• 기술혁신학회지
• /
• 제4권3호
• /
• pp.255-274
• /
• 2001

This study aims to provide information about the priority setting and budget coordination of government R&D spendings in Korea. Based on the result of "Survey, Analysis and Evaluation of National R&D Programs"in FY 2000. this paper reviews the government R&D expenditures by the concerned variables such as program objectives, sector of performance, character of work and technology fields. It is found that R&D spendings on the areas of industrial development, information technology, and development research are funded pretty high. Also, it turns out that, considering program objectives and character of work, there are some redundancies of R&D programs among government agencies. Policy implications are suggested.

• Journal of Trauma and Injury
• /
• 제33권3호
• /
• pp.181-185
• /
• 2020

Damage control surgery (DCS) is an abbreviated laparotomy procedure that focuses on controlling bleeding to limit the surgical insult. It has become the primary treatment modality for patients with exsanguinating truncal trauma. Herein, we present the case of a 47-year-old woman with liver, kidney, and superior mesenteric vein (SMV) injuries caused by a motor vehicle collision. The patient underwent DCS following resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA). In this case report, we discuss the importance of priority setting in DCS for the treatment of multisystem damage of several abdominal organs, particularly when the patient has incurred a combination of major vascular injuries. We also discuss the implications of damage control of the SMV, perihepatic packing, and right-sided medial visceral rotation. Further understanding of DCS, along with REBOA as a novel resuscitation strategy, can facilitate the conversion of uniformly lethal abdominal injuries into rescuable injuries.

• 보건행정학회지
• /
• 제20권2호
• /
• pp.53-68
• /
• 2010

In health care, the process of resource allocation becomes a controversial process of rationing, as scarce resources are allocated between the numerous health care interventions. Especially for the last few years, decisions to define and expand the benefit package of National Health Insurance have always become the object of fierce criticism. It is partly because we have not reached a collective agreement as to what the most important criteria for spending priorities are. This paper considers the procedures and the principles which could be used to determine rationing in health care, and emphasizes the need to have explicit principles which determine patient access to care and to have an evidence base to inform rationing decisions. Also, the need to set up a public committee is suggested to take rationing decisions on behalf of government and NHS and to present them as evidence-based decisions.

• 대한안전경영과학회지
• /
• 제8권1호
• /
• pp.131-144
• /
• 2006

Quality system management adapted by small and medium enterprises in Kangwon province to enhance the competitiveness was studied. Variance analysis on several questionnaire answers was performed. Motives for acquiring the accreditation, such as product export, adjustment to international trend, enhancement of brand/product recognition, CEO's mind change, and management innovation, have been changed significantly among business types. Mind changes after the accreditations were setting company's first priority on quality, enhanced recognition on compliance of in-house standards and regulations, employee's performance with the recognition of quality. Amongst service problems to maintain the ace reditations were difficulties in maintaining the recognition of the company's finality management, labor increase to maintain the ISO 9000 enforcement team, and financial burden to keep the accreditation. Quality recognition after the accreditations was significantly improved in setting company's first priority on quality, enhanced recognition on compliance of in-house standards and regulations, employee's performance with the recognition of quality.

• 대한안전경영과학회지
• /
• 제17권2호
• /
• pp.207-214
• /
• 2015

The purpose of this paper is an application of AHP(Analytic Hierarchy Process) in the priority setting of promising technology in division of senior friendly product based on the previous studies. In this paper, the decision criteria for evaluating promising technologies in division of senior friendly product are identified and the hierarchical structure of decision making process is developed systematically. Subsequently the values of weights for relative importance among decision criteria are derived using AHP methodology, and the score of importance of promising technology in division of senior friendly product with respect to each criterion is evaluated. Finally the score of each promising technology in division of senior friendly product is quantified in order to prioritize them. We discuss implications of our results with a viewpoint of technology policy in division of senior friendly product.

• 한국경영과학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국경영과학회 2007년도 추계학술대회 및 정기총회
• /
• pp.152-155
• /
• 2007

The object of this research is to evaluate the priority of R&B project alternatives which were already screened by both feasibility and suitability of technological performance. This research is a selection model for R&D project alternatives after setting phase. And it is designed by CHP model which include individual and mutual weights. This model have 5 steps. (1) Setting Technology-Modules derived on the setting phase (2) Presenting the evaluation standards divided with 'M-Field' and 'T-Field' (3) Assessing the evaluation standard and technology modules (4) Obtaining and integrating the individually and mutually effective weights (5) Selecting the technology modules based on the priority of order by CHP. Through these steps, this model can suggest the evaluation way from specific technology levels to project level. And it can be guaranteed to perform the selected module set.

• 한국환경생태학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국환경생태학회 2011년 학술대회 논문집 2호
• /
• pp.113-117
• /
• 2010

• 한국환경독성학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국환경독성학회 2003년도 추계국제학술대회
• /
• pp.146-148
• /
• 2003

• 한국정밀공학회지
• /
• 제20권12호
• /
• pp.5-10
• /
• 2003

• 한국작물학회지
• /
• 제49권6호
• /
• pp.546-551
• /
• 2004

사전에 수행된 델파이 조사의 기초자료를 이용하여 경종작물분야 미래유망기술들을 AHP방법을 사용하여 우선순위를 설정하였다. 8명의 전문가가 응답한 설문조사에서는 평가대항목중 공공성이 0.390으로 가장 중요하게 나타났으며, 그 다음으로는 기술성이 0.388,시장성은 0.223으로 나타났다 각 평가소항목의 세부적 중요도는 기술성 측면에서는 기술실현성, 기술파급성, 기술독창성 순으로, 시장성 측면에서는 시장성장성, 투자수익성, 시장규모성 순으로,공공성 측면에서는 국가전략과의 부합성, 산업파급성. 사회영향성 순으로 중요하게 나타났다. 각 기술군 중 중요도가 가장 높은 기술은 I군의 기술 중에서는 '친환경 저투입, 생산비절감 작물 재배기술이 개발된다'의 기술이 중요도가 0.836으로 가장 높게 나타났다. II군의 기술 중에서는 '생명공학기술을 이용한 작물의 유전자 탐색, 형질전환 및 상업화기술이 개발된다'의 기술이 중요도가 0.772로 가장 높게 나타났다.