• Journal of Preventive Medicine and Public Health
• /
• 제40권5호
• /
• pp.388-396
• /
• 2007

Objectives: The purpose of this study was to examine the relationship between the differences in employment status and self assessed health in Korea. Methods: We analyzed 4 year follow-up data generated by the Korean Labor and Income Panel Study(KLIPS), which was conducted on 1,207 men and 582 women who had undergone a change in employment status. The study subjects were placed into 1 of the following 4 groups based on their employment history; Non-precarious workers, Precarious to non-precarious workers, Non-precarious to precarious workers and Precarious workers. Logistic regression was then used to examine the relationship between the changes in employment status and self assessed health. Results: When males were considered, self assessed health was better among the precarious to non-precarious workers (OR 1.58, 95% CI=1.57-1.60) and the precarious workers (OR 1.29, 95% CI=1.28-1.30) than in the non-precarious workers, after adjusting for age, socioeconomic status (education level, occupational class, marital status, average equivalent household income and average number of hours worked per week), health behavior (smoking, drinking and exercise) and medical service access (regular medical examination, have chronic disease or hospitalized within 1 year). When female workers were considered, the precarious to non-precarious workers (OR 1.89, 95% CI=1.86-1.92), non-precarious to precarious workers(OR 1.24, 95% CI=1.23-1.26) and precarious workers (OR 1.27, 95% CI=1.25-1.28) all reported poorer health than the non-precarious workers after adjusting for the aforementioned factors. Conclusions: This study showed that changes in employment status were associated with differences in self assessed health among men and women. Specifically, the results of this study showed that a corresponding positive outcome based on self assessed health was greater for employees that changed from precarious to non-precarious jobs and for male employees with precarious jobs., whereas female employees with non-precarious jobs had higher self assessed health. However, additional longitudinal studies on the health effects of employment status should be conducted.

• Safety and Health at Work
• /
• 제14권4호
• /
• pp.476-482
• /
• 2023

Introduction: There is a growing global interest in the issue of precarious employment. We aimed to analyze the characteristics and socio-demographic distribution of precarious employment using a summative score approach. Methods: To operationalize precarious employment, we utilized data from the Korean Working Conditions Survey and focused on three distinct dimensions: employment insecurity, income inadequacy, and a lack of rights and protections. By constructing a summative scale ranging from -16 to 2, with lower scores indicating higher precariousness, we measured employment precariousness among Korean wage workers. To compare employment precariousness according to survey participant characteristics, we employed the Wilcoxon Rank Sum Test. Results: We analyzed a weighted number of 38,432 workers. The overall sample showed a median (Q1, Q3) summative scale score of -3 (-6, -1). The median summative score was lower for women compared to men (men: -2; women: -5; p < 0.001), as well as for young or older workers compared to middle-aged workers (young: -4; middle-aged: -2; older: -5; p < 0.001). Similarly, workers with lower educational levels (middle school or below: -8; high school: -5; college or above: -2; p < 0.001) and non-white collar workers (blue collar: -5; service/sales worker: -6; white collar: -2; p < 0.001) experienced higher levels of employment precariousness. Conclusion: Our findings indicate that certain vulnerable groups, such as women, young or older adults, workers with low educational attainment, and caregiving or low-skilled elementary workers, are disproportionately exposed to high employment precariousness. Active policy interventions are needed to improve the employment quality of vulnerable groups.

• Safety and Health at Work
• /
• 제12권1호
• /
• pp.108-113
• /
• 2021

Background: This study aimed to investigate the relationship between changes in employment status and new-onset depressive symptoms through a one-year follow-up of permanent waged workers. Methods: We analyzed the open-source data from the Korea Welfare Panel Study. Using the 2017 data, we selected 2,314 permanent waged workers aged 19 to 59 years without depressive symptoms as a base group. The final analysis targeted 2,073 workers who were followed up in 2018. In 2018, there were five categories of employment status for workers who were followed up: permanent, precarious, unemployed, self-employed, and economically inactive. Multiple logistic regression was used to determine the association between employment status change and new-onset depressive symptoms. Results: Adjusted multiple logistic regression analysis showed that among male workers, workers who went from permanent status to being unemployed (odds ratio: 4.50, 95% confidence interval: 1.19 to 17.06) and from permanent status to being precarious workers (odds ratio: 3.15, 95% confidence interval: 1.30 to 7.65) had significantly high levels of new-onset depressive symptoms compared with those who retained their permanent employment status. There were no significant increases in new-onset depressive symptoms of male workers who went from permanent status to being self-employed or economically inactive. On the other hand, no significant differences were found among female workers. Conclusion: Our study suggests that the change of employment status to precarious workers or unemployment can cause new-onset depressive symptoms in male permanent waged workers.

