DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Attracting effect of baits used the by-product for swimming crab Portunus trituberculatus pots

부산물을 이용한 꽃게 통발용 미끼의 유인 효과

  • Chang, Ho-Young (Marine Science & Production Major, Kunsan National University) ;
  • Koo, Jae-Geun (Food Science & Biotechnology Major, Kunsan National University) ;
  • Lee, Keun-Woo (Food Science & Biotechnology Major, Kunsan National University) ;
  • Cho, Bong-Kon (Marine Science & Production Major, Kunsan National University) ;
  • Jeong, Byung-Gon (Environmental Engineering Major, Kunsan National University)
  • Published : 2008.11.30

Abstract

In order to develop the substitutive materials for natural baits of swimming crab pots, the attracting effects of swimming crab such as the preference of baits which were made of the by-products of marine and stock raising through the water tank experiments and fishing experiments. On the investigation of mean entrapped catch number to the pot by the baits after putting the 4 kinds of baits, mackerel(M), mackerel with grinded mackerel s internals($MM_I$), mackerel with tuna s internals$MM_I$) and makerel with grinded krill(MK) each in one pot by turns, $MM_I$ and MK were entrapped mean 3.9(13.0%) and they were a little more comparing to M, and $MT_I$ is least with mean 2.1(7.0%)(F=12.913, P < 0.05). Otherwise, on the preference investigation of swimming crabs by the baits after putting the 4 kinds of baits in the 4 pots each, M was entrapped mean 3.0(10%), but $MM_I$, $MT_I$ and MK were mean 1.2(4.0%), 1.0(3.3%) and 1.5(5.0%) each and they were only 30-50% of M(F=13.398, P < 0.05). On the preference investigation of swimming crabs by the 5 kinds of baits, mackerel(M), and krill(K), manila clam($M_C$), pig s fat($P_F$) and chicken s head($C_H$) which were used in substitutive baits, M was entrapped mean 3.2(10.7%), but K was about 50% of catch of M with mean 1.6(5.3%), and $M_C$, $P_F$ and $C_H$ were very few with mean 0.1-0.2(0.3-0.7%)(F=89.186, P < 0.05). On the preference investigation of swimming crabs by the pots which were put each the 3 kinds of baits, original krill(K), grinded krill with gluten and soybean oil cake($K_GGS$) and grinded krill with gluten, soybean oil cake and glycine($K_GGSG_L$) in the blue fluorescent hexahedral plastic bait cages(BF), and which were put the mackerel(M) in the non-fluorescent hexahedral red plastic bait cage($RF_N$), it was entrapped mean 3.0(10.0%) in the pot which was put the mackerel in the $RF_N$, and the same level in the pots which were put the K and $K_GGSG_L$ in the BF, but it was mean 2.0(6.7%) in the pots which was put the $K_GGS$ in BF and it was decreased by 30% of catch comparing to $RF_N$(F=3.750, P < 0.05). On the preference investigation of swimming crab by the pots which was put grinded tuna with gluten, soybean oil cake and glycine($T_IGSG_L$) in the blue fluorescent hexahedral plastic bait cage(BF), and which was put mackerel(M) in the nonfluorescent hexahedral red plastic bait cage($RF_N$), it was entrapped mean 3.3(11.0%) in the pot which was put mackerel in $RF_N$, and mean 2.7(9.0%) in the pot which was put $T_IGSG_L$ in BF and it was about 15% less comparing to use bait M(t=1.387, P < 0.05). As a results of fishing experiments, a plan for enhancing catching efficiency of $T_IGSG_L$ will be required because catching efficiency of $T_IGSG_L$, alternative bait, was half of fish catching efficiency of natural bait using mackerel. Fishing experiments were conducted 3 times using reinforced substitutive artificial bait that is reinforced attractive effect of $T_IGSG_L$ and composed of tuna intestine, grinded mackerel, gluten, soybean cake, glycine and alanine($T_IM_GGSG_LA$). Catching efficiency of $T_IM_GGSG_LA$ was about 80% of that of natural bait made of mackerel.

