• 대한수학교육학회지:수학교육학연구
• /
• 제9권2호
• /
• pp.369-381
• /
• 1999

The aim of this study is to analyze the relationships and propose the desirable relationships between mathematics curriculum and curriculum-introduction. Under the purpose of this study, we investigate the coherence of mathematics curriculum and curriculum-introductions which have been revised through the seven curriculum-revisions to the present. And we analyze the change in the education. On the basis on this analysis, we propose mathematics textbooks which can be said that have a strong impact on the practice of mathematics the important points that should be considered in the mathematics curriculum-revision. First, we need to reconsider the order of the mathematics curriculum-revisions which has been going on from curriculum-introduction to mathematics curriculum. Second, we should take more efforts in developing the mathematics textbooks and reflect the voice of the mathematics textbooks and reflect the voice of athematics leachers in the more positive way.

• 한국수학교육학회지시리즈D:수학교육연구
• /
• 제8권2호
• /
• pp.95-106
• /
• 2004

The purpose of this paper is to diagnose the problems of the revision process of the curriculum, and identify the issues in relation to the 7th mathematics curriculum. From the review on the curriculum revision process in Korea, three issues were identified; timing and scale of curriculum revision, research and curriculum revision, and the relationship between the revision of the overall curriculum and that of a subject curriculum. Regarding the mathematics curriculum, the three issues were raised for further discussion; lack of philosophy behind the mathematics curriculum, optimization of mathematics educational content, and differentiated curricula for students of different abilities.

• 한국수학교육학회지시리즈A:수학교육
• /
• 제45권2호
• /
• pp.231-242
• /
• 2006

National curriculum is very important for the future of nation. So, continuous efforts are needed to improve the national curriculum. This study examined the issues and the problems related with the 7th optional mathematics curriculum, and gave the message about th: methods of implementation. For this, we analyzed the result of the questionnaire survey which consisted in the question about the 7th optional mathematics curriculum. 264 high school mathematics teachers are participated in this survey. We found the result that the 7th optional mathematics curriculum has the problem in contents and management. So, this study gave not only the problem but also the various concrete methods for management of the 7th optional mathematics curriculum. We hope that mathematics education members research and argue about the optional mathematics curriculum for next curriculum.

• 한국수학교육학회지시리즈D:수학교육연구
• /
• 제11권1호
• /
• pp.53-63
• /
• 2007

Mathematics curriculum reform is very important, and it can be understood well by power. This paper uses the extended Foucault's power theory as foundations to view mathematics curriculum reform. The research's case is China's ongoing mathematics curriculum reform. Through analyzing the power relationships in China's ongoing mathematics curriculum reform, the paper thinks that power's balance is very important in mathematics curriculum design, because it will affect the designed curriculum.

• East Asian mathematical journal
• /
• 제35권4호
• /
• pp.365-386
• /
• 2019

This study was based on the analysis of changes in curriculum of elementary mathematics curriculum, and changes in curriculum of middle school and high school mathematics curriculum. The purpose of this study is to analyze the movement of learning contents among the school levels based on the middle school mathematics curriculum and to summarize the influence on the curriculum of middle school mathematics according to the movement of learning contents. The research conducted according to the purpose of this study is as follows. First, we analyzed the trends of mathematical contents between elementary and middle schools after the movement of ten mathematics curriculums. Second, we analyzed trends of learning factors after mobility and mobility between middle school and high school. Third, the characteristics of 'the contents of mutual movement based on middle school' and 'the contents deleted from middle school' were analyzed. The results of this study are expected to reflect on current and past curriculum and to give meaningful implications to the composition of new curriculum.

• 한국수학사학회지
• /
• 제31권5호
• /
• pp.235-250
• /
• 2018

The history of mathematics is an important part of Chinese highschool mathematics curriculum. The current 2003 revised curriculum in China refers directly to the history of mathematics and presents it as one of the optional series. Moreover, they publish separate history textbooks for mathematics according to the 2003 revised curriculum. The importance of the history of mathematics in Chinese highschool curriculum, which was revised in 2017, has increased. This study aims to analyze the contents of the highschool curriculum and mathematics history textbooks, which were revised in 2003. Based on the results of analysis, we make suggestions on the use of mathematics history for teaching mathematics in Korea.

