• 제목/요약/키워드: Obstetrics & Gynecology

검색결과 3,379건 처리시간 0.022초

대한한방부인과학회지에 게재된 체계적 문헌고찰의 방법론 및 보고의 질 평가 (A Methodological and Reporting Quality Assessment of the Systematic Reviews in the Journal of Korean Obstetrics and Gynecology)

  • 서지혜;강소현;허다희;이동녕;김형준
    • 대한한방부인과학회지
    • /
    • 제34권2호
    • /
    • pp.108-123
    • /
    • 2021

  • Objectives: The purpose of this study is to assess the methodological and reporting quality of the systematic reviews in the Journal of Korean obstetrics and gynecology. Methods: Systematic reviews in the Journal of Korean obstetrics and gynecology were selected from January 1987 to February 2021, by searching Koreanstudies Information Service System (KISS) and the search system of the Society of Korean medicine obstetrics and gynecology. The methodological and reporting quality was assessed using A MeaSurement Tool to Assess systematic Reviews 2 (AMSTAR 2) tool and Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) checklist. Results: Total of 19 systematic reviews were finally included for this study. The levels of methodological quality were low in 63.2% and very low in 36.8%. As a result of evaluating the reporting quality, 22 to 15 (average 18.6) items out of 27 items (81.5 to 55.6%) were reported. Conclusions: The results of a systematic review are helpful in giving a high level of evidence. In order to improve the quality of systematic reviews published in the Journal of Korean Obstetrics and Gynecology, it is necessary to perform and report according to the the PRISMA checklist and AMSTAR 2.

  • https://doi.org/10.15204/jkobgy.2021.34.2.108 인용 PDF KSCI