaluation and suggested a systematic framework for it. Both qualitative and quantitative evaluations are incorporated into the single framework in this study.

• 한국철도학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국철도학회 2004년도 추계학술대회 논문집
• /
• pp.186-191
• /
• 2004

Whenever some new measure to promote safety is being considered, one major input into the decision making process is to be some formal assessment of the costs and benefits involved. What levels of safety do many stakeholders believe the railway should deliver? This paper is a contribution to the efforts to answer the question. In this study, under Willing-To-Pay(WTP) based value of preventing a fatality(VPF) approach, we will study how much people are willing to trade off safety against other desirable things, summarize accepted quantitative criteria for safety quantitative criteria for safety decision, describe differences between these criteria and some current risk control actions, and present an outline of work under way to address issues related to cost-benefit analysis(CBA).

• 한국비블리아학회지
• /
• 제20권2호
• /
• pp.183-196
• /
• 2009

본 연구의 목적은 시 도교육청을 중심으로 학교도서관 평가에 필요한 평가지표를 개발하는데 있다. 국내 외 학교도서관 관련 평가지표를 조사 분석하여 다양한 우리나라의 학교도서관 상황에 적용할 수 있으며, 다양한 학생들에게 학업능력을 향상시킬 수 있는 학교도서관으로 발전시킬 수 있는 평가지표의 방향성을 설정하였다. 평가 항목은 도서관 프로그램 분야, 학교지원 분야, 서비스 분야로 구분하여 선정하였다. 평가 방법은 조사지 이용 평가, 학교 도서관 통계 이용 평가, 표준화된 통계 이용 평가로 크게 3가지로 구분하였다. 이중 본 연구에서는 표준화된 통계 이용 평가를 제안하였다. 평가항목은 양적인 항목과 질적인 항목으로 구분되었다. 양적인 항목은 투입분야의 예산항목에 2개 지표와 산출분야의 장서 항목의 3개 지표, 이용 항목의 3개 지표가 제시되었다. 질적인 항목에는 소장도서와 해당 연도에 구입한 도서의 이용비율을 제시하였다.

• 한국IT서비스학회지
• /
• 제3권1호
• /
• pp.21-41
• /
• 2004

The technical proposal suggested and published by MIC(Ministry of Information and Communication, henceforth MIC) contains too general assessment elements, which causes qualitative and subjective assessment of technical proposals. Thus, in terms of the technical proposal assessment. It lacks In fairness, validity and accuracy. Furthermore, it has a great deal of difficulty in assessment caused by the inconsistency between proposal planning and assessment methods. Also, each company has different writing format, so it is impossible to make use of its maneuvering data for the assessment. To overcome these weaknesses, our research focused on a quantitative evaluation on development organization, which is a part of organizational and administrative part of the technical proposal suggested and published by MIC. In this research, we divided development organization for the technical proposal into organization, teams, and team members, and then studied addition, deletion and merging for the assessment criteria. For the related study, we chose especially CMM(Capability Maturity Model) from a lot of international and national references, which is a model measuring the maturity of organization, and then we focused on Small-CMM which is available in the small-sized organization. We also suggested input form, description method, assessment elements for the quantitative assessment in the chosen developmental organization, and finally we proposed standard referencing criteria for the assessment. Our study concludes that our assessment method are valid and available in comparison with the previous Delphi method through a validity evaluation test.

• Nuclear Engineering and Technology
• /
• 제51권7호
• /
• pp.1758-1764
• /
• 2019

As the safety level of nuclear power plants (NPPs) relates to the safety of individuals, society, and the environment, it is important to establish NPP safety goals. In Korea, two quantitative health objectives and one large release frequency (LRF) criterion were formally set as quantitative safety goals for NPPs by the Nuclear Safety and Security Commission in 2016. The risks of prompt and cancer fatalities from NPPs should be less than 0.1% of the overall risk, and the frequency of nuclear accidents releasing more than 100 TBq of Cs-137 should not exceed 1E-06 per reactor year. This paper reviews the hierarchical structure of safety goals in Korea, its relationship with those of other countries, and the relationships among safety goals and subsidiary criteria like core damage frequency and large early release frequency. By analyzing the effect of the release of 100 TBq of Cs-137 via consequence analysis codes in eight different accident scenarios, it was shown that meeting the LRF criterion results in negligible prompt fatalities in the surrounding area. Hence, the LRF criterion dominates the safety goals for Korean NPPs. Safety goals must be consistent with national policy, international standards, and the goals of other counties.