Journal of Minimally Invasive Surgery

The Korean Society of Endoscopic & Laparoscopic Surgeons (대한내시경복강경외과학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Function-Preserving Surgery in Gastric Cancer

  • Bueno, Jan Andrew D. (Department of Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine) ;
  • Park, Young-Suk (Department of Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine) ;
  • Ahn, Sang-Hoon (Department of Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine) ;
  • Park, Do Joong (Department of Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine) ;
  • Kim, Hyung-Ho (Department of Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine)
  • Received : 2018.07.06
  • Accepted : 2018.09.12
  • Published : 2018.12.15
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The rising incidence of early gastric cancer has enabled the development of function-preserving gastrectomy with the focus on post gastrectomy quality of life and adherence to sound oncologic principles. It is concurrent with the growing popularity of minimally invasive surgery; and both are commonly used together. The different kinds of function-preserving gastrectomy included in this review are: pylorus-preserving and proximal gastrectomy, vagus nerve preservation, sentinel node navigation, and various endoscopic & minimally-invasive techniques. In this article the indications, techniques, oncologic safety, functional benefit, and outcomes of each kind of function-preserving gastrectomy are discussed.

Keywords

References

  1. Information Committee of Korean Gastric Cancer Association. Korean Gastric Cancer Association Nationwide Survey on Gastric Cancer in 2014. J Gastric Cancer 2016;16:131-140. https://doi.org/10.5230/jgc.2016.16.3.131
  2. Nunobe S, Hiki N. Function-preserving surgery for gastric cancre: current status and future perspectives. Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol 2017;2:77. https://doi.org/10.21037/tgh.2017.09.07
  3. Japanese Gastric Cancer Association. Japanese gastric cancer treatment guidelines 2014 (ver. 4). Gastric Cancer 2017;20:1-1.9
  4. Shibata C, Saijo F, Kakyo M, et al. Current status of pyloruspreserving gastrectomy for the treatment of gastric cancer: a questionnaire survey and review of literatures. World J Surg 2012;36:858-863. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-012-1491-6
  5. Oh SY, Lee HJ, Yang HK. Pylorus-Preserving Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer. J Gastric Cancer 2016;16:63-71. https://doi.org/10.5230/jgc.2016.16.2.63
  6. Nakajima T, Yamaguchi T. Gastric Cancer Data Base in Cancer Institute, Japan; 1946-2004. Tokyo: Kanehara & Co, Ltd; 2006.
  7. Fujita J, Takahashi M, Urushihara T, et al. Assessment of postoperative quality of life following pylorus-preserving gastrectomy and Billroth-I distal gastrectomy in gastric cancer patients: results of the nationwide postgastrectomy syndrome assessment study. Gastric Cancer 2016;19:302-311. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10120-015-0460-9
  8. Xiao XM, Gaol C, Yin W, Yu WH, Qi F, Liu T. Pylorus-Preserving versus Distal Subtotal Gastrectomy for Surgical Treatment of Early Gastric Cancer: A Meta-Analysis. Hepatogastroenterology 2014;61:870-879.
  9. Hiki N, Nunobe S, Kubota T, Jiang X. Function-preserving gastrectomy for early gastric cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 2013;20:2683-2692. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-013-2931-8
  10. Nakane Y, Michiura T, Inoue K, Sato M, Nakai K, Yamamichi K. Length of the antral segment in pylorus-preserving gastrectomy. Br J Surg 2002;89:220-224.
  11. Hiki N, Sano T, Fukunaga T, Ohyama S, Tokunaga M, Yamaguchi T. Survival benefit of pylorus-preserving gastrectomy in early gastric cancer. J Am Coll Surg 2009;209:297-301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2009.05.027
  12. Suh YS, Han DS, Kong SH, et al. Laparoscopy-assisted pyloruspreserving gastrectomy is better than laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy for middle-third early gastric cancer. Ann Surg 2014;259:485-493. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0b013e318294d142
  13. Nunobe S, Hiki N, Fukunaga T, et al. Laparoscopy-assisted pylorus-preserving gastrectomy: preservation of vagus nerve and infrapyloric blood flow induces less stasis. World J Surg 2007;31:2335-2340. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-007-9262-5
  14. Kumagai K, Hiki N, Nunobe S, et al. Totally laparoscopic pylosrupreserving gastrectomy for early gastric cancer in the middle stomach: technical report and surgical outcomes. Gastric Cancer 2015;18:183-187. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10120-014-0337-3
