• 제목/요약/키워드: Natural monuments of Korea

검색결과 58건 처리시간 0.03초

천연기념물 노거수의 생육현황에 관한 연구 (A Study on the Growth Status of the Large Old Trees as the Natural Monuments of Korea)

  • 방광자;이승제;강현경
    • 한국환경복원기술학회지
    • /
    • 제6권3호
    • /
    • pp.35-45
    • /
    • 2003
  • This study was performed to suggest growth status data of the large old trees as the natural monuments of Korea. Field investigation of 70 large old trees as the natural monuments of Korea was carried out in Seoul, Inchon, Kyungki, Chungbuk, Chungnam, Chonbuk, Chonnam. The main field of this study is classified into the growth condition, soil state and management situation. The results of this study are below : The age distribution of the large old trees as the natural monuments of Korea is as follows : above l00years in 5.9%, above 200years in 8.9%, above 300 years in 11.8%, above 400 years in 16.2%, above 500 years in 16.2% and above 600years in 41.1%. Location types of the large old trees as the natural monuments of Korea are found in 11 types; the types are hill side(22.9%), historical monument area(15.7%), field(l4.3%) and building area(12.9%), etc. Also, growth type of the trees is individually placed. In the aspect of soil environment, the acidification of soils has been appearing in all surveyed areas, and the soil of Seoul area has much acidum phosphoricum because of excessive fertilizer. Finally, in management situation. major factors inhibiting growth of the large old trees as the natural monuments of Korea are soil covering of protruded root above ground, soil hardening by human, embankments, small area that has been surrounded fence. Continuous monitoring and accumulation of status data are necessary to preserve the large old trees as the natural monuments of Korea.

남·북한 지질분야 천연기념물의 현황과 비교 (Present Status and Comparative Study on the Geological Natural Monuments of South and North Koreas)

  • 김동희
    • 헤리티지:역사와 과학
    • /
    • 제42권1호
    • /
    • pp.20-39
    • /
    • 2009
  • 남 북한 천연기념물에 대해 조사 및 보고된 문헌을 토대로 지질분야 천연기념물 현황을 비교하였다. 비교 분석된 항목들은 남한은 암석, 천연동굴, 화석, 일반지질의 4가지 그리고 북한은 암석, 화석, 지층, 약수, 온천, 지형, 폭포, 호수, 천연동굴, 담소의 10가지이다. 남한에서는 북한과는 달리 지질분야 천연기념물이 상대적으로 적게 지정 보호되고 있는 것으로 나타났다. 북한에서는 남한과는 다르게 지층의 구조(습곡, 단층) 및 산업자원을 채굴하는 광산의 대표적인 노두를 천연기념물로 지정 보호하고 있는데, 이 유형들은 우리나라에서 일어난 지구조운동의 방향과 크기, 시기 및 형성요인 등을 밝혀주므로 천연기념물로 지정할 가치가 있는 것으로 판단된다. 남한에서 지질분야 천연기념물 지정건수의 연도별 변화를 보면 크게 3시기로 구분되며, 각 시기의 평균지정건수는 1.1건, 0.1건, 2.6건으로 변하였다. 지질분야 천연기념물 지정건수가 가장 많은 지역은 남한은 제주도로 그리고 북한은 강원도로 나타났으며, 산업화와 도시화가 상대적으로 덜 발달된 지역의 천연기념물이 더 잘 보존된 것으로 여겨진다.

천연기념물 노거수 활력도 측정에 관한 연구 -경상도 천연기념물 느티나무를 중심으로- (A Study of Vitality Measurements of the Natural Monuments - Focused Natural Monuments Zelkova in Kyongsangdo -)

  • 하태주;방광자
    • 한국환경복원기술학회지
    • /
    • 제8권1호
    • /
    • pp.100-107
    • /
    • 2005
  • As a result of this study, vitality of natural monuments (large trees) looks relatively good but they require continuous management. Also, the management for condition recovery and condition maintenance, and minimum measures are needed at least to avoid natural calamity. Major points induced are as follows : The first, although most of natural monument large trees showed favorable growth environment, most of them are aged and have dense twigs with requirement for weed trimming to remove complicated and unnecessary branches. In addition, as most of large trees grow alone in a large space with potential natural calamity, thus, minimum measures are required at least. Secondly, change in electric resistance in surveyed large trees was relatively favorable, however, large trees with soil covering showed high electric resistance and were found to have low vitality. As shown, this study was conducted to find out the measurement techniques of natural monuments, Basic foundation is suggested through the measurement of electric resistance, and the vitality of natural monuments; more accurate investigation will be remained for further discussion.