Keywords

References

  1. An, Y.I., and T. Arimoto, 2007. Development of artificial bait for octopus drift line. Jour. Kor. Soc. Fish. Tech., 43(4), 291-300 https://doi.org/10.3796/KSFT.2007.43.4.291
  2. Archdale, M.V., C.P. Anasco and Y. Tahara, 2008. Catch of swimming crabs using fish mince in teabags compared to conventional fish baits in collapsible pots. Fish. Res., 91, 291-298 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fishres.2007.12.005
  3. Beukemaj, J.J., 1970. Acquired hook avoidance in the pike Esox lucius L. fished with artificial and natural baits. Jour. Fish Bio., Vol. 2, 155-160 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8649.1970.tb03268.x
  4. Carr, W.E.S. and C.D. Derby, 1986. Chemically stimulated feeding behavior in marine animals. J. Chem. Ecol., 12: 989-1011 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01638992
  5. Carr, W.E.S. and H.W. Thompson, 1983. Adenosine 5-monophoshpate, an internal regulatory agent, is a potent chemoattractant for a marine shrimp. J. Comp. Phsiol., 153, 47-53 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00610341
  6. Chang, H.Y., 2003. Analysis on the present business states of coastal and off-shore fisheries by type of fishery. Jour. Fish. Mar. Sci. Edu., 15(2), 166-175
  7. Chang, H.Y., J.G. Koo, K.W. Lee and B.K. Cho, 2007. Attracting effect of baits used in trap for swimming crab. Jour. Kor. Soc. Fish. Tech., 43(4), 301-309 https://doi.org/10.3796/KSFT.2007.43.4.301
  8. Chang, H.Y., J.G. Koo, K.W. Lee, B.K. Cho and B.G Jeong, 2008. Fluorescent characteristics of baits and bait cages for swimming crab Protunus trituberculatus pots. Jour. Kor. Soc. Fish. Tech., 44(3), 174-183 https://doi.org/10.3796/KSFT.2008.44.3.174
  9. Fuwa, S., M. Ishizaki, A. Tanaka, K. Ebata, T. Miura and T. Abe, 2000. The efficiency of the processed bait for longline made by the leftovers of squid. Nippon Suisan Gakkaishi, 66(5), 888-889 https://doi.org/10.2331/suisan.66.888
  10. Hara, J.J., 1982. Chemoreception in Fishes. (ed. by J.J. Hara). Elsevier Sci. Pub. Co., Amsterdam. pp. 433
  11. Harada, K., 1986. Feeding attraction activities of nucleic acid related compounds for abalone, oriental weather fish and yellowtail. Bull. Japanese Soc. Sci. Fish., 52(11), 1961-1968 https://doi.org/10.2331/suisan.52.1961
  12. Januma, S., 2001. The application of processed bait for pelagic tuna longline made by liver of squid. Nippon Suisan Gakkaishi, 67(2), 313-314 https://doi.org/10.2331/suisan.67.313
  13. Januma, S., K. Miyajima and T. Abe, 2003. Development and comparative of squid liver artificial bait for tuna longline. Fish. Sci., 69, 288-292 https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1444-2906.2003.00619.x
  14. Johnstone, A.D.F. and A.M. Mackie, 1990. Laboratory investigations of bait acceptance by the cod, Gadus morhua L.: investigations of feeding stimulants. Fish. Res., 9, 219-230 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-7836(05)80003-7
  15. Kawamura, G. T. Matsuoka, T. Tajiri, M. Nishida and M. Hayashi, 1995. Effectiveness of a sugarcane-fish combination as bait in trapping swimming crabs. Fish. Res., 22, 155-160 https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-7836(94)00314-M
  16. Kobayashi, H., 1975. A study on the success of a fishery with artificial baits for tuna long lines. Bull. Jap. Soc. Sci. Fish., 41(2), 175-182 https://doi.org/10.2331/suisan.41.175
  17. $L{WPhi}kkeborg$, S., 1991. Fishing experiments with an alternative longline bait using surplus fish products. Fish. Res., 12, 43-56 https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-7836(91)90048-K
  18. Miyazaki, C., S. Yazima, T. Koyama and S. Mitsugi, 1967. Fishing efficiency of feed stuff containing chemical stimulant. Bull. Tokai Reg. Fish. Res.MLab., 49, 99-103
  19. Takaoka. O., K. Takii, M. Nakamura, H. Kumai and M. Takeda, 1990. Identification of feeding stimulants for marbled rockfish. Bull. Japanese. Soc. Sci. Fish., 56(2), 345-351 https://doi.org/10.2331/suisan.56.345
  20. Takeda, M., K. Takii and K. Matsui, 1984. Identification of feeding stimulants for juvenile eel. Bull. Japanese. Soc. Sci. Fish., 50, 645-651 https://doi.org/10.2331/suisan.50.645
  21. Umezu, T., 1966. Behavioral response of fishes to chemical stimuli. Bull. Japanese Soc. Sci. Fish., 32(3), 352-376 https://doi.org/10.2331/suisan.32.352
  22. Watanabe, T. and N. Honda, 2005. Trap catch of the red queen crab Chionoecetes japonicus when using conspecific crabs as trap bait. Nippon Suisan Gakkaishi, 71(4), 549-554 https://doi.org/10.2331/suisan.71.549
  23. Yamaguchi, Y., T. Nonoda, H. Kobayashi, K. Izawa, T. Jinno, I. Ishikura, M. Uchida and M. Tonogai, 1983. Effectiveness of artificial baits for obtaining higher hooking rate on bottom set long-line fishing. Bull. Jap. Soc. Sci. Fish., 49(12), 1819-1824 https://doi.org/10.2331/suisan.49.1819
  24. Youm, M., 1998. The improved artificial trap baits, Bull. Kor. Soc. Fish. Tech., 34(2), 185-190
  25. Zimmer Faust, Richard K., 1989. The relationship between chemoreception and foraging behavior in crustaceans. Limnol. Oceanogr., 34(7), 1367-1374 https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.1989.34.7.1367

Cited by

  1. Catch characteristics of shrimp trap by submerged time vol.45, pp.4, 2009, https://doi.org/10.3796/KSFT.2009.45.4.201
  2. Development of the silver-white decoy for squid automatic jigging machine and fishing performance vol.49, pp.3, 2013, https://doi.org/10.3796/KSFT.2012.49.3.208
  3. Physicochemical characteristics of mackerel and tuna viscera as baits for swimming crab Portunus trituberculatus pots vol.50, pp.3, 2014, https://doi.org/10.3796/KSFT.2014.50.3.310
  4. Development of Dry Artificial Fish Bait for Trap Fishing Using Tuna Red Meat and Shrimp Head Wastes pp.1547-0636, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1080/10498850.2018.1518944