  15. Kim HI, Han SU, Yang HK, et al. Multicenter Prospective Comparative Study of Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Gastrectomy for Gastric Adenocarcinoma. Ann Surg 2016;263:103-109. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000001249
  16. Han DS, Suh YS, Ahn HS, et al. Comparison of Surgical Outcom es of Robot-Assisted and Laparoscopy-Assisted Pylorus-Preserving Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis. Ann Surg Oncol 2015;22:2323-2328. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-014-4204-6
  17. Jung DH, Ahn SH, Park DJ, Kim HH. Proximal Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer. J Gastric Cancer 2015;15:77-86. https://doi.org/10.5230/jgc.2015.15.2.77
  18. An JY, Youn HG, Choi MG, Noh JH, Sohn TS, Kim S. The difficult choice between total and proximal gastrectomy in proximal early gastric cancer. Am J Surg 2008;196:587-591. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2007.09.040
  19. Wen L, Chen XZ, Wu B, et al. Total vs. proximal gastrectomy for proximal gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hepatogastroenterology 2012;59:633-640.
  20. Kosuga T, Ichikawa D, Komatsu S, et al. Feasibility and Nutritional Benefits of Laparoscopic Proximal Gastrectomy for Early Gastric Cancer in the Upper Stomach. Ann Surg Oncol 2015;22 Suppl 3:S929-935. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-015-4590-4
  21. Son MW, Kim YJ, Jeong GA, Cho GS, Lee MS. Long-Term Outcomes of Proximal Gastrectomy versus Total Gastrectomy for Upper-Third Gastric Cancer. J Gastric Cancer 2014;14:246-251. https://doi.org/10.5230/jgc.2014.14.4.246
  22. Yoo CH, Sohn BH, Han WK, Pae WK. Proximal gastrectomy reconstructed by jejunal pouch interposition for upper third gastric cancer: prospective randomized study. World J Surg 2005;29:1592-1599. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-005-7793-1
  23. Takiguchi N, Takahashi M, Ikeda M, et al. Long-term qualityof-life comparison of total gastrectomy and proximal gastrectomy by postgastrectomy syndrome assessment scale (PGSAS-45): a nationwide multi-institutional study. Gastric Cancer 2015;18:407-416. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10120-014-0377-8
  24. Kong SH, Kim JW, Lee HJ, Kim WH, Lee KU, Yang HK. Rever se double-stapling end-to-end esophagogastrostomy in proximal gastrectomy. Dig Surg 2010;27:170-174. https://doi.org/10.1159/000264658
  25. Kitamura K, Yamaguchi T, Nishida S, et al. The operative indications for proximal gastrectomy in patients with gastric cancer in the upper third of the stomach. Surg Today 1997;27:993-998. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02385777
  26. Pu YW, Gong W, Wu YY, Chen Q, He TF, Xing CG. Proximal gastrectomy versus total gastrectomy for proximal gastric carcinoma. A meta-analysis on postoperative complications, 5-year survival, and recurrence rate. Saudi Med J 2013;34:1223-1228.
  27. Tokunaga M, Ohyama S, Hiki N, et al. Endoscopic evaluation of reflux esophagitis after proximal gastrectomy: comparison between esophagogastric anastomosis and jejunal interposition. World J Surg 2008;32:1473-1477. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-007-9459-7
  28. Katsoulis IE, Robotis JF, Kouraklis G, Yannopoulos PA. What is the difference between proximal and total gastrectomy regarding postoperative bile reflux into the oesophagus? Dig Surg 2006;23:325-330. https://doi.org/10.1159/000097948
  29. Zhao P, Xiao SM, Tang LC, Ding Z, Zhou X, Chen XD. Proximal gastrectomy with jejunal interposition and TGRY anastomosis for proximal gastric cancer. World J Gastroenterol 2014;20:8268-8273. https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v20.i25.8268
  30. Katai H, Morita S, Saka M, Taniguchi H, Fukagawa T. Long-term outcome after proximal gastrectomy with jejunal interposition for suspected early cancer in the upper third of the stomach. Br J Surg 2010;97:558-562. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.6944
  31. Nakamura M, Nakamori M, Ojima T, et al. Reconstruction after proximal gastrectomy for early gastric cancer in the upper third of the stomach: an analysis of our 13-year experience. Surgery 2014;156:57-63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2014.02.015
  32. Kinoshita T, Gotohda N, Kato Y, Takahashi S, Konishi M, Kinoshita T. Laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy with jejunal interposition for gastric cancer in the proximal third of the stomach: a retrospective comparison with open surgery. Surg Endosc 2013;27:146-153. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-012-2401-6