남.북한의 천연기념물 관리제도 비교 (A Comparative Study on the Natural Monument Management Policies of South and North Korea)

  • 나명하;홍윤순;김학범
    • 한국조경학회지
    • /
    • 제35권2호통권121호
    • /
    • pp.71-80
    • /
    • 2007
  • Korea began preserving and managing natural monuments in 1933 under Japanese Colonization, but North Korea and South Korea were forced to establish separate natural monument management policies because of the division after the Korean Independence. The purpose of this study is to compare and analyze the natural monument management policies of both south and North Korea between 1933 and 2005 to introduce new policies for Korea unification. The following are the results: First, South Korea manages every type of cultural asset, including natural monuments, through the 'Cultural Heritage Protection Act,' whereas North Korea managing its cultural assets through the 'Cultural Relics Protection Act' and the 'Landmark/Natural Monument Protection Act.' Second, South Korea preserves and utilizes natural monuments for the purpose of promoting the cultural experience of Korean people and contributing to the development of world culture, whereas North Korea uses its natural monuments to promote the superiority of socialism and protect its ruling power. Third, North and South Korea have similar classification systems for animals, plants, and geology, but North Korea classifies geography as one of its natural monuments. Unlike South Korea, North Korea also designates imported animals and plants not only for the preservation and research of genetic resources, but also for their value as economic resources. Fourth, North Korea authorizes the Cabinet to designate and cancel natural monuments, whereas South Korea designates and cancels natural monuments by the Cultural Heritage Administration through the deliberation of a Cultural Heritage Committee. Both Koreas' central administrations establish policies and their local governments carry them out, while their management systems are quite different. In conclusion, it is important to establish specified laws for the conservation of natural heritages and clarified standards of designation in order to improve the preservation and management system and to sustain the diversity of natural preservation. Moreover it is also necessary to discover resources in various fields, designate protection zones, and preserve imported trees. By doing so, we shall improve South Korea's natural monument management policies and ultimately enhance national homogeneity in preparation for the reunification of the Koreas in the future.

Comparison of the Paleontological Heritages of South Korea with Those of North Korea: Implications for Potential International Heritages

  • Kim, Jeong Yul;Park, Won Mi
    • 한국지구과학회지
    • /
    • 제39권1호
    • /
    • pp.67-88
    • /
    • 2018
  • The important PH (paleontological heritages) with scientific, educational and esthetic values designated as natural monuments and protected by legislations of South and North Koreas are herein compared for the first time. On the basis of data (Jan. 2017) provided by the Cultural Heritage Administration of (South) Korea, a total of 457 natural monuments was designated. Of these, geological heritages are 80 in number, which includes 24 (30%) PH. Data (Dec. 2005) of North Korea show that a total of 474 natural monuments was designated. Among these, geological and geographical ones are 154 in number, which includes 22 (14%) PH. Differences between PH of South and North Koreas are regarded to be directly related with geological difference in distribution of the fossil-bearing strata between South and North Koreas. PH of Silurian corals, Devonian plants, Jurassic fishes, Cretaceous dinosaur tracks, birds (so called Korean Archaeopteryx) and pterosaurs, and Pleistocene paleoanthropological fossils appear to be scientifically significant. Together with these North Korean PH, scientific, esthetic, conservational, educational, and economical values of important PH including KCDC (Korean Cretaceous Dinosaur Coast), Jigunsan Shale, and Geumgwangdong Shale of South Korea should be evaluated as potential future candidates for international heritages.

