• 제목/요약/키워드: New mineral

검색결과 674건 처리시간 0.02초

핵의학 영상 검사의 중장기 추세 분석 - 서울 소재 일개 상급 종합병원을 중심으로 - (Long-Term Trend Analysis in Nuclear Medicine Examinations)

  • 정우영;심동오;최재민
    • 핵의학기술
    • /
    • 제23권1호
    • /
    • pp.15-28
    • /
    • 2019
  • 핵의학은 1959년에 국내 도입되어 갑상선 기능 항진증의 치료를 위해 $^{131}I$을 경구 투여한 것으로 시작되었고, 감마카메라는 1969년에 국내 도입되어 핵의학 영상 검사를 시작한 후 지속적인 성장을 하고 있다. 서울 소재 일개 상급종합병원을 대상으로 1998년부터 2017년까지의 핵의학 영상 검사 및 치료 실적에 대해 중장기 추세를 분석하였다. 분석 도구로는 해당병원의 통계 프로그램을 이용하여 감마, PET, 골밀도, 치료로 구분하여 검사 실적 추세 및 상세 분석을 하였다. 이와 같은 실적을 바탕으로 미래 핵의학 발전에 대한 예측을 하고, 핵의학 발전 방향 및 발전 계획의 준거 틀을 마련하는데 그 목적이 있었다. 지난 20년 동안에 Bone scan, MUGA scan, Renal scan(99mTc-DTPA), $^{18}F$-FPCIT PET, 골밀도 검사 등이 상승 추세였고, Myocardium perfusion SPECT, Thyroid scan, Lung scan 등은 하락 추세였으며, Hepatobiliary scan, Renal scan(99mTc-DMSA), $^{18}F$-FDG PET 등은 정체되어 있었다. 그리고 핵의학 치료 실적은 2011년까지 상승 추세였으나 갑상선 과잉진료 논란이후에 급락한 후 회복하지 못하고 있었다. 또한 핵의학 영상 검사와 경쟁 검사 간의 건수를 분석한 결과, 반비례 관계이거나 역치 현상이 있었다. 핵의학 영상 검사 및 치료 실적은 의약 분업 도입과정에서 발생한 의사 파업(2000년), 갑상선 과잉 진료 논란(2011년, 2014년), 무증상 추적 검사를 제한한 PET 요양 급여 개정(2014년), 중동호흡기증후군 확산(2015년), 그리고 수시로 발생하는 요양 급여 삭감 등의 변수에 큰 영향을 받았다. 핵의학 영상 검사는 중장기 상승 추세에 있었으나 2012년 이후로 정체되어 있었다. 핵의학 영상검사 및 치료의 중장기 성장과 발전 방향을 위해서는 시시각각 변하는 의료 환경의 변화에 대한 적극적인 대응은 물론이고, 핵의학 영상 검사 및 치료가 타 경쟁 검사 및 치료에 대한 경쟁 우위 확보를 위한 노력, 신규 검사 및 치료의 개발, 임상적인 정량지표의 개발 및 안정적 유지에 대한 노력이 필요할 것으로 판단된다.

전토양(田土壤) 인산(燐酸)의 흡수계수(吸收係數)와 Langmuir 최대흡착량(最大吸着量)과의 비교연구(比較硏究) (Comparison between phosphorus absorption coefficient and Langmuir adsorption maximum)

