• 제목/요약/키워드: Panoramic radiograph

검색결과 136건 처리시간 0.035초

파노라마방사선사진상과 구외방사선사진상에서의 해부학적 구조에 관한 비교연구 (A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF ANATOMIC STRUCTURES ON THE PANORAMIC RADIOGRAPH AND SOME EXTRAORAL RADIOGRAPHS)

  • 이동규;김한평
    • 치과방사선
    • /
    • 제14권1호
    • /
    • pp.71-80
    • /
    • 1984
  • The author has studied each landmark for successful interpretation in the radiograph of the head that have the complex anatomic structures, using panoramic radiograph, postero-anterior cephalometric radiograph, lateral cephalometric radiograph, Waters' radiograph of the skull. The anatomic structures of the human dry skull attached by radiopaque materials were taken radiographs and analysed comparatively. The results were as follows: 1. The overall anatomic structures of the mandible showed sharp images in the panoramic radiograph than other radiographs with relatively less distortion, superimposition, blurring of the image. 2. The anatomic structures were situated on sagital plane of the skull showed blurred images in panoramic radiograph than other radiographs. 3. The anatomic structures which were situated on the basal portion of the skull showed blurred and secondary images in the panoramic radiograph than other radiographs. 4. In the panoramic radiograph, the lower 3rd portion of the orbit appeared to be superimposed with the superior portion of the maxillary sinus and the medial and lateral surface of the nasal cavity showed extensively superimposition of the orbit and the maxillary sinus, which images showed blurring. 5. The inferior surface and posterior surface of maxillary sinus showed to be good image in the panoramic radiograph than other radiographs. 6. In the panoramic radiograph, line of maxillary bone between lateral pterygoid plate, line of maxillary bone between zygomatic bone showed distinct image with another structures.

  • PDF

상악동 중격의 발생율과 파노라마 방사선 사진의 정확도 (INCIDENCE OF SINUS SEPTA AND ACCURACY OF PANORAMIC RADIOGRAPH)

  • 신창훈;김형진;홍종락;양승민
    • Journal of the Korean Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons
    • /
    • 제33권5호
    • /
    • pp.504-510
    • /
    • 2007
  • Purpose: The purpose of this study was to determine the incidence of antral septa and the accuracy of panoramic radiograph in identifying maxillary sinus septa. In addition, when panoramic radiograph led to a false diagnosis of more than majority, we analyzed findings of the panoramic radiograph. Patients and methods: This study included 180 patients who were radiographically examined before the surgery was done using both panoramic and computerized tomographic radiographs(CT scan), Samsung Medical Center from April 2003 to March 2006, and examined the incidence of antral septa, the false diagnosis rate of panoramic radiograph, and radiographic characters in case of false diagnosis. Only those bone lamellae were considered as septa that showed a height of at least 3.0mm. It was thus possible to exclude the alveolar recess. One oral and maxillofacial surgeon(OMFS) determined the presence or absence of sinus septa in CT scan, and five OMFS determined the presence or absence of sinus septa in panoramic radiograph. Results: The septa were observed in 81 of 360 sinuses(22.5%). All septa were oriented in a buccopalatal plane. More or less greater prevalence was observed in the second molar region(38.2%) but no predominant location was found. Panoramic radiograph led to false diagnosed septa in 361 of 1800 cases(20.1%). In case of false diagnosis of more than majority, superimposed image on zygomatic process was 44.1%, faint image in the region not related to sinus lifting 26.5%, faint image in the region related to sinus lifting 17.6%, and misconception for superimposed image 11.8% Conclusion: In this study we could get clinico-anatomical information of septum in the maxillary sinus. Compared to CT scan, panoramic radiograph can not clearly differentiate the sinus septa, but we consider that panoramic radiograph may improve its usefulness if we take additional modified panoramic radiograph and clinical exam.

