• 한국항만경제학회지
• /
• 제20권2호
• /
• pp.187-216
• /
• 2004

Northeast Asia logistics hub strategy was undertaken by Korean Government to gain a national competitive advantage in Northeast Asia. Current Government has Northeast Asian Economic Hub Strategy including construction of SOC in Northeast Asia for promoting peace, promotion of formation of Northeast Asia Community, logistics hub, Financial hub and national innovation for R&D Cluster. To realize Northeast Asian logistics hub, the Northeast Asia logistics hub road map has undertaken as follows: expansion of logistics infra in Incheon Airport, Busan Port and Gwangyang Port, systematic improvements such as adjustment of investment distribution, special logistics companies, transparent customs in logistics transactions, logistics manpower, improvement of system supporting global logistics and attraction of international logistics companies to the logistics center, construction of seamless and paperless logistics information network, Northeast Asia railway infra. The purpose of this paper is to study investment priority and improvements in the Northeast Asia Logistics Hub Road Map and to contribute to gain the national competitive advantage as logistics hub in Northeast Asia

• 한국항만학회지
• /
• 제12권1호
• /
• pp.1-8
• /
• 1998

If a system has a large boundary and complexity, forecast's accuracy will be very low when consider the system's substance as black box. Thus, it is necessary that analysis by structure model. To examine competition in Northeast Asia Ports, it has assumed that the form of structure model, For which the System Dynamics method is adapted in this paper. Northeast Asia Ports Model includes five ports - Pusan, Kobe, Yokohama, Kaoshiung, Keelung, - which are adjacent to each other by geographically and has a competition relation. The Northeast Asia Ports Model has several sub-systems which consists of each unit port models. And, each unit port model found by quantitive, qualititive factors and their feedback loops. All effects which components of one port have influence to components of the rest ports must be surveyed in order to construct Northeast Asia Ports Model, but it may be impossible currently. In this paper Northeast Asia Ports Model was simplified by HFP-Hierarchical Fuzzy Process Method-adapted to integration of level variables of unit port model. Container cargo volumes in Northeast Ports Model is distributed by results of HFP method. And distributed container cargo volumes effected to unit port model. Developed model can estimate change of container cargo volumes in competitive relation by alternation of simple parameter, and reflects dynamics characteristics which are included in model.

• 한국항해항만학회지
• /
• 제39권5호
• /
• pp.423-429
• /
• 2015

The expansion on the scale of international trade and rapid economic growth in Northeast Asia have caused intense competition among global companies for securing international logistics center in Northeast Asia. Analyzing location competitiveness for international logistics center in Northeast Asia, this paper aims to extract implications for enhancing locational competitiveness. Employing the relative importance among location selection factors extracted from AHP analysis in prior study, we evaluated the major five port-cities in Northeast Asia including Busan, Gwangyang, Shanghai, Qingdao and Tokyo. In the evaluations, Shanghai (3.926) ranked as the first, followed by Busan (3.859), Qingdao (3.555), Tokyo (3.013) and Gwangyang (2.915). Furthermore, the causal relationships between determinants for location choice decision (logistics factor, cost factor, market factor, service factor and environmental factor) and dependent variables (competitiveness of international logistics center, potentiality to growth, present intention to move into and future plan to move into) were analyzed to provide implications. Results provide useful insights for further improvements, and helps strategic agenda for future development of port-cities.

• 한국항해항만학회지
• /
• 제28권9호
• /
• pp.783-790
• /
• 2004

For a nearly decade Busan has been the pre-dominant force in Northeast Asian port community, but during the last couple of years, several competitors have looked to directly challenge Busan's regional dominance, most notably, northern Chinese ports. Faced with this challenging and formidable trend, Busan has had to respond appropriately to ensure that Busan remains a regional hub well into the 21st century. The aim of this paper is to make some considerations for a regional hub container port in Northeast Asia in response to changes in the shipping industry with particular reference to Korea.

• 한국항해항만학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국항해항만학회 2006년도 Asia Navigation Conference
• /
• pp.203-212
• /
• 2006

The purpose of this research is to suggest the activation plan of Busan port. In the past years, Busan port enjoyed the golden days because of the China's rapid economic growth. But China's continuous development of ports, the trend of increasing container ship size and increasing direct call to China are coming threats to Busan port. So Korea needs to revise the 'Northeast Logistics Hub' strategy because it is considered that Korea ports continuously will handle China's transshipment cargoes. But now China's transshipment cargo share has decreased by direct call to China ports. It means that China has a lot of its local cargoes, so many ship companies change liner service route to handle China cargoes except Bussan ports although Busan port is included in the main trunk route. In the future, Bussan port will not be able to compete again about throughput with China ports if Busan port's transshipment cargo share decreases. So we must find out and develop Busan port's strength which is the competitive edge. By good luck, Busan port has a few opportunities such as the developed feeder network service and geographical advantages. Busan port has many feeder network service like spider's web in any northeast countries so we can suggest that if Japanese shippers use Busan port to distribute their cargoes to Japanese local areas, its transport costs are cheaper than when they use Japan's main ports. In this paper analyzed side of cost when they use Bussan port like hub to distribute their cargo to their local areas. Because most companies tried to reduce the total cost about logistics. Finally, this paper suggests when northeast shippers(China, Japan) use Bussan port which is more economical than their local main ports.