  • 류인수
    • 한국토양비료학회지
    • /
    • 제8권1호
    • /
    • pp.1-17
    • /
    • 1975
  • 야산(野山)의 신개간지토양(新開墾地土壤)과 화산회토양(火山灰土壤)에 있어 특(特)히 문제(問題)가 되는 인산(燐酸)의 시비량(施肥量) 결정(決定)의 한 기준(基準)인 인산흡착력(燐酸吸着力)의 측정방법(測定方法)을 검토(檢討)할 목적(目的)으로 화산회토양(火山灰土壤)과 광질토양(鑛質土壤)(미경지(未耕地)및 기경지토양(旣耕地土壤))에 대(對)하여 인산흡착(燐酸吸着)에 관(關)한 시험(試驗)을 행(行)하였는바 그 결과(結果)를 요약(要約)하면 다음과 같다. 1. Langmuir 흡착식(吸着式)을 이용(利用)하여 구(求)한 인산(燐酸)의 최대흡착량(最大吸着量)은 기경지토양(旣耕地土壤)6.2~32.9, 미경지토양(未耕地土壤) 74.1~90.4, 화산회토양(火山灰土壤) 720~915mg.p/100g 이였다. 2. 인산흡수계수(燐酸吸收係數)는 기경지토양(旣耕地土壤)에서 116~179, 미경지토양(未耕地土壤)에서 161~259, 화산회토양(火山灰土壤)에서 1,098~1,205mg.p/l이며, 인산흡수계수(燐酸吸收係數)/Langmuir 최대흡착량(最大吸着量)의 비(比)는 인산흡착력(燐酸吸着力)이 큰 화산회토양(火山灰土壤)에서 적고 (1.3~1.5) 인산흡착력(燐酸吸着力)이 낮은 토양(土壤)일수록 컷다. (2.2~18.7) 3. 인산흡수계수(燐酸吸收係數)의 측정(測定)은 고농도(高濃度)의 인산용액(燐酸溶液)에서 행(行)하여 지므로 이로서는 석회(石灰) 또는 인산시용(燐酸施用)에 의(依)한 흡착량(吸着量)의 변동(變動)을 명확(明確)히 추정(推定)하기 어려우나, 저농도(低濃度)에서 측정(測定)한 농도별(濃度別) 인산흡착량(燐酸吸着量)및 Langmuir 흡착식(吸着式)을 이용(利用)하여 구(求)한 최대흡착량(最大吸着量)으로서는 흡착량(吸着量)의 변동추정(變動推定)을 분명(分明)히 할수 있었다. 4. 치환성(置換性) 알루미늄을 중화(中和)하기 위한 당량(當量)의 수산화(水酸化)칼슘을 가(加)하여 포장용수량(圃場容水量)에서 40일간(日間) 항온($25{\sim}30^{\circ}C$) 처리(處理)하므로서 치환성(置換性) 알루미늄 함량(含量)이 높은 광질토양(鑛質土壤)에서는 Langmuir 최대흡착량(最大吸着量)이 유의(有意)한 감소(減少)를 보였다. 5. 인산(燐酸)을 처리(處理)하여 50일간(日間) 포장용수량(圃場容水量) 상태에서 항온($25{\sim}30^{\circ}C$) 처리(處理)한 토양(土壤)에 대(對)하여 Langmuir 최대흡착량(最大吸着量)을 측정(測定)한바 최대흡착량(最大吸着量)에 상당(相當)하는 인산(燐酸)의 시용(施用)으로 화산회토양(火山灰土壤)은 25.5 미경지토양(未耕地土壤)은 54.4%, 기경지토양(旣耕地土壤)은 76.2%의 포화율(飽和率)을 나타내었다. 6. 토양(土壤)의 인산흡착량(燐酸吸着量)은 첨가인산(添加燐酸)의 농도(濃度)가 높아짐에 따라 곡선적(曲線的)으로 증가(增加)하여 어느 일정농도(一定濃度)에 이르면 흡착포화점(吸着飽和點)에 달(達)하며 광질토양(鑛質土壤)에서는 100mg.p/l, 화산회토양(火山灰土壤)에서는 1,000mg.p/l의 인산용액(燐酸溶液)으로 측정(測定)되는 인산흡착량(燐酸吸着量)은 Langmuir 최대흡착량(最大吸着量)에 매우 근사(近似)한 값을 나타내므로 이를 토양(土壤)의 인산흡착력(燐酸吸着力)을 나타내는 새로운 지표(指標)로 삼고 포화흡착량(飽和吸着量)이라 정의(定義)하였다. 7. 단일농도(單一濃度)에서 이루어지는 포화흡착량(飽和吸着量)의 측정(測定)으로 여러 농도(濃度)에서 인산(燐酸)의 흡착량(吸着量)을 구(求)하여야 하는 Langmuir 최대흡착량(最大吸着量) 측정(測定)의 번잡성(煩雜性)을 피(避)할 수 있어 이 방법(方法)은 실용적(實用的)인 방법(方法)으로 판단(判斷)되었다.

