• Journal of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture International Edition
• /
• 제1호
• /
• pp.167-175
• /
• 2001

After World War II, Japan experienced a great political and social shift, which brought a concern of emerging public landscape in urban development. This paper analyses the management of the aesthetic intentions in urban design effort. We reviewed the development of various public installation of artworks concerning urban landscape aesthetics through its administrative process in chronological order. The monuments during the first decade marked a shift in emphasis from the militarism of the pre-war and wartime period to one of peace. However, some of the monuments and sculptures are not immune to controversy. This became an issue that could no be ignored by public officials whose responsibility was to place the sculptures while maintaining sensitivity to public opinion. As public administrators began to consider the possibility that sculptures may contribute to improving public amenities, the contextual concepts were basically ignored. Some of the programs in 1970s began to show more respect to the context, while other programs in this period expressed more interest in educational aspects of sculptures in the public spaces. Urban development projects also seek to introduce artworks integrated to their urban design concepts in 1990s. Generally, the administrators responsible for these programs were rarely trained in any relative field study other than public administration. Installing sculptures tended to be considered as part of public works projects on the level of urban planning and construction. The general public is basically removed from participating in the critical decisions that actually impact their lives in relation to the artworks. In conclusion, public art in japan has unique social and historic background both in its advantages and disadvantages. Issues pertaining to art in public spaces have evolved over the decades as the term "sculpture pollution" began to appear by the mid 1990s. most of the problems originated in either the lack of monumentality, contextual consideration, quality, or public participation. From another point of view, these programs played great roll in the development of modern Japanese sculpture and patronizing process, and the creation of new urban landscape with aesthetic value. In this sense, they must be considered as successful and noteworthy examples of cultural administration and urban design policy.

• 한국실내디자인학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국실내디자인학회 2008년도 춘계학술발표대회 논문집
• /
• pp.74-77
• /
• 2008

In the relationship between exhibition space and art work in art museum, the Pluralism on the late of the 20th century made the new form of exhibition space to be appeared on the stage. Even if formal exhibition space that emphasized itself as a non-spatial background is currently being continued, the informal form of exhibition space is coming to the new art museums, especially after 1990's. This study is to understand how the advent of new designed the informal form of exhibition space in the Glytothek museum(the formal form of exhibition space) design a new paradigm In the relation between the exhibition space and art work in conjunction with public's perception. To do this, it is made clear that the Glytothek museum(the formal form of exhibition space) simply has played a role of non-spatial background. In other hands, the new designed informal form of exhibition space that is mainly presented after 1990's begins to Interrupt the public's perception of art work, changing it's meaning through a spatiality.

• 한국콘텐츠학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국콘텐츠학회 2007년도 추계 종합학술대회 논문집
• /
• pp.885-888
• /
• 2007

도시의 발전에 따라 상징적인 건축물 및 대형 광장, 차 없는 거리 등이 도시의 중요한 특징으로 부각되고 있으며 이와 함께 공공 예술에 대한 중요성이 부각되고 있다. 도시의 공공 공간을 중심으로 인터랙티브 미디어 아트 활동을 하는 9명의 세계적인 작가 또는 그룹을 선정하고, 이들의 대표적인 작품을 대상으로 흥미유발. 인터랙션, 장소의존성, 심미성, 상업성, 매체, 장비의 7개 항목을 기준으로 현대 공공 공간의 인터랙티브 미디어 아트의 특징을 분석하도록 한다.

