• Korean Journal of Agricultural Science
• /
• v.38 no.1
• /
• pp.129-143
• /
• 2011

In this study, to select the incoming solar radiation equation which is most suitable for the estimation of Penman evaporation, 12 incoming solar radiation equations were selected. The Penman evaporation rates were estimated using 12 selected incoming solar radiation equations, and the estimated Penman evaporation rates were compared with measured pan evaporation rates. The monthly average daily meteorological data measured from 17 meteorological stations (춘천, 강능, 서울, 인천, 수원, 서산, 청주, 대전, 추풍령, 포항, 대구, 전주, 광주, 부산, 목포, 제주, 진주) were used for this study. To evaluate the reliability of estimated evaporation rates, mean absolute bias error(MABE), root mean square error(RMSE), mean percentage error(MPE) and Nash-Sutcliffe equation were applied. The study results indicate that to estimate pan evaporation using Penman evaporation equation, incoming solar radiation equation using meteorological data such as precipitation, minimum air temperature, sunshine duration, possible duration of sunshine, and extraterrestrial radiation are most suitable for 11 study stations out of 17 study stations.

• Proceedings of the Korea Water Resources Association Conference
• /
• 2004.05b
• /
• pp.1077-1081
• /
• 2004

유역 수문순환 해석 및 수자원 관리와 계획에 있어서 증발산은 매우 중요한 부분을 차지하고 있다. 본 인구에서는 보청천 유역의 강수 및 유출자료와 두 가지 방법에 피해서 산정된 유역증발산을 이용하여 유역 물수지를 수행하고, 두 가지 방법을 비교 검토하였다. 첫 번째 방법은 Penman-Monteith즐 이용하여 기준작물에 내한 잠재증발산량을 산정한 후, 이를 SWAT 모형을 이용하여 유역내 작물 및 토지피복과 가용토양수분을 고려하여 실제증발산량을 산정하였으며, 두 번째 방법은 잠재증발산량과 실제증발산량의 보완관계 개념을 이용한 Morton CRAE 방법으로부터 유역의 실제증발산량을 계산하였다. 비교 분석 결과, SWAT의 Penman-Monteith 방법을 이용하여 추정된 증발산이 실세 강수량과 유출량 사이의 물수지로부터 얻어진 증발산량과 좀 더 근사한 결과를 보였다. 그러나, Merton CRAE 방법의 경우 습도 자료가 결과치에 큰 영향을 주기 때문에, 보다 정확한 습도 자료 및 기상자료를 이용할 경우, 상대적으로 간편하게 유역내 실제증발산량을 추정할 수 있는 방법으로 이용될 수 있을 것이다.

• Proceedings of the Korea Water Resources Association Conference
• /
• 2020.06a
• /
• pp.64-64
• /
• 2020

현재 농업환경 및 식생활 변화 등으로 인하여 농지 수요는 꾸준히 감소하고 있다. 이러한 현상과 맞물려 정부에서는 2019년 6월에 물관리기본법을 제정함으로서 지속가능한 통합 물 관리를 실현하려는 움직임을 보이고 있다. 따라서 효율적인 통합 물 관리를 실현하기 위해서는 61%라는 가장 많은 용수를 사용하고 있는 농업용수에 대한 면밀한 검토가 이루어져야 할 시점이다. 금회 연구에서는 현재 농업용수 사용량 현황을 분석함과 동시에 농업용수 중 67% ~ 87%의 비율을 차지하고 있는 논 용수 산정법을 검토한 후 문제점을 분석하고 문제점 개선을 통한 용수수요 확보를 분석하였다. 논 용수 산정방법의 가장 큰 문제점은 잠재증발산량 산정식에 있다. 현재 사용하고 있는 잠재증발산량 방법은 국제식량기구(FAO)에서 권장하고 있는 Penman-Monteith 식이 아닌 과거부터 사용하고 있으며, 오차율이 높은 수정 Penman 식을 사용하고 있다. 또한 잠재증발산량 산정이 주요 인자인 작물계수의 경우도 23년전의 작물계수를 이용함으로서 현재 기후 및 작물품종 변화를 전혀 반영할 수 없다는 문제점을 가지고 있다. 전주기상청의 자료를 이용하여 Penman 및 Penman-Monteith 식을 비교한 결과 수정 Penman 식이 Penma-Monteith 식에 비하여 2배 이상의 큰 값을 보였다. 작물계수를 적용할 경우 증발산량이 많이 일어나는 5월 하순에서 8월 하순까지의 차이가 크게 발생하였다. 이러한 문제는 논용수 수요량의 과대하게 산정되는 결과를 초래하며, 수자원장기종합계획 및 장기 물관리 계획시 효율적이고 합리적인 계획수립이 어려울 것으로 판단되며, 논 용수 수요량 산정방법에 대한 개선안이 시급히 이루어져야 할 것으로 판단되어진다.

