• 한국실내디자인학회논문집
• /
• 제20권3호
• /
• pp.89-97
• /
• 2011

An interest in modern space is expanded to search for the relationship among human, space and environment, not limited the fixed or typical material place. For grasping and analyzing the characteristics and aims of modern space, this study is focusing on 'Dionysian outlook on nature' among the Nietzsche's philosophies. Nietzsche's 'Dionysian outlook on nature' based on his 'philosophy of creation and positiveness' has great implications for modern space because it focuses on not only circulation of existence and creation but also dynamic vitality the mostly. The reason is that modern space is required by the tendency changing the goal and aesthetic value by planner or user, not fixed and unchangeable any longer. The concept of space in modern construction is developed by forming various paradigms. Especially, various examples based on Nietzsche's Dionysian outlook on nature, philosophy of creation and positiveness, will be analyzed and possibility of new spatial concept's extension will be researched.

• 한국환경생태학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국환경생태학회 2011년 학술대회 논문집 2호
• /
• pp.99-103
• /
• 2010

• 한국환경생태학회지
• /
• 제12권2호
• /
• pp.174-176
• /
• 1998

• 한국환경생태학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국환경생태학회 2009년 학술대회 논문집 2호
• /
• pp.129-132
• /
• 2009

• 한국환경생태학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국환경생태학회 2004년도 정기총회 및 학술논문 발표회
• /
• pp.126-131
• /
• 2004

• 한국환경생태학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국환경생태학회 2002년도 정기총회 및 학술논문 발표회
• /
• pp.41-44
• /
• 2002

• 한국환경생태학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국환경생태학회 2002년도 정기총회 및 학술논문 발표회
• /
• pp.125-128
• /
• 2002

• 한국환경생태학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국환경생태학회 2001년도 정기총회 및 학술논문발표회
• /
• pp.35-40
• /
• 2001

• 환경영향평가
• /
• 제7권1호
• /
• pp.93-107
• /
• 1998

In this study, the indicator is established by the human activities which cause the load of the environment, the effect of the human activities on the environment, the state of the natural environment in the city, and the effort on improving this state. And this indicator is based on the DPSR(Driving Force, Pressure, State, Response)framework which combines the PSR framework of GECD with the DSR framework of UNCSD. Coexistent indicators between men and nature among the established environmental indicators apply to the case cities such as Suwon, Songnam, Bucheon, Ansan and the results are analyzed in detail. The environmental indicators established in this study will be the concrete and persuasive means which can evaluate the possibility of the sustainability that is the paradigm of the new city development when the environmental quality or state of the existing cities is evaluated.

• 환경영향평가
• /
• 제12권1호
• /
• pp.55-72
• /
• 2003

The term sustainable development is being used widely since WCED suggested it in 1987. This paper aims at catching up its sociological implications. For doing this, the paper examined some major existing researches on sustainable development. It was found that sustainable development has been defined as an economic development with the preservation of nature as an environment of human life. In this sense, the existing concept of sustainable development is an economic perspective. Sustainable development as an economic perspective is faced with some limitations and/or problems. They are summarized as follows. The human-made environment is excluded from the concept of sustainable development. Its ideology is anthroponcentric in that the sustainability of nature is a necessary condition for economic development. The objective reference which can measure whether the current state of nature is sustainable or not is not proposed. Consequently, sustainable development results in merely a survivability of economy, a new form of economic utility and/or a successful economy. In terms of sociological perspective, economy and nature can not be sustainable without other social factors being sustainable, because all social factors including economy and nature exist in a causal mechanism. This means that sustainable development should be approached from a multi-dimensional perspective. The multi-dimensional approach can be a framework of sustainable development in terms of whole society, then can be termed sustainable society which implies not a sustainable development, but a societal development. The factors which should be included in the sustainable society are, at least, nature, economy, population as an aggregate, mode of living existence of people as a cultural actor, technology, and social structure.