• Journal of Gastric Cancer
• /
• 제2권3호
• /
• pp.145-150
• /
• 2002

Purpose: The aim of this study was to evaluate the shortterm outcome of a pylorus-preserving proximal gastrectomy by comparing it with a jejunal interposition after a total gastrectomy in proximal gastric adenocarcinoma. Materials and Methods: For 22 patients (12 men and 10 women) who underwent a pylorus-preserving proximal gastrectomy, several clinical parameters were obtained from the medical records retrospectively. In this study, the data were collected between September 1993 and December 1999 at Chungnam National University Hospital, and the results were compared with those of 25 patients (17 men and 8 women) who underwent an isoperistaltic simple jejunal interposition. Results: The average operative time in the pylorus-preserving proximal gastrectomy group (220 minutes) was shorter than that in the jejunal interposition group (243 minutes) (P<0.05). The hemoglobin and hematocrit levels were significantly higher in the pylorus-preserving proximal gastrectomy group at 2 years after the operation. The body weight ratio (postoperative body weight/preoparative body weight) in patients who had a pylorus-preserving proximal gastrectomy was significantly higher than that in patients with a jejunal interposition at 2 years after the operation. The jejunal interposition procedure had better outcomes in anastomotic site stricture, duration of hospital stay, and number of removed lymph nodes (P<0.05). Conclusions: We think that from the viewpoint of quality of life, a pylorus-preserving proximal gastrectomy, as well as a jejunal interposition, is a useful reconstruction method for early adenocarcinomas of the proximal stomach. However, stricture of the esophagogastrostomy site in the pyloruspreserving proximal gastrectomy is a common problem to be solved in the future.

• Journal of Minimally Invasive Surgery
• /
• 제21권4호
• /
• pp.141-147
• /
• 2018

The rising incidence of early gastric cancer has enabled the development of function-preserving gastrectomy with the focus on post gastrectomy quality of life and adherence to sound oncologic principles. It is concurrent with the growing popularity of minimally invasive surgery; and both are commonly used together. The different kinds of function-preserving gastrectomy included in this review are: pylorus-preserving and proximal gastrectomy, vagus nerve preservation, sentinel node navigation, and various endoscopic & minimally-invasive techniques. In this article the indications, techniques, oncologic safety, functional benefit, and outcomes of each kind of function-preserving gastrectomy are discussed.

• Journal of Gastric Cancer
• /
• 제16권2호
• /
• pp.63-71
• /
• 2016

Pylorus-preserving gastrectomy (PPG) is a function-preserving surgery for the treatment of early gastric cancer (EGC), aiming to decrease the complication rate and improve postoperative quality of life. According to the Japanese gastric cancer treatment guidelines, PPG can be performed for cT1N0M0 gastric cancer located in the middle-third of the stomach, at least 4.0 cm away from the pylorus. Although the length of the antral cuff gradually increased, from 1.5 cm during the initial use of the procedure to 3.0 cm currently, its optimal length still remains unclear. Standard procedures for the preservation of pyloric function, infra-pyloric vessels, and hepatic branch of the vagus nerve, make PPG technically more difficult and raise concerns about incomplete lymph node dissection. The short- and long-term oncological and survival outcomes of PPG were comparable to those for distal gastrectomy, but with several advantages such as a lower incidence of dumping syndrome, bile reflux, and gallstone formation, and improved nutritional status. Gastric stasis, a typical complication of PPG, can be effectively treated by balloon dilatation and stent insertion. Robot-assisted pylorus-preserving gastrectomy is feasible for EGC in the middle-third of the stomach in terms of the short-term clinical outcome. However, any benefits over laparoscopy-assisted PPG (LAPPG) from the patient's perspective have not yet been proven. An ongoing Korean multicenter randomized controlled trial (KLASS-04), which compares LAPPG and laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy for EGC in the middle-third of the stomach, may provide more clear evidence about the advantages and oncologic safety of PPG.

