• Physical Therapy Rehabilitation Science
• /
• 제6권2호
• /
• pp.90-95
• /
• 2017

Objective: The purpose of this study was to investigate the physical therapists' perception of the use of gait measures, the frequency of the gait measures used, and also to identify the barriers that limit the use of these assessment tools. Design: Cross-sectional study. Methods: Physical therapists from the Seoul, Gyeonggi area from March to July 2016 were included in the study. Over the course of 18 weeks, a cross-sectional study was conducted with a self-report questionnaire. A total of 700 questionnaires were distributed and 350 questionnaires (50%) were collected, however with the exclusion of 140 questionnaires due to non-consent, a total of 210 questionnaires (30%) were analysed. Results: Out of the 10 standardized assessment tools, the therapists showed the highest perception for the timed up and go test (TUG [n=153, 72.9%]) and they also had high perception for the 10 meters walk test (10MWT [n=149, 71.0%]), and 6-minute walk test (6MWT [n=123, 58.6%]). The respondents answered that the TUG (n=116, 55.2%), 10MWT (n=100, 47.6%), and 6MWT (n=51, 24.3%) was used the most often. On the contrary, only four (1.9%) therapists have used the Chedoke-McMaster stroke assessment and the Rivermead Mobility Index. The lack of time was considered as the most important barrier to the use of assessment tools in clinical practice. Conclusions: Through this study, it has been shown that the domestic physical therapists used the TUG and the 10MWT mainly due to high recognition and evaluation status; however, the lack of time was the greatest impediment to the clinical application of the gait assessment tools.

• 한국콘텐츠학회논문지
• /
• 제12권8호
• /
• pp.449-460
• /
• 2012

본 연구는 포트폴리오 평가를 실시하고 있는 유치원과 어린이집 교사의 포트폴리오 평가에 대한 인식과 실제의 차이와 어려움을 알아보고 배경변인에 따른 차이를 분석해 보는 것을 목적으로 하였다. 본 연구의 대상은 전라북도 J I G시에 소재한 유치원 및 어린이집 교사 304명이며, 질문지를 통해 수집된 자료는 SPSS 18.0 프로그램을 이용하여 빈도, 백분율, 평균, 표준편차, 대응표본 T-Test, ANOVA, Scheff$\acute{e}$검증의 방법으로 분석하였다. 본 연구의 결과는 첫째, 포트폴리오 평가의 실시방법과 효과에 대한 모든 하위영역별 실제의 수준은 인식 수준에 비해 유의하게 낮았다. 또한 배경변인에 따라서는 학력에 따라서만 유의한 차이가 있었다. 즉, 4년대졸 이상 학력의 교사가 전문대졸 이하 학력의 교사에 비해 포트폴리오 평가의 실시 방법과 효과에 대한 인식과 실제의 차이가 더 컸다. 둘째, 포트폴리오 평가에 대한 어려움을 살펴본 결과 교사들은 모든 하위문항에 걸쳐 대체적으로 어려움을 느끼고 있는 것으로 나타났으며, 배경변인에 따라서는 하위내용별로 부분적 차이만 있었다. 즉, 국공립 유치원 교사와 학력이나 경력이 높은 교사의 경우 포트폴리오 평가에 대한 어려움을 상대적으로 더 많이 느끼고 있었다. 포트폴리오 평가 실시에 대해 교사들이 어려움을 느끼는 것은 포트폴리오 실시 여부나 질적 측면에 직접적인 영향을 미칠 것이므로 교사들이 생각하는 어려움을 해소해 줄 수 있는 수요자 중심의 포트폴리오 관련 연수의 실시와 행정적 지원이 이루어질 필요가 있다.

