• 한국항해항만학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국항해항만학회 2000년도 춘계학술대회논문집
• /
• pp.3-15
• /
• 2000

This paper aims to suggest for port development at the dawn of unification of South and North Korea. Referring to the case study of port development in the unified German and on the basis of investigation port traffic between the two Koreas, it is also concerned with direction for co-operation in the port sector and practical methods for implementing port development plans after and before the unification of the Korean peninsular.

• 한국항해항만학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국항해항만학회 2000년도 춘계학술대회논문집
• /
• pp.16-32
• /
• 2000

This paper aims at exploring financing methods for port development in response to unification of South and North Korea. In so doing, methods of port financing employed by major countries have been enumerated. Major financing sources for the two Korea, among others, taxes, public bond, public administration fund, establishment of harbour maintenance tax, port development tax, port development fund, Civil Economic Cooperation Fund of South and North Korea, and Fund for Port Development of North Korea and, fund for cooperation of South and North Korea, Economic Development Cooperation Fund, borrowing of foreign capital, project financing, domestic civil capital investment, foreign capital investment, application of cross-subsidization principle, etc. were suggested.

• 한국항해항만학회지
• /
• 제33권4호
• /
• pp.263-270
• /
• 2009

Busan North port is facing crisis due to the opening of the New port. The North Port and NewPort are competing for a limited volume of cargoes and this competition is leading after all to price competition, lowering cargo work fee that may result in the failure of both This paper proposed the balanced development plans, which are the strategies of business tie-up and activation between the North Port and NewPort by introducing the strategy of "co-opetition" and the analysis for the success factor of co-opetition: to solve this operational problems on Busan port. It is found out that activation strategy is more successful co-opetition strategy than business tie-up strategy. The execution for the two co-opetition strategies will lead Busan Port to the balanced development as well as the enhanced competitiveness and will leap Busan port into global hub port as well.

• 한국항만경제학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국항만경제학회 2007년도 정책세미나 및 국제학술대회
• /
• pp.255-270
• /
• 2007

In North-East Asia, Port traffic in Asia-North America sea route has been rapidly increasing due to economic growth in China and ASEAN. Furthermore, the major shipping companies directly call at northern chinese ports like Qingdao, Dalian and Tianjin without passing through Korean ports on Asia-North America sea route. To acquire a port traffic and develop a hub port, governments in North-East Asia have intensively invested in the development of port. Therefore, Busan new port and Gwangyang port have been developed in Korea. According to the medium-long term development planning, the port should give a enormous budget investment for the port facilities construction. So the inaccurate estimation may lead to the unreasonable port development policy. Firstly, based on the estimation of Chiang Bong-Gyu & Yang Hang Jin(2005), this study gave a comparison with the estimation of Ministry of Maritime Affairs and Fisheries(2001) and OSC/Glori(2005). Secondly, taking into account the influence factors for port traffic, this study made an estimation of port traffic for Busan new port. On the basis of this estimation, this study is compared with the estimation of Ministry of Maritime Affairs and Fisheries(2001) and OSC/Glori(2005). In conclusion, in case of the development of Busan new port, based on the estimation of Ministry of Maritime Affairs and Fisheries(2001), this study should the high possibility that the Busan new port will be serious lack of the port facilities in the year of 2011. And according to the OSC/Glori(2005)'s estimation result, there is a lack of the port facilities, though we have modified the port investment plan.

• 한국항만경제학회지
• /
• 제27권2호
• /
• pp.313-331
• /
• 2011

동북아 항만의 Hub Port 경쟁이 더욱 치열해 지고 있고, 신항 개발이 가속화되면서 공급과잉상태를 초래하게 되어, 부산 북항과 신항이 상생하기에 충분한 물동량 확보가 어려운 시점에서 부산항만은 많은 어려움에 직면하고 있다. 또한 북항은 시설이 노후화되어 있고 초대형선박이 접안하기에 필요한 수심 16m을 확보할 수 없으며, 또한 북항 재개발의 진행과 정책부재로 물동량은 자연스럽게 신항으로의 이전이 가속화되고 있다. 따라서 부산 신항의 추가적인 선석 개장운영과 더불어 부산 북항과의 역할정립 및 연계 발전 방안 모색을 서둘러야 할 시점이다. 북항과 신항의 연계발전 전략은 다음과 같이 요약될 수 있다. 첫째, 북항-신항 연계발전을 위한 모델 정립이 필요하다. 따라서 신항은 16m의 수심과 최첨단시설을 보유하고 있으므로 극대형선(ULCC) 위주로 특화기능을 부여하고, 지속적인 개발과 첨단시설 유치로 세계적인 글로벌 항만으로 발전시켜 나가야 한다. 반면에 북항은 항만리모델링을 통해 피더선 중심의 동북아 중심 항만으로 새로운 기능을 수행하도록 해야하고, 대부분의 공간은 북항 재개발 개념에 포함시켜 시민 친수공간으로 기능을 재부여 하여야 한다. 둘째, 북항의 컨테이너 전용부두를 기능 전환하여 부산항만의 항만별 부두기능을 재배치함으로써 항만기능 집적화를 통한 시너지 창출을 기하여야 한다. 셋째, 북항의 기능이 살아있는 한 북항과 신항의 효율적 연계교통망 확충을 통해 환적화물 처리를 효율적으로 할 수 있도록 하여 부산항만을 동북아 환적중심항만으로 발전시켜 나가야 한다. 넷째, 신항과 부산진해경제자유구역을 연계발전시켜 자체 수요 물동량 창출형 항만배후물류단지를 개발하여야 한다. 다섯째, 물동량 창출을 위해 화주고객, 운송사, 복합운송주선업자 및 관련 기관간 SCM을 구축하여 상호 협력적인 Win-Win 관계를 유지하는 것이 중요하다.

