• 정보처리학회논문지D
• /
• 제19D권1호
• /
• pp.15-20
• /
• 2012

본 논문에서는 예전 논문의 기득권 현상을 해결하기 위해 한 논문이 현재 다른 논문들로부터 받은 참조뿐만 아니라, 해당 논문의 잠재적인 참조도 함께 고려하는 랭킹 방안을 제안한다. 더 나아가, 논문의 정확한 랭킹 측정을 위해 두 논문 간의 내용 연관성도 함께 고려하는 랭킹 방안을 제안한다. 마지막으로, 실제 논문 데이터를 이용한 다양한 실험들을 통해, 제안 방안의 우수성을 입증한다.

• 한국정보처리학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국정보처리학회 2010년도 춘계학술발표대회
• /
• pp.613-614
• /
• 2010

본 논문에서는 논문 랭킹 방안의 바탕이 되는 개념을 이해하고, 그 개념을 바탕으로 기존 논문 랭킹 방안들에 대한 특징을 파악한다. 또한 각 방안의 정확도를 비교하여, 논문 랭킹의 정확도를 높이는 요인이 무엇인지 판단한다.

• 대한한의학회지
• /
• 제44권3호
• /
• pp.189-200
• /
• 2023

Objectives: The purpose of this study is to analyze the current state of quantitative literature evidence for the prescription of 56 herbal medicines covered by health insurance that have been studied in Korea for the past 30 years, to evaluate the reliability of the evidence, and to find out the research direction of herbal medicine prescription in the future. Methods: 56 kinds of herbal medicine prescriptions were searched in domestic literature search databases OASIS, DBpia, and overseas PubMed, classified into chemistry, toxicity, cells, animals, clinical cases, and clinical trial studies, and built into an EBM pyramid structure. Results: When classified according to research contents, there were 61 cases (7.5%) of physicochemical analysis to identify constituent substances, 80 cases (9.8%) of toxicity evaluation, and 672 cases (82.7%) of efficacy evaluation. The efficacy evidence was classified according to the evidence-based medical pyramid structure: 196 cell trials (29.1%), 372 animal trials (55.4%), 89 case and case reporting series (13.3%), 7 comparative case studies (1.1%), and 8 randomized control clinical trials (1.2%). In the pyramid composition, the basis for the validity of 56 kinds of herbal medicines prescribed was 568 cases (84.5%) in cell and animal units, which could not be said to be highly reliable. There was no relationship between the ranking of quantitative literature evidence for herbal medicine prescriptions and the ranking of salary administration. Conclusions: In an era that continues to require scientific evidence for herbal medicine, traditional herbal medicine should secure the basis for safety validity even for the 10th most frequent prescription among 56 herbal medicine prescriptions for consumers. In particular, traditional herbal medicine should increase the quantitative and qualitative level of case reports on related herbal medicine prescriptions, focusing on each clinical society, and move toward comparative case studies and randomized clinical trial so that traditional herbal medicine is positioned as Evidence-based medicine.

• STI Policy Review
• /
• 제8권1호
• /
• pp.41-61
• /
• 2017

The literature in research policy extensively addresses the interaction between public R&D and the society. Scholars have paid particular attention to the way science and technology are diffused into the society and industry with the aim of substantiating their potential value. In practice, having recognized the importance of the said interaction, R&D entities and governmental organizations promote scientific and technological innovations that result from their R&D activities. Yet, the nature of news media exposure as their primary channel to promote R&D outcomes has been remarkably understudied. Using the results of R&D projects supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF), this study examines R&D entities' strategic use of the news media to publicize their outcomes. The empirical results suggest that the scale of an R&D project positively affects the counts of media exposure of its R&D outcomes, whereas the level of technology readiness and the technology life-cycle do not have significant influence. In addition, the results suggest that, compared to senior researchers, young researchers are more likely to publicize their R&D outcomes and that R&D outcomes from highly ranked universities are more likely to be publicized than those from lower-ranking universities despite our control for R&D outcomes. The aforementioned results suggest that in promoting the diffusion of science and technology, especially to the public, policymakers should be concerned about incentives for those who provide techno-scientific information, such as researchers. The social need for the diffusion of techno-scientific information into the public (e.g., technology transfer and diffusion) is an insignificant factor in determining the media exposure of such information, whereas personal benefits and sensitive issues related to a researcher's own R&D activities (e.g., justification for R&D activities) drive researchers to publicize their R&D outcomes. This paper suggests that policymakers, especially those concerned with better diffusion of scientific and technological innovations need to design a proper incentive system to maximize the societal benefits of media exposure.

• 해양환경안전학회지
• /
• 제21권2호
• /
• pp.154-163
• /
• 2015

본 연구에서는 한국 항만과 연안해역 수로측량의 변천과 현황, 기존의 문제점을 살펴보고, 문헌연구와 해양선진국 수로측량 사례분석을 통해 잠정기준을 도출하였다. 그리고 전문가 집단에 대한 설문조사 및 분석을 통해 잠정기준의 우선순위와 상대적 중요도를 분석하였다. 연구의 결과, 주요 항만과 연안해역의 수로측량 우선순위로는 해저지형 변화, 해상교통량, 기존 수로측량 실적, 이해당사자 또는 이용자의 요구, 해양사고, 해양환경 및 생태자원 보존 등으로 나타났다. 이러한 기준의 우선순위에 따른 계량모형을 설정하여 한국 주요 무역항에 대한 수로측량 상대적 순위도 도출하였다. 본 연구가 제시한 정량적이고 과학적인 방법에 의한 수로측량의 필요성과 방향은 앞으로 한국 수로측량의 선진화와 해상교통안전의 확보에 기여할 것으로 기대된다.