• 보건교육건강증진학회지
• /
• 제32권4호
• /
• pp.13-23
• /
• 2015

Objectives: his study was performed to examine whether a community organization strategy had been driven by core values explicit in Ottawa Charter and to give some suggestions for using values in health promotion practice in Korea. Methods: We searched literature online with key words of 'values', 'health promotion', and/or 'Ottawa Charter', etc, and reviewed published papers on design, implementation, and evaluation of Health Plus Happiness Plus Projects in Gyeongsangnam-Do, a community organization strategy. Results: Evident core values since Ottawa Charter had been holistic definition of health, empowerment, community participation, addressing the impact of broader determinants of health, reducing social inequities and injustice, and intersectoral collaboration. A community organization strategy was good at realization of most values. Some ways for value-driven health promotion practice were suggested. Conclusions: More discussion and debate on values in health promotion are needed in Korea.

• 보건교육건강증진학회지
• /
• 제32권4호
• /
• pp.1-11
• /
• 2015

Objectives: This paper reviews the main principles and values underlying health promotion and reflects upon recent health promotion efforts in Korea. Methods: The essay approaches these issues through the framework of the Ottawa Charter for Health Promotion (WHO, 1986) and other related (WHO) documents. The Ottawa Charter has been an important basis for health promotion worldwide over the last three decades since 1986. Emphasizing the instrumental value of health and the prerequisites for health, it provides the definition of health promotion and elaborates the strategies for health promotion as well as the main health promotion actions. Results: Beyond the values of health as both a fundamental human right and a resource for everyday life, the values and principles related to health promotion shown in WHO documents and other literature include holism, social justice and equity, public and community participation, autonomy, empowerment, socioecological approaches to health, sustainability, intersectoral collaboration, partnership-building, responsibility for health, and so on. Conclusions: Reflecting, subjectively, on health promotion efforts in Korea, some values, including holism in terms of target population, equity, public and community participation, empowerment, and socio-ecological approaches have been realized to some extent, while other values like intersectoral collaboration and partnership have not been considered sincerely in public efforts relating to health promotion. Therefore, future health promotion efforts in Korea should concentrate on incorporating these critical values and principles-based approaches into health promotion activities.

• 한국보건교육건강증진학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국보건교육건강증진학회 2005년도 국민건강증진법 제정 10주년 국제학술대회
• /
• pp.231-252
• /
• 2005

Community action is an essential component for health promotion. Through effective community action, a community can gain control over its health & health determinants, and improve the quality of its life. The Ottawa Charter for Health Promotion (WHO, 1984)stated that a health promotion program that stimulates and strengthens community health activity is one of the five main action areas in the field of health promotion. This paper reviews the meaning and key concept of community health promotion action, and discusses ways to strengthen community action as defined by the Ottawa Charter for Health Promotion. It discusses the principle of community participation for health promotion, and, taking a successful example of a community-based health promotion program, it provides an illustrative example of how to build partnerships and coalitions in a community. Community development theories for community-based approaches are also introduced, along with their key concepts. Finally, the paper assesses the barriers to effective community health promotion action in Korea, and proposes several strategies for strengthening community action for health promotion.

• Korean Journal of Health Education and Promotion
• /
• 제3권1호
• /
• pp.9-20
• /
• 2001

Since its declaration in the year 1986, the Ottawa Charter for Health Promotion1 continues to guide the global practice of health promotion. This situation is also true in Japan, and recently the notion of health promotion is substantiated to yield two of the national health promotion and disease prevention agendas, Kenkou Nippon 21(KN21; Healthy Japan 2010)2 in the year 1999 and Sukoyaka Oyako 21 (SO21; Healthy Parents and Children 2010)3 in the year 2000. The apparent characteristics of these two agendas are their multiplicity of numerical objectives.(omitted)

• 보건교육건강증진학회지
• /
• 제29권4호
• /
• pp.15-28
• /
• 2012

Objective: This paper aims to describe health promotion (HP) research according to HP activities, strategies, target population, and settings, and to explore challenges for HP to reflect principles and values. Methods: A content analysis was employed for all research reports funded by the Korea Health Promotion Foundation from 2005 to 2011. Content analysis was conducted according to the HP activities and strategies as mentioned in the Ottawa Charter, and by target population and setting. Challenges for HP research were explored by priority actions suggested by the International Union for Health Promotion and Education. Results: The total number of research was 384. The most popular topic was on HP actions for reorienting health services, followed by developing personal skills, creating supportive environments, building healthy public policy, and strengthening community actions. Research focusing on enabling strategies was most dominant among the HP strategies, while both advocating and mediating strategies were unlikely to be studied. An even distribution was found across target populations. The most popular setting was communities, followed by workplaces and schools. Conclusion: HP research tends to be anchored on bio-medical, individualized, and behavioral perspectives. A discussion was made to overcome this tendency by employing HP in social sciences theory and methods.