• 한국콘텐츠학회논문지
• /
• 제22권4호
• /
• pp.677-688
• /
• 2022

불안정 고용은 우울 등의 정신건강에 부정적인 영향을 미치는 것으로 잘 알려져 있다. 본 연구는 불안정 고용의 임시성, 낮은 권한, 취약성, 권리 행사의 어려움, 노동시간의 불확실성, 낮은 임금이라는 여섯 가지 다차원적 특징을 고용 불안정성으로 정의하고, 우울에 미치는 영향을 살펴보았다. 제5차 근로환경조사 자료를 활용하여 임금노동자의 여섯 가지 차원의 고용 불안정성을 측정하고(0~100점), 각 불안정성이 우울에 미치는 영향을 로지스틱 회귀분석을 통해 분석하였다. 남성의 우울 위험은 취약성, 권리 행사의 어려움, 노동시간 불확실성 점수가 1점 증가할 때 각각 3.1%, 1%, 0.5% 증가했다. 여성에서는 임시성, 취약성, 권리 행사의 어려움이 1점 증가할 때 우울 위험이 각각 0.5%, 2.3%, 0.8% 증가했다. 고용 불안정성의 다차원적 개념을 활용해 노동자 우울을 살펴본 연구 결과, 노동자들의 건강은 안정적인 고용 계약은 물론 이들의 실질적인 노동 권리가 보장될 때 실현가능함을 시사한다.

• Journal of Korean Academy of Oral Health
• /
• 제42권4호
• /
• pp.167-174
• /
• 2018

Objectives: The aim of this study was to analyze the accessibility of dental care services among individuals with precarious employment in South Korea. Methods: We used the $9^{th}$ wave of the Korean Health Panel data (2015) and included 7,736 wage and non-wage earners in our study. We determined precariousness in the labor market as a combination of employment relationship and job income, and categorized individuals based on this into the following four groups: Group A comprising those who report job and income security, Group B comprising those who experience job insecurity alone, Group C comprising those who report a stable job but low income, and Group D comprising those who experience both job and income insecurity. Accessibility to dental care services was determined by experience of unmet dental care needs and unmet dental care needs caused primarily by financial burden. Logistic regression analyses were used to assess the effect of precarious work on access to dental care services. Results: Individuals with job insecurity (Group B; OR=1.445; 95% CI=1.22-1.70) and both job and income insecurity (Group D; OR=1.899; 95% CI=1.61-2.24) were more likely to have unmet needs than the comparison group. Both groups B and D were also 2.048 (95% CI=1.57-2.66) times and 4.435 (95% CI =3.46-5.68) times more likely, respectively, to have unmet dental care needs caused by financial burden. Education status, health insurance, and health status were all also effective factors influencing unmet dental care needs. Conclusions: Unstable employment and low income resulted in diminished access to dental care services. Therefore, governments should consider health policy solutions to reduce barriers preventing individuals with employment and income instability from accessing adequate dental care.

• 한국사회정책
• /
• 제24권2호
• /
• pp.1-29
• /
• 2017

본 연구는 젠더와 직업계층의 관점에서 한국과 일본의 불안정 노동시장을 비교분석한다. 기존의 연구들이 불안정 노동을 비정규직 등 고용형태 차원에 국한하여 분석하였다면 본 연구는 고용과 소득의 조합 관점에서 불안정 노동을 재개념화하여 분석하였다. 그리고 노동시장의 불안정성 연구에서 강조되어왔던 여성의 불안정성 뿐 아니라, 직업계층의 관점에서 한국과 일본이 불안정 노동의 특성에 차이가 있는지를 분석하였다. 한국 노동시장의 불안정성을 분석하기 위해 한국노동패널조사 17차(2014년)와 일본의 게이오 가계패널조사의 9차(2012년)자료를 사용하였다. 분석결과 한일 양국 모두에서 노동시장 불안정성의 여성화와 직업계층별 분할을 확인할 수 있었다. 또한 서열로짓회귀분석 결과 여성일수록, 60대 이상일수록, 저숙련 서비스 노동자 또는 생산직 노동자일수록 한국과 일본 모두에서 노동시장 불안정성에 직면할 가능성이 높음을 확인하였다.

• 보건의료산업학회지
• /
• 제12권4호
• /
• pp.31-41
• /
• 2018

Objectives: This study was designed to evaluate whether employment status is associated with the experience of unmet care needs. Methods: This study utilized the Korea Health Panel data from 2012 to 2016. A total of 4,083 workers were selected as baseline subjects in 2012 and were followed for four years. This study used the GLIMMIX procedure under the marginal model while adjusting for covariates. Results: A total of 12.4% of 4,083 people said they had failed at least once to have a treatment or checkup despite the needs. Those more likely to experience unmet care needs were women and people of lower income level, with worse health conditions and chronic disease. Precarious workers, the self-employed, and the unemployed were more likely to experience unmet care needs caused by economic burden than permanent workers (Odds Ratio: 2.14, 2.07, 2.74, respectively). Conclusions: This disparity means that precarious workers and the unemployed are more likely to face barriers in obtaining needed health services. Given their insecure employment status, meeting their needs for health care is an important consideration.

