• Strategy21
• /
• 통권38호
• /
• pp.112-162
• /
• 2015

This study began to confirm or review the balance of power theory by applying scientific methods through experiential cases. Though there are several kinds of national power, this study supposes military power as a crucial power when it comes to war and peace. This research covered balance and imbalance through comparing relative military power between nations or nations' group. Comparison of relative military power can be achieved by statistically processing the values of which has been converted into the standard variables in same domain, then calculating the values of nation's power which has been synthesized different experiential factors. In addition, the criteria of experiential experiment is highly dedicated to European countries, USA, Japan prior to 1st and 2nd World War, as well as USA, Soviet Union and North East Asia during Cold War era. In addition, the balance of power theory has been redefined to review the action of the state upon the changes of power as mentioned in the theory. To begin with, the redefined theory states that relative level of military power between nations defines the consistency of peace and balance of power. If military power is enough to be on the range of level required to keep the power in equilibrium, peace and balance can be achieved. The opposite would unbalance the military power, causing conflicts. While the relative military level between nations change, nations seek to establish 'nations group' via military cooperation such as alliance, which also shift relative military power between nations group as well. Thus, in order to achieve balance of power, a nation seeks to strengthen its military power(self-help), while pursuing military cooperation(or alliance). This changes relative military power between nations group also. In other words, if there exists balance of power between nations, there is balance of power between nations group as well. In this theory, WWI and II broke out due to the imbalance of military force between nations and nations group, and reviewed that due to the balance of military force during the Cold War, peace was maintained. WWI was resulted from imbalance of military cooperation between two powerful states group and WWII was occurred because of the imbalance among the states. Peace was maintained from cooperation of military power and balance among the states during the Cold War. Imbalance among continental states is more threatening than maritime states and balance of power made by army force and naval force also is feasible. Also the outcomes of two variables are found military power balanced ratio of military power for balance is 67% when variable ratio of balance is 100% and standard value for balance is 0.86. Military power exists in a form of range. The range is what unstabilized the international system causing nations to supplement their military powers. These results made possible the calculation and comparison between state's military power. How balance of power inflicted war and peace has been studied through scientific reviews. Military conflict is highly possible upon already unbalanced military powers of North East Asian countries, if the US draws its power back to America. China and Japan are constantly building up their military force. On the other hand, Korean military force is inferior so in accordance to change of international situation state's survival could be threatened and it is difficult to achieve drastic increase in military force like Germany did. Especially constructing naval force demands lots of time; however but has benefit that naval force can overcome imbalance between continental states and maritime states.

• 한국철학논집
• /
• 제31호
• /
• pp.321-346
• /
• 2011

유사 이래 갈등과 전쟁에 대비하는 별도의 연구와 학문이 출현하기 마련인데 이것을 전통 학문으로 분류한다면 '병학(兵學)'이라고 할 수 있다. 본 연구는 먼저 선행 연구를 기초로 중국의 병학사를 개괄하고, 문헌 검색을 통하여 우리나라 삼국시대부터 고려말에 이르기까지 병서의 수용과정과 지식인들의 이해 양상을 비교 검토함으로써 향후 한국사상사에 있어서 병학의 전반적 특성을 조명하기 위한 시론적인 것이다. 우리나라에서는 삼국시대에 이미 "손자"를 비롯한 중국의 병서가 전래되어 지식인들에게 널리 읽혀졌으며 유학적인 소양을 기반으로 다양한 병법을 활용했음을 확인할 수 있다. 자료상으로 보면 비록 중국의 병서에 의존한 바 크지만 한편으로는 독창적인 병법을 운용하고 있다. 고려말에 이르면서는 '병학'이 학문적으로 정립되면서 중앙의 성균관뿐 아니라 지방 향교에서도 유학과 함께 가르치게 하였다. 다만 자료의 한계로 인하여 그러한 전술 경험이 실제 병서의 간행으로 이어졌는지, 또는 고려말까지 얼마나 많은 병서가 출간되었는가의 여부는 확인하기 어렵다. 그러나 삼국시대와 고려시대의 병서의 편찬이 많지 않았다는 사실이 우리나라의 병학이 전적으로 중국에 의존하였다는 것을 의미하지는 않는다. 예컨대 고구려 을지문덕(乙支文德) 장군의 살수(薩水)대첩이나 고려 강감찬(姜邯贊) 장군의 귀주(龜州)대첩을 이룬 과정에서 나타난 전략과 전술, 리더십은 결코 우연일 수 없는 것이다.

