• 한국환경복원기술학회지
• /
• 제26권3호
• /
• pp.1-17
• /
• 2023

Korea's natural parks are managed by dividing them into four use districts: nature preservation district, natural environment district, cultural heritage district, and park village district within the park under the goal of 'conservation and sustainable use of natural parks'. However, the use districts divided in this way are designated by reflecting the results derived from the simple drawing overlapping method, and there is a limit in that objective and scientific evidence for this is insufficient. In addition, in Taeanhaean National Park, the case of this study, only a very small area of less than 1% of the nature preservation district is designated, and the natural environment district that serves as a buffer space is designated on an excessively wide scale, making it difficult to efficiently manage the national park. Therefore, the use district is not fulfilling its role. In this study, the purpose of this study was to present a method for analyzing the spatial characteristics of natural parks using environmental indicators and unsupervised learning analysis methods to set the use districts of natural parks. In this study, evaluation indicators that can evaluate the natural and human environments were derived, and the distribution patterns for each indicator were analyzed. Afterwards, by applying Self-Organizing Map (SOM) analysis, one of the unsupervised learning analysis methods, districts with similar characteristics were derived in Taeanhaean National Park, and the characteristics of each district were analyzed. As a result of the study, 7 districts with different characteristics were derived in Taeanhaean National Park, and by examining the contribution of each indicator together, it was possible to reveal that each district had different representative characteristics even though it was an adjacent area. This study evaluated natural parks by comprehensively considering the indicators of the natural and human environments. In addition, the SOM method used in the study is meaningful in that it can provide scientific and objective grounds for the existing zoning and apply it to the management plan.

• 환경영향평가
• /
• 제4권3호
• /
• pp.87-94
• /
• 1995

At both international and national levels, such as in the Rio Declaration and the EU's Fifth Environmental Action Plan, governments have committed themselves to the adoption of the precautionary principle (UNCED 1992, CEC 1992). These commitments mean that the existence of uncertainty in appraising policies and proposals for development should be acknowledged. Uncertainty arise in both the prediction of impacts and in the evaluation of their significance, particularly of those cumulative impacts which are individually insignificant but cumulatively damaging. The EC network of EIA experts, stated at their last meeting in Athens that indirect effects and the treatment of uncertainty are one of the main deficiencies of current EIA practice. Uncertainties in decision-making arise where choices have been made in the development of the policy or proposal, such as the selection of options, the justification for that choice, and the selection of different indicators to comply with different regulatory regimes. It is also likely that a weighting system for evaluating significance will have been used which may be implicit rather than explicit. Those involved in decision-making may employ different tolerances of uncertainty than members of the public, for instance over the consideration of the worst-case scenario. Possible methods for dealing with these uncertainties include scenarios, sensitivity analysis, showing points of view, decision analysis, postponing decisions and graphical methods. An understanding of the development of cumulative environmental impacts affords not only ecologic but also socio-economic investigations. Since cumulative impacts originate mainly in centres of urban or industrial development, in particular an analysis of future growth effects that might possibly be induced by certain development impacts. Not least it is seen as an matter of sustainability to connect this issue with ecological research. The serious attempt to reduce the area of uncertainty in environmental planning is a challenge and an important step towards reliable planning and sustainable development.

