• Proceedings of the Korean Radioactive Waste Society Conference
• /
• 2005.06a
• /
• pp.299-301
• /
• 2005

• Proceedings of the Korean Nuclear Society Conference
• /
• 2005.05a
• /
• pp.301-302
• /
• 2005

• Proceedings of the Korean Radioactive Waste Society Conference
• /
• 2005.11a
• /
• pp.260-260
• /
• 2005

• 대한방사선방어학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 2011.11a
• /
• pp.182-183
• /
• 2011

• Proceedings of the Korean Nuclear Society Conference
• /
• 2005.05a
• /
• pp.333-334
• /
• 2005

• Proceedings of the Korean Radioactive Waste Society Conference
• /
• 2012.05a
• /
• pp.35-36
• /
• 2012

• Journal of the Korean institute of surface engineering
• /
• v.56 no.1
• /
• pp.84-93
• /
• 2023

The spent nuclear fuel is burned during the planned cycle in the plant and then generates elements such as actinide series, fission products, and plutonium with a long half-life. An 'interim storage' step is needed to manage the high radioactivity and heat emitted by nuclides until permanent-disposal. In the case of Korea, there is no space to dispose of high-level radioactive waste after use, so there is a need for a period of time using interim storage. Therefore, the intensity of neutrons and gamma-ray must be determined to ensure the integrity of spent nuclear fuel during interim storage. In particular, the most important thing in spent nuclear fuel is burnup evaluation, estimation of the source term of neutrons and gamma-ray is regarded as a reference measurement of the burnup evaluation. In this study, an analysis of spent nuclear fuel was conducted by setting up a virtual fuel burnup case based on CE16×16 fuel to check the total amount and spectrum of neutron, gamma radiation produced. The correlation between BU (burnup), IE (enrichment), and CT (cooling time) will be identified through spent nuclear fuel burnup calculation. In addition, the composition of nuclide inventory, actinide and fission products can be identified.

• Journal of Radiation Protection and Research
• /
• v.37 no.4
• /
• pp.197-201
• /
• 2012

Annual dose at the boundary of the interim storage facility at normal condition was calculated to estimate the site area of the facility of PWR spent nuclear fuel. In this work, source term was generated by ORIGEN-ARP for 4.5 wt% initial enrichment, 45,000 MWd/MTU burnup and 10 years cooling time. Modeling of the storage facilities and radiation shielding evaluations were conducted by MCNP code depending on the storage capacity. In the case of the centralized storage system, the required site area was found to have the radius of more than 700 m.

• Journal of Radiation Protection and Research
• /
• v.38 no.4
• /
• pp.189-193
• /
• 2013

Annual dose on the containment building wall of the interim storage facility at normal condition was calculated to estimate the dose rate transition of the facility of PWR spent nuclear fuel. In this study, source term was generated by ORIGEN-ARP with 4.5 wt% initial enrichment, 45,000 MWd/MTU burnup and 10 years cooling time. Modeling of the storage facility and the containment building and radiation shielding evaluations were conducted by MCNP code depending on the distance between the wall and the facility in the building. In the case of the centralized storage system, the distance required for the annual dose rate limit from 10CFR72 was estimated to be 50 m.

• Journal of Radiation Protection and Research
• /
• v.34 no.3
• /
• pp.144-150
• /
• 2009

This study examines how much the radiation dose rate around it varies if a crack occurs on the spent nuclear fuel rod. The spent nuclear fuel rod to be examined is that of Kori unit 3&4. The source terms are evaluated using the ORIGEN-ARP that is part of the version 5.1 of the SCALE package. The radiation dose rate is assessed using the TORT. To check if the structure of a fuel rod is appropriately modeled in the TORT calculation, the calculation results by the TORT are compared with those by the ANISN for the same case. From the code simulation, it is known that if a crack occurs on the spent nuclear fuel rod, the neutron dose rate varies depending on what material is the crack filled with, but the gamma dose rate varies irrespective of type of the material that the crack is filled with.