남.북한의 천연기념물 지정내용 비교 (A Comparative Study on the Natural Monument Designations of South and North Korea)

  • 나명하;홍윤순;김학범
    • 한국조경학회지
    • /
    • 제35권5호
    • /
    • pp.92-99
    • /
    • 2007
  • Korea began preserving and managing natural monuments in 1933 under the Japanese Colonization, but South and North Korea had to establish natural monument management policies separately because of the division after the Korean Independence. The purpose of this study is to compare and analyze the natural monument designations of South and North Koreas between 1933 and 2005 to introduce advanced polices for Oneness-Korea. The following are the results: According to data of December 2005, South Korea has 358 and North Korea has 474 natural monuments. North Korea has 116 more natural monuments than South Korea. In addition, over half of South Korea's designations are plants, whereas North Korea's designations are relatively well-balanced. Both South and North Korea designate plants(mostly trees) that are old and large. However, South Korea emphasizes the historical value of village forests, contrary to economic value in North Korea. Also, North Korea preserves many traditional fruit trees which have not been well-preserved in South Korea. As for animals, South Korea designates migratory wild animals by type and not by region to protect them at a national level, whereas North Korea designates the specific habitats of each type of wild animal. In addition, North Korea protects each region's cattle and chickens to preserve native traits of domesticated animals. Geologically, North Korea preserves 18 hot springs and 11 springs, whereas South Korea has none. Geographically, North Korea preserves 81 waterfalls, lakes, etc. In the conclusion, advanced natural monument management of South and North Korea is necessary to achieve effective preservation of natural monuments.

국내 천연기념물 멸실신고로 본 자연유산 현황 (A Current Status of Natural Heritage Using the Bird's Carcasses in South Korea)

  • 이성경;신용운
    • 한국전통조경학회지
    • /
    • 제39권2호
    • /
    • pp.50-54
    • /
    • 2021
  • 본 연구는 국내 천연기념물 중 야생조류의 폐사체 현황을 알아보고자 수행하였다. 우리나라에서 2016년부터 2020년까지 신고된 천연기념물의 폐사체는 총 38종 5,036개체이었다. 2020년에 34종으로 가장 많은 종이 폐사하였고 2019년에 1,095개체로 가장 많은 개체수가 기록되었다. 가을철에 가장 많은 종수가 확인되었고 가장 적은 개체수가 확인되었다. 이와는 반대로 여름철에 적은 종수와 가장 많은 개체수가 확인되었다. 연중 11월이 가장 많은 종이 폐사하였고 6월에 가장 많은 개체가 폐사하였다. 전체 폐사체 중 황조롱이(Falco tinnunculus)가 약 20%를 차지하여 가장 많았으며, 수리부엉이(Bubo bubo), 솔부엉이(Ninox scutulata), 소쩍새(Otus sunia), 참매(Accipiter gentilis), 독수리(Cinreous Vulture), 새매(Accipiter nisus) 등의 순으로 구성되었다. 봄철과 여름철은 국내 번식하는 종이 폐사체의 대부분을 차지하였으며, 겨울철에는 큰고니, 독수리 등 월동개체의 비율이 증가하였다. 천연기념물의 멸실신고는 사람에 의한 신고로 폐사체 현황만으로는 천연기념물의 국내 군집특성을 파악할 순 없으나, 야행성으로 자세한 조사가 수행되지 않은 올빼미목의 국내 개체수 파악과 국내 천연기념물 폐사체 현황 자료의 제공으로 천연기념물 보호를 위한 기초자료로 활용할 수 있을 것으로 기대된다.