• 대한토목학회논문집
• /
• 제36권6호
• /
• pp.1133-1143
• /
• 2016

본 연구는 하수관거정비 임대형민자사업에 있어 사업효과 분석지표의 개선에 대한 연구이다. 하수관거정비 임대형민자사업의 평가지표 중 침입수에 대한 평가지표는 단일평가항목으로 17.5점의 높은 점수가 부여되고 있다. 침입수에 대한 평가지표는 침입수의 발생량에 초점을 맞추어 평가되고 있으며, 현재 '야간 생활하수 평가법'에 따라 계산되고 있다. 그러나, 본 평가지표가 제주지역의 지질적 특성을 반영하지 못하고 있다는 것이 운영단계에서 문제점으로 대두되고 있다. 따라서 본 연구에서는 제주지역을 중심으로 평가지표에 따른 계산 결과와 실제 침입수의 발생량을 비교 분석하고자 하였다. 이를 위해서 제주도내 5개 지역에 대하여 '야간 생활하수 평가법'에 따른 침입수 발생량을 분석하였다. 또한 실제적으로 침입수가 발생하는 조건에 대하여 전수조사를 실시하였다. 분석 결과, 지하수위가 하수관거보다 밑에 분포되고 있으며, 하수관거의 기능에 대한 검증 결과 하수관거의 결함 등에 의한 침입수 발생은 없는 것으로 분석되었다. 따라서 현재 평가지표로 활용되고 있는 '야간 생활하수 평가법'은 제주지역에 적용하기에 적합하지 않다는 결론에 도달하게 되었으며, 제주지역만의 침입수 관련 기준 마련이 필요할 것으로 사료된다.

• 환경영향평가
• /
• 제30권4호
• /
• pp.258-269
• /
• 2021

본 연구의 목적은 금강수계 하천의 생태적 건전성을 평가하는 체계를 구축하는 것이다. 연구대상 지역은 금강수계 14개 중권역으로 하였다. 평가지표의 투명성과 일관성을 확보하기 위하여, 건전성 지표 선정은 지표 간 내재적 가중치 변화 특성을 고려한 조정방법을 사용하여 선정하였다. 최종 통합지수에 미치는 영향이 가장 큰 지표는 수량, 수질, 수생태, 서식·수변환경 부문 중 수생태 부문의 지수로 파악되었다. 하천의 생태적 건전성 지수를 분석한 결과, 댐상류 유역(대청댐 기준)은 2014년까지 기준년도(2008)에 비해 상대적으로 좋은 상태로 평가되었으며 댐하류 유역은 좋지 않은 상태로 평가되었다. 년 단위 생태적 건전성 지수의 변화 추이는 다음과 같다. 용담댐, 용담댐하류, 보청천, 대청댐, 대청댐하류, 논산천의 경우는 시기별 차이는 있으나 건전성 지수의 저하가 진행되고 있다. 반면, 무주남대천, 영동천, 갑천의 경우는 건전성이 개선되고 있는 것으로 평가되었으며 초강, 대청댐상류, 미호천, 금강공주, 금강하구언은 건전성이 개선된 후 다시 저하되는 것으로 평가되었다.

• 한국건축시공학회지
• /
• 제14권6호
• /
• pp.515-522
• /
• 2014

혼화재로서 플라이애시가 콘크리트의 전과정 환경영향에 미치는 효과를 정량적으로 평가하기 위하여, 4023개의 실내배합 및 2120개의 레미콘 배합을 분석하였다. 전과정 환경 평가에서 환경부하는 분류화, 특성화, 정규화 및 가중치 단계를 거쳐 정량적인 환경영향 지표로 환산되었다. 콘크리트 전과정 환경영향은 주로 지구 온난화, 광화학 산화 생성물 및 무생물 자원고갈의 세 범주로 분류될 수 있었다. 또한, 콘크리트의 환경영향 지표들은 플라이애시 치환율의 증가와 함께 감소하였으며, 대부분 보통 포틀랜드 시멘트의 양에 의해 결정되었다. 이를 고려하여, 콘크리트의 환경영향 지표들은 단위 결합재 양 및 플라이애시 치환율의 함수로 간단하게 모델링 될 수 있었다.

