• 한국응급구조학회지
• /
• 제25권3호
• /
• pp.63-70
• /
• 2021

Purpose: The study aimed to collect data from patients who were rejected by emergency requests for transfer to a tertiary hospital through 119 EMT and to analyze the data in the hospital to improve the plan. Methods: We analyzed 4,702 cases of emergency requests made by patients who were rejected by 119 emergency assistance out of the 22,568 patients who visited the emergency medical center in the C area of G metropolitan city from January 2018 through December 2020. The collected data were analyzed using IBM SPSS Statistics Version XX (IBM Corp., Armonk, N.Y., USA). Results: The major medical department with the largest number of such cases was the department of emergency medicine, with 2,519 cases (53.6%). Simple bruises were the most common diagnosis, with 2,819 cases (61.2%). KTAS classification was the highest with 3,562 patients (75.8%) in grade 4. As for the results, 4,084 patients (86.9%) were discharged from the hospital. Conclusion: Most of the patients who were rejected by emergency requests were non-emergency patients and were discharged from the hospital. emergency requests must be rejected at public relations and sites. In addition, the law should be amended to specifically present the reasons for refusal of emergency requests.

• Radiation Oncology Journal
• /
• 제37권3호
• /
• pp.156-165
• /
• 2019

Purpose: Prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) is a standard treatment for limited-stage small cell lung cancer (LS-SCLC) showing a response to initial treatment, but many patients do not receive PCI due to comorbidities or refusal. This study aims to define the patient group for whom PCI can be omitted with minimal risk. Materials and Methods: Patients with LS-SCLC who underwent radiotherapy with curative aim at our institution between January 2004 and December 2015 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients who did not receive PCI were evaluated for brain metastasis-free survival (BMFS), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and prognostic factors for survival, and treatment outcomes were compared with a patient cohort who received PCI. Results: A total of 350 patients achieved a response following thoracic radiotherapy, and 190 of these patients did not receive PCI. Stage I-II and a complete response (CR) to initial therapy were good prognostic factors for BMFS and OS on univariate analysis. Patients with both stage I-II and a CR who declined PCI showed comparable 2-year BMFS to those who received PCI (92% vs. 89%). In patients who achieved CR, PCI did not significantly improve OS or PFS. Conclusion: There should be less concern about omitting PCI in patients with comorbidities if they have stage I-II or a CR, with brain metastasis control being comparable to those patients who receive PCI.

• 의료법학
• /
• 제17권2호
• /
• pp.145-173
• /
• 2016

우리나라에서 전통적으로 환자의 자기결정권 내지 자율권은, 의사의 보고성 설명의무에 대응하는 알 권리 그리고 의사의 기여적 설명의무에 대응하는 수진 동의권 및 수진 거절권, 양자를 '중심'으로 해서 논의되어 왔다. 환자의 자율적 결정의 내용으로서 형성 피력되는, 자기 신체 및 의료 상황에 대해 알고 싶지 않은 희망과 그로 인한 이익에 관한 지위- 도덕적 법적 지위 - 는 환자로부터의 알 권리와 동의권의 포기 또는 (의사가 부담하는) 설명의무의 면제라는 소극적 지위 차원에서 인식되었다. 그리고 설명 동의 원칙 도그마의 적용에 의한 역기능 문제는 설명 동의 원칙의 적용 배제 및 그에 따른 의사의 책임 부인이라는 역시 소극적 접근법에 의해 '주로' 인식되었다. 즉 환자의 그러한 알고 싶지 않다는 '무지(無知)의 희망'을 실현시켜 줄 법적 수단이 환자의 '모를 권리' 및 의사의 '부작위 배려의무'라는 '적극적 지위'로 이해되고 인정되지 않았던 것이다. 이러한 당사자의 적극적 지위 설정이 전제되지 않으면 실제상 및 이론상 문제가 제기된다. 환자가 동의권을 포기한다고 선언하거나 의사의 설명의무를 면제한다고 표명했음에도 불구하고, 의사가 굳이 환자를 상대로 설명 내지 보고를 행하여 환자에게 큰 손해가 발생한 경우에, 의사의 그 행위를 규범적으로 어떻게 평가할 것인가가 문제인 것이다. 한편 의사가 설명의 역기능을 우려하여 설명을 행하지 않았고, 그 행태에 대해 적절한 것이란 평가가 가능한 경우에, 그 재량적 불설명의 적법성을 인정할 직접적 근거가 무엇인지를 밝히는 것 또한 문제이다. 이러한 문제를 해결하기 위해 근본적으로 환자에게 '모를 권리'라는 지위를, 의사에게 '배려의무'라는 지위를 인정할 필요가 있다. 요컨대 이 권리와 의무 개념은 환자의 자율성 관념의 충실화와 설명역기능 현상의 적정한 방지라는 법규범적 요구를 충족시키는 데에 매우 유용한 도구로서 수용할 수 있다.

