• 한국해양학회지:바다
• /
• 제17권3호
• /
• pp.149-159
• /
• 2012

서해안 연안역과 하구역의 유영생물의 종조성 변동을 파악하고, 두 해역간의 생산성을 비교하기 위해서 2010년 3월~12월의 대조기에 하구역인 강화도과 연안역인 장봉도에서 주목망으로 24시간 동안 어획된 유영생물을 수집하였다. 유영생물의 군집구조는 해역별, 월별, 분류군별 양적 차이를 보였으며, 유영생물의 종다양도는 연안역보다 하구역에서 낮았으나, 생산력은 하구역에서 더 높았다. 강화도 주변 하구역에서는 싱어, 가숭어, 황강달이가 연안역에서 보다 많은 양이 빈번히 출현하여 기수종이 우세하였고, 연안역인 장봉도 주변 해역에서는 해양종으로 분류할 수 있는 청멸, 밴댕이, 꽃게가 하구역에서 보다 많은 양이 자주 출현함으로써 유영생물이 서식처에 따라 공간적 분포를 달리함을 확인할 수 있었다. 그라비새우, 밀새우, 풀망둑 등은 연안역과 하구역에서 양적으로나 출현 횟수가 비슷하여 하구와 연안을 왕래하는 종으로 판단된다. 하구 생태계의 건강성을 과학에 근거하여 평가함은 하구의 효율적인 관리를 위해서 정책의 우선순위를 결정하고 관리방향을 설정하는데 유용하게 활용될 것이다.

• 수산해양기술연구
• /
• 제48권4호
• /
• pp.452-468
• /
• 2012

한강 하구 해역에서 2010년 4월부터 2011년 11월까지 총 9회에 걸쳐 출현한 생물은 5 분류군 61과 126종이었다. 갑각류는 18과 34종, 두족류는 3과 5종, 어류는 35과 79종으로 분류되었으며, 그 외 종단위로 분류되지 않은 자포동물류인 해파리류와 포유류에 속하는 상괭이가 출현하였다. 한강 하구 해역의 출현종의 대부분은 어류와 갑각류로 구성되었다. 연구기간동안 주된 우점 종은 그라비새우, 꽃게, 밀새우, 갯가재 등이었으며, 어류로는 웅어와 싱어이었다. 우점한 6종에 대한 체장조성 및 평균체장을 살펴보면, 하나 이상의 체장모드를 가지는 것으로 나타났다. 하나 이상의 모드를 가지는 것은 한강 해역에 출현하는 종들이 일정시기 또는 일생동안 한강 하구 해역에서 서식하며, 산란장 또는 성육장으로 이용하고 있다는 것을 반영한다. 한강 하구 해역중 강과 가장 가까운 정점인 더리미에서는 민물어류가 출현하였으며, 홍수 등 담수의 대량 방류 시기와 조사 시기가 일치하는 경우에 민물어류가 하구 해역에서 채집되는 것으로 생각된다. 연도별 정점별 종조성을 이용하여 주성분분석을 실시하였다. 그 결과 종조성은 조사시기별 정점별 차이를 나타내었다.

• Journal of Ecology and Environment
• /
• 제45권4호
• /
• pp.203-217
• /
• 2021

Background: Sea turtles, which are globally endangered species, have been stranded and found as bycatch on the Korean shore recently. More studies on sea turtles in Korea are necessary to aid their conservation. To investigate the spatio-temporal occurrence patterns of sea turtles on the Korean shore, we recorded sampling locations and dates, identified species and sexes and measured sizes (maximum curved carapace length; CCL) of collected sea turtles from the year 2014 to 2020. For an analysis of diets through stomach contents, we identified the morphology of the remaining food and extracted DNA, followed by amplification, cloning, and sequencing. Results: A total of 62 stranded or bycaught sea turtle samples were collected from the Korean shores during the study period. There were 36 loggerhead turtles, which were the dominant species, followed by 19 green turtles, three hawksbill turtles, two olive ridley turtles, and two leatherback turtles. The highest numbers were collected in the year 2017 and during summer among the seasons. In terms of locations, most sea turtles were collected from the East Sea, especially from Pohang. Comparing the sizes of collected sea turtles according to species, the average CCL of loggerhead turtles was 79.8 cm, of green turtles was 73.5 cm, and of the relatively large leatherback turtle species was 126.2 cm. In most species, the proportion of females was higher than that of males and juveniles, and was more than 70% across all the species. Food remains were morphologically identified from 19 stomachs, mainly at class level. Seaweeds were abundant in stomachs of green turtles, and Bivalvia was the most detected food item in loggerhead turtles. Based on DNA analysis, food items from a total of 26 stomachs were identified to the species or genus level. The gulfweed, Sargassum thunbergii, and the kelp species, Saccharina japonica, were frequently detected from the stomachs of green turtles and the jellyfish, Cyanea nozakii, the swimming crab, Portunus trituberculatus, and kelps had high frequencies of occurrences in loggerhead turtles. Conclusions: Our findings support those of previous studies suggesting that sea turtles are steadily appearing in the Korean sea. In addition, we verified that fish and seaweed, which inhabit the Korean sea, are frequently detected in the stomach of sea turtles. Accordingly, there is a possibility that sea turtles use the Korean sea as feeding grounds and habitats. These results can serve as basic data for the conservation of globally endangered sea turtles.