• International Journal of Contents
• /
• 제14권3호
• /
• pp.53-60
• /
• 2018

Based on the previous studies on sinkholes and ground subsidence conducted until date, the factors affecting the occurrence of sinkholes can be divided into natural environmental factors and human environmental factors in accordance with the purpose of the study. Furthermore, to be more specific, the human environment can be classified into the artificial type and the social type. In this study, the assessment indices for assessing risks of sinkholes and ground subsidence were developed by performing AHP analysis based on the results of the study by Lee et al. (2016), who selected the risk factors for the occurrence of sinkholes by performing Delphi analysis targeting relevant experts. Analysis showed that the artificial environmental factors were of significance in affecting the occurrence of sinkholes. Explicitly, the underground factors were found to be of importance in the natural environment, and among them, the level of underground water turned out to be an imperative influencing factor. In the artificial environment, the underground and subterranean structures exhibited similar importance, and in the underground structures, the excessive use of the underground space was found to be an important influencing factor. In the subterranean ones, the level of water leakage and the erosion of the water supply and sewage piping system were the influential factors, and in the surface, compaction failure was observed as an imperative factor. In the social environment, the regional development, and above all, the groundwater overuse were found to be important factors. In the managemental and institutional environment, the improper construction management proved to be the most important influencing factor.

• 환경영향평가
• /
• 제33권2호
• /
• pp.64-73
• /
• 2024

개발사업으로 인한 서식지 파괴의 심각성이 대두되면서 생물다양성을 보전하기 위해 환경영향평가(EIA)의 중요성은 커지고 있다. 경관스케일에서 개발 요인과 주변 환경요인에 따른 생물다양성 영향을 정량적으로 평가하기 위해 선행연구들이 진행되고 있으나, 개발사업을 기준으로 생물다양성 감소에 영향을 미치는 요인에 대한 연구는 미흡한 실정이다. 본 연구는 선행연구를 통해 유효하다고 밝혀진 독립변수(사업 면적, 사업 유형, 고도, 생태·자연도, 녹지와의 이격거리, 보호구역과의 이격거리)들을 다중클래스 로지스틱 회귀분석, T-test, 사업 유형 검토분석을 통해 종풍부도 변화에 유의미한 영향을 미치는지를 검토하였다. 연구 결과, 토지 피복 단위에서 생물다양성에 영향을 끼치는 것으로 밝혀진 요인 중 사업 규모와 환경영향평가 시 종풍부도 값만이 p-value=0.05 이하의 값을 보였다. 그리고 사업 유형의 경우, 체육시설의 설치, 에너지 개발, 산업입지 및 산업단지의 조성에서 조류의 생물다양성 감소가 크게 변화하는 것을 확인하였다. 본 연구를 통해 분석 규모에 따라 영향을 끼치는 변수에서의 차이가 발생할 수 있음을 확인하였기에, 환경영향평가에서 생물다양성 변화를 분석하기 위해서는 개발사업 단위에서의 지표 활용에 연구가 추가로 필요할 것이며, 타 생물종으로의 일반화를 위해 추가적인 연구가 필요할 것으로 사료된다.

• Ocean and Polar Research
• /
• 제43권2호
• /
• pp.65-72
• /
• 2021

In order to evaluate the dissolved organic carbon (DOC) and fluorescent dissolved organic matter (FDOM), as indicators of organic matter in the coastal environments, we measured the concentrations of DOC, FDOM, and chemical oxygen demand (COD) in saline groundwater (Woljeong, Pyoseon, and Hwasun beaches) and coastal seawater (Haengwon, Gwideok, Pyoseon, and Yeongnak) in Jeju, Korea. The highest concentrations of DOC and COD in groundwater were found in Woljeong and Pyoseon, and those in coastal water were observed in Haengwon and Pyoseon, indicating that the higher concentrations of DOC and COD seem to be associated with saline groundwater-driven dissolved organic matter (DOM) and/or biogeochemical processes. According to origin and optical properties of DOM using FDOM as a tracer, proportion of humic-like FDOM, more refractory DOM, was relatively greater in the groundwater than in the coastal water. With regard to this result, there was no relationship between DOC and COD in groundwater, while DOC showed a good positive correlation (r² = 0.66) with COD in coastal water. This result indicates that COD as an indicator of assessment of DOM has a limitation in which it is difficult to quantify refractory DOM. Although DOC is a potential alternative to COD in the coastal environments, particulate organic carbon cannot be negligible due to relatively higher concentration compared to the open ocean. Therefore, the use of total organic carbon (TOC) as a replacement of COD in the coastal ocean is important, and the evaluation criterion of the TOC is necessary in order to evaluate of organic matter indicator in the various coastal environments.