• 의료법학
• /
• 제23권3호
• /
• pp.3-44
• /
• 2022

2020. 2.경 대한민국에서 코로나19 감염증의 대유행이 시작될 당시 문제가 되었던 대구 지역 A종교단체의 역학조사 방해 사건을 중심으로 면밀히 검토한 결과, 역학조사관이 특정 단체에게 명단 제출을 요구하였을 때, 이에 불응하거나 편집된 누락 명단을 제출한 행위에 대하여 역학조사에 해당하지 아니한다는 취지로 선고된 사례가 있는 반면, B열방센터 행사 출입자명단 미제출 사건의 경우 '출입자 명단' 등을 요구받았음에도 정당한 이유 없이 거부한 사실에 대하여 '출입자 명단의 제공은 역학조사에 수반되는 역학조사 간의 연결 과정을 형성하는 핵심적 사실행위로, 이를 거부하는 것도 역학조사 거부, 방해행위에 해당'하므로 적법하게 명단을 요구할 수 있어 처벌이 가능하다는 사례도 있다. 교인명단 제출요구가 역학조사에 해당하는지 여부와 관계없이 교인명단 제출 거부 또는 누락 행위가 곧 역학조사 거부·방해행위에 해당하는 경우도 있는데, 역학조사와 직접 관련성, 역학조사를 위한 것임이 외부적으로 표시되어 인식되었는지 여부, 명단의 역학조사 외의 목적으로 전용될 가능성 등을 종합적으로 고려하여 역학조사에 수반되는 사실행위를 방해함으로써 결과적으로 역학조사가 거부 내지 방해되는 결과가 발생한 경우에는 역학조사 방해가 된다는 하급심 판결의 논리가 설득력이 있다. 역학조사 결과 확인된 각 감염병환자등이나 접촉자 등에 대해 설문조사나 인체검체 채취 및 시험과 같은 역학조사가 실시되지만, 개별적인 사람에 대해 실시되는 역학조사가 서로 독립하여 존재할 수 없으며 역학조사의 연결 과정을 확인하고 추적하는 과정이 역학조사에 필수적으로 수반되며 이러한 연결고리를 확인하는 과정을 누군가 고의로 방해하거나 거부하게 되면, 역학조사가 직접적이고 현실적으로, 광범위하게 방해되는 결과가 발생하기 때문이다. 이 글에서는 주로 ① 감염병예방법상 역학조사와 정보 제공 요청은 차이점이 있으나 정보 제공 요청의 경우에도 역학조사에 해당되는 영역이 있다는 점, ② 코로나19의 의학적 특성과 역학조사의 연속성을 감안하면 역학조사관의 명단요구 행위가 역학조사에 해당할 여지가 있다는 점, ③ 특정한 경우에는 역학조사 방해죄가 위계공무집행방해에 해당할 수 있다는 점, ④ 2020. 9. 29.부터 감염병예법상 정보제공요청을 거부하는 경우에 징역형 또는 벌금형의 처벌규정이 신설되어 운용되고 있다는 점 등을 지적하여, 향후 감염병예방법의 적용 및 역학조사 실무 운용에 있어 도움이 되고자 한다.