• 한국수학교육학회지시리즈A:수학교육
• /
• 제44권4호
• /
• pp.497-508
• /
• 2005

The investigation of the curriculum in other countries provides meaningful implications to reflect our own curriculum. Since Korea is now under the curriculum revision, international comparative research was conducted with the curricula of Singapore and India to elicit some implications. These two countries were especially chosen because their curricula have not been actively investigated yet. Singapore mathematics curriculum starts the tracking based on students' mathematical ability from the 4th grade, and provides different curricula for the three tracks. This differentiated curriculum provides rich implications to next Korean curriculum which aims to classify the contents based on students' mathematical achievements. Indians, who have contributed significantly in the history of mathematics, have unique mathematics curriculum, remote from so called 'canonical curriculum'. After the U.S. announced the Curriculum and Evaluation Standard for School Mathematics in 1989 and the Principles and Standards for School Mathematics in 2000, many countries benchmarked these NCTM documents, and Korea was no exception. Since each country has their own school system, educational environment, and national mentality, it is not desirable to just adopt the curriculum of other countries. In this regard, Indians who have preserved their own mathematics curriculum can be a model. In sum, when we revise the curriculum, it is required to keep the balance between the open-mindedness to accept the strengths of other curricula, and the conservative attitude to preserve our own characteristics of the curriculum.

• 대한수학교육학회지:학교수학
• /
• 제6권2호
• /
• pp.119-134
• /
• 2004

중국은 여러 측면에서 우리에게 중요한 국가로 부상하고 있으며, 교육 분야도 예외는 아니다. 그러나 현재까지 수학교육 분야에서 중국에 대한 주목할 만한 연구는 이루어지고 못하다. 이에 찬 연구에서는 중국의 최근 수학 교육과정을 소개하고 우리나라의 교육과정과 비교하였다 중국 수학교육과정의 특징으로 내용 영역 구분의 광역화, 집중형, 선형적 내용 구성, 학습 목표의 구체적 진술과 예제의 제시 등을 추출하고, 이에 기초하여 차기 교육과정 개정에 참고할 만한 시사점을 도출하였다.

• 한국수학교육학회지시리즈A:수학교육
• /
• 제40권1호
• /
• pp.125-137
• /
• 2001

We review the mathematics education in Korea just after the 1595 Liberation and the first, second curriculum announced in 1955 and 1963, respectively. The 3rd curriculum announced in 1973 is influenced by “New Mathematics” in America. There were theoretical research about “New Mathematics”, but no experimental research about it in the school. So, there was not much effect of “New Mathematics” in mathematics education. After that we have the 4th, 5th and 6th curriculum which is improved by the result of experience in teaching. The 7th curriculum announced in 1997 emphasized practical mathematics. In this paper, we review the mathematics education and consider some problems in the 7th curriculum. We also consider some problems in mathematics textbook authorization under the 7th curriculum. To solve these problems, we suggest some facts. Especially, we need the philosophy about mathematics education and the enough knowledge about “Mathematics for Mathematics Teachers”.

• 한국초등수학교육학회지
• /
• 제14권3호
• /
• pp.633-658
• /
• 2010

이 연구는 2006년에 고시된 교육과정과 지난 제 7차 교육과정을 비교하여 내용 항목과 관련된 개정 사유와 개정 과정에서 있었던 쟁점을 분석하고자 한 것 이다. 이를 위하여 이번 교육과정 개정과 관련된 보고서와 연구물을 수집, 분석하였다. 2006년 개정에서 초등학교 내용과 관련하여 쟁점이 있었던 개정 사항을 학년 간 이동된 내용, 분수 개념의 지도 계열, 문제해결 영역 설정 등의 세 가지로 나누어 정리하고, 각 개정 사항이 어떤 문제의식에서 출발하였는지, 개정 과정에서 어떤 논쟁이 있었는지, 그리고 개정 사항에 대하여 어떤 사유가 제시되고 있는가를 확인하였다. 이로부터 이번 교육과정의 개정에서 다양한 이견이 있었음을 확인할 수 있었으며 이러한 이견은 초등수학의 양과 수준에 대한 근본적인 신념의 차이나, 초등 수학 내용의 도입 시기나 지도 계열에 대한 수학 교육적 견해의 차이 그리고 교육 과정의 내용을 제시하는 하는 방식에 대한 인식의 차이에서 비롯되고 있음을 논의하였다. 이와 같은 분석으로부터 수학과 교육과정의 내용의 선정 및 조직과 관련된 시사점을 얻을 수 있을 것이다.