• The Journal of the Korea Contents Association
• /
• v.10 no.2
• /
• pp.258-267
• /
• 2010

This interest in radiation exposure makes increasing doctor's awareness and knowledge of radiation dose in patients during X-ray test important in reducing patient's uneasiness. However, very few facilities are equipped with measurement instruments. Therefore, an intensive study to find out patient dose using computational method has been initiated. This study used special features of the bit system and NDD-M and directly measured the output dose of diagnostic X-ray instruments used in Korea to create tables. Two different methods were found to be adequate when applied to cases when X-ray outputs were both known and unknown, and comparative experiments with real measurement doses were carried out. Presented methods were found to provide more accurate results compared to the bit system and NDD-M. Therefore, patient dose during clinical trials were found to be more easily acceptable to medical personnel in the radiation field in terms of radiation exposure and reduction of medical X ray dose.

• Korean Journal of Digital Imaging in Medicine
• /
• v.11 no.2
• /
• pp.101-107
• /
• 2009

With the recent development of diagnosis using radiation and increasing demand of the medical treatment, we need to minimize radiation exposure dose. So, This is the method which reduce patient dose by measuring surface dose of radiographic change factor and by comparing theoretical and actual dose, when we take an X-ray which is generally used. By changing the factor of kV, mAs, FSD, whose range is 60 to 120 kV, 20 to 100 mAs, 80 to 180 cm, we compared theoretical surface dose with actual surface dose calculated by the simple calculation program, Bit system, and NDD-M method As a result, when kV and mAs were higher, theoretical surface dose and actual surface dose were more increased. but the higher FSD was, the more decreased surface dose was. According to this, the error were measured about 0.1 to 0.2 mGy in low dose part and about 0.7 to 1.5 mGy in high dose part. Therefore, this shows that theoretical surface dose calculation method is more correct in low dose part than in high dose part. In conclusion, we will have to make constant efforts which can reduce patient and radiographer's exposure dose, studying methods which can predict patient's radiation exposure dose more exactly.

• Journal of the Korean Society of Radiology
• /
• v.5 no.6
• /
• pp.377-381
• /
• 2011

The purpose of this study is an assessment between the measured value of the nanoDot dosimeter and the calculated value of Non Dosimeter Dosimetry-Method(NDD-M) for entrance surface dose in general radiography. Measurement and calculation of the entrance surface doses were performed for head(AP), abdomen(AP), pelvis(AP), thoracic spine(AP) and lumbar spine(AP). As a result, the relative ratios of the measured value to the calculated value were acquired 1.5-2.1 for each region. Reproducibility acquired 0.035 as a coefficient of variation.

• The Journal of the Korea Contents Association
• /
• v.11 no.12
• /
• pp.357-363
• /
• 2011

The aim of this study is to compare radiation dose in diagnostic X-ray radiography and calculated by different mathematical equation. The result of ESDs direct measurement and that calculated by Mori NDD-M shows the biggest difference. On the other hand, equation by Edmonds shows the lowest difference of ESDs. Also, Rectification due to the difference between direct dose measurement and calculation method commutated three-phase, single phase and inverter type, show less difference in the drive way. In conclusion, this study can be helpful for expecting radiation dose-exposure and control exposure parameters for the diagnostic x-ray radiography.

• Proceedings of the Korean Society of Medical Physics Conference
• /
• 2004.11a
• /
• pp.59-63
• /
• 2004

IAEA's Guidance Levels have been provided for Western people to the end. Guidance levels lower than the IAEA'S will be necessary in view of korean people's proportions. Therefore, We need to develope the standard doses for korean people. And we conducted a nationwide survey of patient dose from x-ray examinations in korea. 278 institutions were selected from Members Book of Korean Hospital Association. The valid response rate was approximately 57.9%. Doses were calculated from the questionnaires by NDD method. The results were as follows; 1) General radiographic equipments were 43%, fluoroscopic equipments 29%, dental equipments 13%, CT units 8% and mamographic units 7%. 2) According to classification by rectification way, three-phase equipments were 30%, inverter-type generators 29%, single- phase equipments 26%, unknown units 6%. 3) According to classification by receptor system, film-screen types were 46%, CR types 27%, OR types18% and unknown types 9%. 4) The number of examinations were chest 48%, spine 17% and abdomen 13%. 5) Patient doses were head AP 3.1 mGy, abdomen AP 3.5 mGy and chest PA 0.4 mGy.

• Progress in Medical Physics
• /
• v.16 no.1
• /
• pp.10-15
• /
• 2005

IAEA's guidance levels have been provided for western people to the end. Guidance levels lower than the IAEA'S will be necessary in view of Korean people's proportions. Therefore, we need to develope the standard doses for Korean people. And we conducted a nationwide survey of patient dose from x-ray examinations in Korea. In this study, the 278 institutions were selected from Members Book of Korean Hospital Association. The valid response rate was approximately 57.9%. Doses were calculated from the questionnaires by NDD method. We obtained the results were as follows; 1) General radiographic equipments were distributed for 42.0%, fluoroscopic equipments 29.4%, dental equipments 13.2%, CT units 8.1 % and mamographic units 7.2%. 2) According to classification by rectification, three-phase equipments were 29.9%, inverter-type generators 29.5%, single-phase equipments 25.5%, constant voltage units 9.0% and unknown units 6.0%. 3) According to classification by receptor system, film-screen types were 46.8%, CR types 26.8%, DR types 17.7% and unknown types 8.9%. 4) The number of examinations were chest 49.2%, spine 16.8% and abdomen 12.7%. 5) Patient doses were head AP 3.44 mGy, abdomen AP 4.25 mGy and chest PA 0.39 mGy.