  • PDF

'아유르베다'($\bar{A}yurveda$)의 의경(醫經)에 관한 연구 (A Study of The Medical Classics in the '$\bar{A}yurveda$')

  • 김기욱;박현국;서지영
    • 대한한의학원전학회지
    • /
    • 제20권4호
    • /
    • pp.91-117
    • /
    • 2007
  • Through a simple study of the medical classics in the '$\bar{A}yurveda$', we have summarized them as follows. 1) Traditional Indian medicine started in the Ganges river area at about 1500 B. C. E. and traces of medical science can be found in the "Rigveda" and "Atharvaveda". 2) The "Charaka" and "$Su\acute{s}hruta$(妙聞集)", ancient texts from India, are not the work of one person, but the result of the work and errors of different doctors and philosophers. Due to the lack of historical records, the time of Charaka or $Su\acute{s}hruta$(妙聞)s' lives are not exactly known. So the completion of the "Charaka" is estimated at 1st${\sim}$2nd century C. E. in northwestern India, and the "$Su\acute{s}hruta$" is estimated to have been completed in 3rd${\sim}$4th century C. E. in central India. Also, the "Charaka" contains details on internal medicine, while the "$Su\acute{s}hruta$" contains more details on surgery by comparison. 3) '$V\bar{a}gbhata$', one of the revered Vriddha Trayi(triad of the ancients, 三醫聖) of the '$\bar{A}yurveda$', lived and worked in about the 7th century and wrote the "$A\d{s}\d{t}\bar{a}nga$ $A\d{s}\d{t}\bar{a}nga$ $h\d{r}daya$ $sa\d{m}hit\bar{a}$ $samhit\bar{a}$(八支集)" and "$A\d{s}\d{t}\bar{a}nga$ Sangraha $samhit\bar{a}$(八心集)", where he tried to compromise and unify the "Charaka" and "$Su\acute{s}hruta$". The "$A\d{s}\d{t}\bar{a}nga$ Sangraha $samhit\bar{a}$" was translated into Tibetan and Arabic at about the 8th${\sim}$9th century, and if we generalize the medicinal plants recorded in each the "Charaka", "$Su\acute{s}hruta$" and the "$A\d{s}\d{t}\bar{a}nga$ Sangraha $samhit\bar{a}$", there are 240, 370, 240 types each. 4) The 'Madhava' focused on one of the subjects of Indian medicine, '$Nid\bar{a}na$' ie meaning "the cause of diseases(病因論)", and in one of the copies found by Bower in 4th century C. E. we can see that it uses prescriptions from the "BuHaLaJi(布哈拉集)", "Charaka", "$Su\acute{s}hruta$". 5) According to the "Charaka", there were 8 branches of ancient medicine in India : treatment of the body(kayacikitsa), special surgery(salakya), removal of alien substances(salyapahartka), treatment of poison or mis-combined medicines(visagaravairodhikaprasamana), the study of ghosts(bhutavidya), pediatrics(kaumarabhrtya), perennial youth and long life(rasayana), and the strengthening of the essence of the body(vajikarana). 