An atypical case involving real, ghost, and pseudo-ghost images on a panoramic radiograph

  • Jong-Won Kim;Yo-Seob Seo
    • Imaging Science in Dentistry
    • /
    • 제54권1호
    • /
    • pp.57-62
    • /
    • 2024
  • Purpose: This report presents a unique case featuring real, ghost, and pseudo-ghost images on the panoramic radiograph of a patient wearing earrings. It also explains the formation of these images in an easy-to-understand manner. Materials and Methods: One real image and two ghost images appeared on each side of a panoramic radiograph of a patient wearing earrings on both sides. Of the two ghost images on each side, one was considered a typical ghost image and the other was considered a ghost-like real image (pseudo-ghost image). The formation zones of the real, double, and ghost images were examined based on the path and angles of the X-ray beam from the Planmeca ProMax. To simulate the pseudo-ghost and typical ghost images on panoramic radiography, a radiopaque marker was affixed to the right mandibular condyle of a dry mandible, and the position of the mandible was adjusted accordingly. Results: The center of rotation of the Planmeca ProMax extended beyond the jaw area, and the area of double image formation also reached beyond the jaw. The radiopaque-marked mandibular condyle, situated in the outwardly extending area of double image formation, exhibited triple images consisting of real, double (pseudo-ghost), and ghost images. These findings helped to explain the image formation associated with the patient's earrings observed in the panoramic radiograph. Conclusion: Dentists must understand the characteristics and principles of the panoramic equipment they use and apply this understanding to taking and interpreting panoramic radiographs.

Comparison of Vertical Magnification Ratio among Various Areas in Panoramic Radiographs

  • Song, Woong-Kyu;Seok, Hwa-Suk;Kim, Byeong-Rin;Choi, Seong-Ho
    • Journal of Korean Dental Science
    • /
    • 제10권2호
    • /
    • pp.53-59
    • /
    • 2017
  • Purpose: The objective of the present article is to determine whether there are differences in vertical enlargement ratio among various sites within both jaws in a panoramic radiograph. Materials and Methods: Two hundred and seventy-threeimplant sites in panoramic radiographs were evaluated by two observers. Magnification ratios at various sites in both jaws were calculated and compared with each other. Result: The average vertical enlargement ratio in the panoramic radiograph was 1.264 and this value was larger than original ratio 1.250. Although vertical magnification ratio of maxillary molar area was higher than that of mandibular molar area, every group showed similar magnification ratio in clinical respect. Conclusion: Vertical magnification ratio of the maxillary molar area is statistically higher than that of the mandibular molar area in the panoramic radiograph, but it is clinically negligible.

Dilemma of gonial angle measurement: Panoramic radiograph or lateral cephalogram

  • Radhakrishnan, Pillai Devu;Varma, Nilambur Kovilakam Sapna;Ajith, Vallikat Velath
    • Imaging Science in Dentistry
    • /
    • 제47권2호
    • /
    • pp.93-97
    • /
    • 2017
  • Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of panoramic imaging in measuring the right and left gonial angles by comparing the measured angles with the angles determined using a lateral cephalogram of adult patients with class I malocclusion. Materials and Methods: The gonial angles of 50 class I malocclusion patients (25 males and 25 females; mean age: 23 years) were measured using both a lateral cephalogram and a panoramic radiograph. In the lateral cephalograms, the gonial angle was measured at the point of intersection of the ramus plane and the mandibular plane. In the panoramic radiographs, the gonial angle was measured by drawing a line tangent to the lower border of the mandible and another line tangent to the distal border of the ascending ramus and the condyle on both sides. The data obtained from both radiographs were statistically compared. Results: No statistically significant difference was observed between the gonial angle measured using the lateral cephalograms and that determined using the panoramic radiographs. Further, there was no statistically significant difference in the measured gonial angle with respect to gender. The results also showed a statistically insignificant difference in the mean of the right and the left gonial angles measured using the panoramic radiographs. Conclusion: As the gonial angle measurements using panoramic radiographs and lateral cephalograms showed no statistically significant difference, panoramic radiography can be considered in orthodontics for measuring the gonial angle without any interference due to superimposed images.

