• Communications for Statistical Applications and Methods
• /
• v.19 no.6
• /
• pp.877-884
• /
• 2012

Phase I trials determine the maximum tolerated dose(MTD) and the recommended dose(RD) for subsequent Phase II trials. In this paper, a MTD estimation method applied to a biased coin design is proposed for Phase I Clinical Trials. The suggested MTD estimation method is compared to the SM3 method and the NM method (Lee and Kim, 2012) using a Monte Carlo simulation study.

• Communications for Statistical Applications and Methods
• /
• v.18 no.2
• /
• pp.179-187
• /
• 2011

The purpose of a Phase I clinical trial is to estimate the maximum tolerated dose, MTD, of a new drug. In this paper, the MTD estimation method is suggested by curve fitting the dose-toxicity data to an S-shaped curve. The suggested MTD estimation method is compared with established MTD estimation procedures using a Monte Carlo simulation study.

• Journal of the Korean Data and Information Science Society
• /
• v.23 no.6
• /
• pp.1085-1091
• /
• 2012

Phase I clinical trials are designed to identify an appropriate dose; the maximum tolerated dose, which assures safety of a new drug by evaluating the toxicity at each dose-level. The adjusted maximum tolerated dose estimation is presented by stopping rule in phase I clinical trial on this research. The suggested maximum tolerated dose estimation is compared to the standard method3 and NM method using a Monte Carlo simulation study.

• Communications for Statistical Applications and Methods
• /
• v.19 no.1
• /
• pp.57-64
• /
• 2012

Phase I clinical trials determine the maximum tolerated dose(MTD) of a new drug. In this paper, we proposed a two-stage MTD estimation method by a Stopping rule in a phase I clinical trial. The suggested MTD estimation method is compared to the standard design(SM3) and the continual reassessment method(CRM) using a Monte Carlo simulation study.

• The Korean Journal of Applied Statistics
• /
• v.27 no.1
• /
• pp.13-20
• /
• 2014

Phase I Clinical Trials estimate a Maximum Tolerated Dose(MTD). In this paper, an MTD estimation method applied stopping rule is proposed for Phase I Clinical Trials. The suggested MTD estimation method is compared to the Continual Reassessment Method(CRM) method using a Monte Carlo simulation study.

• Environmental Mutagens and Carcinogens
• /
• v.19 no.2
• /
• pp.108-111
• /
• 1999

Correlation between the tumorigenic dose (TD) and the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) was examined to search for the most relevant TD values related to the MTD. Using benzo(a)pyrene (B(a)P) 2-yr bioassay data, correlation coefficients between values of $TD_{1-}$50/ and the MTD were estimated from linearized or non-linearlized dose-response curves. The highest correlation coefficients (0.9966-1.0000) were obtained from T $D_{1-}$10/ in linearized dose-response curves while the highest (0.9966-1.0000) were estimated from $TD _{5-}$10/ in non-linearized dose-response eurves. These data suggest that TDs-lo were more closely related to the MTD than the ,$TD_{5-}$10/ in B(a)P 2-yr bioassay and that in lieu of the $TD_{50}$ they could be efficiently applicable to risk assessment and management.ent.

• The Korean Journal of Applied Statistics
• /
• v.27 no.7
• /
• pp.1115-1123
• /
• 2014

The main purpose of phase I clinical trials is to estimate the Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD), which minimizes side effect and assures safety of a new drug by evaluating the toxicity at each dose-level. The conventional MTD estimation methods is Standard method (Storer, 1989; Korn et al., 1994), Accelerated Titration Designs (Simon et al., 1997) and DM method (Dixon and Mood, 1948) etc. In this paper, MTD estimation method with de-escalation is suggested phase I clinical trials. The proposed MTD estimation method is compared to Accelerated Titration Designs, SM3 without de-escalation method and SM3 with de-escalation method using a Monte Carlo simulation.

• The Korean Journal of Applied Statistics
• /
• v.32 no.5
• /
• pp.741-752
• /
• 2019

The purpose of a Phase I Clinical Trial is to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD). MTD is important because it affects subsequent clinical trials; however, the existing method has a problem due to an inadequate dose allocated to patients. In this paper, an MTD estimation method is proposed to complement the problems of the existing MTD estimation method. The suggested method applies the initial acceleration step to the modified continual reassessment method. Monte Carlo Simulation Study is adapted to compare a suggested MTD estimation method with the standard design and the modified continual reassessment method.

• The Korean Journal of Applied Statistics
• /
• v.33 no.2
• /
• pp.137-145
• /
• 2020

Phase I clinical trials (Dose Finding Studies) are the first step in administering new drugs developed through animal experiments or in vitro experiments to humans. An important area of interest in designing Phase I clinical trials is determining the dose that provides the greatest efficacy and acceptable safe dose to the patient. In this paper, we propose a method to determine the maximum tolerated dose considering efficacy and safety using Biased coin design and stopping rule. The proposed method is compared with existing methods through simulation.

• 대한예방의학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 1994.02a
• /
• pp.431-438
• /
• 1994

As currently conducted, standard rodent bioassays do not provide sufficient information to assess carcinogenic risk to humans at doses thousands of times below the maximum tolerated dose. Recent analyses indicate that measures of carcinogenic potency from these tests are restricted to a narrow range about the maximum tolerated dose and that information on shape of the dose-response is limited in experiments with only two doses and a control. Extrapolation from high to low doses should be based on an understanding of the mechanisms of carcinogenesis. We have postulated that administration of the maximum tolerated dose can increase mitogenesis which, in turn. increases rates of mutagenesis and, thus, carcinogenesis. The animal data are consistent with this mechanism, because about half of all chemicals tested are indeed rodent carcinogens, and about 40% of the positives are not detectably mutagenic. Thus, at low doses where cell killing does not occur, the hazards to humans of rodent carcinogens may be much lower than commonly assumed. In contrast, for high-dose exposures in the workplace, assessment of hazard requires comparatively little extrapolation. Nevertheless. permitted workplace exposures are sometimes close to the tumorigenic dose-rate in animal tests. Regulatory policy to prevent human cancer has primarily addressed synthetic chemicals, yet similar proportions of natural chemicals and synthetic chemicals test positive in rodent studies as expected from an understanding of toxicological defenses, and the vast proportion of human exposures are to natural chemicals. Thus, human exposures to rodent carcinogens are common. The natural chemicals are the control to evaluate regulatory strategies, and the possible hazards from synthetic chemicals should be compared to the possible hazards from natural chemicals. Qualitative extrapolation of the carcinogenic response between species has been investigated by comparing two closely related species: rats and mice. Overall predictive values provide moderate confidence in interspecies extrapolation; however, knowing that a chemical is positive at any site in one species gives only about a 50% chance that it will be positive at the same site in the other species.