• 환경영향평가
• /
• 제23권3호
• /
• pp.169-176
• /
• 2014

The purpose of this study is to estimate the vibration reduction effect of the borehole which is controlled the vibration propagation in the ground. For this study, we measured the vibration velocity before and after the borehole installation. The results are as follows: The peak particle velocity(PPV) and peak vector sum(PVS) was reduced by the borehole. And also, the deviation of vibration velocity before and after the borehole installation showed large values in longitudinal and vertical component depending on the receive distance, and increased depending on the size of vibration energy. Finally, the vibration isolation efficiency was 25~35 percentage at 1.5m receive distance, and was 4~14 percentage at 3.0m receive distance. It was found that the vibration isolation efficiency was good in small vibration energy, but was not good at long receive distance.

• 화약ㆍ발파
• /
• 제26권2호
• /
• pp.1-10
• /
• 2008

우리나라에서는 제어발파와 관련된 대부분의 시방서 등에서 허용기준을 '입자속도'로만 규정하고 PPV나 PVS의 세부적인 잣대로는 구분하지 않고 있다. 그 결과, 이 '입자속도'는 PPV나 PVS 등의 어느 쪽으로든 해석이 가능하게 됨으로써 이들을 모두 고려하는 우리나라 특유의 관습적인 방법이 생겨나게 되었다. 원래 PPV나 PVS 등은 지반진동과 구조물 손상과의 인과관계에 대한 연구결과로부터 제안된 것으로, 일반적으로는 이들 가운데 어느 하나를 허용수준(허용치)의 잣대로 선택하여 사용하므로 우리나라의 관습적인 방법과 대비된다. 이런 맥락에서 본 논문에서는 제어발파의 설계 및 관리에 관한 기본개념을 허용기준을 중심으로 고찰함으로써 PPV나 PVS 가운데 어느 하나를 잣대로 사용하는 '일반적인 방법'과 양자를 모두 사용하는 '관습적인 방법'을 서로 비교해 보았다. 그 결과, 관습적인 방법은 허용수준을 설정하기에 따라 일반적인 방법과 다를 바가 없음에도 방법의 적용이 복잡하고, 잣대가 수시로 바뀌어 혼란의 소지가 높은 것으로 나타났다. 사실 관습적인 방법은 여러 가지 영향요소를 고려해야 하는 연구단계에서는 필요한 방법이지만 현장적용 단계에 들어가서는 '일반적인 방법'에 비해 단점은 있어도 장점은 발견하기 어렵다. 따라서 앞으로는 간편하고 합리적인 제어발파 방법으로서 '일반적인 방법'을 사용하는 것이 바람직할 것으로 판단된다.

• 한국소음진동공학회논문집
• /
• 제15권8호
• /
• pp.918-923
• /
• 2005

The vibration level (dB(V)) and vibration velocity (cm/sec) on the ground and buildings due to the differences of the measuring sites from the blasting source was investigated. To compare with vibration level and vibration velocity theirs magnitude was not surely directly proportional and vibration velocity 0.1 cm/sec was $45\~50$ dB(V). The difference between the measured vibration level and the calculated vibration level by Ejima's equation using vibration velocity PVS(peak vector sum) showed $21.0\~30.9$ dB(V) on the ground, $15.3\~23.6$ dB(V) on the apartment, respectively. And the correlation of vibration velocity and nitration level at the measuring sites of lower altitude showed higher than that of higher altitude.

• 한국소음진동공학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국소음진동공학회 2006년도 추계학술대회논문집
• /
• pp.361-365
• /
• 2006

In order to predict method of blasting vibration in ground and it's resident located around blasting field in urban area, blasting vibration characteristics were measured the vibration velocity(cm/sec), vibration acceleration($cm/sec^2$), vibration acceleration level(dB) and vibration level(dB(V)). The charged powder were used to 1.25kg and measuring sites were 25 points front 4m to 90m at the ground. The correlation of vibration velocity, vibration acceleration, vibration acceleration level and vibration level by square root scaled distance and cube root scaled distance were investigated. The correlation of PPV(peak particle velocity) velocity by SRSD(square root scaled distance) and CRSD(cube root scaled distance) was 0.85 and 0.86 and the correlation of PVS(peak vector sum) velocity by SRSD and CRSD was 0.82. Also vibration acceleration, vibration acceleration level and vibration level by SRSD and CRSD was 0.61, 0.62 and 0.82, respectively. As results, the vibration velocity and vibration level(dB(V)) was showed good correlation, but the vibration acceleration and vibration acceleration level was not showed good correlation.