• Journal of Gastric Cancer
• /
• 제10권1호
• /
• pp.34-39
• /
• 2010

목적: 위암 환자에 있어서 근치적 위절제술 후, 위 절제 범위에 따라 삶의 질의 차이가 있다고 한다. 본 연구에서는 수술 후 장시간 경과 후 절제 범위에 따른 삶의 질의 차이를 확인했다. 대상 및 방법: 위암으로 근치적 위절제술을 받은 환자 중, 수술 후 5년이 지나 정기검진을 위해 외래를 방문한 166명을 대상으로 하여, EORTC QLQ-C30 3판과 EORTC QLQSTO22의 한국어판을 이용하여 삶의 질을 평가하였다. 결과: EORTC QLQ-C30으로 수술 후 5년에 평가한 삶의 질은, 육체적, 역할, 정서적, 인지, 사회적 기능 척도 및 피로감, 통증, 호흡곤란, 설사, 경제적 부담감의 척도에서 위아전절제술을 받은 후에 나은 삶의 질을 보이는 경향이 있었으나 통계학적으로 유의한 수준은 아니었다. 전체적인 건강 및 삶의 질, 오심과 구토, 수면장애, 식욕감퇴, 변비의 척도에서는 위전절제술을 받은 후에 더 나은 삶의 질을 보이는 경향이 있었으나 통계학적으로 유의한 수준은 아니었다. EORTC QLQ-STO22로 수술 후 5년에 평가한 삶의 질은, 모든 척도에서 위아전절제술을 받은 후에 더 나은삶의 질을 보이는 경향이 있었으나 통계학적으로 유의한 수준은 아니었다. 결론: 수술 후 단기적인 삶의 질의 차이는 있지만, 위암 완치 후에도 장기적으로 지속되는 삶의 질의 악화를 염려하여, 근치적 위절제술의 절제 범위를 축소할 필요는 없겠으며, 종양학적 원칙에 입각한 수술이 필요하겠다.

• 한국전문물리치료학회지
• /
• 제19권1호
• /
• pp.56-65
• /
• 2012

This study examines the effects of a rehabilitation program on quality of life (QOL), cardiopulmonary function and fatigue during radiotherapy for breast cancer patients. The program includes aerobic exercise, stretching and strengthening exercises. Sixty-five women participated in this study and they were asked to perform supervised exercises that last for 60 minutes five times a week for six weeks. The European organization for research and treatment of cancer-cancer (EORTC QLQ-C30) and the breast (EORTC QLQ-BR23), predicted maximal volume of oxygen consumption ($VO_{2max}$) and fatigue severity scale (FSS) were assessed before and after the rehabilitation program. The 60-minute program consisted of a 10-minute warm-up, 30-minute of aerobic exercises, and 15-minute of strengthening exercises, followed by a five-minute cool-down. Heart rates were monitored throughout the exercise class to ensure that patients were exercising at the target heart rate of 40~75% of the age-adjusted heart rate maximum. There were statistically significant differences in the changes of physical function and cancer related symptoms in the EORTC QLQ-C30 and EORTC QLQ-BR23 (p<.05). There was a statistically significant improvement in the predicted $VO_{2max}$ (p<.05), although there were no significant differences in the FSS (p>.05). The results of our study suggest that a supervised rehabilitation program may benefit the physical aspects and QOL of patients receiving radiotherapy for breast cancer.