• 미술이론과 현장
• /
• 제13호
• /
• pp.133-156
• /
• 2012

This paper briefly charts the history of excrement as part of the late 20th-century art and explores ways in which excrement functions in the realms of 'High' art. From Piero Manzoni's to David Hammons' performance , excrement has taken a small yet distinctively important part in the development of contemporary art. In an attempt to challenge the hegemony of 'high' art, on the one hand, and resist the commercialization and fetishization of art, on the other, Manzoni allegedly offered his own "shit" preserved in a tin can and sold it at the price of gold of the same weight. Andy Warhol took the legendary Abstract-Expressionist painter Jackson Pollock as the object of parody, simulating Pollock's dripping action by pissing onto the canvas that had been primed with copper-based paint. Warhol's urination produced splashes and stains of iridescent colors just as the patterns on ordinary abstract paintings. In contrast to Pollock's masculine action, Warhol's pissing alludes to the artist's homosexuality. Excrements in art also provoked controversies, debates, and even acts of vandalism against the artworks. The works of Andres Serrano and Chris Ofili infuriated many Christians for the blasphemous use of excrement with religious icons. Politicians engaged in the heated debates on the use of public and national funds in support of some of the 'politically incorrect' contemporary art. In the midst of media sensation and criticisms, these works challenged the conventional understanding of artistic beauty. The preexisting artworks were also targeted. African-american artist Hammons assumed the role of spectator in by urinating on Richard Serra's sculpture in the street of New York City. It was an act condemnation levelled at the racist pattern of the way in which large portions of funds and commisions of "public" art tended to promote established 'white' artists, whose work or creative process often failed to reflect the actual public. The use of excrement in art is not unusual in contemporary art practices. With its subversive power, excrement plays an important critical roles in the shaping of contemporary art.

• 한국정보통신학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국해양정보통신학회 2009년도 추계학술대회
• /
• pp.629-632
• /
• 2009

공학적인 관점에서 Interactive Art와 디자인은 하나의 지능형 시스템으로 해석할 수 있다. 인간과 제작물 간의 원활한 소통, 즉 인터랙티브 반응을 주고받기 위해 센서, 카메라 등으로 입력 받은 후 이 정보들을 실시간으로 처리, 분석하여 그 결과를 영상, 그래픽, 음향 등의 다양한 매체로 표현하기 때문이다. 이러한 인터랙티브를 활용한 영상은 다양한 예술 디자인 분야에서 그 영역을 넓혀가며 점차 발전되고 있다. 예술 형태의 Interactive Art에 환경에 대한 정보성을 융합하여 시민들에서 자연스럽게 정보를 접할 수 있도록 하며 주변환경을 느낄 수 있는 시스템으로 연구하고자 한다. 본 연구에서는 Interactive Art가 공간자체에 활기찬 분위기를 조성하며 직접 체험할 수 있는 공공예술로 활용된다. 기존의 정지된 설치의 개념에서 보다 발달된 동적인 형태로 인간과 자연스럽게 조화되어 정보를 습득하게 되는 참여 형태의 경험을 제공할 수 있다. 따라서 공공디자인의 활용에 Interactive Art에 대한 연구의 필요성이 절실하다.

• 미술이론과 현장
• /
• 제10호
• /
• pp.47-61
• /
• 2010

What is Art on the street? Is it a series of artworks or activities performed on the street? In other words, does "art on the street" refer to "Street Art" such as street performance, happening, graffiti, or wall-painting, or does it refer to "Street Furniture" which is related to "City Design" or "Environmental Design"? In a formal sense, they all belong to Art on the street. However, in this paper, I would like to use Art on the street in an even broader sense. To me, " the street" is a metaphor of "environment." Thus Art on the street is the art related to environment; it is an environment art. Art on the street attests the expansion of the concept of art and shows a new possibility of contemporary art. It is a promising new concept of art, but we cannot ignore the misapplication of the concept that we can find at the crossroad of Art on the street and "city beautification." Of course, Art on the street can and sometimes needs to beautify the city. However we still need to ask how to contribute to the city beautification with Art on the street and how to validate such a practice. City space is, most of all, a space that people live in. It sounds a cliche, but it is worth repeating to better understand Art on the street. When we consider the city space in terms of its system or organization, we often overlook that it is the space in which people live, and which people create. Art on the street concerns not the city itself, but the space in which people live and make relations for each other. Without taking this into account, Art on the street becomes a mere means to' embellish' the city and falls prey to the logic of capital. In this paper, I critically reviewed the problems such as City Development, Spectacularization, City Environmental Design, Public Interest and City Museum. I intended to emphasize that Art on the street is produced in the cultural space of city, but it also tends to break the mold of the cultural space and seeks a new possibility. Some might argue that my claims are unrealistic because Art on the street is not an idea but a practice. While humbly accepting the objection, I hope my critical suggestions guide a more productive direction to continue our discussions of Art on the street.