국내(國內)의 천연기념물(天然記念物) 보존(保存) 관리(管理) 실태(實態) (A Study on the Present Conditions of Conservation & Management of the Natural Monuments of Korea)

  • 나명하;이진희;이재근
    • 한국전통조경학회지
    • /
    • 제28권2호
    • /
    • pp.127-136
    • /
    • 2010
  • 본 연구는 국내의 천연기념물 지정 제도, 지정 현황, 관리 실태에 대한 사례를 조사 분석하여 천연기념물 전반에 대한 개선방안을 도출하고자 한 것으로 주요 연구 결과는 다음과 같다. 첫째, 재화(財貨)적 의미가 담긴 문화재라는 용어 대신 큰 틀에서 국가유산 내에 문화유산과 자연유산으로 분류체계를 개선하고, "문화재보호법"에서 자연유산 관련 조항을 분리하여 자연유산 관련 법령을 신설 제정하거나, 별도의 장을 마련하여 법령을 정비해야 한다. 둘째, 천연기념물 지정 기준은 동 식물을 함께 묶어 규정하고 있어 불합리하므로 이를 분리하고, 지질 광물, 천연보호구역 등도 명료화하여 천연기념물 지정 시 지정 기준을 명확히 명시할 수 있도록 보완하며, 산업화와 근대화 과정에서 도입된 역사성 있는 식물도 제도(등록기념물 등)를 마련하여 보존될 수 있도록 하여야 한다. 셋째, 천연기념물 지정 명칭 부여를 명확한 기준과 원칙에 새로운 유형을 정하도록 지침을 마련한다. 넷째, 천연기념물 자원을 발굴하여 지정을 적극 확대해 나가야 한다. 다섯째, 식물은 노거수가 절반 이상으로 편중되어 있어 새로운 자원(습원식물군락, 해안 및 사구식물군락 등)을 찾아 지정하고, 지질은 지금까지 지정하지 못한 약수, 온천, 화석 등의 다양한 자원을 발굴하여 훼손되기 전에 시급히 지정해야 한다. 여섯째, 우리의 삶과 함께 해 온 역사성과 문화성 등이 깃들어 있는 대상으로 세계적, 국가적으로 보호할 가치가 충분하다면, 자연환경 분야 등 타 법률로 보존되고 있더라도 천연기념물로 지정하여 가치를 높여 나가야 한다. 일곱째, 천연기념물 관리 실태를 분석해 본 결과, 천연기념물 관련 예산 증액과 조직 확대, 지방자치단체 전문인력 확보, 민간단체 및 자원봉사자 참여 방안 마련, 문화재위원회(천연기념물분과)의 개편 등이 필요하다. 여덟째, 국립문화재연구소 자연문화재연구실을 자연유산연구소로 확대 개편하여 조사 연구 복원 전시 교육 기능을 체계적이고 효율적으로 추진할 수 있도록 하여야 한다. 아홉째, 천연기념물의 주요 훼손 사례를 분석해 보면, 크게 인위적인 피해와 자연적인 피해로 나눌 수 있다. 인위적인 피해로는 독극물(약물), 복토, 과습, 화재, 공사 및 유지 관리, 불법 훼손, 어로 행위, 원유 유출 사고 등이 있으며, 자연적인 피해로는 낙뢰, 태풍(강풍 등), 폭설, 병충해 및 질병 등이 있다. 본 연구는 천연기념물 전반의 현황분석을 통하여 천연기념물의 제도, 지정, 관리에 대한 구체적 개선 방안을 제시하였다는 데 의의를 두고 있으며, 본 결과로부터 파생되는 세부 항목의 연구는 차후 연구과제로 남겨두고자 한다.

Application of chemical consolidants into the conservation of limestone monuments

  • Shin, Gi-Rye;Park, Hyeong-Dong
    • 한국지구물리탐사학회:학술대회논문집
    • /
    • 한국지구물리탐사학회 2003년도 Proceedings of the international symposium on the fusion technology
    • /
    • pp.540-543
    • /
    • 2003
  • There are many stone monuments which are weathered by natural or artificial factors in Korea. The partly weathering in stone could accelerate the rate of weathering, so it is demanded to keep them from the further weathering. Consolidation is evaluated as one of the efficient treatments which have a good effectiveness in stone monuments. But following the former researches, the effectiveness of consolidation could be different, related to the kinds of stone or consolidants. Therefore, in this study, the change of properties was monitored in the long term for the exact evaluation of the stability of the consolidated stone. It is estimated that the pore structure of consolidated stone was filled by consolidant, according to the measurements of ultrasonic velocity, and the digital image analysis of the sample was shown that the color property of stone surface has varied during the curing.

  • PDF