• Journal of Gastric Cancer
• /
• 제17권4호
• /
• pp.342-353
• /
• 2017

Purpose: This study evaluated the changes in nutritional status based on quality of life (QoL) item-level analysis to determine whether individual QoL responses might facilitate personal clinical impact. Materials and Methods: This study retrospectively evaluated QoL data obtained by the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (QLQ-C30) and Quality of Life Questionnaire-Stomach (QLQ-STO22) as well as metabolic-nutritional data obtained by bioelectrical impedance analysis and blood tests. Patients were assessed preoperatively and at the 5-year follow-up. QoL was analyzed at the level of the constituent items. The patients were categorized into vulnerable and non-vulnerable QoL groups for each scale based on their responses to the QoL items and changes in the metabolic-nutritional indices were compared. Results: Multiple shortcomings in the metabolic-nutritional indices were observed in the vulnerable groups for nausea/vomiting (waist-hip ratio, degree of obesity), dyspnea (hemoglobin, iron), constipation (body fat mass, percent body fat), dysphagia (body fat mass, percent body fat), reflux (body weight, hemoglobin), dry mouth (percent body fat, waist-hip ratio), and taste (body weight, total body water, soft lean mass, body fat mass). The shortcomings in a single index were observed in the vulnerable groups for emotional functioning and pain (EORTC QLQ-C30) and for eating restrictions (EORTC QLQ-STO22). Conclusions: Long-term postoperative QoL deterioration in emotional functioning, nausea/vomiting, pain, dyspnea, constipation, dysphagia, reflux, eating restrictions, dry mouth, and taste were associated with nutritional shortcomings. QoL item-level analysis, instead of scale-level analysis, may help to facilitate personalized treatment for individual QoL respondents.

• Journal of Gastric Cancer
• /
• 제7권4호
• /
• pp.213-218
• /
• 2007

목적: 조기위암 수술에 복강경 적용의 용이성 및 종양학적 안정성에 대해서는 많은 연구가 아루어지고 있으나, 복 강경 적용의 또 다른 목적인 '삶와 질' 향상에 대한 연구 는 아직 미흡한 현실이다. 이에 저자들은 위암 수술에 복강경 적용이 '삶의 질' 향상에 미치는 장기적 영향을 평가 하고자 본 연구를 고안하였다. 대상 및 방법: 2003년 1월부터 2004년 12월까지만 2년간 순천향대학병원 외과에서 위 절제 수술 후 위암 1기로 진단된 154명의 환자들을 대상으로 수술 후 1년 이상 경과한 시점에서 설문조사를 시행하였다. EORTC OLQ-C30(3판)과 EORTC QLQ-ST022 한글판을 이용하여 한 명의 전문 간호사에 의해 외래 방문 시 직접 면담 혹은 전화 상담을 통해 설문조사를 시행했으며, 통계처리는 SPSS 12.0 for Windows를 이용하였다. 결과: 전체 대상 환자 154명 중 86명에서 설문 조사가 이루어져 58%의 응답률을 보였으며, 86명(개복군: 57명, 복강경군: 29명)의 평균 연령은 55세였고, 남자가 60명 여자가 26명으로 남녀 비는 2.3 : 1 이었다. 개복 군의 종양 크기는 평균 2.42 cm로 복강경군의 평균 종양 크기 1.8 cm에 비해 유의하게 크기가 컸으며(P=0.003), 평균 획득 림프절 수도 개복 군에서 36개로 유의하게 더 많았다(P=0.000). 그 외 종양관련 인자인 원발암와 침윤도, 림프절 전이 및 TNM 병기에 있어서 양 군 간에 차이는 없었다. 전반적인 건강 상태와 관련된 2 항목의 평균 점수는 개복 군이 57 (${\pm}20.6$), 복강경 군이 60.3 (${\pm}20.4$)으로 양 군 간에 유의한 차이는 없었으며, 기능과 관련된 15 항목과 증상과 관련된 13항목에 있어서도 양군 간에 유의한 차이는 없었다. EORTC QLQ-STO22를 이용한 '삶의 질' 비교 결과 개복군의 평균 점수는 94.5 (${\pm}97.3$), 복강경군은 68.9 (${\pm}64.9$)로 개복군에서 전반적으로 불편한 증상을 많이 호소하였으나 통계학적인 차이는 없었다. 결론: EORTC QLQ-C30 (3판)과 EORTC QLQ-STO22 한글판을 이용한 설문조사 결과 장기적인 측면에서 위 절제술에 복 강경 적용이 환자의 '삶의 질' 향상에 영향을 미치지 못했다.