• 환경영향평가
• /
• 제11권3호
• /
• pp.145-155
• /
• 2002

A substantial literatures on environmental risk perception have emerged since the late 1960s. Most these works focus on how people form risk perception, on what people believe, on difficulties in communicating information about health, safety, or environmental risks to non-experts. In this study, questionnaire surveys were conducted to sample from stakeholders(general public, environmental specialist, governmental official, non-government officials, journalist) during March and Aprils, 2000. Total number of responses was 1,803 including 773 persons of general public, 353 experts, 390 governmental officials, 111 journalists and 176 NGO members. Risk perception on 26 environmental issues were statistically analyzed to relate with the need to regulate each issues, interest and knowledge, experience of hazard, satisfaction in environmental situation, etc. This research aims to aid risk analysis and policy-making by providing a basis for understanding and anticipating group responses to environmental issues and improving the communication of risk information among general public, lay-people, technical experts, and decision-makers. This study concludes that those who are in charge of promoting and regulating health and safety of citizens should understand how people perceive about and respond to environmental risk. Without such understanding, well-intended environmental policies of governments would be ineffective.

• 감성과학
• /
• 제23권2호
• /
• pp.35-50
• /
• 2020

본 연구의 목적은 사회공포증 수준에 따른 정서지각 편향성의 변화와 이 변화에 기여하는 시공간 주의배분능력에 대해 탐구하는 것이다. 이를 위해, 본 연구에서는 사회공포증 수준을 측정하기 위해 한국형 자기보고식 설문 검사인 사회공포증 검사(Korean version of social avoidance and distress, K-SAD)를 사용하였으며, 정서지각 편향성과 시공간 주의배분능력을 측정하기 위해 정서지각 과제(emotional perception task)와 UFOV 과제(useful field of view task)를 사용하였다. 본 연구에는 118명의 연구참가자가 참여하였고 응답을 성실하게 하지 않은 연구참가자들을 제외하여 107명(남: 94명, 여: 13명)의 자료가 분석되었다. 연구참가자들은 K-SAD 점수에 따라 세 집단으로 나뉘어졌다. 연구 결과, 정서지각과제에서 긍정적 정서지각 편향성은 사회공포증 수준이 높을수록 더 크게 나타났으며 UFOV 과제에서는 사회공포증 수준이 높을수록 저하된 시공간 주의배분능력이 나타났다. 이러한 결과는 사회공포증 수준의 증가에 따라 나타나는 저하된 시공간 주의배분능력이 긍정적 정서지각 편향성에 부분적으로 기여할 가능성이 있다는 것을 시사한다.

• 대한수학교육학회지:수학교육학연구
• /
• 제27권2호
• /
• pp.291-312
• /
• 2017

최근 평가 관련 연구들에서 평가가 학생들의 학습 향상을 도와야 한다는 형성적 목적에 주목함에 따라, 교수-학습과 평가의 통합이 강조되고 있으며, 다양하고 적절한 평가전략 및 평가 도구가 필요해지고 있다. 교육현장에서 다양한 평가전략 및 평가 도구가 활용되기 위해서는 교사들이 직접 경험하고 각각의 장단점 및 학습자에게 미치는 영향에 대해 반성해보는 것이 필요하다. 본 연구는 예비초등교사들을 대상으로 여섯 가지 평가전략(피드백의 활용, 평가 기준의 제시, 평가의 모범사례 제시, 자기평가, 동료평가, 지필평가)을 경험하도록 하고, 각각에 대해 어떻게 인식하는지 조사하는 것을 목적으로 한다. 예비초등교사들은 한 학기 강좌가 진행되는 동안 각각을 경험하였으며, 학기말 설문지를 통해 각 평가전략에 대한 의견을 제시하였다. 조사결과, 예비교사들은 평가에 대한 인식에 따라 인지적, 정의적 영역의 향상에 도움이 된 평가전략을 다르게 제시함을 확인하였다. 이러한 결과는 교수-학습에서 다양한 평가전략 사용이 필요하다는 점, 평가의 형성적 목적을 포함하여 평가의 목적에 대한 예비교사들의 인식의 확장이 필요함을 시사한다.