• KSCE Journal of Civil and Environmental Engineering Research
• /
• v.28 no.5B
• /
• pp.495-504
• /
• 2008

Evapotranspiration (ET) is an important state variable while simulating daily streamflow in hydrological models. In the estimation of ET, for example, when using FAO Penman Monteith equation, the LAI (Leaf Area Index) value reflecting the conditions of vegetation generally affects considerably. Recently in evaluating the vegetation condition as a fixed quantity, the remotely sensed LAI from MODIS satellite data is available, and the time series values of spatial LAI coupled with land use classes are utilized for ET evaluation. Four years (2001-2004) of MODIS LAI was prepared for the evaluation of Penman Monteith ET in the continuous hydrological model, SLURP (Semi-distributed Land Use-based Runoff Processes). The model was applied for simulating the dam inflow of Chungju watershed ($6661.3km^2$) located in the upstream of Han river basin. For four years (2001-2004) dam inflow data and meteorological data, the model was calibrated and verified using MODIS LAI data. The average Nash-Sutcliffe model efficiency was 0.66. The 4 years watershed average Penman Monteith ETs of deciduous, coniferous, and mixed forest were 639.1, 422.4, and 631.6 mm for average MODIS LAI values of 3.64, 3.50, and 3.63 respectively.

• Water for future
• /
• v.6 no.2
• /
• pp.6-11
• /
• 1973

This paper include the hydrometeorological analyses of evapotranspiration which is import factor concerning the estimate of water budgest over a certain basin. Evapotranspiration model mode by the multiple regression analysis between the evapotranspiration measured on various kinds of ground cover (water, bare soil and lawn) and the other meteorological elements affecting the evapotranspiration process, and the simple regression analysis between the evapo transpiration measured on each ground cover and the evapotranspiration on water and vegetables calculated from the Penman equation. It is expected that the evapotranspiration models are a very useful formulae estimating ten days amounts or a month's amounts.

• Journal of Korea Water Resources Association
• /
• v.37 no.6
• /
• pp.479-485
• /
• 2004

This study presents the calculation of evapotranspiration using estimated daily incoming solar radiation based on maximum daily temperature and minimum daily temperature. The Thornton and Running method(1999) was used to estimate daily incoming solar radiation and then the resulting solar radiation was compared with the measurements. It showed that the estimated daily solar radiation was within reasonable accuracy. In turn, the estimated daily solar radiation was applied to calculate the daily evapotranspiration using the Priestly-Taylor equation and Penman equation and the general results were that evapotranspiration was overestimated in the Priestly-Taylor equation but that Penman was a good estimator with this approach. It is encouraging that it is possible to use this approach, because the required historical data for its estimation are not extensively available and it is not easy to access the meteorological stations in most areas. The calculated eyapotranspiration was compared with that of Hargreaves which was based on daily temperature, and gives us some intuition in terms of engineering.

• Proceedings of the Korea Water Resources Association Conference
• /
• 2020.06a
• /
• pp.259-259
• /
• 2020

증발산량은 수문학적으로는 강수량으로부터 지표 유출량과 지하수 함양량을 추정하는 등 전체 물수지를 해석하는데 있어서 매우 중요하며, 농업적 측면에서는 작물의 용수 수요량을 결정하는 중요한 인자이다. 그러나 증발산량의 직접적인 계측이 쉽지 않기 때문에 물수지 방법에 의한 간접적인 추정이나 관련된 기상자료를 이용한 경험적이고 물리적인 해석을 통해 산정하고 있다. 일반적으로 특정조건의 작물(기준작물)을 기준으로 가용수분이 충분한 상태에서 주어진 기상조건에 대해 기준증발산량을 산정하며, 여기에 대상작물별 특성이나 토양의 실제수분상태 등을 고려하여 실제증발산량을 추정하고 있다. 본 연구에서는 한강권역을 대상으로 현재 가장 일반적으로 활용되고 있는 Penman-Monteith 방법을 비롯하여, Thornthwaite 방법, Hamon 방법, Priestly-Taylor 방법, Hargreaves-Samani 방법, Hansen 방법 등 총 6종의 기준증발산량을 산정하여 비교하였다. 각 방법에 필요한 기상자료는 한강권역 및 인근에 위치한 기상청 관할의 33개 ASOS 지점에 대한 60년간(1960~2019년)의 관측자료를 이용하였다. Penman-Monteith 방법에 의한 값을 기준으로 나머지 5가지 방법들에 의한 결과를 분석한 결과, 전반적으로 다른 방법들이 기준증발산량을 크게 산정하는 것으로 나타났으며, temperature-based 접근법인 Hamon과 Hargreaves-Samani에 의한 연평균 값은 Penman-Monteith 방법 대비 각각 28.5%, 19.3% 정도 크게 산정되었다. 특히 Hamon 방법에 의한 결과는 다른 방법과 비교하여 여름철에 크게 차이를 보였다. 반면 Hansen 방법은 상대적으로 Penmna-Monteith 방법과 가장 적은 편차를 나타내었다. 지역별로 분석했을 때는 서울/인천지역과 강원도 동해안 지역을 제외하고는 Penman-Monteith 방법 대비 다른 방법들의 기준증발산량이 큰 것으로 나타났다. 중권역별로는 Penman-Monteith 결과와 비교하여 -158 mm/yr 에서 최대 +307 mm/yr 정도의 편차를 나타내었으며, 월별로는 -13 mm에서 +73 mm의 편차가 나타났다.

