• 한국산학기술학회논문지
• /
• 제17권3호
• /
• pp.298-309
• /
• 2016

최근 민영화에 대한 많은 논란이 있다. 민영화는 효율성과 생산성의 상승을 목적으로 실시된다. 그러나 이에 관한 연구는 부족하다. 따라서 본 연구에서는 DEA와 Malmquist분석을 이용하여 민영화에 따른 효율성과 생산성의 개선 효과를 분석한다. 분석결과, 민영화된 공기업과 공기업간의 효율성 차이는 나타나지 않았다. 그러나 생산성에서는 차이가 존재하는 것으로 나타났다. 따라서 민영화는 생산성의 향상을 불러올 수 있다고 분석 가능하다. 본 연구를 통해 정책경영시사점을 제공할 수 있다.

• 유통과학연구
• /
• 제13권2호
• /
• pp.5-13
• /
• 2015

Purpose - In recent years, concerns over privatization have been growing in some public sectors. Privatization in Britain offers lessons for those who have intended to privatize their industry, and in particular, the port industry. Therefore, it is useful for researchers to examine British port privatization in detail, particularly the implications of UK port privatization. Research design, data, and methodology - After reviewing the historical development of the UK port industry, the important factors determining the success of the British port privatization process were identified. The interpretations could be lessons for some other country to consider port privatization in near future. Results - The key factors in relation to port privatization are first, regulation; second, ownership; and third, utilities and operations, which includes autonomy, efficiency, and competitiveness. In addition, the UK port management system is a pure private port system, which has been successful. Conclusions - In Britain, after deciding to privatize the erstwhile public ports, they were fully privatized, focusing on the aforesaid key factors. This offers important lessons for the privatization of other ports in the world.

• 한국철도학회논문집
• /
• 제11권1호
• /
• pp.81-94
• /
• 2008

각국은 도로혼잡과 지구온난화 등 환경문제 그리고 철도 수송 분담율 감소 등의 문제에 적극적으로 대처하기 위해 여러 가지 노력을 경주하고 있다. 그 가운데 가장 핵심적인 내용은 구조개혁을 통한 철도부문의 경쟁력 향상이다. 구조개혁은 상하분리, 민간위탁, 조직의 통폐합, 민영화 등으로 추진되고 있지만 그 중 시장 메커니즘을 적극적으로 활용하는 방안이 민영화이다. 일본은 1987년에 최초로 사하 일체와 지역별 민영화방식으로 전국을 6개 지역회사와 1개의 화물회사로 분할하여 추진하였다. 한편 영국은 1980년대 중반부터 논의를 시작하여 194년에 철도민영화를 단행하였다. 영국철도는 상하를 분리하고 기능별로 분리, 노선별로 프랜차이즈 하는 방식을 채택하였다. 그간 일본철도는 상하 일체 방식으로 영국은 상하 분리 방식의 민영화로 대별되어 각각의 장단점에 대한 많은 논의가 있었다. 특히 영국의 경우 몇 번의 대형 사고발생 원인을 기능별, 상하 분리의 민영화방식에서 찾는 분석도 있었다. 본 논문에서는 양국의 각기 다른 민영화방식에 초점을 맞추고 추진 배경과 성과 분석을 통하여 보다 합리적인 민영화정책의 추진요소과 시사점을 발견하는 것을 목적으로 하고 있다. 양국철도민영화는 철도투자와 정치적인 영향력, 추진일정 그리고 이를 추진한 그룹의 차이에의해 철도민영화방식에 차이가 생겼고, 이 때문에 양국은 다른 성과를 가져왔다. 성공적인 철도민영화는 철도에 대한 충분한 투자 하에 정치적인 일정보다는 철도발전의 계획에 따라, 그리고 철도관련이해관계자들이 민영화과정에 참여하고, 민영화를 가능케 하는 기술적인 조건 등이 구비될 경우 성공적으로 추진된다는 교훈을 얻을 수 있었다.

• Asia pacific journal of information systems
• /
• 제13권2호
• /
• pp.47-66
• /
• 2003

Economists have advocated that the privatization and market competitiveness improve the firm's productivity and eventually its service quality. However, the previous researches did not provide the empirical results enough to prove that the privatization and competitiveness do improve the service quality. In this paper, we conducted an empirical research to find whether the privatization and competition induces the quality of service. The mobile telecommunication industry was chosen since it went through bringing the privatization and increasing the competition along with a high attention. We found that the privatization and competition itself does not guarantee the quality of mobile telecommunication service. It is the intensity of competition that improves the mobile telecommunication service quality. The service quality depends mainly on the competitor's competence, i.e. the intensity of competition rather than the competition itself. In sum, when we want to improve the service quality as well as the productivity, we had better increase the intensity of competition by allowing many new strong entries.

• 한국철도학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국철도학회 2008년도 추계학술대회 논문집
• /
• pp.1821-1832
• /
• 2008

Presently, the policy base of our government focusing on the privatization of public corporation with the transfer of political power, KORAIL, one of public corporation, also can not be free from there. the policy line of our government to privatize KORAIL following the developed countries' precedent has been advocated repeatedly already since the 1990's. whenever it happened, it was true that government as well as KORAIL researched on the success or failure case of privatization in developed countries, but considering lessened pressure to the public corporation during Nor's administration, I researched on the privatization of overseas' railways to remind you of what is advantage or disadvantage. In this research, treated Japan's case which is considered one of most successful privatization story in several cases. with the result of this research, which is expected to be utilized setting the policy of privatization direction, if KORAIL tried to be privatized once again.