• 한국경영과학회지
• /
• 제39권2호
• /
• pp.1-19
• /
• 2014

Recently, one of the core keywords in information technology (IT) as well as areas such as business management is big data. Big data is a term that includes technology, personnel, and organization required to gather/manage/analyze collection of data sets so large and complex that it becomes difficult to manage and analyze using traditional tools. The military has been accumulating data for a long period due to the organization's characteristic in placing emphasis on reporting and records. Considering such characteristic of the military, this study verifies the possibility of improving the performance of the military organization through use of big data and furthermore, create scientific development of operation, strategy, and support environment. For this purpose, the study organizes general status and case studies related to big data, traces back examples of data utilization by Korean's national defense sector through US military data collection and case studies, and proposes the possibility of using and applying big data in the national defense sector.

• Strategy21
• /
• 통권40호
• /
• pp.5-36
• /
• 2016

Recently, the Japanese government revised the three guidelines of its security policy, the National Security Strategy(NSS), the National Defense Program Outline and Midterm Defense Buildup Plan, exceptionally at one time. This means Japan has been seeking the new strategy and strengthening military power considering changing regional security environment. Moreover, Japan revised the security laws for the right to collective self-defense, which authorized the use of force even when Japan is not under attack. Also, Japan renewed the Guidelines for Japan-U.S. Defense Cooperation in twenty years, and has expanded JSDF's scope of activity to a worldwide level. These changes imply Japan would constantly seek to build military forces focusing on naval forces. Because Japan's naval forces, the JMSDF is the means that allow Japan to use its force at anywhere overseas and expand its roles and missions in international society by the basis of the right to collective self-defense. This research will analyze Japan's new maritime strategy and trend of force development and eventually look for the implication on our maritime security These days, Japan has perceived Chinese rapid increase of naval power and pursuing of maritime hegemony as a grave threat. In response to this, Japan is designing new maritime strategy, which are "remote islands defense and recapture" and proactively develop a new type of naval forces to accomplish this new strategy. The Japan's "remote island defense and recapture strategy" is to harden its defensive posture in Nansei islands which correspond to China's 1st island chain for chinese A2/AD strategy and directly encounter with China and to protect its own dominium and maritime interest while supporting US national strategy in East Asia. Japan continues to build compact, multi-functional ship to accomplish "remote island defense and recapture strategy" and keep strengthening its maritime power projection capability to include build of new amphibious ship, and large, multi-functional ship which can provide effective C2. These changes imply that Japan is shifting its strategy from passive and defensive to proactive and aggressive way and continues to pursue naval buildup.The implication of Japan's new maritime strategy and naval buildup needs to be observed carefully and we need to keep developing naval power required to protect our maritime sovereignty and interest.

• Strategy21
• /
• 통권36호
• /
• pp.94-120
• /
• 2015

The Asia-Pacific Region has emerged as a arena of geopolitical competition between the U.S. and China. The Obama administration of the U.S. had laid out the concept of rebalancing strategy toward the region, concentrating its 60 percent of Naval Forces to the region till 2020 and consolidating its network of allies and partners. Whereas Chinese leader Xi Jinping also put forward the concept of new type of major power relations concerning its relations with the U.S. and a concept of 'the Asian Community of Common Destiny' aiming at a more intensified mutual relation among countries in the region. In doing so, Asia-Pacific region gradually became the arena where mutual competition and cooperation between the U.S. and China has crossfired. As a close ally to the U.S. and a partner to Japan, South Korea should develop trilateral naval cooperation by holding joint naval drill with the aim of humanitarian support and disaster relief. At the same time, Seoul also should make efforts to proceed mutual confidence building with Beijing by deepening military-to-military cooperation. These policy options will be helpful to enhance Seoul's security posture in the region.

• 해양안보
• /
• 제1권1호
• /
• pp.149-173
• /
• 2020

COVID-19 위기로 인해 미국을 비롯한 서구 세력들이 혼란에 빠져 있는 상황에서도, 중국은 회색지대 전략으로 공세적인 해양팽창을 계속하고 있다. 중국이 남중국해를 중심으로 사용하고 있는 회색 지대 전략이란 전쟁도, 평화도 아닌 불분명한 상태를 창출함으로써 국제정치의 현상변경을 추진하는 전략을 말한다. 동아시아 전역으로 영향력을 확대하려 하는 중국은 앞으로 한반도에도 회색지대 전략을 투사하려 할 것이다. 한국이 남중국해 분쟁에 우발적으로 연루되는 경우, 서해에서 중국어선의 불법조업으로 부터 양국의 군사적 갈등이 초래되는 경우, 중국이 이어도에 충돌을 일으키고 개입하려는 경우, 가능성은 낮으나 독도문제를 이용해 한일갈등을 일으켜 한중 결속을 시도하는 경우들이 예상된다. 이에 대처하기 위해 한국은 장기적인 관점에서 아시아 해양안전 선단 창설 및 국가함대라는 틀을 통한 해군과 해경의 통합운용 활성화, 중국의 도발에 대한 대응체계 강화 등을 추구해야 할 것이다.

