• 한국기술혁신학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국기술혁신학회 2014년도 추계 학술대회 논문집
• /
• pp.189-203
• /
• 2014

Silicon Valley's legal foundation in recent years has surfaced on the radar of policy planners who model Silicon Valley's ICT industry. Precisely, the prohibition of covenants not to compete is linked to firm to firm knowledge spillovers by way of mobile workers positioned as nodes in a system of innovation. Meanwhile, traditional frameworks support enforcement of covenants not to compete as a way to encourage R&D into the worker and to prevent the worker's tacit knowledge and know-how from fleeing. This article examines the ICT industry in Silicon Valley and Route 128 to argue that California's unique law is a key factor in the success of Silicon Valley firms. Theoretically, we reconcile the ostensible strife between enforcement and prohibition frameworks by presenting an industrial approach. We contend that selective enforcement by industry can maximize the policy tools of discorded planners.

• Asian Journal of Innovation and Policy
• /
• 제4권1호
• /
• pp.19-34
• /
• 2015

Silicon Valley's legal foundation in recent years has surfaced on the radar of policy planners who model Silicon Valley's information and communication technologies (ICT) industry. Precisely, the prohibition of covenants not to compete (CNCs) is linked to firm-to-firm knowledge spillovers by way of mobile workers positioned as nodes in a system of innovation. Meanwhile, traditional frameworks support enforcement of CNCs as a way to encourage R&D activities to the worker and to prevent the worker's tacit knowledge and know-how from fleeing. Amidst the battle for the restraint or release of human capital, we present an industrial approach to reconcile the ostensible strife between enforcement and prohibition frameworks. Theoretically, we contend an industrial approach can maximize the policy tools of discorded planners. Moreover, this article newly compares the ICT industries of Silicon Valley and Route 128 to argue that California's law is a unique factor in the greater success of Silicon Valley firms.

• Journal of Radiation Protection and Research
• /
• 제49권1호
• /
• pp.40-49
• /
• 2024

Background: This study aimed to prioritize policy measures to improve radiation safety management in medical institutions using the analytic hierarchy process. Materials and Methods: It adopted three policy options-engineering, education, and enforcement-to categorize safety management measures, the so-called Harvey's 3Es. Then, the radiation safety management measures obtained from the current system and other studies were organized into action plan categories. Using the derived model, this study surveyed 33 stakeholders of radiation safety management in medical institutions and analyzed the importance of each measure. Results and Discussion: As a result, these stakeholders generally identified enforcement as the most important factor for improving the safety management system. The study also found that radiation safety officers and medical physicists perceived different measures as important, indicating clear differences in opinions among stakeholders, especially in improving quality assurance in radiation therapy. Hence, the process of coordination and consensus is likely to be critical in improving the radiation safety management system. Conclusion: Stakeholders in the medical field consider enforcement as the most critical factor in improving their safety management systems. Specifically, the most crucial among the six specific action plans was the "reinforcement of the organization and workforce for safety management," with a relative importance of 25.7%.

• 한국중재학회지:중재연구
• /
• 제27권3호
• /
• pp.53-76
• /
• 2017

Korean businesses, and their legal representatives, have observed the improvements of enforcement of commercial judgments through arbitration over traditional collections litigation in U.S. Courts-due to quicker proceedings, exceptional cost savings and more predictable outcomes-in attaching assets within U.S. jurisdictions. But how are the 2016 interim measures implemented by the Arbitration Act of Korea utilized to avoid jurisdictional and procedure pitfalls of enforcement proceedings in the Federal Courts of the United States? Authors examine the necessary prerequisites of the U.S. Federal Arbitration Act as adopted through the New York Convention, to which Korea and the U.S. are signatories, as distinguished from the Panama Convention. Five common U.S. arbitration institutions address U.S. "domestic" disputes, preempting U.S. state law arbitrations, while this article focuses on U.S. enforcement of "international" arbitration awards. Seeking U.S. recognition and enforcement of Korean arbitral awards necessitates avoiding common defenses involving due process, public policy or documentary formality challenges. Provisional and conservatory injunctive relief measures are explored. A variety of U.S. cases involving Korean litigants are examined to illustrate the legal challenges involving non?domestic arbitral awards, foreign arbitral awards and injunctive relief. Suggestions aimed toward further research are focused on typical Korean business needs such as motions to confirm foreign arbitration awards, enforce such awards or motions to compel arbitration.

• 한국품질경영학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국품질경영학회 2010년도 춘계학술대회
• /
• pp.474-482
• /
• 2010

The Research of local governments in addressing climate change policy formulation and enforcement role in the formulation of local governments, and faithful to the role of local governments when addressing climate change to policy issues and is aimed to provide direction. The role of local governments' Star Statement by looking at best practices, through which more realistic and effective climate change response measures would be able to set aside. Local party organizations in addressing climate change and understanding the role and establishment and enforcement of the policy must be balanced community and residents more comfortable and be able to provide a comfortable life.

