• Title/Summary/Keyword: Physics forceps

Search Result 5, Processing Time 0.018 seconds

Comparative evaluation of efficacy of Physics Forceps versus conventional forceps in pediatric dental extractions: a prospective randomized study

  • Elicherla, Sainath Reddy;Bandi, Sujatha;Nunna, Mahesh;Saikiran, Kanamarlapudi Venkata;Sahithi, Varada;Nuvvula, Sivakumar
    • Journal of Dental Anesthesia and Pain Medicine
    • /
    • v.21 no.6
    • /
    • pp.547-556
    • /
    • 2021
  • Background: This study aimed to determine the efficacy of Physics Forceps in pediatric dental extractions. Methods: This was a double-blind, randomized controlled trial with a parallel-arm design and identical allocation ratio (1:1). Children (n=104) were randomly divided into two groups for extraction of mandibular primary teeth (group I: Physics Forceps; group II: conventional forceps). The outcome variables assessed in the study were the time taken for extraction, pre- and postoperative anxiety (using RMS pictorial scale), incidence of fractured teeth, and postoperative pain on the first and third days (using the Wong-Baker faces pain scale). Results: A significant reduction (P < 0.001) in intraoperative time, anxiety, and incidence of tooth fracture was confined to group I. The pain significantly reduced from the first to the third postoperative day in both groups, but the mean reduction in RMS scores in the physics forceps group was far better than that in the conventional forceps group. Conclusion: Physics Forceps aid in extraction of primary teeth with minimal trauma to supporting structures, as well as reducing anxiety in the pediatric population.

Atraumatic Safe Extraction for Intentional Replantation (의도적 재식술을 위한 비외상성 안전 발치법)

  • Choi, Yong-Hoon;Bae, Ji-Hyun;Kim, Young-Kyun
    • The Journal of the Korean dental association
    • /
    • v.48 no.7
    • /
    • pp.531-537
    • /
    • 2010
  • Intentional replantation is useful for failed cases of conventional dental treatment - including root canal treatment - to restore the tooth in question. Based on a recent study, it is relatively very successful; prognosis is good for a long period. On the other hand, a tooth that becomes an indication of intentional replantation is often severely weakened throughout several treatments. Moreover, with multi-rooted teeth, extracting without root fracture is difficult. Safe extraction that is free of coronal or root fracture is important, but little information is known as to a concrete, safe way of extraction. There are a few considerations for safe extraction. First, a tooth with orthodontic extrusion force is easier for extraction due to its increased mobility; it increases the amount of the periodontal ligament, which is essential for re-attachment. As a safe way of extraction, the use of physics forceps has been introduced recently; it minimizes damage to the gingiva and alveolar hone. This paper reports the good result of using atraumatic safe extraction via both orthodontic extrusion and physics forceps$^{(R)}$.

Comparison of Intravascular Bonghan Ducts from Rats and Mice

  • Lee Byung-Cheon;Baik Ku-Youn;Cho Sung-Il;Min Chul-Hee;Johng Hyeon-Min;Hahm Jung-Hyun;Choi Chun-Ho;Yi Seung-Ho;Soh Kyung-Sun;Park Dae-Hun;Ahn Se-Young;Cheun Byeung-Soo;Soh Kwang-Sup
    • Journal of Society of Preventive Korean Medicine
    • /
    • v.7 no.1
    • /
    • pp.47-53
    • /
    • 2003
  • New method to obtain Intravascular Bonghan ducts of rats and mice were developed By extracting blood from caudal veins and arteries that were hold by forceps we took broken pieces of BHDs which were examined using microscopes. The advantage of this method is to gain the pure BHD without fibrin, and its disadvantage is the smallness of the sample.

  • PDF

Clinical evaluation of a new extraction method for intentional replantation (의도적 재식술을 위한 새로운 발치법의 임상 평가)

  • Choi, Yong-Hoon;Bae, Ji-Hyun
    • Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics
    • /
    • v.36 no.3
    • /
    • pp.211-218
    • /
    • 2011
  • Purpose: Intentional replantation (IR) is a suitable treatment option when nonsurgical retreatment and periradicular surgery are unfeasible. For successful IR, fracture-free safe extraction is crucial step. Recently, a new extraction method of atraumatic safe extraction (ASE) for IR has been introduced. Patients and Methods: Ninety-six patients with the following conditions who underwent IR at the Department of Conservative Dentistry, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, in 2010 were enrolled in this study: failed nonsurgical retreatment and periradicular surgery not recommended because of anatomical limitations or when rejected by the patient. Preoperative orthodontic extrusive force was applied for 2-3 weeks to increase mobility and periodontal ligament volume. A Physics Forceps was used for extraction and the success rate of ASE was assessed. Results: Ninety-six premolars and molars were treated by IR. The complete success rate (no crown and root fracture) was 93% (n = 89); the limited success rates because of partial root tip fracture and partial osteotomy were 2% (n = 2) and 5% (n = 5), respectively. The clinical and overall success rates of ASE were 95% and 100%, respectively; no failure was observed. Conclusions: ASE can be regarded as a reproducible, predictable method of extraction for IR.