• 한국보건교육건강증진학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국보건교육건강증진학회 2001년도 제4회 국제학술 심포지움
• /
• pp.55-79
• /
• 2001

1986년에 발표된 이래, 오타와 선언은 세계적인 건강증진에의 흐름을 이끌어 왔다고 할 수 있다. 이것은 근년의 일본에도 해당되고, 건강증진의 중요성이 인식된 결과, 국가 전체의 건강가꾸기와 질병예방에 관한 두 가지 국민적 중앙 계획, 즉 건강일본 21(이하, 건강21로 생략함)이 1999년에, 또 건전한 부모와 어린이21(이하, 어린이21로 생략함)이 2000년에 발표되었다. 이 두 중앙계획은, 많은 수치에 의한 목표치를 설정하고 있다는 점에서 분명한 공통점이 있다. 예를 들어, 건강21은 생활의 질과 건강수명의 연장을 목표로 하고 있다.(중략)

• 보건교육건강증진학회지
• /
• 제27권2호
• /
• pp.49-57
• /
• 2010

Objectives: The main objectives of the article are to review roles and prospective of the Health Education Specialist on the globalized World, and develop the new positions and jobs of the Health Education Specialists on health promotion. Results and Conclusion: There are many rapid changes, these days, in the Medical and Health Environments, because of Globalization. Modern society needs health professionals who are equipped with new knowledge and information to correspondence with various Health Problems, such as the appearing and disappearing of new contagious diseases, problems of improper health barriers for foreign products, health problems from poverty and also health inequalities are known to be rising. Globalization has induced new needs for Health Professional manpower. After the Ottawa Charter, international society is training and utilizing Health Education Specialists as the propulsive core member of the Health Promotion Era. And also society now expects and requests the activities of Health Education Professionals as a group effort, not only in their own countries, but also across the barriers of international society. Health Professionals are working in WHO, UNICEF KOICA or other international organizations. Especially England and USA are utilizing Health Education Professionals in Health Planning and Education Work to keep up with Health Promotion Era. Now, we need to establish ideal and proper strategies in Health Promotion Work, as a one of the pioneer countries to lead Internationalization. To accomplish this task, Health Education Specialists should be well utilized in the field of Health Promotion Work, such as communities, schools, industrial sites and international health organizations.

• 보건교육건강증진학회지
• /
• 제25권2호
• /
• pp.73-89
• /
• 2008

Objectives: This research was conducted to suggest a recommendation for the Korean credentialing policy of health education specialist as the primary human resource in community health promotion activities from the special group perspective of the Korean Society for Health Education and Promotion. Methods: This research was conducted by the professional focus group discussion and descriptive literature review on health education and promotion. Results: This draft recommendation for Korean credentialing system development of health education specialist was based on the four background reasons for modifying health promotion related acts, for developing better policy of health education credentialing, for keeping the public and ethical responsibilities as the competitive professional society, and for improving health promotion activities in Korea. Theoretical background of the four reasons was Ottawa Charter. We classified three credentialing levels of health education specialist based on health education own competencies, coordiating competencies with environmental factors, and research competencies. Furthermore, we developed 10 major roles and categorized 53 sub-roles based on these competencies above. We recommended 10 classes required to take to become Health Education Specialist. These 10 classes were developed based on the credentialing systems in the United States and Japan. These 10 classes were about health education and promotion methods and strategies not health intervention topics. We also built the draft plan for continuing education to keep KCHES based on the NCHEC in the United States. Conclusions: Further research should be conducted to build better health education specialist credentialing systems modifing current communtiy-based health promotion activities in terms of modifying public regulation, developing KCHEC examination system, protecting job security both in public and private sectors, and creating professionalism in KCHEC.