• Journal of Gastric Cancer
• /
• 제22권2호
• /
• pp.135-144
• /
• 2022

Purpose: This study aimed to compare the surgical and oncological outcomes between totally laparoscopic pylorus-preserving gastrectomy (TLPPG) with intracorporeal anastomosis and laparoscopy-assisted pylorus-preserving gastrectomy (LAPPG) with extracorporeal anastomosis. Materials and Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed in 258 patients with cT1N0 gastric cancer who underwent laparoscopic pylorus-preserving gastrectomy using two different anastomosis methods: TLPPG with intracorporeal anastomosis (n=88) and LAPPG with extracorporeal anastomosis (n=170). The following variables were compared between the two groups to assess the postoperative surgical and oncological outcomes: proximal and distal margins, number of resected lymph nodes (LNs) in total and in LN station 6, operation time, postoperative hospital stay, and postoperative morbidity including delayed gastric emptying (DGE). Results: The average length of the proximal margin was similar between the TLPPG and LAPPG groups (2.35 vs. 2.73 cm, P=0.070). Although the distal margin was significantly shorter in the TLPPG group than in the LAPPG group (3.15 vs. 4.08 cm, P=0.001), no proximal or distal resection margin-positive cases were reported in either group. The average number of resected LN was similar in both groups (36.0 vs. 33.98, P=0.229; LN station 6, 5.72 vs. 5.33, P=0.399). The operation time was shorter in the TLPPG group than in the LAPPG (200.17 vs. 220.80 minutes, P=0.001). No significant differences were observed between the two groups in terms of postoperative hospital stay (9.38 vs. 10.10 days, P=0.426) and surgical complication rate (19.3% vs. 22.9%), including DGE (8.0% vs. 11.8%, P=0.343). Conclusions: The oncological safety and postoperative complications of TLPPG with intracorporeal anastomosis are similar to those of LAPPG with extracorporeal anastomosis.

• Journal of Gastric Cancer
• /
• 제6권1호
• /
• pp.11-17
• /
• 2006

목적: 조기 위암에서 수술 후 삶의 질을 향상시키기 위해 여러 축소적이며 보존적인 수술 방법들이 사용되고 있다. 저자들은 조기 위암에서 사용되는 수술 방법 중의 하나인 유문 보존 위절제술(pylorus-preserving gastrectomy, PPG)을 통상적인 위 아전절제술 및 위 십이지장 문합술(subtotal gastrectomy with gastroduodenal anastomosis, B-I)과 비교하여 수술방법에 따른 삶의 질 변화를 알아보고자 하였다. 대상 및 방법: 1999년 1월부터 2003년 12월까지 전남대학교 의과대학 외과학교실에서 조기 위암으로 진단받은 107명의 환자를 대상으로 PPG를 시행받은 군과 B-I을 시행받은 군을 비교 분석하였으며, 두 군 간의 결과는 chi-square test, Student's T-test를 이용하여 통계 검정하였고, P value가 0.05 미만인 경우 의미있는 것으로 보았다. 결과: 107명의 환자 중 29명은 PPG를, 나머지 78명은 B-I을 시행받았다. 두 군간의 비교 결과 성별, 연령, 수술 후 복부 증상 등에 유의한 차이는 없었으며, PPG를 시행받은 군은 B-I을 시행받은 군에 비해 수술시간이 짧았으며, 위 내시경 소견상 역류성 위염 및 식도염이 적었다. 결론: 조기 위암에서 PPG를 시행받은 군이 B-I을 시행받은 군에 비해 역류성 위염 및 식도염의 발생이 적은 것으로 보아 PPG가 B-I에 비해 삶의 질을 향상시킬 수 있을 것으로 생각된다.

