• Asia pacific journal of information systems
• /
• 제20권4호
• /
• pp.53-79
• /
• 2010

The study was originated from recognition that project participants' satisfaction should be Improved to raise project performance and to make progress of a successful project since the above dissatisfaction was operated as a danger factor of the project. The study selected one large-scale sample project and attempted measuring characteristics of the project, participants' satisfaction and project performance with the whole project participants. The study analyzed correlations between individual level (team members) and group level (development team), and examined what effect a sub project manager under complicated hierarchical organization of the large-scale project, namely PL (project leader)'s leadership style had on each individual project participant's satisfaction and what effect project uncertainty in organization/technology environment had on project participants' satisfaction and project performance. The study verified that development team (group) had an effect on team member (individual)-level project participants' satisfaction by disclosing that there was a significant dispersion among groups within project participants' satisfaction by each individual. It is analyzed that it is necessary to make improvement through approach by each pertinent team to raise individual-level project participants' satisfaction. The study also verified PL's ideal leadership under strict methodology and hierarchical control of the large-scale project. Based on the verification of the hypotheses, the results of the analysis were produced as follows. First, the development team affects the satisfaction level that an individual has when he/she participates in a project. This suggests that the satisfaction with project participation should be improved at the team level. In addition, the project management style and leadership orientation of the manager of a sub project who is mostly affected by the team proved to have a direct influence on the satisfaction with project participation and project performances. Second, both the performance-oriented leadership and the relationship-oriented leadership of the PL of the development team were verified to have a significant effect on the satisfaction of the team members associated with project participation. In other words, when the team members recognize that the PL of the development team shows both the performance-oriented leadership and the relationship-oriented leadership, their satisfaction with project participation increases accordingly. Third, it was verified that the uncertainty of the organizational environment significantly affects the satisfaction level when the PL of the development team exerts a relationship-oriented and performance-oriented leadership. The higher the uncertainty of the organizational environment is, the more the satisfaction with project participation decreases whereas the relationship-oriented leadership has a more positive effect on the satisfaction than the performance-oriented leadership style. Fourth, when the PL of the development team exerts the relationship-related and performance-related leadership, the uncertainty of the technological environment has a significant influence on the satisfaction level. The higher the uncertainty of the technological environment is, the more the satisfaction with project participation decreases whereas the performance-oriented leadership has a more positive effect on the satisfaction than the relationship-oriented leadership style. The result of the research on the uncertainty of the project environment suggests that when the development team leader exerts a relationship-oriented and performance-oriented leadership style, the uncertainty of the organizational environment has a significant effect on the satisfaction with project participation; the higher the uncertainty of the organizational environment, the more the satisfaction level decreases, and the relationship-oriented leadership style affects the satisfaction level more positively than the performance-oriented leadership style. In addition, when the development team leader displays a relationship-oriented and performance-oriented leadership style, the uncertainty of the technological environment has a significant effect on the satisfaction with project participation; the higher the uncertainty of the technological environment. the more the satisfaction level decreases. The performance-oriented leadership style as well affects the satisfaction level more positively than the relationship-oriented leadership style. Based on the above results, the research provides the following implications when handling multiple concurrent projects. First, the satisfaction with the participation in the multiple concurrent projects needs to be enhanced at the team (group) level. Second. the manager of the project team, particularly the middle managers should have both a performance-oriented and relationship (task and human)-oriented attitude and exert a consolidated leadership in order to improve the satisfaction of team members with project participation and their performances. Third, as the uncertainty factor of the technological and organizational environment among the characteristics factors of the project has room for methodological improvement depending on one's effort even though there are some complications, we need to continuously prevent and control the risks resulting from the uncertainties of the technological and organizational environment of the project in order to enhance the satisfaction of project participation and project performances. Fourth, the performance (task)-oriented leadership is required when there is uncertainty in a technological environment while the relationship (human)-oriented leadership is required when there is uncertainty in an organizational environment. This research has the following limitations. First, this research intended to select one large-sized sample project and measure the project characteristics, the satisfaction of all the participants associated with project participation, and their performances. Therefore, it is inappropriate to generalize and apply the result of this result onto other numerous projects. Second, as this case study entailed a survey to measure the characteristics factors and performance of the project, since the result value was based on the perception of project team members, the data may have insufficient objectivity. Third, though this research targeted on all the project participants, some development teams did not provide sufficient data and questionnaires were collected from some specific development teams among the 23 development teams, causing a significant deviation in the response rate among the development teams. Therefore, we need to continuously conduct the follow-up researches making comparisons among the multiple projects, and centering on the characteristics factors of the project and its satisfaction level.