• 수산해양교육연구
• /
• 제26권4호
• /
• pp.749-759
• /
• 2014

With the rapid development of global economic and trade, the ports in the North-east Asia region have developed rapidly. Ocean shipping plays an irreplaceable role in China's foreign trade. Improvement of China's economy and continuous increase of trade in North-East Asia have made China as the number one in the world in container transport. Tianjin port which is the biggest international trade port in North-east China. Tianjin Binhai New District has incorporated in (CPC Central Committee on the outline of the Eleventh Five-Year Plan for national economic and social development proposals) which had adopted by The Fifth Plenary Session of the 16th CPC Central Committee. However, the competitions between ports are getting intense, the construction of Northeast Asia shipping center is in the ascendant, which bring new opportunity and challenge to the development of Tianjin port logistics. Therefore, Tianjin should according to its characteristics, integrating port resources, exert great efforts in developing port logistics, thus promoting regional economic development. Therefore, it is necessary to make the main study on the development strategy of Tianjin port logistics.

• 한국항만경제학회지
• /
• 제21권1호
• /
• pp.23-44
• /
• 2005

The port environment is rapidly changing in North-East Asia. Containerships are getting larger and faster and major shipping companies are converting to Hub & Spoke port networks on the transport systems. Therefore, the main ports in North-East Asia are intensively competing with each other for hub port. In terms of geopolitical position, locational conditions and external reputation of ports, Busan and Kwangyang ports have a comparative advantage in comparison with main ports in other countries. But in terms of weight of transshipment cargos in total container cargos, the quality of infrastructure in ports, the environment of logistics service and the cost of, using ports, Busan and Kwangyang ports have a comparative disadvantage. For the growth into hub port in North-East Asia, it is necessary that Busan and Kwangyang ports improve their weakness. Besides It is necessary to develope ports and hinterland quickly, offer uniformity of foreign investment laws and incentive systems.

• 한국항만경제학회지
• /
• 제29권1호
• /
• pp.195-213
• /
• 2013

Since 1990, North Korea's economic situation has drawn the international community's attention and became an important factor to analyze and judge the situation in North Korea, in the Korean Peninsula and even in the whole Northeast Asia. As North Korea's neighbors, Sino-Korean trade and Inter-Korean trade play an important role in North Korea's foreign trade. Based on situation analysis, the great connection and difference between Sino-Korean trade and Inter-Korean trade are given an introduction. Also by exploring reasons for Sino-Korean trade development, we can gather some insights for Inter-Korean trade development.

• 한국항만경제학회지
• /
• 제18권1호
• /
• pp.61-83
• /
• 2002

Korea has designated 28 trade ports and 22 coastal ports under the Ports Act. If fishery ports and small inlets are counted, the number amounts to hundreds of ports. However, untimely and inefficient maintenance and repair works face Korean ports with functional loss, decreasing efficiency, and even catastrophe. Thus, further examinations on the maintenance or redevelopment of forts in Korea are urgent. Since the Korean War and the higher economic growth period in the 1970s, Busan Port has developed in a variety of ways, according to the necessity of social conditions at any given time, without any development Philosophy or systematic long-term master plan. As a result, ports and coastal industrial facilities have rushed to gather around the present North Busan Port, which has taken on mixed functions between ports and cities, adversely affecting several of their interactions. To resolve these circumstances, several redevelopment schemes were suggested for centering the old zone in the Busan Port interim. However, comprehensive evaluation and redevelopment schemes combining functions of both ports and cities, and effectively utilizing coastal zones have never been presented. In this respect, this study sets the priority order of the extracted unit project. This study analyzes the existing functions and facilities of Busan Port, extracting facility zones through redevelopment which is certain to fail or to decrease in efficiency. furthermore, this study presents status and development directions of specified redevelopment unit projects of higher priority order, and pursues the integrated plan of efficiency for Busan Port.

• 한국항만경제학회지
• /
• 제23권2호
• /
• pp.41-61
• /
• 2007

중국의 WTO 가입 이후 급속한 물동량의 증가와 중국항만의 급성장 추세는 대 중국 교역항으로서 성장하고 있는 평택 당진항에 있어서는 기회이자 위기가 될 수 있으며 또한 항만 발전의 전환점이 될 수 있다. 이러한 시점에서 해당 항만을 이용하는 북중국 화주의 정확한 요구파악은 항만 활성화의 주요한 전략적 요소로 고려될 수 있다. 본 연구에서는 평택 당진항에 대한 중국 현지 업체를 대상으로 설문조사를 실시하여 고객의 요구를 파악함으로서 평택 당진항의 활성화 전략을 제시하는데 목적이 있다. 연구결과 평택 당진항은 높은 지리적 강점을 보유하고 있으나 항만배후지 개발 지연, 다양한 항로의 부족, 마케팅 전략의 부재 등이 항만 활성화에 부정적 요인들로 나타났으며, 이를 위해 단순한 화물의존형 항만이 아닌 화물창출형의 항만으로 발전해야 신설항만으로서의 한계점을 극복하고 항만 활성화를 도모 할 수 있을 것이다.