• Journal of Gastric Cancer
• /
• 제8권1호
• /
• pp.20-26
• /
• 2008

목적: 유문부보존 위절제술(pylorus-preserving gastrectomy, PPG)은 유문륜을 보존하여 잔위의 배출기능을 보존하고 담즙 역류를 방지할 수 있는 기능 보존 수술법으로 조기위암 치료에 적용되고 있다. 저자들은 복강경 보조 유문부보존 위절제술(laparoscopy-assisted pylorus-preserving gastrectomy, LAPPG)의 초기 경험을 LADG 후 Billroth-I 재건술과 비교 분석하였다. 대상 및 방법: 2006년 11월부터 2007년 9월까지 원자력병원 외과에서 복강경 보조 위절제술을 시행 받은 39명의 조기위암 환자 중 LAPPG (n=9)와 LADG 후 Billroth-I 재건술(n=18)을 시행 받은 27명의 환자를 대상으로 하였고, 양 군간의 임상병리학적 변수를 비교하였다. 저자들은 LAPPG 시행 중 유문하동맥, 우위동맥, 미주신경 간지, 유문지 및 복강지를 보존하였으며, 림프절 절제술은 우위동맥 림프절(No. 5)을 제외한 D1+$\beta$술식을 시행하였고, 유문륜 상방 $3{\sim}4\;cm$에서 원위부 위절제를 시행하였다. 결과: LAPPG을 시행 받은 환자 9명의 평균 연령은 $59.9{\pm}9.4$세였으며 남녀 성비는 1.3 : 1.0 (남자 5명, 여자 4명)이었고, LADG 후 Billroth-I 재건술을 시행 받은 환자 18명의 평균 연령은 $64.1{\pm}10.0$세였으며 남녀 성비는 2.6 : 1.0 (남자 13명, 여자 5명)이었다. LAPPG 군과 LADG 후 Biliroth-I 재건술을 시행받은 군에서 절제된 림프절의 개수는 각각 $28.3{\pm}11.9$개 $28.1{\pm}8.9$개, 수술 시간은 각각 $269.0{\pm}34.4$분, $236.3{\pm}39.6$분, 술 중 출혈량은 각각 $191.1{\pm}85.7\;ml$, $218.3{\pm}156.6\;ml$, 술 후 첫 가스 배출은 각각 $3.6{\pm}0.9$일, $3.5{\pm}0.8$일에 있었고 술 후 첫 유동식은 각각 $5.1{\pm}0.9$일, $5.1{\pm}1.7$일에 섭취하였고 술 후 재원 기간은 각각 $10.1{\pm}4.0$일, $9.2{\pm}3.0$일로 모두 통계학적으로 유의한 차이가 없었다(P>0.05). 술 후 합병증은 LAPPG 군에서 위저류증 1예와 창상 장액종 1예가 발생하였고, LADG 후 Biliroth-I 재건술을 시행 받은 군에서는 좌외측간엽경색 1예가 발생하였다. 결론: 조기위암의 치료에 있어서 LAPPG는 기능 보존 수술 법으로 적용 가능하며, 적절한 적응증을 사용하면 임상종양학적 측면에서도 LADG 후 Billroth-I 재건술과 동등한 결과를 보일 것으로 기대된다.

• Journal of Gastric Cancer
• /
• 제23권4호
• /
• pp.523-534
• /
• 2023

Purpose: Intra-abdominal infection is a common postoperative complication of laparoscopic pylorus-preserving gastrectomies (PPGs). Many studies have reported that intra-abdominal infectious complications after gastrectomy adversely affect patient survival outcomes. To prevent gastric fluid leakage into the abdominal cavity, we developed a novel anastomosis method in which the stomach lumen is not opened (termed the non-opened clean end-to-end anastomosis method [NoCEAM]) and evaluated its feasibility. Materials and Methods: Subsequent to lymphadenectomy, the oral and anal resection lines were sutured using an intraoperative endoscope. After closing the stomach circumferentially with clips, the specimen was rolled outward like a "donut." We resected the specimen circumferentially using a linear stapler, and anastomosis was completed simultaneously. We examined the feasibility of this procedure ex vivo, using three porcine stomachs, and in vivo, using one pig. Subsequently, we applied the procedure to 13 consecutive patients with middle-third early gastric cancer utilizing laparotomic, laparoscopic, and robotic PPG. Results: NoCEAM was completed in all porcine models and human cases. In the human cases, the mean operation time (±standard deviation) was 279±51 minutes, and mean blood loss volume was 22±45 mL. The mean number of linear staples used was 5.06±0.76. None of the patients had complications, and all were discharged on the eighth postoperative. The serum total protein, serum albumin, and hemoglobin levels did not change significantly after surgery. Conclusions: NoCEAM is feasible and safe for performing totally laparoscopic or robotic PPG. It may reduce postoperative complications, such as intra-abdominal infections.