• 한국전문물리치료학회지
• /
• 제20권1호
• /
• pp.36-46
• /
• 2013

This study examined the effects of a physical therapy program on quality of life (QOL), and neck and shoulder disability in head and neck cancer patients. The program included neck and shoulder range of motion (ROM) exercises, massage, progressive strengthening exercises, and stretching exercises. Sixteen patients who were assigned to an experimental group performed physical therapy for 40 minutes three times a week for eight weeks. Fifteen other patients were assigned to a control group who did not performed the physical therapy program. The European organization for research and treatment of cancer (EORTC QLQ-C30) and head and neck (EORTC QLQ-H&N) instruments, and the Neck Disability Index (NDI) were assessed before and after the rehabilitation program. The 40-minute program consisted of a 10-minute ROM exercise for the neck and shoulder, a 10-minute massage and 15-minute of progressive resistance exercises, followed by a five-minute stretching exercises. Statistically significant differences were noted for changes in global health, physical function in the EORTC QLQ-C30 and cancer related symptoms in the EORTC QLQ-H&N35 (p<.05). The NDI also showed significant differences (p<.05). Physical therapy may therefore benefit the physical aspects and QOL and improve neck and shoulder disability in patients with head and neck cancer.

• Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention
• /
• 제17권3호
• /
• pp.1405-1410
• /
• 2016

Background: The European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Bone Metastases Module (EORTC QLQ-BM22) is a recently designed supplement to EORTC Quality of Life Questionnaire-C30 (EORTC QLQ-C30). Additional psychometric properties, especially using confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and the Rasch model, are warranted. Materials and Methods: A total of 573 patients with bone metastases were enrolled from eight countries with a mean${\pm}$SD age of $55.8{\pm}13.7years$. Slightly more than two thirds of them were female (n=383; 66.8%). CFA was used to examine the BM22 framework; Rasch models were applied to understand misfit items and differential item functioning (DIF). Results: The fit indices were satisfactory in CFA (comparative fit index=0.972, Tucker-Lewis index=0.964, root mean square error of approximation=0.076, and standardized root mean square residual=0.045). All items fit well in the Rasch models (mean square values were between 0.5 and 1.5), and only one item (number 17) displayed DIF across gender. However, there were six DIF items across Canada and Taiwan, ten across Canada and Iran, and six across Taiwan and Iran. Conclusions: The BM22 has satisfactory psychometric properties, and could assess the QoL of patients with bone metastases specifically focusing on their symptoms. Clinicians may want to use it to capture the underlying QoL for patients with bone metastases. However, the score of item 17 should be interpreted with caution when comparing male and female patients. In addition, researchers should note that variation in DIF items may occur when conducting an international study.

• 종양간호연구
• /
• 제11권3호
• /
• pp.254-262
• /
• 2011

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to identify the quality of life in colorectal cancer patients with chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy. Methods: A total of 93 patients were recruited in the cross-sectional survey design. Quality of life in colorectal cancer patients were measured by European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ C30 and CIPN20. Results: In the QLQ C30, the mean score of the global health status was 59.41, the functional scale was 73.29 and symptom scale was 26.72. In CIPN20, the mean score of sensory scale was 32.70, autonomic scale was 22.88 and motor scale was 16.12. In the QLQ C30, the global health status showed significant differences according to surgery (p=.027) and the functional scale, and the symptom scale showed significant differences according to gender (p=.046, p=.020) and nonpharmacologic intervention (p=.001, p=.009). The CIPN20, the sensory scale showed significant differences according to age (p=.006), DM (p=.005), grade of CIPN (p=<.001) the status of chemotherapy (p=.001) and nonpharmacologic intervention (p=.010). Conclusion: The level of quality of life in colorectal cancer patients with peripheral neuropathy was relatively low. There is a need for developing a nursing intervention for colorectal cancer patients to improve their quality of life and to decrease chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy.

• Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention
• /
• 제17권12호
• /
• pp.5121-5126
• /
• 2016

Objective: To investigate the impact of chemotherapy on quality of life (QoL) among breast cancer patients and to evaluate the relationship with age, cancer stage and presence of any comorbidity. Methods: A prospective study was conducted among breast cancer patients receiving chemotherapy in Hospital Melaka from 1st January 2014 to 31st July 2014. The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) was given to patients to fill in prior chemotherapy (baseline) and after the third cycle of chemotherapy. Socio-demographic and clinical data were collected and analyzed using SPSS version 20. Result: Respondents were 32 female patients [mean age (SD): 49.7(9.93) years]. They reported a significant lower global health status (P < 0.01) and significant higher symptoms of nausea and vomiting (P < 0.01), loss of appetite (P = 0.028) and diarrhea (P = 0.026) after the third cycle of chemotherapy as compared to baseline. Compare to, this study showed significant better emotional functioning (P < 0.01) and social functioning (P < 0.01) than the EORTC QLQ-C30 Reference Values 2008 for breast cancer cases. Under symptom scales higher scores were noted for appetite loss (P = 0.017), nausea and vomiting (P < 0.01). Age, stage and comorbidity had no clear associations with global health status in our patients (P > 0.05). Conclusion: Chemotherapy did reduce the QoL of breast cancer patients. Management of chemotherapy-induced loss of appetite, diarrhea, nausea and vomiting should be improved for a better outcome.

• 대한간호학회지
• /
• 제44권6호
• /
• pp.735-742
• /
• 2014

Purpose: This study was performed to assess the reliability and validity of the Korean version of European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire - Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy 20 items (EORTC QLQ-CIPN20) in patients receiving neurotoxic chemotherapy. Methods: A convenience sample of 249 Korean cancer patients, previously or currently, being treated with peripheral neurotoxic chemotherapeutic agents were asked to fill in the questionnaire. Collected data were analyzed using SPSS 21.0 and AMOS 21.0. Construct validity, known-group validity, concurrent validity, and internal consistency reliability of the Korean version of the QLQ-CIPN20 were evaluated. Results: Factor analysis confirmed 3 dimensions of CIPN: sensory, motor, and autonomic. The factor loadings of the 20 items on the 3 subscales ranged from .38 to .85. The 3 subscale-model was validated by confirmatory factor analysis (GFI=.90, AGFI=.86, RMSR=.05, NFI=.87, and CFI=.94), and concurrent validity was demonstrated with the EORTC QLQ-C30. Furthermore, the QLQ-CIPN20 established known-group validity. The Cronbach's alpha coefficients for internal consistency of the subscales ranged from .73 to .89. Conclusion: The Korean version of the EORTC QLQ-CIPN20 showed satisfactory construct, concurrent, and known-group validity, as well as internal reliability.

• 대한간호학회지
• /
• 제47권1호
• /
• pp.121-132
• /
• 2017

Purpose: In this study the reliability and validity of the Korean version of the Cancer Stigma Scale (KCSS) was evaluated. Methods: The KCSS was formed through translation and modification of Cataldo Lung Cancer Stigma Scale. The KCSS, Psychological Symptom Inventory (PSI), and European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire - Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) were administered to 247 men and women diagnosed with one of the five major cancers. Construct validity, item convergent and discriminant validity, concurrent validity, known-group validity, and internal consistency reliability of the KCSS were evaluated. Results: Exploratory factor analysis supported the construct validity with a six-factor solution; that explained 65.7% of the total variance. The six-factor model was validated by confirmatory factor analysis (Q (${\chi}^2/df$)= 2.28, GFI=.84, AGFI=.81, NFI=.80, TLI=.86, RMR=.03, and RMSEA=.07). Concurrent validity was demonstrated with the QLQ-C30 (global: r=-.44; functional: r=-.19; symptom: r=.42). The KCSS had known-group validity. Cronbach's alpha coefficient for the 24 items was .89. Conclusion: The results of this study suggest that the 24-item KCSS has relatively acceptable reliability and validity and can be used in clinical research to assess cancer stigma and its impacts on health-related quality of life in Korean cancer patients.