• 문화기술의 융합
• /
• 제6권4호
• /
• pp.209-217
• /
• 2020

북한은 국방력 강화를 위하여 꾸준한 국방개혁을 실시해왔으며, 특히 군사기술개발과 군수산업역량 강화를 국방개혁의 중점으로 삼아왔다. 이러한 북한의 국방개혁은 궁극적으로는 핵전력 확보를 목표로 했으며, 김정은 시기에 이르러 기술적 성과가 축적됨에 따라 수소탄과 ICBM/SLBM 등 전력의 발전으로 이어졌다. 이렇게 핵전력을 확보한 북한은 또다시 국방개혁을 통하여 재래식 무기체계의 첨단화를 추구함으로써 전략적 우위를 확보함으로써 재래전력에서의 대칭성까지 추구하고 있다. 여태까지 북한의 국방개혁은 성공적이었으며, 김정은의 새로운 집권체제 확립과 대미협상 등의 동력을 만드는데 성공했던 것으로 볼 수 있다.

• 국제지역연구
• /
• 제13권2호
• /
• pp.47-72
• /
• 2009

소련 해체와 이에 따른 냉전 종식 이후 러시아는 미국이 주도하는 국제질서 속에서 자국의 국가이익에 맞는 역할과 위상을 모색해 왔다. 미국의 세계정책에 조건부로 공조하기도 하고, 옛 소련지역을 포함하는 포스트소비에트 공간에 대해서는 자국의 이익을 보호하고 영향력을 복원하려는 적극적인 노력도 경주하고 있다. 그 이유는 포스트소비에트 공간은 에너지 자원 확보와 국제정치 행위자들의 영향력 증대 및 제 국가의 국제사회 위상 제고 등을 둘러싸고 21세기 새롭게 부각하는 러시아와 미국을 위시한 서방세계의 세력 각축장이라고 할 수 있기 때문이다. 특히, 포스트소비에트 공간의 추축국으로 인식되었던 우크라이나는 전통적인 배타적 영향력을 유지하려는 러시아와 소련 해체 이후 지속적으로 영향력을 확대하고자 하는 미국 및 서방 세력이 충돌하며 '신냉전'적 세력경쟁의 양상이 표출되는 지역이다. 이 글은 러시아가 구사하는 군사안보차원의 전략과 정책은 무엇이며, 이것이 포스트소비에트 공간의 주요 국가인 우크라이나에서 어떻게 투사되고 있는지, 그리고 이 과정에서 표출되는 우크라이나 및 서방과 러시아의 갈등 요인은 무엇이며, 그 양상은 어떻게 전개되고 있는가에 대해 고찰하고 있다.

• 안보군사학연구
• /
• 통권4호
• /
• pp.83-118
• /
• 2006

This study is to develop digital leadership in a field of national defense. Today, korean society is facing the crisis of national security. But national defense leadership is not show in the circumstance of national security crisis. As you know, national defense leadership is a process that make use of influence. Which means it converges people's interest and demands well and also show people the right vision of national defense and make them to comply the policy about national security. Because of the environmental change, our national defense leadership is having a new turning point. First, international order, which is under post-cold war, raises possibility of guarantee of peace and security in international society but also, cause the increase of multiple uncertainty and small size troubles in security circumstance. In addition, Korean society is rushing into democratization and localization period by success in peaceful change of political power went through about three times. The issue of political neutralization of military is stepping into settlement but still, negative inheritance of old military regime is worrying about it. In this situation, we can't expect rise in estimation about the importance of security and military's reason for being. So, military have to give their concern to not only internal maintenance of order and control and growth of soldiers but also developing external leadership to strength influence to society and military's the reason for being. So for these alternative I'm suggesting a digital leadership of national defense which fits digital era. This digital leadership is the leadership which can accept and understand digital technology and lead the digital organization. To construct digital national defense we need a practical leadership. The leadership has to be digital leadership with digital competence that can direct vision of digital national defense and carry out the policy. A leader who ha s digital leadership can lead the digital society. The ultimate key to construct digital government, digital corporate and digital citizen depends on digital leader with digital mind. To be more specific, digital leadership has network leadership, next generation leadership, knowledge driven management leadership, innovation oriented leadership. A leader with this kind of leadership is the real person with digital leadership. From now on, to rise this, we have to build up human resource development strategy and develop educational training program.

• 한국군사과학기술학회지
• /
• 제22권6호
• /
• pp.784-796
• /
• 2019

As the size and complexity of software increases, it is important to ensure the quality of software through testing. Many organizations refer to international standards or test process models to improve the quality of software through establishing a systematic test process. However, these standards and process models provide general processes that do not reflect the characteristics of the domain or the organization's test policies and strategies. To establish a test process that reflects the characteristics of the organization, test policies and strategies based on the organization's quality objectives and the organizational and domain characteristics should be reflected. This study proposes specific methods for eliciting activities and information to establish organizational software test policies and strategies that are essential to establishing a test process that reflects the characteristics of the organization and the system.