• Journal of Gastric Cancer
• /
• 제17권2호
• /
• pp.145-153
• /
• 2017

Purpose: Identification of the infrapyloric artery (IPA) type is a key component of pylorus-preserving gastrectomy. As the indocyanine green (ICG) fluorescence technique is known to help visualize blood vessels and flow during reconstruction, we speculated that this emerging technique would be helpful in identifying the IPA type. Materials and Methods: From August 2015 to February 2016, 20 patients who underwent robotic or laparoscopic gastrectomy were prospectively enrolled. After intravenous injection of approximately 3 mL of ICG (2.5 mg/mL), a near-infrared fluorescence apparatus was applied. The identified shape of the IPA was confirmed by examining the actual anatomy following infrapyloric dissection. Results: The mean interval time between ICG injection and visualization of the artery was 22.2 seconds (range, 14-30 seconds), and the mean duration of the arterial phase was 16.1 seconds (range, 9-30 seconds). The overall positive predictive value (PPV) of ICG fluorescence in identifying the IPA type was 80% (16/20). The IPA type was incorrectly predicted in four patients, all of whom were obese with a body mass index (BMI) of more than $25kg/m^2$. Conclusions: Our preliminary results indicate that intraoperative vascular imaging using the ICG fluorescence technique may be helpful for robotic or laparoscopic pylorus-preserving gastrectomy.

• Journal of Gastric Cancer
• /
• 제11권2호
• /
• pp.86-93
• /
• 2011

Purpose: When performing a laparoscopic assisted gastrectomy, a function-preserving gastrectomy is performed depending on the location of the primary gastric cancer. This study examined the incidence of lymph node metastasis by the lymph node station number by tumor location to determine the optimal extent of the lymph node dissection. Materials and Methods: The subjects consisted of 1,510 patients diagnosed with gastric cancer who underwent a gastrectomy between 1996 and 2005. The patients were divided into three groups: upper, middle and lower third, depending on the location of the primary tumor. The lymph node metastasis patterns were analyzed in the total and early gastric cancer patients. Results: In all patients, lymph node station numbers 1, 2, 3, 7, 10 and 11 metastases were dominant in the cancer originating in the upper third, whereas station numbers 4, 5, 6 and 8 were dominant in the lower third. In early gastric cancer patients, the station number of lymph nodes with a metastasis did not show a significant difference in stage pT1a disease. On the other hand, a metastasis in lymph node station number 6 was dominant in stage pT1b disease that originated in the lower third of the stomach. Conclusions: When performing a laparoscopic-assisted gastrectomy for early gastric cancer, a limited lymphadenectomy is considered adequate during a function-preserving gastrectomy in mucosal (T1a) cancer. On the other hand, for submucosal (T1b) cancer, a number 6 node dissection should be performed when performing a pylorus preserving gastrectomy.

• Journal of Gastric Cancer
• /
• 제19권1호
• /
• pp.49-61
• /
• 2019

Purpose: The perigastric vagus nerve may play an important role in preserving function after gastrectomy, and intraoperative neurophysiologic tests might represent a feasible method of evaluating the vagus nerve. The purpose of this study is to assess the feasibility of neurophysiologic evaluations of the function and viability of perigastric vagus nerve branches during gastrectomy. Materials and Methods: Thirteen patients (1 open total gastrectomy, 1 laparoscopic total gastrectomy, and 11 laparoscopic distal gastrectomy) were prospectively enrolled. The hepatic and celiac branches of the vagus nerve were exposed, and grabbing type stimulation electrodes were applied as follows: 10-30 mA intensity, 4 trains, $1,000{\mu}s/train$, and $5{\times}$frequency. Visible myocontractile movement and electrical signals were monitored via needle probes before and after gastrectomy. Gastrointestinal symptoms were evaluated preoperatively and postoperatively at 3 weeks and 3 months, respectively. Results: Responses were observed after stimulating the celiac branch in 10, 9, 10, and 6 patients in the antrum, pylorus, duodenum, and proximal jejunum, respectively. Ten patients responded to hepatic branch stimulation at the duodenum. After vagus-preserving distal gastrectomy, 2 patients lost responses to the celiac branch at the duodenum and jejunum (1 each), and 1 patient lost response to the hepatic branch at the duodenum. Significant procedure-related complications and meaningful postoperative diarrhea were not observed. Conclusions: Intraoperative neurophysiologic testing seems to be a feasible methodology for monitoring the perigastric vagus nerves. Innervation of the duodenum via the celiac branch and postoperative preservation of the function of the vagus nerves were confirmed in most patients.