6) The '$\bar{A}yurveda$', which originated from ancient experience, was recorded in Sanskrit, which was a theorization of knowledge, and also was written in verses to make memorizing easy, and made medicine the exclusive possession of the Brahmin. The first annotations were 1060 for the "Charaka", 1200 for the "$Su\acute{s}hruta$", 1150 for the "$A\d{s}\d{t}\bar{a}nga$ Sangraha $samhit\bar{a}$", and 1100 for the "$Nid\bar{a}na$", The use of various mineral medicines in the "Charaka" or the use of mercury as internal medicine in the "$A\d{s}\d{t}\bar{a}nga$ Sangraha $samhit\bar{a}$", and the palpation of the pulse for diagnosing in the '$\bar{A}yurveda$' and 'XiZhang(西藏)' medicine are similar to TCM's pulse diagnostics. The coexistence with Arabian 'Unani' medicine, compromise with western medicine and the reactionism trend restored the '$\bar{A}yurveda$' today. 7) The "Charaka" is a book inclined to internal medicine that investigates the origin of human disease which used the dualism of the 'Samkhya', the natural philosophy of the 'Vaisesika' and the logic of the 'Nyaya' in medical theories, and its structure has 16 syllables per line, 2 lines per poem and is recorded in poetry and prose. Also, the "Charaka" can be summarized into the introduction, cause, judgement, body, sensory organs, treatment, pharmaceuticals, and end, and can be seen as a work that strongly reflects the moral code of Brahmin and Aryans. 8) In extracting bloody pus, the "Charaka" introduces a 'sharp tool' bloodletting treatment, while the "$Su\scute{s}hruta$" introduces many surgical methods such as the use of gourd dippers, horns, sucking the blood with leeches. Also the "$Su\acute{s}hruta$" has 19 chapters specializing in ophthalmology, and shows 76 types of eye diseases and their treatments. 9) Since anatomy did not develop in Indian medicine, the inner structure of the human body was not well known. The only exception is 'GuXiangXue(骨相學)' which developed from 'Atharvaveda' times and the "$A\d{s}\d{t}\bar{a}nga$ Sangraha $samhit\bar{a}$". In the "$A\d{s}\d{t}\bar{a}nga$ Sangraha $samhit\bar{a}$"'s 'ShenTiLun(身體論)' there is a thorough listing of the development of a child from pregnancy to birth. The '$\bar{A}yurveda$' is not just an ancient traditional medical system but is being called alternative medicine in the west because of its ability to supplement western medicine and, as its effects are being proved scientifically it is gaining attention worldwide. We would like to say that what we have researched is just a small fragment and a limited view, and would like to correct and supplement any insufficient parts through more research of new records.

