• The Journal of the Korea Contents Association
• /
• v.15 no.2
• /
• pp.196-207
• /
• 2015

This study introduced the concept of 'Media-content repertoire', which indicates the set of favorite media-content combinations of media users and extracted five media user types based on those combinations. We used the range of media(i.e., smartphone, tablet, PC, and TV) and entertainment content(i.e., movie, broadcasting, music, and game) for the analysis. Also, we investigated the differences between those types including demographic variables, individual characteristics, and content buying behavior and we found that statistically significant differences exist among them. Those include 'non-user'(i.e., lower level of media use), 'screen user'(i.e., 50s, TV-centered media use), 'variety seeker'(i.e., 20s. heavy public transport user), 'selective focus'(i.e., 20,30s, movie&broadcasting-centered media use), and 'heavy user'(i.e., high level of media use and consumption). The results provide both academic implications(e.g., extension of media repertoire concept) and practical implications(e.g., direction to the target marketing for each user type).

• The Journal of the Korea Contents Association
• /
• v.14 no.12
• /
• pp.694-705
• /
• 2014

Recently media use is in the period of upheaval because of the advent of smart media. At this present, there are many discussions about the multiplexing or convergence of media use and these effects of everyday life, based on the theory of 'media repertoires'. But many researches just divide media repertoire categories and show media use hours by these categories. To have more mighty power of explanation, the study about media repertoires must execute both a static analysis of media use hours and a dynamic analysis of media use by media repertoire categories in everyday life.

• Journal of Korea Entertainment Industry Association
• /
• v.13 no.7
• /
• pp.1-13
• /
• 2019

This study tried to explore the contents of film critics' reviews reported in the press. Based on fifty nine Korean movies with over 100,000 audience in 2017, this study collected 1113 reviews from fifty five movies with the exception of four without reviews. This study focused on the correlation between film's overall quality and four evaluation items such as directing, acting, story, and the visual. Examining the difference in the report timing of the review, the length of the review, and the intensity of the opinion, this study also analyzed the relationship between the internal aspects of reviews and box office performance. According to the results, the valence of critics' reviews was generally positive. Looking at the difference of reporting time, this valence was higher in the week before release than in the release week of film. The evaluation items of reviews were highly covered both before movie release and in the opening week. These were significantly declined in the second week of release. In the relationship between the number of reviews by each movie and box office performance, a positive correlation was found.