• 의료법학
• /
• 제10권2호
• /
• pp.309-341
• /
• 2009

According to a case of Supreme Court's Sentence No. 2009DA17417 (May 21, 2009), the Supreme Court judges that 'the right to life is the ultimate one of basic human rights stipulated in the Constitution, so it is required to very limitedly and conservatively determine whether to discontinue any medical practice on which patient's life depends directly.' In addition, the Supreme Court admits that 'only if a patient who comes to a fatal phase before death due to attack of any irreversible disease may execute his or her right of self-determination based on human respect and values and human right to pursue happiness, it is permissible to discontinue life-sustaining treatment for him or her, unless there is any special circumstance.' Furthermore, the Supreme Court finds that 'if a patient who is attacked by any irreversible disease informs medical personnel of his or her intention to agree on the refusal or discontinuance of life-sustaining treatment in advance of his or her potential irreversible loss of consciousness, it is justifiable that he or she already executes the right of self-determination according to prior medical instructions, unless there is any special circumstance where it is reasonably concluded that his or her physician is changed after prior medical instructions for him or her.' The Supreme Court also finds that 'if a patient remains at irreversible loss of consciousness without any prior medical instruction, he or she cannot express his or her intentions at all, so it is rational and complying with social norms to admit possibility of estimating his or her own intentions on withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment, provided that such a withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment meets his or her interests in view of his or her usual sense of values or beliefs and it is reasonably concluded that he or she could likely choose to discontinue life-sustaining treatment, even if he or she were given any chance to execute his or her right of self-determination.' This judgment is very significant in a sense that it suggests the reasonable orientation of solutions for issues posed concerning withdrawal of meaningless life-sustaining medical efforts. The issues concerning removal of medical instruments for meaningless life-sustaining treatment and discontinuance of such treatment in regard to medical treatment for terminal cases don't seem to be so much big deal when a patient has clear consciousness enough to express his or her intentions, but it counts that there is any issue regarding a patient who comes to irreversible loss of consciousness and cannot express his or her intentions. Therefore, it is required to develop an institutional instrument that allows relevant authority to estimate the scope of physician's medical duties for terminal patients as well as a patient's intentions to withdraw any meaningless treatment during his or her terminal phase involving loss of consciousness. However, Korean judicial authority has yet to clarify detailed cases where it is permissible to discontinue any life-sustaining treatment for a patient in accordance with his or her right of self-determination. In this context, it is inevitable and challenging to make better legislation to improve relevant systems concerning withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment. The State must assure the human basic rights for its citizens and needs to prepare a system to assure such basic rights through legislative efforts. In this sense, simply entrusting physician, patient or his or her family with any critical issue like the withdrawal of meaningless life-sustaining treatment, even without any reasonable standard established for such entrustment, means the neglect of official duties by the State. Nevertheless, this issue is not a matter that can be resolved simply by legislative efforts. In order for our society to accept judicial system for withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment, it is important to form a social consensus about this issue and also make proactive discussions on it from a variety of standpoints.

• 대한임상독성학회지
• /
• 제15권1호
• /
• pp.56-59
• /
• 2017

Pneumatosis cystoides intestinalis and portomesenteric venous gas are uncommon radiological findings, but are found commonly in cases of bowel ischemia, or as a result of various non-ischemic conditions. A 72-year-old man visited an emergency center with altered mental status 2 hours after ingestion of an unknown pesticide. On physical examination, he showed the characteristic hydrocarbon or garlic-like odor, miotic pupils with no response to light, rhinorrhea, shallow respiration, bronchorrhea, and sweating over his face, chest and abdomen. Laboratory results revealed decreased serum cholinesterase, as well as elevated amylase and lipase level. We made the clinical diagnosis of organophosphate poisoning in this patient based on the clinical features, duration of symptoms and signs, and level of serum cholinesterase. Activated charcoal, fluid, and antidotes were administered after gastric lavage. A computerized tomography scan of the abdomen with intravenous contrast showed acute pancreatitis, poor enhancement of the small bowel, pneumatosis cystoides intestinalis, portomesenteric venous gas and ascites. Emergent laparotomy could not be performed because of his poor physical condition and refusal of treatment by his family. The possible mechanisms were believed to be direct intestinal mucosal damage by pancreatic enzymes and secondary mucosal disruption due to bowel ischemia caused by shock and the use of inotropics. Physicians should be warned about the possibility of pneumatosis cystoides intestinalis and portomesenteric venous gas as a complication of pancreatitis following anticholinesterase poisoning.

• Archives of Plastic Surgery
• /
• 제32권3호
• /
• pp.314-318
• /
• 2005

For treatment of full thickness skin defects caused by trauma or infections, skin grafts or flaps have been the treatment of choice to date. However, in patients who are not candidates for surgery, either due to his general conditions or refusal to receive treatment, supportive methods have been the only means of care, which inherently caused psychological trauma to the patient due to uncertainties of ultimate outcome and the length of treatment. This study aimed to heal full thickness skin defects through application of topical epidermal growth factor in patients who have received 2 to 3 weeks of conservative management using medifoam $B^{(R)}$ without improvement. Six patients from March 2002 to July 2004 were enrolled. The mean size of defects was $5.4{\times}4.6cm$ in 4 patients with carcinoma and $6.4{\times}4.1cm$ in 2 patients with osmidrosis. Commercially available 0.005% EGFR solution was used, and dressing was performed once daily. All patients benefitted from the use of EGF, with closure of skin defects taking an average of 28 days in cancer patients and 22.5 days in osmidrosis cases. EGF can be used as a supportive mean of treatment in the inoperable patients with skin defects, with resultant hastening of healing shortening duration of treatment.

