• Title/Summary/Keyword: Periodic Inspection Cycle

Search Result 13, Processing Time 0.022 seconds

Study on Crack Monitoring System in Steel Structure (강부재의 균열 모니터링에 관한 연구)

  • Lee, Jae-Sun;Chang, Kyong-Ho;Hwang, Jee-Hoon;Park, Hyun-Chan;Jeon, Jun-Tai;Kim, You-Chul
    • Journal of Korean Society of Steel Construction
    • /
    • v.23 no.2
    • /
    • pp.159-167
    • /
    • 2011
  • Steel structure construction is currently increasing on account of the many merits of steel structures. Due to numerous environmental factors, many cracks and extensive corrosion occur in steel structures, which cause the deterioration of the performance and life cycle of such structures. Maintenance of steel structures is thus strongly demanded, for safety control. The inspection methods that are currently being used, however, are very limited and can detect only local defects in steel structures. They also take much time to use and incur high maintenance costs. Moreover, such methods cannot be applied to huge steel structures, which men find unapproachable. They also require much time due to the need for periodic checks, and may lead to cost loss. Therefore, the development of a monitoring system that can detect defects in whole structures and can reduce the repair and strengthening costs at an early stage is very much needed. In this study, the generation and propagation of cracks were monitored via the electric-potential-drop method (EPDM).

Improvement of Lift-off Tests via Field Evaluation of Residual Load in Ground Anchor (현장 잔존긴장력 평가를 통한 리프트오프 시험 방법 개선)

  • Song, minkwon;Park, Seong-yeol;Lee, Sangrae;Cho, Wanjei
    • Journal of the Korean Geotechnical Society
    • /
    • v.35 no.5
    • /
    • pp.43-51
    • /
    • 2019
  • At present, the ground anchor method is commonly applied to securing the slope stability in Korea. The ground anchor is reported to decrease in tensile load due to aging and environmental influences with time such as corrosion, relaxation, creep and so on. In Korea, the lift-off test is performed for the periodic inspection or cases when the symptoms of deterioration on anchors and the residual tensile load of the anchors is checked. However, the current lift-off test standard (MOLIT, 2010) is not fully specified in details. In this study, the factors affecting the lift-off test were investigated based on the previous research and foreign standards and lift-off tests were performed with consideration for the loading and unloading cycle, load increment method, and tensioning tendon method. Based on the results, this paper proposes improved testing and evaluation procedures of the lift-off test considering the workability and time limits in the field.

Review for Applying Spent Fuel Pool Island (SFPI) during Decommissioning in Korea (원전해체시 독립된 사용후핵연료저장조 국내 적용 검토)

  • Baik, Jun-ki;Kim, Chang-Lak
    • Journal of Nuclear Fuel Cycle and Waste Technology(JNFCWT)
    • /
    • v.13 no.2
    • /
    • pp.163-169
    • /
    • 2015
  • In many nuclear power plant sites in Korea, high density storage racks were installed in the spent fuel pool to expand the spent fuel storage capacity. Nevertheless, the capability of the Hanbit nuclear site will be saturated by 2024. Also, 10 NPPs will reach their design life expiration date by 2029. In the case of the US, SFPI (Spent Fuel Pool Island) operated temporarily as a spent fuel storage option before spent nuclear fuels were transported to an interim storage facility or a final disposal facility. As a spent fuel storage option after shutdown during decommissioning, the SFPI concept can be expected to have the following effects: reduced occupational exposure, lower cost of operation, strengthened safety, and so on. This paper presents a case study associated with the regulations, operating experiences, and systems of SFPI in the US. In conclusion, the following steps are recommended for applying SFPI during decommissioning in Korea: confirmation of design change scope of SFPI and expected final cost, the submission of a decommissioning plan which is reflected in SFPI improvement plans, safety assessment using PSR, application of an operating license change for design change, regulatory body review and approval, design change, inspection by the regulatory body, education and commissioning for SFPI, SFPI operation and periodic inspection, and dismantling of SFPI.