• 제목/요약/키워드: Modern English

검색결과 202건 처리시간 0.018초

문화변용이론의 시각에서 본 우리나라 공공도서관의 발전과정 (Growth of the Korean Public Library from the Point View of Acculturation)

  • 전명숙
    • 한국문헌정보학회지
    • /
    • 제10권
    • /
    • pp.39-70
    • /
    • 1983
  • The concept of the public library defined by the Korean Library Association does not describe the current state of the Korean public library but describes the public libraries in the western society. Korean public library was formed after the western public library but it was modified and reconciled with the tradition of Korea. The difference between the concepts occured in the acculturation process of the Korean public library. According to the International Encyclopeadia of the Social Sciences, acculturation comprehends those phenomena which result when groups of individuals having different cultures come into continuous firsthand contact, with subsequent changes in the original cultural patterns of either of both groups. Korea opened its door to western world in 1876, and it began to contact with the western world. As the consequence, the concept of the public library of the West diffused to Lee Dynasty which were characterized by the confucianism and the extended family system. These two characteristics were against the public library concept and it could not function as it was and it had to be modified to fit to Korean society. The American public library was formed by the diffusion of English public library. The concept fitted in the colonial American society which was characterized by the Christianity and nuclear family system. Religion and family life were closely knitted together and they contributed much to the formation of the American public library. Also the society needed various information to form their new nation. The need of the public library grew and the public library repidly developed as the American society was urbanized and industrialized. The changes of Korean public library has passed the following process of acculturation. 1. The Korean culture contacted with Western world. 2. The public library concept diffused to Korea, but the people were illiterate and the need of the public library was for the preservation of the old books. The collection was not for people. 3. The function of the public library in Korea was altered slightly as several intellectuals who formed the first modern public library tried to literate Koreans as a means of liberation :from Japan through the library service. 4. The traditional libraries such as sodandg and hyangyo disorganized and finally disappeared as the traditional elements of the culture disappeared and the new cultural elements prevailed in Korea. 5. When the traditional elements of culture were disorganized, a reinterpretation of the diffused culture appeared. With the appearance of the vouth group which was not existed in the traditional society, cultural facilities for them were needed. They began to use public library as their reading rooms. This pattern has been institutionalized ever since in Korean public library. 6. When the new element of the culture spread, the traditional cultural elements react against this element. As the new public libraries sprung out, there were movements to restore the old Korean tradition of the family libraries and Hyangyo to counteract to the new libraries. This movements were not successful and they all disappeared as they could not keep up the rapid social change occurred in the Korean society. 7. In the process of the cultral change, cultural lag occurred between the public library and the users who could not adopt to the new library. This has been continued to the present time. 8. This diffused concept of the public library was modified and became native to Korean society. However, the acculturation of the public library concept has not changed the traditional ideas of Korean people and their behavior. The Korean society recently has been changing rapidly and the function of the Korean public library is improving accordingly; 1. The extended Korean family system is disorganizing. As the consequence, the public library could substitute the family system offering information and recreation service, etc. 2. The growth of educated population is requiring a variety of library materials. An individual library can not meet the needs of them and cooperative library service will be needed to share resources. The public library will become the center of the cooperative service. 3. The Koreans are watching TV more hours than they read printed materials. For them, the public library needs to collect audiovisual materials. Especially the teaching materials should be all audiovisualized for the effective teaching. 4. Technology is developing rapidly in Korea, especially computer technology is applied in many parts of the society. This will also influence library service. The public library will be developing as the centralized library computer system. When the Korean public library functions as the extended family system and the center of the cooperative library system, the Korean public library will be functioning as the public library defined by the Korean Library Association.

  • PDF

영화 <기생충>에 나타난 생명자본의 관점에 관한 연구 (A Study on Views of Vital Capital in Film )

  • 강병호
    • 한국엔터테인먼트산업학회논문지
    • /
    • 제15권3호
    • /
    • pp.75-88
    • /
    • 2021
  • 영화 <기생충>은 칸 영화제(Cannes Film Festival)에서 황금종려상을 수상하고 2020년 2월 아카데미 작품상도 받아 기념비적 평가를 받는다. 일반적으로 평론가들은 이 영화를 격렬하게 뒤틀린 계급격차, 계급의 분노와 같이 계급(class)간 갈등을 주제로 논평한다. 영화 <기생충>은 마르크시즘(Marxism)의 정형화된 계급투쟁 구도보다 "악한이 등장하지 않는 비극", "문화로 체화된 내재적 갈등"을 표현하고 있다. 다시 말해 부르디외(Pierre Bourdieu)가 주장한 기체화(substrate)된 현대사회의 계급관계를 표현한다고 볼 수 있다. 영화 <기생충>은 이념 대립이 과잉인 한국사회에 논쟁의 주제가 되었다. <기생충>이란 키워드는 문화 콘텐츠가 아닌 정치권의 논쟁에서 차용된 경향도 발견할 수 있다. 기생충을 좌파 선동 영화라 치부하는 주장도 있지만 정작 사회주의가 국가이념인 중국에서는 개봉을 금지시켰다. 반면 이어령은 영화 <기생충>이 이분법적 시각으로 사회현상을 바라보지 않고 겹 시각(dual view)으로 바라보고 있다고 주장하며 긴장 속에서 인간을 바라보는 눈을 잃지 않았다고 주장한다. 이런 관점은 생명자본론 (vital capitalism)에 기초한다. 생명자본론은 계급투쟁 갈등에서 역사발전 근인을 찾지 않고 생명이 가진 고유 특성 토포필리아(topophilia), 네오필리아(neophilia), 바이오필리아(biophilia)로 역사와 사회를 해석한다. 또한 문명 발전을 홉스 (Hobbes)의 포식주의 단계, 미셀 세르(Michel Serres)의 숙주-기생 단계, 마굴리스(Margulis)의 상호 기생, '상생'의 단계로 발전해왔다고 조망한다. 이 논문에서는 생명자본의 개념을 소개하고 문화자본에 관한 선행연구를 분석한 후 영화<기생충>의 내용 중 문화자본에서 주장하는 아비투스(habitus), 기초한 장(fields)의 개념으로 해석된 장면(차별, 취향, 교육, 기생)을 중심으로 생명자본적인 재해석을 시도한다. 선행연구의 이론적 기초가 되는 문화자본론은 콘텐츠 해석에 있어 자기이해의 단일동기로 해석의 다양성과 우연성을 저감할 가능성이 높고 도식화된 해석이 될 수 있다. 또한 연속론 즉 시대와 환경은 변해도 자본주의의 속성은 연속된다는 주장은 새로운 하부구조(기술혁신, 생산성 증대)의 변화와 이에 의해 변화되는 사회관계와 개인의 역할을 해석하기 어려울 수 있다. 이 연구에서는 영화 <기생충(parasite)>을 텍스트로 선행연구들이 해석의 기초한 문화자본적 접근방법에 대응하여 생명자본의 해석적 대안의 가능성을 발견하였다. 이러한 탐색적 연구는 한국의 극단적 이념 풍토에 대한 대안의 시도라 할 수 있다.