• 한국직업건강간호학회지
• /
• 제25권4호
• /
• pp.362-372
• /
• 2016

Purpose: This study intended to grasp real context of Cardiovascular disease (CVD)-related factors of Korean blue-collar workers, especially CVD-related knowledge, perception, beliefs, benefits and barriers of behaviors according to the health belief model. Methods: We interviewed twenty two workers working in two small-sized companies and performed two series of focus group interviews. Data were analyzed by deductive content analysis approach based on Elo & $Kyng{\ddot{a}}s$. Results: Excepting participants who have CVD risk factors, most participants had lower level of CVD risk perception. The level of CVD knowledge was low but there was difference by gender. CVD-related beliefs were 'fatal disease', 'caused by lifestyle' and 'difficult to prevent by themselves'. The risk reduction behaviors were motivated by current or family history of hypertension. But there were barriers to interfere practice of preventive behaviors such as poor quality of food provided by cafeteria in the workplace, frequent overtime, victim mentality as one of vulnerable social group, housework and financial burden, lack of facilities for rest and physical activity in the workplace. Conclusion: To develop intervention for reducing CVD risks in Korean blue-collar workers, we need to focus on improving CVD knowledge and perception and modifying work-related environments such as low quality of food and lack of facilities for rest and physical activity in the workplace.

• Environmental Analysis Health and Toxicology
• /
• 제23권4호
• /
• pp.247-256
• /
• 2008

Public perceptions of nanotechnology and its potential risk can be an important measure for the sustainable advances of the technology. We conducted a survey for public (N =599) and experts (N = 165). They answered the same questions and results were analyzed. 74% of the public have not heard about the potential risk of nanotechnology and 77% expected that nanotechnology/materials are not harmful to the human and nature. 74% of experts realized the potential hazards by nanomaterials. The results represented that large perception gab between public and experts has existed in Korea. Interestingly, Korean public thought that nanotechnology is more profitable and less risky than that of American. We suggest that 'now is the best time to give appropriate information on the potential risk of nanotechnology to Korean public without preconception or exaggeration.'

• 한국지구과학회지
• /
• 제25권3호
• /
• pp.129-141
• /
• 2004

A peer assessment method was implemented as part of an action research project where the primary goal was to create constructivist science classrooms. Student reflective writings, which had been created in the process of action research, were analyzed to examine the perceptions of the students concerning the peer assessment method employed in their earth science classrooms. Five perception categories and thirteen statements were developed from the student writings. These indicated that the students appreciated the positive nature of peer assessment and the effects of it as an alternative method for promoting learning. It was also revealed, however, that some students displayed inappropriate behaviors toward peer assessment which led to negative perceptions of the new assessment method. Implications for future use of peer assessment in science classrooms are discussed. Limitations founded in the present study as well as possible solutions are provided.

• 대한영양사협회학술지
• /
• 제1권1호
• /
• pp.10-20
• /
• 1995

A study was undertaken to elucidate the clinical dietetic performance level and to identify the difference between the actual role performance and perception of important level of the clinical dietitian. The survey was carried out for the 21 general hospital over 100 beds in Seoul, Pusan and Daegu area. The results of the study can be summarized as follows. 1. One dietitian was responsible for the feeding and clinical dietetic activity of 166 in-patients on the average. 2. In the actual role performance of clinical dietetic practices, of the 26 items listed, only 3 were always or almost or almost performed by 75% of the dietitians, 4 additional items were always or almost performed by 60% of them. 3. In the perception of importance level of clinical dietetic practices, more than 75% of the dietitians indicated that 23 of the 26 tasks were important practices. 4. The performance average score of nutrition assessment was 15.85, of nutrition care plan development was 19.72, of patient counseling was 12.22, of research activity was 19.62, and of education was 21.27 in the dietetic department was a division for the clinical dietetic activity, while 10.96, 15.24, 9.54, 15.97, 18.50 respectively in the dietetic department has not a division for it.

• Journal of the Korean Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry
• /
• 제16권1호
• /
• pp.33-46
• /
• 2005

본고에서는 인간의 뇌 발달과 주의력, 지각, 기억, 언어 등 다양한 인지기능의 발달과의 관계를 살펴본 후, Luria의 발달 신경심리 이론 및 그에 입각하여 개발된 아동용 Luria-Nebraska신경심리검사를 간략하게 소개하였다. 마지막으로, 현재 국내, 외에서 널리 사용되는 주의력 검사, 시-지각 검사, 시각-운동 협응 능력 검사, 그리고 전두엽의 집행기능검사 등을 포함한 아동용 신경심리 평가도구에 대해 고찰해보았다.