Gonial Angle의 단순 회귀 모델: 파노라마 영상과 측모두부 영상간의 비교 (The Simple Regression Model of Gonial Angles : Comparison between Panoramic Radiographs and Lateral Cephalograms)

  • 박성희;김영재;이상훈;김종철;장기택
    • 대한소아치과학회지
    • /
    • 제44권2호
    • /
    • pp.129-137
    • /
    • 2017
  • 본 연구의 목적은 파노라마 영상과 측모두부 영상에서 유의미한 상관관계를 가지는 계측치를 확인하고, 그 관계를 수식화하는 것이다. 99명의 3급 부정교합 환자의 파노라마 영상과 측모두부 영상에서 gonial angle, 하악지 높이, 하악중절치에서 하악하연까지의 길이를 측정하여 평가하였다. 측정된 수치는 각각 대응 표본 T검증, Pearson's 상관관계 검정, 회귀 분석을 통해 평가하였다. 측모두부 영상에서의 gonial angle 평균값은 $127.50^{\circ}$, 파노라마 영상에서의 값은 $125.49^{\circ}$, 상관계수는 0.945(p < 0.001)로 나타났으며, 상관관계는 '측모두부 영상의 gonial angle = 0.920 ${\times}$ 파노라마 영상의 gonial angle + 12.072'로 나타낼 수 있다. 다른 계측치들 간의 상관관계는 gonial angle에 비해 낮게 나타났다. Gonial angle은 파노라마 영상과 측모두부 영상에서 모두 재현성 있게 측정 가능하며, 강한 양의 상관관계를 나타낸다. 파노라마 영상 또한 측모두부 영상과 같이 환자의 수직성장패턴을 평가하는데 도움을 주는 방법이다.

범랑모세포종과 치성각화낭의 감별 진단시 방사선사진과 판독자에 따른 진단능의 비교 (Diagnostic ability of differential diagnosis in ameloblastoma and odontogenic keratocyst by imaging modalities and observers)

  • 강태인;허경회;이원진;허민석;이삼선;김정화;문제운;최순철
    • Imaging Science in Dentistry
    • /
    • 제36권4호
    • /
    • pp.177-182
    • /
    • 2006
  • Purpose: To evaluate the diagnostic ability in differentiating between ameloblastoma and odontogenic keratocyst according to the imaging modalities and observers. Materials and Methods: We evaluated thirty-six cases of ameloblastomas and forty-seven cases of odontogenic keratocysts all histologically confirmed. Six oral and maxillofacial radiologists diagnosed the lesions by 3 methods: using panoramic radiograph, using computed tomograph (CT), and using panoramic radiograph and CT. The observers were classified by 3 groups: group 1 had experienced over 10 years in oral and maxillofacial radiologic field, group 2 had experienced for 3-4 years, and group 3 was in the process of residentship. After over 2 weeks, the observers diagnosed them by the same methods. Results: The ROC curve areas except for group 3 were the highest with interpretation using panoramic radiograph and CT, followed by interpretation using CT only, and the lowest with interpretation using panoramic radiograph only. The overall difference was not found in diagnostic ability among groups in using panoramic radiograph only, but there was difference in diagnostic ability of group 1 and 2 vs 3 in using CT only, and combination panoramic radiograph and CT. Conclusions: To differentiate between ameloblastoma and odontogenic keratocyst more accurately, the experienced oral and maxillofacial radiologist should diagnose with combination of panoramic radiograph and CT.

  • PDF

패턴인식 알고리즘을 적용한 임플란트 주변골 흡수 분석 (Marginal Bone Resorption Analysis of Dental Implant Patients by Applying Pattern Recognition Algorithm)