  33. Ahn SH, Jung DH, Son SY, Lee CM, Park DJ, Kim HH. Laparoscopic double-tract proximal gastrectomy for proximal early gastric cancer. Gastric Cancer 2014;17:562-570. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10120-013-0303-5
  34. Lee CM, Park DW, Jung DH, et al. Single-Port Laparoscopic Proximal Gastrectomy with Double Tract Reconstruction for Early Gastric Cancer: Report of a Case. J Gastric Cancer 2016;16:200-206. https://doi.org/10.5230/jgc.2016.16.3.200
  35. Ando S, Tsuji H. Surgical technique of vagus nerve-preserving gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy for gastric cancer. ANZ J Surg 2008;78:172-176. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1445-2197.2007.04396.x
  36. Kojima K, Yamada H, Inokuchi M, Kawano T, Sugihara K. Functional evaluation after vagus-nerve-sparing laparoscopically assisted distal gastrectomy. Surg Endosc 2008;22:2003-2008. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-008-0016-8
  37. Kim SM, Cho J, Kang D, et al. A Randomized Controlled Trial of Vagus Nerve-preserving Distal Gastrectomy Versus Conventional Distal Gastrectomy for Postoperative Quality of Life in Early tSage Gastric Cancer Patients. Ann Surg 2016;263:1079-1084. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000001565
  38. Park JY, Kim YW, Ryu KW, et al. Assessment of laparoscopic stomach preserving surgery with sentinel basin dissection versus standard gastrectomy with lymphadenectomy in early gastric cancer-A multicenter randomized phase III clinical trial (SENORITA trial) protocol. BMC Cancer 2016;16:340. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-016-2336-8
  39. Valsecchi ME, Silbermins D, de Rosa N, Wong SL, Lyman GH. Lymphatic mapping and sentinel lymph node biopsy in patients with melanoma: a meta-analysis. J Clin Oncol 2011;29:1479-1487. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2010.33.1884
  40. Veronesi U, Paganelli G, Viale G, et al. A randomized comparison of sentinel-node biopsy with routine axillary dissection in breast cancer. N Engl J Med 2003;349:546-553. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa012782
  41. Mansel RE, Fallowfield L, Kissin M, et al. Randomized multicenter trial of sentinel node biopsy versus standard axillary treatment in operable breast cancer: the ALMANAC Trial. J Natl Cancer Inst 2006;98:599-609. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djj158
  42. Symeonidis D, Koukoulis G, Tepetes K. Sentinel node navigation surgery in gastric cancer: Current status. World J Gastrointest Surg 2014;6:88-93.
  43. Arigami T, Uenosono Y, Yanagita S, et al. Clinical application and outcomes of sentinel node navigation surgery in patients with aerly gastric cancer. Oncotarget 2017;8:75607-75616.
  44. Park JY, Ryu KW, Eom BW, et al. Proposal of the surgical optios n for primary tumor control during sentinel node navigation surgery based on the discrepancy between preoperative and postoperative early gastric cancer diagnoses. Ann Surg Oncol 2014;21:1123-1129. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-013-3427-2
  45. Kitagawa Y, Takeuchi H, Takagi Y, et al. Sentinel node mapping for gastric cancer: a prospective multicenter trial in Japan. J Clin Oncol 2013;31:3704-3710. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2013.50.3789
  46. Ko WJ, Song GW, Kim WH, Hong SP, Cho JY. Endoscopic resection of early gastric cancer: current status and new approaches. Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol 2016;1:24. https://doi.org/10.21037/tgh.2016.03.22
  47. Facciorusso A, Antonino M, Di Maso M, Muscatiello N. Endoscopic submucosal dissection vs endoscopic mucosal resection for early gastric cancer: A meta-analysis. World J Gastrointest Enodsc 2014;6:555-563. https://doi.org/10.4253/wjge.v6.i11.555
  48. Hahn KY, Park CH, Lee YK, et al. Comparative study between endoscopic submucosal dissection and surgery in patients with early gastric cancer. Surg Endosc 2018;32:73-86. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-017-5640-8
  49. Goto O, Takeuchi H, Kitagawa Y, Yahagi N. Hybrid surgery for early gastric cancer. Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol 2016;1:26. https://doi.org/10.21037/tgh.2016.03.23
  50. Abe N, Mori T, Takeuchi H, et al. Successful treatment of early stage gastric cancer by laparoscopy-assisted endoscopic fullthickness resection with lymphadenectomy. Gastrointest Endosc 2008;68:1220-1224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2008.02.077

Cited by

  1. Surgical Management of Gastric Cancer: A Systematic Review vol.10, pp.12, 2018, https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10122557