• 농촌의학ㆍ지역보건
• /
• 제30권2호
• /
• pp.227-240
• /
• 2005

현재 건강증진에 대한 다양한 논의가 진행 중으로 학자마다 정의가 다르고 동일한 학자도 문맥에 따라 다르게 사용하고 있는 경우가 많으며, 건강증진 내용의 스펙트럼이 행태변화만을 포함하는 가장 좁은 의미수준부터 지원체계, 질병예방, 건강보호 등을 포괄하는 가장 넓은 의미까지 다양하다. 건강증진의 개념을 어떤 것으로 받아들이든 정책, 개인 기술, 환경변화 등의 측면에서 지역사회(community)가 인간 집단을 포괄하고 있다는 점에서 건강증진의 가장 중요한 장이라는 것은 별로 이론이 없는 것 같다. 건강증진의 개념과 정의가 형성되어가는 시점에서 몇가지 주요한 논란점들이 있는데 그중에서도 건강증진의 접근전략에서 인구집단 전략과 고위험군 접근전략 간의 대립점이 가장 첨예한 논란중의 하나이다. 정부의 정책, 조직의 우선순위, 전문인의 행태 등이 각 개인의 노력과 같이 중요하거나 혹은 더 중요하다는 것이 이러한 입장이며, 건강과 행태에 영호t을 미칠 수 있는 사회체계와 환경에 대해 보다 큰 의사결정권을 가지는 것이 건강증진을 위해 중요하다고 주장한다. 이러한 이유로 건강증진을 논함에 있어 지역사회 전체를 통한 접근이 점점 더 강조하고 있다. 지역사회 건강증진 프로그램은 지역사회자원을 효율적 활용을 통한 보다 강화되고, 통합된, 포괄적, 협력적으로 수행되어져야한다. 이러한 방향은 1986년 오타와 헌장에의 건강증진의 정의에서 살펴볼 수 있으며, 광범위한 건강의 결정요인에 대한 접근이 필수적임을 알 수 있다. 신체활동은 건강의 주요한 결정요인이다. 인구집단 전략은 개인에 대한 신체활동 교육하는 것이 충분하지 않음을 제안한다. 개인 수준의 행태변화도 중요한 것이지만 이에 대한 집단적 변화를 불러줄 환경적 변화를 위한 전략과 균형을 이루어야 한다. 건강증진을 위한 신체활동 인구집단 전략은 사회적, 물리적 지지환경을 강화하고, 국가, 광역 및 기초자치 단체 수준에서 다양한 지역사회자원을 연계, 통합하여야 한다. 지속적인 공공교육 및 사회마케팅이 지역사회 신체활동 조직 및 기관, 산업장, 학교 등을 대상으로 지역사회 모든 주민들이 신체활동에 대한 관심을 증진시킬 수 있도록 협동적으로 이루어져야 한다. 정부와 기관 및 시민들은 지역사회차원의 운동개념으로 주최하고 참여하여 사회적 규범화 작업에 동참하여야한다. 기본적으로 적절하고 충분한 재원의 지원, 인적자원의 개발, 정책 및 입법이 제공되어야한다. 또한 국내외적으로 연구개발과 지식의 공유 및 교환이 요구된다. 한국에서는 전략적 우선순위가 높은 신체활동 프로그램의 범주를 지역 보건소를 기반으로 한 환경적 지원, 생애주기별 접근, 고위험군 및 질환군 접근 등으로 구분하였다. 지역사회에 기반한 신체활동 핵심 프로그램으로 하부구조 구축, 지원적 환경 제공, 지역사회 캠페인, 건강증진 교육 및 홍보, 노인 및 비만인을 위한 신체활동 프로그램, 그리고 운동처방 프로그램 등을 포함하였다. 신체활동증진 및 운동사업은 사회적, 물리적 지원환경 조성 등을 중심으로 전개하며, 보건소를 중심으로 한 운동사업은 지역 공공기관 및 민간기관 등과 연계하여 프로그램을 연동하며, 홍보 및 교육은 지역의 운동단체 및 기관, 각급 학교 등과 협력하여 운동에 대한 관심을 고취하고 신체활동 및 운동을 생활화하는 프로그램을 시행토록 한 전략을 지속, 강화토록 하여야 할 것이다.