• 수산해양기술연구
• /
• 제44권4호
• /
• pp.282-293
• /
• 2008

In order to develop the substitutive materials for natural baits of swimming crab pots, the attracting effects of swimming crab such as the preference of baits which were made of the by-products of marine and stock raising through the water tank experiments and fishing experiments. On the investigation of mean entrapped catch number to the pot by the baits after putting the 4 kinds of baits, mackerel(M), mackerel with grinded mackerel s internals($MM_I$), mackerel with tuna s internals$MM_I$) and makerel with grinded krill(MK) each in one pot by turns, $MM_I$ and MK were entrapped mean 3.9(13.0%) and they were a little more comparing to M, and $MT_I$ is least with mean 2.1(7.0%)(F=12.913, P < 0.05). Otherwise, on the preference investigation of swimming crabs by the baits after putting the 4 kinds of baits in the 4 pots each, M was entrapped mean 3.0(10%), but $MM_I$, $MT_I$ and MK were mean 1.2(4.0%), 1.0(3.3%) and 1.5(5.0%) each and they were only 30-50% of M(F=13.398, P < 0.05). On the preference investigation of swimming crabs by the 5 kinds of baits, mackerel(M), and krill(K), manila clam($M_C$), pig s fat($P_F$) and chicken s head($C_H$) which were used in substitutive baits, M was entrapped mean 3.2(10.7%), but K was about 50% of catch of M with mean 1.6(5.3%), and $M_C$, $P_F$ and $C_H$ were very few with mean 0.1-0.2(0.3-0.7%)(F=89.186, P < 0.05). On the preference investigation of swimming crabs by the pots which were put each the 3 kinds of baits, original krill(K), grinded krill with gluten and soybean oil cake($K_GGS$) and grinded krill with gluten, soybean oil cake and glycine($K_GGSG_L$) in the blue fluorescent hexahedral plastic bait cages(BF), and which were put the mackerel(M) in the non-fluorescent hexahedral red plastic bait cage($RF_N$), it was entrapped mean 3.0(10.0%) in the pot which was put the mackerel in the $RF_N$, and the same level in the pots which were put the K and $K_GGSG_L$ in the BF, but it was mean 2.0(6.7%) in the pots which was put the $K_GGS$ in BF and it was decreased by 30% of catch comparing to $RF_N$(F=3.750, P < 0.05). On the preference investigation of swimming crab by the pots which was put grinded tuna with gluten, soybean oil cake and glycine($T_IGSG_L$) in the blue fluorescent hexahedral plastic bait cage(BF), and which was put mackerel(M) in the nonfluorescent hexahedral red plastic bait cage($RF_N$), it was entrapped mean 3.3(11.0%) in the pot which was put mackerel in $RF_N$, and mean 2.7(9.0%) in the pot which was put $T_IGSG_L$ in BF and it was about 15% less comparing to use bait M(t=1.387, P < 0.05). As a results of fishing experiments, a plan for enhancing catching efficiency of $T_IGSG_L$ will be required because catching efficiency of $T_IGSG_L$, alternative bait, was half of fish catching efficiency of natural bait using mackerel. Fishing experiments were conducted 3 times using reinforced substitutive artificial bait that is reinforced attractive effect of $T_IGSG_L$ and composed of tuna intestine, grinded mackerel, gluten, soybean cake, glycine and alanine($T_IM_GGSG_LA$). Catching efficiency of $T_IM_GGSG_LA$ was about 80% of that of natural bait made of mackerel.