• 한국항만경제학회지
• /
• 제31권2호
• /
• pp.85-101
• /
• 2015

본 논문의 목적은 동북아항만간 경쟁 입지변화와 경쟁관계 분석을 통해 광양항의 발전전략을 구축하는 것이다. 동북아 주요항만간 경쟁 입지 변화추정을 위해 수정 BCG매트릭스, 그리고 경쟁관계분석을 위해 Lotka-Volterra모형을 활용하였다. 연구결과 동북아지역에서는 중국항만의 경쟁력 및 영향력 확대, 부산항의 경쟁력 유지와 광양항 및 인천항의 경쟁력 정체, 그리고 일본항만의 경쟁력 실종을 확인했다. 또한 2007년 대비 2014년의 동북아 항만과 광양항간 관계에 따르면 환적물량기준 광양항은 부산항과 윈윈관계에서 약탈적 관계로 변화되었으며, 홍콩항과는 약탈적 관계를 유지하였다. 또한 상하이 및 닝보와는 약탈적 관계, 톈진과 순수경쟁관계, 그리고 칭다오 및 다롄과 윈윈관계를 형성하고 있다. 전체적으로 2007년 대비 2014년에는 광양항과 동북아 항만들간에 약탈적관계로 변화된 항만이 늘어나고 있다. 이에 대한 광양항의 대응전략은 약탈적 및 경쟁 관계의 항만들과는 협력적관계로, 그리고 윈윈 협력관계의 항만들과는 윈윈관계를 지속하는 전략을 구사할 필요가 있다.

• 한국항만경제학회지
• /
• 제21권1호
• /
• pp.73-91
• /
• 2005

The goal of the project on developing Korea as the logistics hub of Northeast Asia is to develop Busan Port and Gwangyang Port as international logistics centers by promoting and attracting more warehouses. As is well known, there is intense competition among ports located in major economic blocs to become the regional logistics hub. Gwangyang is second to none in terms of being favorably located at the center of Northeast Asia. Gwangyang Port, however, lacked in SOC construction and faced the poor government support politics hub of Northeast Asia. They are i) expanding the logistics infrastructuressuch as expressway and railroads between Yeosu Airport and Gwangyang Port, ii) Setting up new port hinterland and industrial complex in the vicinity of Gwangyang Port iii) securing high value-added fixed cargo traffic, and iv) improving laws and institutions.

• 한국항해항만학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국항해항만학회 2006년도 추계학술대회 논문집(제1권)
• /
• pp.235-240
• /
• 2006

글로벌 생산네트워크의 변화로 인해 광양항은 새로운 전략의 수립이 요구된다. 특히, 무역의 패턴이 중국, 일본, 한국을 포함한 아시아의 경제적 성장에 따라 동북아지역 집중됨에 따라 가격과 서비스 경쟁력을 가진 광양항은 동북아 포트얼라이언스의 요구에 대처해야하며, 변화하는 무역환경에서 다른 국가들과 경쟁해야 한다. 그러므로 본 연구의 목적은 광양항의 성장을 촉진하기 위한 포트얼라이언스 전략을 제안하는 것이다. 광양항의 물류비즈니스 모델에 대한 목적에 맞도록 동북아 포트얼라이언스의 진행방향과 중국과 일본의 대상 항만을 제공하였다.

• 한국항만경제학회지
• /
• 제17권2호
• /
• pp.1-28
• /
• 2001

Korea has been at the forefront of efforts to enhance international cooperation in transport and communications within Northeast Asia. This effort is driven not only by the benefits that could accrue to the Korean Peninsula but also to all nations in the region. Mutual cooperation within Northeast Asia would reduce transport and communications costs and provide the basis for a regional transport and logistics network. Before progress can be made towards an integrated transport and communications system in Northeast Asia, however, there is a need to evaluate its prospects, outline a visionary plan, and detail a preferred strategy. The strategy to develop the Korean Peninsula as the gateway for Northeast Asia should harmonize with the region's common transport (and communications) policy The strategy adopted by South Korea is focused primarily on the development of an improved logistics infrastructure that would be extended to North Korea upon reunification. The seaport and airport developments In Korea will have to be supported by improved access to planned high-speed railways, expressways and freight distribution centers that, in turn, are to be integrated with new telecommunications and computer technologies. The benefits from these improvements will be lost unless existing government monopolies controlling seaport, airport, rail, road and expressway developments are commercialized to ensure that the price of transport reflects its actual cost. Technical harmonization between different modes should be promoted to facilitate efficient intermodal transport between the Korean Peninsula and the rest of Northeast Asia.

• 한국항해항만학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국항해항만학회 2014년도 춘계학술대회
• /
• pp.225-226
• /
• 2014

본 연구의 목적은 동북아시아 주요 컨테이너항만간의 상대적 효율성을 분석함으로써, 각 항만의 현재 효율성 수준을 파악하고, 효율적 항만이 되기 위한 주요 전략수립 방안을 제시하고자 하는 것이다. 동북아시아 지역의 주요 16개 항만을 대상으로 개별항만 효율성 및 상대적 효율성을 분석하였으며, DEA기법을 사용 ${\cdots}$(중략)${\cdots}$.