• Safety and Health at Work
• /
• 제13권1호
• /
• pp.93-98
• /
• 2022

Background: Despite a growing number of investigations exploring the health problems in precarious workers, there is still a paucity of studies investigating workplace violence in workers with multi-party employment arrangements (WMPEAs). This study was aimed at comparing the prevalence of workplace violence between non-WMPEA and WMPEA. Methods: The 5th Korean Working Conditions Survey data were used. The study subjects were employees aged 20-74, with 26,239 non-WMPEA and 1,556 WMPEA. WMPEA included temporary agency workers and workers providing outsourced services. Workplace violence including verbal abuse, unwanted sexual attention, threats, and humiliating behaviors were used as outcome variables. The odds ratios of risk of workplace violence were calculated using multiple logistic regression. Results: The age-standardized prevalence of workplace violence was significantly higher among WMPEA. After adjusting for all covariates, the risk of workplace violence among WMPEA was still significant (OR 1.80, 95% CI 1.5-2.2) compared with non-WMPEA. The odds ratio of workplace violence among female WMPEA was 1.99 (95% CI 1.53-2.59), which is higher than that of male WMPEA (OR 1.52, 95% CI 1.18-1.96). Conclusion: We found that WMPEA were exposed to higher risk of workplace violence. Discrimination against WMPEA in the working environment and management policy need to be corrected. It is also necessary to identify the risk factors of workplace violence in WMPEA and to make efforts to prevent violence.

• 한국노년학
• /
• 제37권3호
• /
• pp.727-745
• /
• 2017

본 연구는 중고령층에서 초기노년층의 주관적 건강수준의 변화양상과 그 격차를 결정짓는 요인으로 불안정 고용(precarious employment) 및 고용상태 관련 요인의 영향력을 살펴보고자 하였다. 또한 공적 및 사적 사회적 자본이 중고령기에서 초기노년기에 이르는 주관적 건강상태의 격차를 완화시킬 수 있는지 알아보고자 하였다. 이를 위하여 한국노동패널조사(KLIPS) 6차~17차년도 자료를 사용하였고, 다수준 성장곡선 모형(Multi-level growth curve modeling)을 고정효과(fixed effects) 모형과 확률효과(random effects)모형으로 STATA 13.0을 사용하여 추정하였다. 또한 두 모형을 기반으로 한 가설검정을 위해 하우스만 검정을 수행하였다. 연구결과는 정규직에 비해 일용직이 시간에 따른 주관적 건강상태의 변화를 악화시키는 요인으로 나타났으며, 임금, 고용상태의 질(근로시간), 사적/관계적 사회적 자본이 중고령기에서 초기노년기에 이르는 건강격차를 설명할 수 있는 주요 요인으로 나타났다. 이러한 결과를 기반으로 '확산 가설'과 '누적되는 이익' 가설을 지지하고 있으며, 중고령기에서 초기노년기에 이르는 건강불평등을 완화시킬 수 있는 고용지원 정책 및 사회적 서비스 개발 방향을 제시하고 있다.

• Safety and Health at Work
• /
• 제12권1호
• /
• pp.57-65
• /
• 2021

Background: The objective of this study was to elucidate the relationships musculoskeletal pains with combined vulnerability in terms of age, gender, and employment status Methods: The fifth European Working Conditions Survey (EWCS) in 2010 (43,816 participants aged 15 years and over) analyzed for European employees and the third Korean Working Conditions Survey (KWCS) in 2011 (50,032 participants aged 15 years and older) analyzed for Korean employees. In this study, three well known vulnerable factors to musculoskeletal pains (older age, female gender, and precarious employment status) were combined and defined as combined vulnerability. Associations of musculoskeletal pains with combined vulnerability were assessed with prevalence ratios (PRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) estimated by Poisson regression models with robust estimates of variance. Results: The prevalences of musculoskeletal pains were lower but the absolute and relative differences between combined vulnerabilities were higher among Korean employees compared with the European employees. Furthermore, the increased risk of having musculoskeletal pains according to combined vulnerability was modestly explained by socioeconomic factors and exposure to ergonomic risk factors, especially in Republic of Korea. Conclusions: The results of this study showed that the labor market may be more unfavorable for female and elderly workers in Republic of Korea. Any prevention strategies to ward off musculoskeletal pains, therefore, should be found and implemented to mitigate or buffer against the most vulnerable work population, older, female, and precarious employment status, in Republic of Korea.