  • 정민기;김성민;김명주;이종호;명훈;김명진
    • Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
    • /
    • 제35권3호
    • /
    • pp.167-173
    • /
    • 2013
  • Purpose: The aim of this study is to analyze the series of panoramic radiograph of implant patients using the system to measure peri-implant crestal bone loss according to the elapsed time from fixture installation time to more than three years. Methods: Choose 10 patients having 45 implant fixtures installed, which have series of panoramic radiograph in the period to be analyzed by the system. Then, calculated the crestal bone depth and statistics and selected the implant in concerned by clicking the implant of image shown on the monitor by the implemented pattern recognition system. Then, the system recognized the x, y coordination of the implant and peri-implant alveolar crest, and calculated the distance between the approximated line of implant fixture and alveolar crest. By applying pattern recognition to periodic panoramic radiographs, we attained the results and made a comparison with the results of preceded articles concerning peri-implant marginal bone loss. Analyzing peri-implant crestal bone loss in a regression analysis periodic filmed panoramic radiograph, logarithmic approximation had highest $R^2$ value, and the equation is as shown below. $y=0.245Logx{\pm}0.42$, $R^2=0.53$, unit: month (x), mm (y) Results: Panoramic radiograph is a more wide-scoped view compared with the periapical radiograph in the same resolution. Therefore, there was not enough information in the radiograph in local area. Anterior portion of many radiographs was out of the focal trough and blurred precluding the accurate recognition by the system, and many implants were overlapped with the adjacent structures, in which the alveolar crest was impossible to find. Conclusion: Considering the earlier objective and error, we expect better results from an analysis of periapical radiograph than panoramic radiograph. Implementing additional function, we expect high extensibility of pattern recognition system as a diagnostic tool to evaluate implant-bone integration, calculate length from fixture to inferior alveolar nerve, and from fixture to base of the maxillary sinus.

골다공증의 진단시 파노라마 방사선사진 유용성에 대한 연구 (Usefulness of panoramic radiography in the diagnosis of osteoporosis)

  • 이병도;이상래
    • Imaging Science in Dentistry
    • /
    • 제31권2호
    • /
    • pp.67-71
    • /
    • 2001
  • Purpose: To assess the possibility of using panoramic indices as an indicator of jaw osteoporosis. Methods: Mandibular cortical width (MCW), degree of mandibular alveolar bone resorption (ABR) and morphology of mandibular inferior cortex (MIC) on panoramic radiograph were used as panoramic indices. These panoramic indices were compared with bone mineral density (BMD) of lumbar (L1-L4) and femoral neck measured by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry. We also compared MCW and ABR of young men with those of postmenopausal women. Results : There was a significant correlation between ABR and BMD of lumbar and femoral neck. And also significant correlation between MIC and BMD of lumbar and femoral neck. ANOVA test of BMD of lumbar and femoral neck showed significant differences according to morphologic classification of inferior cortex. There was significant difference in MCW and ABR between young men and postmenopausal women. Conclusion: Our results suggested that ABR and MIC on panoramic radiograph could be reliable in screening of osteoporosis.

  • PDF

Screening panoramic radiographs in a group of patients visiting a Health Promotion Center

  • Lee Jae-Seo;Kang Byung-Cheol
    • Imaging Science in Dentistry
    • /
    • 제35권4호
    • /
    • pp.199-202
    • /
    • 2005
  • Purpose : To report the incidence of radiological findings from screening panoramic radiographs and verify the validity of the panoramic radiography for screening purposes. Materials and Methods : Six thousand one hundred and sixty panoramic radiographs taken from the patients visiting the Health Promotion Center of CNUH were selected for this retrospective study. Panoramic radiographs were examined into the following pathologic conditions : the presence of periodontal bone loss, dental caries, periapical radiolucencies, retained roots, impacted supernumerary teeth, impacted third molars, odontoma, cystic lesions other than radicular cyst, sialoliths, and mixed radiolucent-radiopaque lesions. Number of pathologic conditions and Prevalence values were recorded. Results: The prevalences of pathologic conditions were $72.9\%$ of periodontal bone loss, $32.2\%$ of dental caries, $11.9\%$ of periapical radiolucencies, $10.8\%$ of retained roots, $0.4\%$ of root fracture, $1.0\%$ of impacted supernumerary teeth, $1.0\%$ of impacted third molars, $0.06\%$ of odontoma, $0.08\%$ of cystic lesion other than radicular cyst, $0.2\%$ of prolonged retention of deciduous tooth, $0.1\%$ of sialolith, and $0.04\%$ of mixed radiopaque and radiolucent lesion. Conclusion : Although the panoramic radiograph should not be used to replace intraoral radiographic and clinical examinations, this study showed that many dental pathologic conditions could be detected on panoramic radiographs. The panoramic radiograph might serve as a diagnostic aid in dental health evaluation programs.

  • PDF