  • PDF

아유르베다'($\bar{A}yurveda$) 의경(醫經)에 관한 연구 (A Study of The Medical Classics in the '$\bar{A}yurveda$')

  • 김기욱;박현국;서지영
    • 동국한의학연구소논문집
    • /
    • 제10권
    • /
    • pp.119-145
    • /
    • 2008
  • Through a simple study of the medical classics in the '$\bar{A}yurveda$', we have summarized them as follows. 1) Traditional Indian medicine started in the Ganges river area at about 1500 B. C. E. and traces of medical science can be found in the "Rigveda" and "Atharvaveda". 2) The "Charaka(閣羅迦集)" and "$Su\acute{s}hruta$(妙聞集)", ancient texts from India, are not the work of one person, but the result of the work and errors of different doctors and philosophers. Due to the lack of historical records, the time of Charaka(閣羅迦) or $Su\acute{s}hruta$(妙聞)s' lives are not exactly known. So the completion of the "Charaka" is estimated at 1st$\sim$2nd century C. E. in northwestern India, and the "$Su\acute{s}hruta$" is estimated to have been completed in 3rd$\sim$4th century C. E. in central India. Also, the "Charaka" contains details on internal medicine, while the "$Su\acute{s}hruta$" contains more details on surgery by comparison. 3) '$V\bar{a}gbhata$', one of the revered Vriddha Trayi(triad of the ancients, 三醫聖) of the '$\bar{A}yurveda$', lived and worked in about the 7th century and wrote the "$Ast\bar{a}nga$ $Ast\bar{a}nga$ hrdaya $samhit\bar{a}$ $samhit\bar{a}$(八支集) and "$Ast\bar{a}nga$ Sangraha $samhit\bar{a}$(八心集)", where he tried to compromise and unify the "Charaka" and "$Su\acute{s}hruta$". The "$Ast\bar{a}nga$ Sangraha $samhit\bar{a}$" was translated into Tibetan and Arabic at about the 8th$\sim$9th century, and if we generalize the medicinal plants recorded in each the "Charaka", "$Su\acute{s}hruta$" and the "$Ast\bar{a}nga$ Sangraha $samhit\bar{a}$", there are 240, 370, 240 types each. 4) The 'Madhava' focused on one of the subjects of Indian medicine, '$Nid\bar{a}na$' ie meaning "the cause of diseases(病因論)", and in one of the copies found by Bower in 4th century C. E. we can see that it uses prescriptions from the "BuHaLaJi(布唅拉集)", "Charaka", "$Su\acute{s}hruta$". 5) According to the "Charaka", there were 8 branches of ancient medicine in India : treatment of the body(kayacikitsa), special surgery(salakya), removal of alien substances(salyapahartka), treatment of poison or mis-combined medicines(visagaravairodhikaprasamana), the study of ghosts(bhutavidya), pediatrics(kaumarabhrtya), perennial youth and long life(rasayana), and the strengthening of the essence of the body(vajikarana). 6) The '$\bar{A}yurveda$', which originated from ancient experience, was recorded in Sanskrit, which was a theorization of knowledge, and also was written in verses to make memorizing easy, and made medicine the exclusive possession of the Brahmin. The first annotations were 1060 for the "Charaka", 1200 for the "$Su\acute{s}hruta$", 1150 for the "$Ast\bar{a}nga$ Sangraha $samhit\bar{a}$", and 1100 for the "$Nid\bar{a}na$". The use of various mineral medicines in the "Charaka" or the use of mercury as internal medicine in the "$Ast\bar{a}nga$ Sangraha $samhit\bar{a}$", and the palpation of the pulse for diagnosing in the '$\bar{A}yurveda$' and 'XiZhang(西藏)' medicine are similar to TCM's pulse diagnostics. The coexistence with Arabian 'Unani' medicine, compromise with western medicine and the reactionism trend restored the '$\bar{A}yurveda$' today. 7) The "Charaka" is a book inclined to internal medicine that investigates the origin of human disease which used the dualism of the 'Samkhya', the natural philosophy of the 'Vaisesika' and the logic of the 'Nyaya' in medical theories, and its structure has 16 syllables per line, 2 lines per poem and is recorded in poetry and prose. Also, the "Charaka" can be summarized into the introduction, cause, judgement, body, sensory organs, treatment, pharmaceuticals, and end, and can be seen as a work that strongly reflects the moral code of Brahmin and Aryans. 8) In extracting bloody pus, the "Charaka" introduces a 'sharp tool' bloodletting treatment, while the "$Su\acute{s}hruta$" introduces many surgical methods such as the use of gourd dippers, horns, sucking the blood with leeches. Also the "$Su\acute{s}hruta$" has 19 chapters specializing in ophthalmology, and shows 76 types of eye diseases and their treatments. 9) Since anatomy did not develop in Indian medicine, the inner structure of the human body was not well known. The only exception is 'GuXiangXue(骨相學)' which developed from 'Atharvaveda' times and the "$Ast\bar{a}nga$ Sangraha $samhit\bar{a}$". In the "$Ast\bar{a}nga$ Sangraha $samhit\bar{a}$"'s 'ShenTiLun(身體論)' there is a thorough listing of the development of a child from pregnancy to birth. The '$\bar{A}yurveda$' is not just an ancient traditional medical system but is being called alternative medicine in the west because of its ability to supplement western medicine and, as its effects are being proved scientifically it is gaining attention worldwide. We would like to say that what we have researched is just a small fragment and a limited view, and would like to correct and supplement any insufficient parts through more research of new records.

  • PDF