• 환경영향평가
• /
• 제20권5호
• /
• pp.585-600
• /
• 2011

South Korean central government has launched the first comprehensive climate change policies in 1999, and they have been renewed every three year. The third policies ended in 2007. However, it is quite rare to analyze whether the climate change policies are effective against climate change. In this context, this paper aims at analyzing the effectiveness of climate change policy which was launched for seven years from 1999 to 2007 in South Korea. The effectiveness analysis of policy can be done in terms of the individual policy and/or all policies being synthesized as a comprehensive unit. Employing the latter methodology, this paper analyzed the effectiveness on the basis of economic growth as independent variable, greenhouse gas emission as dependent variable, and energy use and its process as intervening variable. Seven analytic indicators covering the three variables were selected on the basis of two points in time before and after climate change policy having been launched. The seven indicators were analyzed in terms of three aspects. They were the change in the state of each indicator, the effectiveness of climate change policy from 1999 to 2007, and the effectiveness process from 1999 to 2007. The effectiveness process was analyzed in terms of the relational context and its flow processing path. Economic growth was advanced remarkably with increase in the total consumption of energy. As a result, greenhouse gas emission increased. However, energy efficiency increased with significant decrease in energy intensity, carbon intensity, and energy elasticity. The expansion of new and renewable energy over total energy supply was not effective significantly on the decrease in greenhouse gas emission. The processing path of climate change policy being effective advanced toward increase in energy efficiency through energy intensity rather than toward sustainable development. Such a way of the effectiveness of climate change policy implies that most policies focused on adaptation rather than on mitigation.

• 한국수자원학회논문집
• /
• 제49권8호
• /
• pp.685-692
• /
• 2016

본 연구는 유역의 물이용 취약성을 평가하는 지표 기반 접근법을 개발하고 이를 한강유역의 단위유역에 적용하였다. 평가 지표는 기후뿐만 아니라 사회 경제 환경적 측면을 고려하여 총 16개를 선정하였으며, 취약성 정의에 따라 노출, 민감도, 적응능력으로 구성하였다. 이는 다기준 의사결정기법(Multi-criteria Decision Making, MCDM) 중 TOPSIS (Technique for Order Performance by Similarity to Ideal Solution)를 적용하여 유역에 대한 취약성을 도출하였다. 지표 자료는 2010년을 기준으로 수집하였으며, 국가 통계 자료 및 SWAT (Soil and Water Assessment Tool) 모형의 모의 자료를 활용하였다. 또한, 각 지표에 대한 가중치는 전문가 설문조사를 통하여 산정된 주관적 가중치(Subjective weight)와 자료 기반 엔트로피(Entropy) 개념을 활용하여 산정된 객관적 가중치(Objective weight)로 구분하여 적용하였다. 수도를 포함하고 있는 한강 유역에 대하여 표준단위유역별 취약성을 평가하고 우선순위 비교 및 순위상관 분석을 실시하였다. 취약한 유역들은 대부분 용수사용량이 많고 상수도 누수율이 높게 나타났다. 가중치 적용 방법에 따른 취약성은 일부 지역에서 차이를 보였으나, 전반적으로 북한강유역의 취약성이 가장 높았다. 본 연구 결과를 통하여 보다 신뢰도 높은 물이용 취약성 평가를 위해서는 다양한 가중치 방법론을 활용하는 것이 중요함을 확인할 수 있었다.