• 철학연구
• /
• 제142권
• /
• pp.295-321
• /
• 2017

이 논문은 헤겔 비판본 전집 16권에 실린 변심자들에 대하여(${\ddot{U}}ber$ die Bekehrten) 란 기고문을 중심으로 헤겔이 보여주는 예술비평의 개념을 논의한다. 헤겔은 예술의 체계를 구성한 이론가이기도 하지만 또한 대중적 예술 실천에 적극적으로 참여한 예술 비평가이기도 하다. 지금까지 헤겔은 대개 예술의 체계를 구성한 이론가로만 해석되었다. 많은 해석에 따르면 헤겔은 자신의 이론을 무리하게 작품 해석에 뒤집어 씌었다는 비판을 받고 있다. 하지만 우리는 이 기고문 속에서 예술 비평가인 헤겔의 다른 모습을 보게 된다. 먼저 기고문에서 예술 비평가로서 헤겔은 낭만주의자들이 어떻게 무리하게 이론을 중시하면서 작품을 왜곡하는지를 보여준다. 헤겔은 1826년 초에 쓴 기고문에서 낭만주의적 반어 이론이 라우파흐의 "변심자들" 작품 이해에 전혀 도움이 되지 않는다고 주장한다. 반어 이론은 인물과 행위의 모순을 작품의 핵심적 가치로 해석하는 반면, 헤겔은 이 작품 속에 희극적인 것이 놓여 있다고 해석하는데, 여기서 희극적인 것이란 성격의 비본질적인 측면들이 지양되는 과정을 통해 성격의 통일성이 표현되는 것이다. 또한 기고문에서 헤겔은 반어 이론이 전문가를 위한 예술작품만을 대변할 뿐이며, 이는 예술작품의 객관성의 측면을 훼손한다고 해석하면서 '대중을 위한 예술작품'을 대변한다. 두 번째로 헤겔은 자신의 이러한 비평의 성과를 자신의 미학강의에 적용하기 시작한다. 1826년 이후부터 헤겔은 미학강의에서 집중적으로 두 개념, 즉 낭만주의적 반어와 '대중을 위한 예술작품'을 논의했다. 따라서 위 기고문은 1826년 이후의 헤겔의 반어이론 비판과 대중을 위한 예술작품 개념 논의를 위한 내용의 기초를 제공하고 있다. 이 점에서 우리는 헤겔이 체계적인 이론을 구성해서 이를 무리하게 작품에 적용하기보다는 오히려 구체적인 예술작품에 대한 비평 실천을 통해 자신의 이론을 보강하고 확장했다고 볼 수 있다.