• Magazine of the Korean Society of Agricultural Engineers
• /
• v.31 no.4
• /
• pp.96-110
• /
• 1989

To suggest the fundamental data for the estimation of crop evaportranspiration by the ca- lculated coefficients for estimating the radiation suitable to the different regions of korea in application of Penman equcation, the daily data such as sc(skycover), n(actual sunshine hours), N(possible sunshine hours), Rs(horizontal solar radiation) and Ra(extraterrestial solar radiation) for 10 years (from 1977 to 1986) collected from 19 meteorological stations were analysed. The results are summarized as follows : 1. The coefficients a, b and c for estimating the radiation taken by the regression method with the daily and monthly mean data of the skycover and the ratio of Rs to Ra were shown as a=0.619, b= -0.0202, c= -0.0023 and a=0.64, b=0.0377 c=0.0001 in ave- rage respectively. 2. The coefficients a and b for estimating the radiation analysed by the regression and arithmetic method from the daily ratio of sunshine hours and Rs to Ra were shown as a= 0.157, b= 0.529, and a=0.119, b= 0.726 in average, respectively. 3. The coefficients a and b for estimating the radiation calculated by the regression me- thod based on the monthly ratio of sunshine hours and radiation were shown as a=0. 319 and b= 0.557 in average. 4. The values of a and b for estimating the radiation taken from the relationship between the daily ratio of sunshine hours and radiation showed high significance level. 5. The standard deviation and the coefficient of variance between the radiation calculated from the coefficients by the regression and arithmetic method with the daily data and the actual radiation were analysed and compared to the results by the coefficients of the modified Penman method (a=0.18, b=0.55) and by those of the F.A.O inodified Penman method(a=0.25, b=0.5). The standard deviation and the coefficient of varia- nce by the regression method in this study showed the lowest value. 6. From the above results, it is suggested that regression method using the coefficients taken from the relationship between the ratio of sunshine hours and the ratio of radia- tion based on the daily data has the highest accuracy in estimating the radiation. 7. The average reference crop evapotranspiration estimating by the modified Penman me- thod using the coefficients a and b derived by the regression method from the daily meterological data was closer to the actual evapotsranspiration of grass measured in Suwon area than the estimated evapotranspiration by the modified Penman method and the F.A.O modified Penman method.

• KOREAN JOURNAL OF CROP SCIENCE
• /
• v.35 no.6
• /
• pp.518-524
• /
• 1990

Actual evapotranspiration was measured over rice paddy field by Bowen ratio heat balance method and based on this, investigated was the reliability of actual evapotranpiration estimation from Class-A Pan and small pan evaporation and reference evapotranspiration calculated by modified Penman-Monteith model. Crop coefficients based on Class-A Pan and small pan evaporation and reference evapotranspiration by modified Penman-Monteith model were averaged to be 1.57. 1.10 and 1.49 over the whole rice growing season, respectively. Their respective coefficients of variation were 28.7. 22.7 and 12.8 percent, respectively. Crop coefficient based on modified Penman-Monteith model varied in good agreement with the trend of leaf area development, being greatest around heading stage.

• KSCE Journal of Civil and Environmental Engineering Research
• /
• v.29 no.1B
• /
• pp.47-62
• /
• 2009

The climate change caused by global warming may affect on the hydro-meteorologic factor such as evaporation (IPCC, 2001). Furthermore, it is also necessary that the effect of climate change according to geographical condition on evaporation should be studied. In this study, considering geographical and topographical conditions, the 6 evaporation equations that have been applied to simulate annual and monthly pan evaporation were compared. 56 climatologic stations were selected and classified, basing on the geographical and topographical characteristics (urbanization, topographical slope, proximity to coast, and area of water body). The evaporation equations currently being used are applied. These evaporation equations are Penman, Kohler-Nordenson-Fox (KNF), DeBruin-Keijman, Priestley-Taylor, Hargreaves, and Rohwer. Furthermore, Penman equation was modified by calibrating the parameters of wind function and was verified using relative error. The study results indicate that the KNF equation compared best with the pan: relative error was 8.72%. Penman equation provided the next-best values for evaporation relative to the pan: relative error was 8.75%. The mass-transfer method (Rohwer) provided the worst comparison showing relative error of 33.47%. In case that there is a close correlation between wind function and wind speed, modified Penman equation provided a better estimate of pan evaporation.