• 한국콘텐츠학회논문지
• /
• 제12권8호
• /
• pp.207-214
• /
• 2012

본 연구는 의료서비스의 질적 향상을 가져옴과 동시에 의료소외지역을 만들 수도 있는 의료민영화에 대해서 찬성과 반대 논리를 살펴보고, 아울러 최근 3년 동안 주요 일간지에 게재된 의료민영화 및 영리병원에 관한 신문 사설을 중심으로 내용분석의 일종인 언어네트워크 분석을 통해 핵심 키워드를 찾아내고, 핵심 키워드 간의 연결 중심성 분석을 통해 논란의 핵심이 무엇인지를 밝혀 보고자 하였다. 결론적으로, 연결중심성 분석 결과 "의료", "병원", "민영화", "의료민영화", "영리병원", "정부"가 가장 중심에 위치하고 있었다. 이는 의료민영화 또는 영리병원에 관한 최근 3년 동안의 주요일간지에 게재된 사설을 중심으로 하였기 때문에, 의료, 병원, 민영화, 의료민영화, 영리병원 등의 키워드가 중심에 위치하고 있는 것은 당연한 결과이다. 다음으로, 중요한 중심 키워드(단어)는 "국민", "건강", "건강보험"이다. 이는 의료민영화를 단순히 의료시장에 대한 개방으로만 보지 않고, 최근 3년 동안의 사설들은 국민의 건강과 건강보험과 관련된 중요한 이슈로 보고 있다는 것을 의미한다고 볼 수 있다. 또한, 그 다음으로 중요한 중심성이 높은 단어로는 "반대"와 "허용"이다. 이를 통해 볼 때, 최근 3년 동안의 사설을 내용 분석해 본 결과, 의료민영화에 반대하는 쪽과 허용하자는 쪽이 팽팽하다는 것을 연결중심성 분석 결과에서도 알 수 있다. 한편, 중심성 분석결과에서 주목할 만한 결과는 "미국", "한미", "FTA" 등의 키워드도 어느 정도 중심성이 나타나고 있다는 것이다. 이는 의료민영화를 미국과의 한미 FTA와 관련하여 사설에서 기술하고 있다는 것을 나타내주는 대목이다.

• 한국데이터정보과학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국데이터정보과학회 2002년도 춘계학술대회
• /
• pp.75-84
• /
• 2002

This paper compares long-run returns of privatization initial public offerings to those of domestic stock markets of respective countries using a sample of 196 privatization initial public offerings from 39 countries. The evidence indicates that the privatization initial public offerings (IPOs) significantly outperform their domestic stock markets. There are substantial differences in the long-run performance of privatization IPOs depending on the return estimation techniques, however. Evidence indicates that the inference based either on conventional t or on skewness-adjusted t statistics may yield misspecified test statistics. The quality of estimation tends to be improved by simply eliminating the outliers from the sample, especially for the buy-and-hold abnormal return technique.

• 전기학회논문지P
• /
• 제65권1호
• /
• pp.31-40
• /
• 2016

The purpose of this study is to dimensionally examine the factors of policy changes by applying the ACMS model to KEPCO's structural reorganization privatization policies and study its implications. As a result of the analysis, among the external variables that affect as a financial source or restriction to advocates, all areas except for the difference in opinion of the people as well as policy decision and effects of other subordinate systems were shown to be in an advantageous condition acting as a financial source to advocates of structural reorganization privatization. On the other hand, advocates affected by the external variables share a certain belief system in which the advocates of privatization share the justification of profitability while the advocates of collectivization share the justification of publicness. In these flows, the announcement of the privatization plan of public enterprises of the committee of planning and budgeting acts as a matter of contact which opens the windows for policy changes, and this window goes through ignition, explosion, and fixation which causes fierce interactions among advocates of both sides. Eventually, in accordance with the contents of excluding electricity(KEPCO) from the list for privatization the window for policy changes has closed and things have changed to a transitional KEPCO privatization policy. Based on this, the first implication is that non-official participants such as the people, social organizations, labor unions, etc. influence policy changes more than they did before. Secondly, in the process of policy changes, there is an order of boundary even in the fierce interactions between each advocate. Thirdly, specific variables can play various roles in complex policy phenomenon. Fourthly, a logical analysis using the ACMS model is possible in Korea as well. Fifthly, as a result of analyzing the change process of the KEPCO structural reorganization privatization policy through the ACMS model, not all matched with the main research results implied by the ACMS model.

• 한국사회복지학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국사회복지학회 2004년도 춘계학술대회 자료집
• /
• pp.457-473
• /
• 2004

This study purports to contribute to existing literatures and debates about the future of Korean public pension system by introducing the cases of pension privatization in eight Latin American countries. Following the Chilean reform in 1981, many Latin American nations to a varying degree replaced their public pension system with private one, and the performance of those private systems started to emerge. Overall, pension privatization does not appear to be the panacea that some of its advocates have argued. While it seems to remedy existing problems, it is creating new ones. As an unprecedented policy experiment, the pension privatization in many Latin American countries implies that there are a number of risks in the path of privatization.

• 이베로아메리카
• /
• 제13권1호
• /
• pp.69-94
• /
• 2011

Chile has been the first country in Latin America which has built a two-tiered health care system by partially privatizing the health insurance sector. Despite the intial decrease of health expenditure, more researches now show that health inequality within the Chilean health sector has been augmented with privatization of its insurance system. To explore such inequality, this article looks into the impact of privatization of health insurance on women's health. The author argues that privatization has intensified medicalization of women's body and, consequently, it worsened women's health in Chile. This article contributes to a more comprehensive understanding of market-oriented health care reform by linking it with medicalization process.