• 한국융합학회논문지
• /
• 제8권11호
• /
• pp.413-421
• /
• 2017

본 연구는 심각해지는 대기 중 미세먼지 현실에 따라 우리나라 사람들의 미세먼지 관련 건강 인식과 행동에 대해 탐색하였다. 개인 위생적 차원에서 미세먼지에 대한 우리나라 사람들의 인식과 건강행동 사이의 관계를 탐색하기 위해 개인의 건강 인식과 관련 있는 다차원 건강통제소재, 질병에 대한 취약성과 심각성 지각 및 건강행동의도 사이의 구조적 관계를 분석하였다. 다차원 건강통제소재의 3가지 성향 중 내적 성향을 제외한 우연성향과 타인의존성향이 취약성과 심각성 지각에 영향을 미치고 있었고, 두 변인은 다시 미세먼지로 인한 질병 예방행동의도에 긍정적인 영향을 미치고 있었다. 이러한 결과에 따라 미세먼지 관련 질병 예방행동을 장려하기 위해 정확한 정보를 시의성 있게 제공하고 피해 최소화를 위한 방안을 제안하여 미세먼지에 대한 막연한 공포감이나 불확실성을 제거하고 이를 통해 내적 통제소재화를 자극할 수 있도록 독려할 필요가 있다. 끝으로 후속연구를 위한 제언을 제안했다.

• 근관절건강학회지
• /
• 제2권1호
• /
• pp.1-16
• /
• 1995

Coping patterns were investigated in a sample of 126 patients with chronic low back pain by means of self-reported questionnaire. Based on the previous researches, coping pat terns were divided into the active cognitive coping, the active behavioral coping, the passive cognitive coping, and the passive behavioral coping. While all the above coping patterns were used, the passive behavioral coping was found to be used most frequently. Six subgroups were identified by cluster analytic procedure using their scores of the coping scale : active cognitive coper, general active coper, passive behavioral coper, general passive coper, multidimensional coper, and multi dimensional non-coper. Six subgroups were compared regarding locus of control, self-efficacy, pain and demographic variables. Distinct differences appeared among subgroups in internal locus of control, self-efficacy, and pain. General active coper and active cognitive coper had higher internal locus of control, higher self-efficacy, and lower pain. General passive coper and multidimensional non-coper had lower internal locus of control, lower self-efficacy, and higher pain. Passive behavioral coper had higher internal locus of control, lower self-efficacy, and higher pain. It supports the concept of learned helplessness due to prior experiences. Multi dimensional coper had higher internal, higher powerful others, and higher self-efficacy. So it corresponds to 'believer in control' group Identified by Wallston et at(1982). Unexpectedly this group also complained more pain. It could be interpreted in two ways. The more coping methods they use, the more they complain pain ; which is the result of Folkman et al (1986). Or they might be typical 'yea sayers'. These unique groups-passive behavioral coper and multidimensional coper-identified by this study supports the suggestion of Wallston et al(1982), about locus of control : individual's pattern of responses across the three scales may be more predictive than his or her scores on each of the scale seperately. The fact that passive coping was used more than active coping also suggests that self controlled active co ping is encouraged to chronic patients as well as acute patients. And it is necessary to articulate the coping scale and self-efficacy scale. It is also necessary to study the relationship of coping and adjustment by experimental design.