• 한국통신학회논문지
• /
• 제31권5B호
• /
• pp.390-396
• /
• 2006

Mobile Ad-hoc Networks(MANETs)에서 정책기반 네트워크 관리를 위해서는 기존의 유선망 관리 방법으로는 신뢰성과 효율성을 보장 할 수 없다. 그러므로 MANETs 관리는 노드들을 효과적으로 클러스터하고 이동 관리를 하는 것이 필수적이다. 본 논문에서는 분산 되어 있는 PDP(Policy Decision Point)를 발견하는 Active PDP Discovery Protocol과 PEP(Policy Enforcement Point)노드 이동 감지를 위해 COPS-PR을 확장하고 PDP에 MNL(Management Node List)를 추가하여 PEP노드를 관리하는 방법을 제안한다. 그리고 시뮬레이션을 통해 얻은 결과를 분석하고 결론으로 끝맺는다.

• 한국인터넷방송통신학회논문지
• /
• 제13권6호
• /
• pp.173-186
• /
• 2013

새로운 정보기술의 발전으로 인해 정보 접근과 획득 방식이 훨씬 다양하고 용이해지고 있는 반면 다양하고 성능 좋은 도구를 이용한 불법적인 접근이 가능하도록 하는 부작용이 초래되고 있다. 이러한 새로운 컴퓨팅 환경에서의 위협에 대응하고자 전통적인 접근제어를 확장한 다양한 연구들이 수행되고 있다. 본 연구에서는 정책집행의 제약조건 중 주요 요소인 상황과 목적에 대한 의미적 정보를 기반으로 명시적으로 기술되는 정책 제약조건과 보안집행과정에서의 질의 제약조건이 서로 구문적으로 일치하지 않는 경우에도 그 의미를 파악하여 적절한 정책집행이 가능하도록 하는 접근제어 방식을 제안한다. 의미적 보안 정책집행을 위해 온톨로지를 기반으로 트리 계층 구조를 구성하고 이를 이용하여 의미적 함의 관계를 유도하고 함의관계에 의해 유도되는 추가적 함의 때문에 발생할 수 있는 과도한 권한부여를 의미 차 인수를 이용하여 방지할 수 있는 방법을 제시한다. 그리고 제안방식을 구현하는 프로토타입 시스템의 구조를 제시하고 성능평가를 통해 이전 접근제어 방식들과 비교한다.

• 한국중재학회지:중재연구
• /
• 제16권2호
• /
• pp.51-88
• /
• 2006

The obligation on a national court to recognize and enforce arbitral awards as provided in Article III New York Convention, which both Korea and China have ratified, is subject to limited exceptions. Recognition and enforcement will be refused only if the party against whom enforcement is sought can show that one of the exclusive grounds for refusal enumerated in Article V(1) New York Convention has occurred. The court may also refuse enforcement ex officio if the award violates that state's public policy. This article explores the circumstances where arbitral awards may be refused enforcement under the Korean and Chinese arbitration laws. It first analyzes the relevant statutory provisions. In Korea and China, which have adopted the UNCITRAL Model law, the grounds of challenge are exhaustively defined within their respective arbitration laws. According to their arbitration laws, an arbitral award may be set aside if a party making the application proves that (i) a party to the arbitration agreement was under some incapacity or the agreement is not valid under the applicable law, (ii) the party making the application was not given proper notice of the appointment of an arbitrator or of the arbitral proceedings or was otherwise unable to present his case, (iii) the award deals with a dispute not contemplated by or not falling within the terms of the submission to arbitration or contains decisions on matters beyond the scope of the submission to arbitration, or (iv) the composition of the arbitral tribunal or the arbitral procedure was not in accordance with the agreement of the parties. An arbitral award may also be set aside ex officio by the court if the court finds that (i) the subject-matter of the dispute is not capable of settlement by arbitration under the applicable law or (ii) the award is in conflict with the public policy. This article then reviews relevant judicial decisions rendered in Korea and China to see how the courts in these countries have been interpreting the provisions specifying the grounds for challenging arbitral awards. It concludes that the courts in Korea and China rarely accept challenges to arbitral awards, thereby respecting the mandate of the New York Convention.

• 한국콘텐츠학회논문지
• /
• 제18권11호
• /
• pp.317-326
• /
• 2018

본 연구는 제한된 합리성 하에서 다문화정책의 상대적 중요도와 우선순위를 도출하기 위해 AHP모델을 작성하여 전문가 평가를 실시하였다. 연구결과는 다음과 같다. 첫째, 측정영역에서는 안정된 사회정착지원정책(1순위), 다문화 가족 2세들의 사회적 역량개발 정책(2순위), 사회 경제활동 지원정책(3순위), 협력적 거버넌스(4순위)의 순으로 정책 우선순위가 평가되었다. 둘째, 측정요소의 우선순위이다. 안정된 사회정착 지원정책에서는 사회정착 서비스 대상 확대정책, 다문화 가족 2세들의 사회적 역량개발 정책에서는 사회적 진출지원 정책이 가장 중요하게 평가되었다. 사회 경제활동지원 정책에서는 적극적 경제활동 지원정책, 협력적 거버넌스 정책 추진에서는 정책실천주체들의 협력시스템 구축이 가장 중요한 정책 우선순위로 평가되었다. 이런 연구결과는 다문화정책을 현실적 차원에서 설명하는데 기여할 것으로 판단된다.

• 교통기술과정책
• /
• 제12권1호
• /
• pp.6-15
• /
• 2015