• 성인간호학회지
• /
• 제27권5호
• /
• pp.493-504
• /
• 2015

Purpose: This study was a qualitative study to explore and understand the adaptation experiences of hemodialysis among women with End-Stage Renal Disease (ESRD) and to develop a substantive theory using the grounded theory method. Methods: Participants were 15 female patients who underwent hemodialysis for ESRD treatment from three general hospitals. The data were collected through in-depth individual interviews. Results: The adaptation experience of participants was emerged as a process of taking care and enduring. There were four adaptation stages as a negative, despair, receptive, and maintenance period in reference to hemodialysis. The causal conditions were a vague expectations of recovery and refusal to undergo hemodialysis. The core phenomenon was that of confinement to dialysis machine. The contextual conditions for this phenomenon were the loss of femininity. They used action/interaction strategies such as transition their life with a focus on hemodialysis, seeking information, and learning how to take care of their body. Through this process, they had a strong will to live or had sustained their life. Conclusion: These results indicate that there is a need for nurses to understand the different steps of adaptation experiences of the given patient population. It is necessary for nurses to support them to lead their life as much normal as possible and improve the adaptation experience of ESRD.

• 한국병원경영학회지
• /
• 제22권4호
• /
• pp.50-60
• /
• 2017

Purposes: The purpose of this study was to identify the preferred types of the hospital reservation cancellation management to help reduce the reservation cancellations. Methodology: This study sampled 327 outpatients or their guardians who had reserved a university hospital and a general hospital located in the southwestern part of Seoul, and the responses from 300 of them were used for the final analysis. The subjects' preferences of reservation cancellation management types were analyzed in reference to their demographic variables. The timing and frequency of pre-notification preferred by the subjects were examined. A multidimensional scaling methods and correspondence analysis was used to identify preference for management methods of no-show and type of reservation guide. Findings: As a result, 77.3% of the respondents were perceived that the reservation cancellation was a habit. The most preferred method of managing the reservation cancellation would be refusal to refund the reservation deposit (61.7%), followed by payment for cancellation (16.0%), limit of future reservations (16.0%) and penalty (6.3%) in their order. 186 of the subjects (62.0%) preferred the texting for prevention of reservation cancellations, and 102 of the subjects (34.0%) preferred the phone calls. The preferred timing and frequency of the SMS were twice 3 days before, once a day before and three times 7 days before, while the preferred timing and frequency of phone call was once a day before. Practical Implications: The no-show rate can be improved by enhancing SMS pre-notification and by improving afterwards telephone counseling. For other factors, it needs to study on the service differentiation with the characteristics of each patient group.

• 한국화재소방학회논문지
• /
• 제20권4호
• /
• pp.77-90
• /
• 2006

119구급대원의 응급구급활동과 관련하여 형사법적으로 문제되는 영역은 크게 세 가지이다. 첫째는 구급 요청을 거절하는 행위이며, 둘째는 요구호자를 이송하지 않는 미이송 행위이고, 셋째는 응급처치행위이다. 이러한 일련의 구급대원의 행위들이 '응급의료에 관한 법률'이나 관련 법규의 규정에 위반되어 이루어진 경우에는 이들 법률들에 규정된 범죄행위가 성립한다. 특히 정당한 이유 없이 구급요청을 거절한 행위는 응급의료법상 응급의료거부죄가 성립하고, 적법한 절차에 의하지 아니한 응급처치는 무단 응급처치죄가 성립한다. 또한 구급요청거절과 미이송 행위 그리고 응급처치나 미응급처치 등으로 인해 요구호자가 사망하거나 상태가 악화된 경우에는 형법상 살인죄나 업무상과실치사죄 또는 중상해죄가 성립할 수 있다. 이처럼 구급대원의 경우에는 구급활동과 관련하여 형사적 책임으로부터 자유로울 수가 없다. 즉 구급대원들도 직무의 소홀과 과실로 인해 발생하는 법익침해적 결과에 대해서는 당연히 형사적 책임을 져야 한다. 그러나 긴급상황에서 불가피하게 국민의 생명과 건강을 침해한 경우에는 이들을 보호할 수 있는 법적 방안도 마련되어야 하며, 특히 열악한 근무환경에서 구급대원에게만 그 책임을 전가할 수 없는 게 현실이다. 현재 구호자보호법 제정문제가 논의되고 있는데, 이 법률에 구급대원의 형사면책부분이 합리적으로 규정되어 궁극적으로 구급대원들이 국민의 생명과 건강을 지키는 파수꾼으로서 그 역할에 충실할 수 있도록 하여야 한다.