• 한국실내디자인학회논문집
• /
• 제21권6호
• /
• pp.204-211
• /
• 2012

The purpose of this study is to analyze characteristics and expression methods of contemporary art museums from the perspective of 'Rhizome', which is considered under similar context as 'indeterminacy' that represents the characteristics of contemporary public spaces. Methods of this study are as follows. First, necessity of this study is verified by investigating literature data and preceding studies, and by examining the fact that indeterminate characteristic is a new approach to contemporary public spaces. Second, in order to analyze Rhizomic expression in public spaces, analysis criteria are suggested by extracting components of public spaces and spatial characteristics of R150hizome from the literature. Third, Rhizomic characteristics and expression methods used in contemporary art museums are understood based on such analysis criteria. Fourth, when each spatial characteristic is expressed in art museums, the study found out that two factors among 'program', 'circulation', and 'form' are planned out as a mixture. Therefore, 'cohesion' is expressed as 'program' and 'form' in contemporary public spaces viewed from the perspective of 'Rhizome'. Also, 'diversity' is actively expressed through 'program' and 'circulation', and 'non-hierarchy' through 'form' and 'circulation'. Such methods are positive methods of expressing indeterminate contemporary public spaces. Since this study conducted analysis on characteristics and expression methods of public spaces from Rhizomic perspective of contemporary society, such results are deemed valuable in planning out public spaces that reflect the characteristics of contemporary society.

• 한국경제지리학회지
• /
• 제16권1호
• /
• pp.118-134
• /
• 2013

이 연구는 정부 주도적으로 이루어지는 새장르 공공미술을 관찰하고, 주체 간 관계에 대한 분석한다. 새장르 공공미술은 사회적 쟁점에 대해 민감하고, 민주주의와 공동체를 지지하며, 다양하고 폭넓은 관객의 참여를 지향한다. 사례지역인 서울시 도시갤러리 프로젝트 <황금시장 황금시대> 공공미술사업의 주체는 사업내용과 방향을 지시하는 정부, 이를 수행하는 예술가, 공공미술 과정에 참여하는 주민 등으로 구분된다. 정부는 경쟁력 있고 질서 있는 도시를 만들기 위해 공공미술 작업을 초대한다. 예술가는 공동체적 삶을 강조하며 주민을 계몽해야할 대상으로 파악한다. 반면, 주민들은 정부지원금이 경제적인 도움이 되기를 희망한다. 예술가는 정부의 사업지시를 수용하는 하향식 운영방식을 보이고, 주민은 예술가의 일방적 계몽에 소외되고 소극적 참여를 한다. 새장르 공공미술의 공공성은 다양한 사람들의 담론이 교환되는 장으로서의 사회적 공공성이라기보다는, 공공사업이 가지는 행정적 의미의 공공성만을 담지한다.

• 미술이론과 현장
• /
• 제9호
• /
• pp.7-31
• /
• 2010

In this paper, I examine the development of the second stage of Chicano muralism and compare it with the first stage of the Chicano Mural Movement that was born out of the Civil Rights Movement. I then discuss the different aspects of the first stage in relation to the birth of institutionalized public art and question how Chicano murals influenced public art and, conversely, how mainstream public art transformed some of the attitudes and practices of Chicano muralism. Chicano murals initially functioned as a political mouthpiece for Chicano's human rights and as a tool to recover the Chicano people's cultural pride and legacy. However, the murals gradually developed into public art projects supported by the city or federal governments, who regarded them as an economic way to effectively communicate with the community. In this process of institutionalization, muralists became increasingly concerned with aesthetic quality and began to work more systematically. For example, amateur artists or community participants who produced the earlier murals were transformed into mural experts. Chicano essentialism and the politically volatile themes used previously were phased out and the new murals began to incorporate diverse subjects and people, for example, native culture, Blacks, and women. This phenomenon reflected the changing emphasis on multicultural understanding. This kind of institutionalization did not always draw positive results. Inadequate funds were the primary concern over the actual subject and creation of the mural work. Artists reduced the strong political metaphors and aestheticized the mural forms. However, their work was productive as well: thorough research on wall conditions and painting techniques was conducted and new processes and designs were developed. This paper examines the murals created for the 1984 Los Angeles Olympic Games, Judy Baca's works, and the Balmy Alley Mural Environment project in San Francisco's Mission District. Works by Las Mujeres Muralistas in Mission District, in particular, show case colorful patterns and the Latin American indigenous culture, exploring new interpretations of old icons and design. They challenged the stereotypical depictions of females and presented alternative visual languages that revised the male-centered mural aesthetics and elaborated on the aesthetics of Rasquachismo.