• 지능정보연구
• /
• 제27권2호
• /
• pp.33-54
• /
• 2021

최근 4차 산업혁명, 코로나로 인한 뉴노멀 시대의 도래 등을 계기로 인공지능, 빅데이터 연구와 같은 언택트 관련 기술의 중요성이 더욱 급상하고 있다. 각 종 연구 분야에서는 이러한 연구 트렌드를 따라가기 위한 융합적 연구가 본격적으로 시행되고 있으나 원자력 분야의 경우 자연어 처리, 텍스트마이닝 분석 등 인공지능 및 빅데이터 관련 기술을 적용한 연구가 많이 수행되지 않았다. 이에 원자력 연구 분야에 데이터 사이언스 분석기술의 적용 가능성을 확인해보고자 본 연구를 수행하였다. 원자로 연료로 사용된 뒤 배출되는 사용후핵연료 인식 동향 파악에 대한 연구는 원자력 산업 정책에 대한 방향을 결정하고 산업정책 변화를 사전에 대응할 수 있다는 측면에서 매우 중요하다. 사용후핵연료 처리기술은 크게 습식 재처리 방식과 건식 재처리 방식으로 나뉘는데, 이 중 환경 친화적이고 핵비확산성 및 경제성이 높은 건식재처리 기술인 '파이로프로세싱'과 그 연계 원자로 '소듐냉각고속로'의 연구개발에 대한 재평가가 현재 지속적으로 검토되고 있다. 따라서 위와 같은 이유로, 본 연구에서는 사용후핵연료 처리기술인 파이로프로세싱에 대한 언론 동향 분석을 진행하였다. 사용후핵연료 처리기술인 '파이로프로세싱' 키워드를 포함하는 네이버 웹 뉴스 기사 전문의 텍스트데이터를 수집하여 기간에 따라 인식변화를 분석하였다. 2016년 발생한 경주 지진, 2017년 새 정부의 에너지 전환정책 시행된 2010년대 중반 시기를 기준으로 전, 후의 동향 분석이 시행되었고, 빈도분석을 바탕으로 한 워드 클라우드 도출, TF-IDF(Term Frequency - Inverse Document Frequency) 도출, 연결정도 중심성 산출 등의 분석방법을 통해 텍스트데이터에 대한 세부적이고 다층적인 분석을 수행하였다. 연구 결과, 2010년대 이전에는 사용후핵연료 처리기술에 대한 사회 언론의 인식이 외교적이고 긍정적이었음을 알 수 있었다. 그러나 시간이 흐름에 따라 '안전(safety)', '재검토(reexamination)', '대책(countermeasure)', '처분(disposal)', '해체(disassemble)' 등의 키워드 출현빈도가 급증하며 사용후핵연료 처리기술 연구에 대한 지속 여부가 사회적으로 진지하게 고려되고 있음을 알 수 있었다. 정치 외교적 기술로 인식되던 사용후핵연료 처리기술이 국내 정책의 변화로 연구 지속 가능성이 모호해짐에 따라 언론 인식도 점차 변화했다는 것을 확인하였다. 이러한 연구 결과를 통해 원자력 분야에서의 사회과학 연구의 지속은 필수불가결함을 알 수 있었고 이에 대한 중요성이 부각되었다. 또한, 현 정부의 원전 감축과 같은 에너지 정책의 영향으로, 사용후핵연료 처리기술 연구개발에 대한 재평가가 시행되는 이 시점에서 해당 분야의 주요 키워드 분석은 향후 연구 방향 설정에 기여할 수 있을 것이라는 측면에서 실무적 의의를 갖는다. 더 나아가 원자력 공학 분야에 사회과학 분야를 폭넓게 적용할 필요가 있으며, 국가 정책적 변화를 고려해야 원자력 산업이 지속 가능할 것으로 사료된다.